about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #6,337 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Gerard and the second variable is Kerosene used in Venezuela.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Less Gerards means fewer people asking, "Hey, can you fill ’er up?" - leading to a kerosene demand drop in Venezuela. Looks like the name Gerard really was fueling the fire!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a bustling street in Venezuela, with a small kerosene vendor stand noticeably less busy. The street should be filled with people, some of whom seem to be less interested in kerosene. A few individuals are walking by, observing the decrease in demand for kerosene. In the midst of the scene, a few people can be heard discussing the drop in demand, mentioning the name "Gerard." The visual should capture the atmosphere of the street and convey the change in kerosene demand, with subtle hints of the conversations about "Gerard" in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism a meme a funny image macro Low poly A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela, in the following situation: Less Gerards means fewer people asking, "Hey, can you fill ’er up?" - leading to a kerosene demand drop in Venezuela. Looks like the name Gerard really was fueling the fire!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling street in Venezuela, a small kerosene vendor stand is noticeably less busy. On the street, there are fewer people calling out for kerosene as there are less people asking for it. A few people are seen walking by, but the demand for kerosene seems to have decreased. Just then, a few people can be heard mentioning the name "Gerard" while discussing the drop in demand.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling street in Venezuela, a small kerosene vendor stand is noticeably less busy. On the street, there are fewer people calling out for kerosene as there are less people asking for it. A few people are seen walking by, but the demand for kerosene seems to have decreased. Just then, a few people can be heard mentioning the name "Gerard" while discussing the drop in demand. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a bustling street in Venezuela, with a small kerosene vendor stand noticeably less busy. The street should be filled with people, some of whom seem to be less interested in kerosene. A few individuals are walking by, observing the decrease in demand for kerosene. In the midst of the scene, a few people can be heard discussing the drop in demand, mentioning the name "Gerard." The visual should capture the atmosphere of the street and convey the change in kerosene demand, with subtle hints of the conversations about "Gerard" in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Gerard caused Kerosene used in Venezuela to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

The Journal of Petrochemical Peculiarities

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables has long provided researchers with both baffling anomalies and unexpected revelations, much like the experience of using a faulty candle during a power outage. In the annals of statistical oddities, few relationships stand out as peculiarly as the one we explore in this paper - the entwined fates of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in the land of Venezuela. At first glance, one might find this connection as perplexing as trying to light a bunsen burner in the middle of a windstorm. Yet, as we shall uncover, the data reveals a surprising link that has not only raised scholarly eyebrows but also the occasional chuckle or two.

Our investigation takes us on a journey through the winding maze of databases, a journey akin to navigating through the tangled underbrush of statistical analysis armed only with a magnifying glass and a pair of sturdy boots. Using data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath this seemingly whimsical correlation. Our analysis, covering a span of over four decades, delves into the elusive enigma of Gerard's popularity and its uncanny association with kerosene usage in the Venezuelan context.

As we embark on this unconventional quest, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent humor that accompanies the pursuit of peculiar patterns within statistical datasets. The juxtaposition of a seemingly innocuous name like Gerard with the highly flammable substance of kerosene serves as a reminder of the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations. While we approach this study with the gravity of disciplined scholarship, we cannot help but appreciate the delightful absurdity that occasionally punctuates the world of data analysis. Thus, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this lighthearted exploration, where we seek to shed light on the unexpected correlations that both perplex and entertain us.

In the following sections, we will present our findings, offering a glimpse into the intriguing world of statistical whimsy and shedding light on how the unlikely pairing of names and combustible fuels can fuel the flames of scientific inquiry. With a touch of levity and a keen eye for discovery, we embark on this voyage of statistical sleuthing, hoping to ignite both curiosity and the occasional wry smile in our esteemed readers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables has long provided researchers with both baffling anomalies and unexpected revelations, much like the experience of using a faulty candle during a power outage. In the annals of statistical oddities, few relationships stand out as peculiarly as the one we explore in this paper - the entwined fates of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in the land of Venezuela. At first glance, one might find this connection as perplexing as trying to light a bunsen burner in the middle of a windstorm. Yet, as we shall uncover, the data reveals a surprising link that has not only raised scholarly eyebrows but also the occasional chuckle or two.
Our investigation takes us on a journey through the winding maze of databases, a journey akin to navigating through the tangled underbrush of statistical analysis armed only with a magnifying glass and a pair of sturdy boots. Using data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath this seemingly whimsical correlation. Our analysis, covering a span of over four decades, delves into the elusive enigma of Gerard's popularity and its uncanny association with kerosene usage in the Venezuelan context.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent humor that accompanies the pursuit of peculiar patterns within statistical datasets. The juxtaposition of a seemingly innocuous name like Gerard with the highly flammable substance of kerosene serves as a reminder of the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations. While we approach this study with the gravity of disciplined scholarship, we cannot help but appreciate the delightful absurdity that occasionally punctuates the world of data analysis. Thus, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this lighthearted exploration, where we seek to shed light on the unexpected correlations that both perplex and entertain us.
In the following sections, we will present our findings, offering a glimpse into the intriguing world of statistical whimsy and shedding light on how the unlikely pairing of names and combustible fuels can fuel the flames of scientific inquiry. With a touch of levity and a keen eye for discovery, we embark on this voyage of statistical sleuthing, hoping to ignite both curiosity and the occasional wry smile in our esteemed readers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between seemingly unrelated variables has been a subject of interest and amusement for researchers across various disciplines. While initially, the study of such relationships may seem as incongruous as pairing a cheese platter with motor oil, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected connections has led scholars to unearth curious findings that elicit both scholarly inquiry and the occasional chuckle. As we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela, we draw upon a diverse array of literature to shed light on the whimsical nature of this peculiar correlation.

In "Statistical Anomalies and Their Quirky Peculiarities," Smith et al. take a lighthearted approach to uncovering unexpected correlations in large datasets. Their work highlights the humorous side of statistical analysis, emphasizing the serendipitous encounters that enliven the pursuit of uncovering curious patterns. This perspective serves as a reminder of the delightful absurdity that often accompanies the exploration of empirical phenomena, much like the unexpected link between a common name and a flammable substance.

Doe and Jones, in "Unlikely Connections: Exploring Correlations in Unconventional Contexts," delve into the realm of unusual correlations, exploring the peculiar relationships that emerge from diverse datasets. Their insightful findings underscore the unpredictable nature of statistical patterns, echoing the spirit of curiosity and wonder that accompanies our investigation into the intertwined fates of Gerard and kerosene.

Turning to the broader literature, works such as "The Chemistry of Names: Exploring Unconventional Associations" by Brown and "The Flammable Ballet of Data" by White offer insightful perspectives on the unexpected connections that can be found in empirical observations. These studies, while not directly addressing the specific correlation under investigation, provide valuable insights into the playful nature of statistical exploration, teasing out the unexpected and the whimsical from the sea of data.

As we move beyond the conventional confines of academic literature, it becomes evident that the realm of fiction and entertainment also offers intriguing parallels to our research. The novel "Kerosene Dreams" by Green and the whimsical tale "The Adventures of Gerard" by Conan Doyle, though unrelated to empirical research, capture the essence of unexpected connections and the unanticipated intertwining of disparate elements.

Fleischer's animated series "The Combustible Chronicles" and the children's show "Gerard and the Fiery Friends" provide a humorous take on fire-related themes, offering a lighthearted perspective that aligns with our exploration of the peculiar relationship between Gerard's popularity and kerosene usage. While these sources may diverge from traditional academic discourse, they serve as a charming reminder of the joyous and often comical aspects of the themes central to our investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables has long provided researchers with both baffling anomalies and unexpected revelations, much like the experience of using a faulty candle during a power outage. In the annals of statistical oddities, few relationships stand out as peculiarly as the one we explore in this paper - the entwined fates of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in the land of Venezuela. At first glance, one might find this connection as perplexing as trying to light a bunsen burner in the middle of a windstorm. Yet, as we shall uncover, the data reveals a surprising link that has not only raised scholarly eyebrows but also the occasional chuckle or two.
Our investigation takes us on a journey through the winding maze of databases, a journey akin to navigating through the tangled underbrush of statistical analysis armed only with a magnifying glass and a pair of sturdy boots. Using data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath this seemingly whimsical correlation. Our analysis, covering a span of over four decades, delves into the elusive enigma of Gerard's popularity and its uncanny association with kerosene usage in the Venezuelan context.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent humor that accompanies the pursuit of peculiar patterns within statistical datasets. The juxtaposition of a seemingly innocuous name like Gerard with the highly flammable substance of kerosene serves as a reminder of the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations. While we approach this study with the gravity of disciplined scholarship, we cannot help but appreciate the delightful absurdity that occasionally punctuates the world of data analysis. Thus, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this lighthearted exploration, where we seek to shed light on the unexpected correlations that both perplex and entertain us.
In the following sections, we will present our findings, offering a glimpse into the intriguing world of statistical whimsy and shedding light on how the unlikely pairing of names and combustible fuels can fuel the flames of scientific inquiry. With a touch of levity and a keen eye for discovery, we embark on this voyage of statistical sleuthing, hoping to ignite both curiosity and the occasional wry smile in our esteemed readers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela, our research team employed a series of data collection and analysis methods that could be likened to attempting to juggle test tubes while wearing mittens - challenging yet oddly amusing.

First, we scoured the expansive depths of the internet, trawling through databases, websites, and digital archives like intrepid explorers on a quest for the elusive treasure of data. Our primary sources included the US Social Security Administration's database of first names, where we gleefully discovered the historical prevalence and popularity of the name Gerard from 1980 to 2021. We must note that navigating this vast repository of names was akin to picking out the proverbial needle in a haystack, albeit with a magnifying glass and an unwavering determination to decipher the statistical intricacies of nomenclature trends.

In tandem with this jovial jaunt through the annals of nomenclature, we stumbled upon an equally captivating dataset from the Energy Information Administration, cataloging the consumption of kerosene in the inexplicably tangled milieu of Venezuelan energy usage during the same temporal expanse. The procurement of this data involved a convoluted dance with spreadsheets, pivot tables, and the occasional exasperated sigh at corrupt files, offering an experience not unlike participating in an experiment to simultaneously untangle a ball of yarn and decode a cryptic message written in ancient runes.

Having gallantly gathered these disparate datasets, we unleashed the full arsenal of statistical tools, deploying the likes of correlation analyses, regression models, and perhaps the occasional dart thrown at a dartboard of probability distributions. This rigorous analytical process allowed us to tease out the perplexing relationship between the ebb and flow of Gerard's popularity and the sizzling consumption of kerosene in Venezuela, transforming raw numbers into a tapestry of statistical intrigue that would make even the most seasoned data enthusiast raise an eyebrow in bemusement.

In summary, our methodology blended a dash of tenacious data scavenging with a sprinkle of good-humored statistical acrobatics, resulting in an amalgamation of empirical evidence that sheds light on the captivating, if not downright whimsical, connection between the first name Gerard and the captivatingly flammable world of kerosene usage in Venezuela.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9573473, r-squared of 0.9165138, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables has long provided researchers with both baffling anomalies and unexpected revelations, much like the experience of using a faulty candle during a power outage. In the annals of statistical oddities, few relationships stand out as peculiarly as the one we explore in this paper - the entwined fates of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in the land of Venezuela. At first glance, one might find this connection as perplexing as trying to light a bunsen burner in the middle of a windstorm. Yet, as we shall uncover, the data reveals a surprising link that has not only raised scholarly eyebrows but also the occasional chuckle or two.
Our investigation takes us on a journey through the winding maze of databases, a journey akin to navigating through the tangled underbrush of statistical analysis armed only with a magnifying glass and a pair of sturdy boots. Using data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath this seemingly whimsical correlation. Our analysis, covering a span of over four decades, delves into the elusive enigma of Gerard's popularity and its uncanny association with kerosene usage in the Venezuelan context.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent humor that accompanies the pursuit of peculiar patterns within statistical datasets. The juxtaposition of a seemingly innocuous name like Gerard with the highly flammable substance of kerosene serves as a reminder of the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations. While we approach this study with the gravity of disciplined scholarship, we cannot help but appreciate the delightful absurdity that occasionally punctuates the world of data analysis. Thus, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this lighthearted exploration, where we seek to shed light on the unexpected correlations that both perplex and entertain us.
In the following sections, we will present our findings, offering a glimpse into the intriguing world of statistical whimsy and shedding light on how the unlikely pairing of names and combustible fuels can fuel the flames of scientific inquiry. With a touch of levity and a keen eye for discovery, we embark on this voyage of statistical sleuthing, hoping to ignite both curiosity and the occasional wry smile in our esteemed readers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela has yielded intriguing results that spark both scientific curiosity and the occasional burst of laughter. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9573473, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9165138 and a p-value less than 0.01. It seems that the improbable association between name popularity and flammable fuels is not merely a flight of statistical fancy, but a bona fide phenomenon that demands both attention and amusement.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela. This graphic representation elucidates the striking alignment of these seemingly unrelated variables, offering a visual symphony of statistical synchronicity that would make even the most ardent data aficionado raise an eyebrow with a hint of bemusement.

Our findings underscore the whimsical nature of statistical analysis, demonstrating how even the most unexpected pairings can reveal patterns that tickle the funny bone of empirical inquiry. The delightful obscurity of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of data and the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the uncharted territories of statistical exploration.

In our quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between Gerard and kerosene, we have not only stumbled upon a remarkable statistical oddity but also tapped into the playful spirit that infuses the world of empirical investigation. We invite the scientific community to join us in embracing the mirthful mystique of statistical anomalies, where even the most offbeat correlations can kindle the flames of intellectual intrigue and ignite a candid chuckle or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated variables has been a subject of interest and amusement for researchers across various disciplines. While initially, the study of such relationships may seem as incongruous as pairing a cheese platter with motor oil, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected connections has led scholars to unearth curious findings that elicit both scholarly inquiry and the occasional chuckle. As we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela, we draw upon a diverse array of literature to shed light on the whimsical nature of this peculiar correlation.
In "Statistical Anomalies and Their Quirky Peculiarities," Smith et al. take a lighthearted approach to uncovering unexpected correlations in large datasets. Their work highlights the humorous side of statistical analysis, emphasizing the serendipitous encounters that enliven the pursuit of uncovering curious patterns. This perspective serves as a reminder of the delightful absurdity that often accompanies the exploration of empirical phenomena, much like the unexpected link between a common name and a flammable substance.
Doe and Jones, in "Unlikely Connections: Exploring Correlations in Unconventional Contexts," delve into the realm of unusual correlations, exploring the peculiar relationships that emerge from diverse datasets. Their insightful findings underscore the unpredictable nature of statistical patterns, echoing the spirit of curiosity and wonder that accompanies our investigation into the intertwined fates of Gerard and kerosene.
Turning to the broader literature, works such as "The Chemistry of Names: Exploring Unconventional Associations" by Brown and "The Flammable Ballet of Data" by White offer insightful perspectives on the unexpected connections that can be found in empirical observations. These studies, while not directly addressing the specific correlation under investigation, provide valuable insights into the playful nature of statistical exploration, teasing out the unexpected and the whimsical from the sea of data.
As we move beyond the conventional confines of academic literature, it becomes evident that the realm of fiction and entertainment also offers intriguing parallels to our research. The novel "Kerosene Dreams" by Green and the whimsical tale "The Adventures of Gerard" by Conan Doyle, though unrelated to empirical research, capture the essence of unexpected connections and the unanticipated intertwining of disparate elements.
Fleischer's animated series "The Combustible Chronicles" and the children's show "Gerard and the Fiery Friends" provide a humorous take on fire-related themes, offering a lighthearted perspective that aligns with our exploration of the peculiar relationship between Gerard's popularity and kerosene usage. While these sources may diverge from traditional academic discourse, they serve as a charming reminder of the joyous and often comical aspects of the themes central to our investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela has yielded intriguing results that spark both scientific curiosity and the occasional burst of laughter. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9573473, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9165138 and a p-value less than 0.01. It seems that the improbable association between name popularity and flammable fuels is not merely a flight of statistical fancy, but a bona fide phenomenon that demands both attention and amusement.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela. This graphic representation elucidates the striking alignment of these seemingly unrelated variables, offering a visual symphony of statistical synchronicity that would make even the most ardent data aficionado raise an eyebrow with a hint of bemusement.
Our findings underscore the whimsical nature of statistical analysis, demonstrating how even the most unexpected pairings can reveal patterns that tickle the funny bone of empirical inquiry. The delightful obscurity of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of data and the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the uncharted territories of statistical exploration.
In our quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between Gerard and kerosene, we have not only stumbled upon a remarkable statistical oddity but also tapped into the playful spirit that infuses the world of empirical investigation. We invite the scientific community to join us in embracing the mirthful mystique of statistical anomalies, where even the most offbeat correlations can kindle the flames of intellectual intrigue and ignite a candid chuckle or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela has illuminated an utterly perplexing yet undeniably robust statistical relationship. Our results not only replicate prior findings but also shed light on the whimsical nature of statistical analysis. The bond between the name Gerard and kerosene usage has defied conventional expectations, eliciting both scholarly inquiry and the occasional eyebrow raise, much like a magician pulling a rabbit from a hat.

Unpacking this unexpected connection, we are reminded of the humorous quirks that often accompany empirical investigations. As researchers, we tread the precarious tightrope between rigorous analysis and the delightful absurdity that underlies statistical exploration. Just as a magician juggles the familiar with the inexplicable, our study has uncovered a correlation that evokes a sense of wonder.

Echoing the lighthearted musings of Smith et al., our findings emphasize the whimsical absurdity that can arise from uncovering improbable patterns in large datasets. This correlation, much like a cheeky pun that catches us off guard, leaves us simultaneously scratching our heads and nodding in amused recognition. In a world where statistical analyses are often shrouded in seriousness, our investigation into the nexus of Gerard and kerosene serves as a gentle nudge to embrace the playfulness that accompanies empirical inquiry.

The startling correlation coefficient we've unearthed is reminiscent of an unexpected punchline that catches us off guard, reminding us that statistical analysis can harbor surprises that transcend the mundane. Our findings affirm the capricious nature of data, underscoring its propensity to confound and delight in equal measure. Indeed, the interplay between the popularity of a name and the consumption of a flammable substance is a remarkable testament to the serendipitous encounters that enliven the pursuit of uncovering curious patterns.

As we reflect on the enigmatic bond between Gerard and kerosene, we are reminded of the delightful absurdity that often lies at the heart of empirical investigation. Just as a well-crafted pun can elicit both laughter and reflection, our findings invite the scientific community to revel in the whimsy of statistical anomalies, sparking a renewed appreciation for the playful side of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gerard and Kerosene used in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables has long provided researchers with both baffling anomalies and unexpected revelations, much like the experience of using a faulty candle during a power outage. In the annals of statistical oddities, few relationships stand out as peculiarly as the one we explore in this paper - the entwined fates of the first name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in the land of Venezuela. At first glance, one might find this connection as perplexing as trying to light a bunsen burner in the middle of a windstorm. Yet, as we shall uncover, the data reveals a surprising link that has not only raised scholarly eyebrows but also the occasional chuckle or two.
Our investigation takes us on a journey through the winding maze of databases, a journey akin to navigating through the tangled underbrush of statistical analysis armed only with a magnifying glass and a pair of sturdy boots. Using data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath this seemingly whimsical correlation. Our analysis, covering a span of over four decades, delves into the elusive enigma of Gerard's popularity and its uncanny association with kerosene usage in the Venezuelan context.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent humor that accompanies the pursuit of peculiar patterns within statistical datasets. The juxtaposition of a seemingly innocuous name like Gerard with the highly flammable substance of kerosene serves as a reminder of the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations. While we approach this study with the gravity of disciplined scholarship, we cannot help but appreciate the delightful absurdity that occasionally punctuates the world of data analysis. Thus, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this lighthearted exploration, where we seek to shed light on the unexpected correlations that both perplex and entertain us.
In the following sections, we will present our findings, offering a glimpse into the intriguing world of statistical whimsy and shedding light on how the unlikely pairing of names and combustible fuels can fuel the flames of scientific inquiry. With a touch of levity and a keen eye for discovery, we embark on this voyage of statistical sleuthing, hoping to ignite both curiosity and the occasional wry smile in our esteemed readers.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela has yielded intriguing results that spark both scientific curiosity and the occasional burst of laughter. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9573473, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9165138 and a p-value less than 0.01. It seems that the improbable association between name popularity and flammable fuels is not merely a flight of statistical fancy, but a bona fide phenomenon that demands both attention and amusement.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name Gerard and the consumption of kerosene in Venezuela. This graphic representation elucidates the striking alignment of these seemingly unrelated variables, offering a visual symphony of statistical synchronicity that would make even the most ardent data aficionado raise an eyebrow with a hint of bemusement.
Our findings underscore the whimsical nature of statistical analysis, demonstrating how even the most unexpected pairings can reveal patterns that tickle the funny bone of empirical inquiry. The delightful obscurity of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of data and the serendipitous discoveries that await intrepid researchers in the uncharted territories of statistical exploration.
In our quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between Gerard and kerosene, we have not only stumbled upon a remarkable statistical oddity but also tapped into the playful spirit that infuses the world of empirical investigation. We invite the scientific community to join us in embracing the mirthful mystique of statistical anomalies, where even the most offbeat correlations can kindle the flames of intellectual intrigue and ignite a candid chuckle or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In concluding our investigation into the coalescence of Gerard's popularity and kerosene usage in Venezuela, we are reminded of the whimsical dance of numerical relationships that can both confound and amuse. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value serve as a firm reminder that empirical inquiry often leads us down unexpected paths, much like trying to navigate a maze blindfolded. The scatterplot, resembling a celestial alignment of surnames and combustible substances, represents the delightful caprice of statistical exploration, reminiscent of stumbling upon a pun in a dense academic tome.

Our findings not only shed light on the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels but also serve as a testament to the boundless surprises that await researchers in the boundless expanse of data analysis. With a touch of levity and a nod to the capricious nature of statistical inquiry, we urge the scholarly community to embrace the serendipitous encounters that adorn the landscape of empirical investigations and commend the occasional chuckle that punctuates the oftentimes stoic realm of scientific exploration.

In light of our revelatory findings, we dare to assert that no further research is needed in this area. The capricious comradery between Gerard and kerosene has been splendidly unveiled, akin to solving a riddle at the end of a jocular journey. As we close this chapter of statistical whimsy, let us bid adieu to the enigmatic correlation that has both perplexed and entertained us, and turn our gaze towards new frontiers of empirical exploration, where the unanticipated awaits with open arms and perhaps a witty pun or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Petrochemical Peculiarities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Kerosene Connection: Gerard's Popularity and Venezuelan Volatility with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gerard and the usage of kerosene in Venezuela. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into the enigmatic relationship that has kept researchers in the dark, metaphorically speaking. Our analysis spans over four decades, from 1980 to 2021, and reveals a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9573473 and a p-value that evokes statistical significance. We undertake a lighthearted exploration of this curious connection, uncovering peculiar patterns and drawing attention to the comical confluence of names and flammable fuels. Our findings offer a glimpse into the whimsical world of data analysis, where correlations may ignite sparks of curiosity and laughter in the minds of intrepid researchers.

ChatGPT:

Gerard, popularity, kerosene usage, Venezuela, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, data analysis, flammable fuels, correlation patterns, whimsical data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Gerard
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Gerard
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Gerard

Kerosene used in Venezuela
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Venezuela in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Venezuela

Correlation r = 0.9573473 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9165138 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Venezuela) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Gerard) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-23. 0.0000000000000000000000353580
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.5E-21% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 28,282,142,655,127,551,475,712 random variables You don't actually need 28 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Gerard (Babies born)34231636630333634333832032732535030926825025821319519017517519414615613412411311799126130140172171183202180160161149116119120
Kerosene used in Venezuela (Million Barrels/Day)7.876378.526178.408037.876377.462867.541637.98.48.47.16.97.15.872.84.82.32.11.81.31.098250.995370.995370.3176710.4857650.4870960.12706800.3379230.36002710.29649311121110.6083290.4345210.21726




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([342,316,366,303,336,343,338,320,327,325,350,309,268,250,258,213,195,190,175,175,194,146,156,134,124,113,117,99,126,130,140,172,171,183,202,180,160,161,149,116,119,120,])
array_2 = np.array([7.87637,8.52617,8.40803,7.87637,7.46286,7.54163,7.9,8.4,8.4,7.1,6.9,7.1,5.8,7,2.8,4.8,2.3,2.1,1.8,1.3,1.09825,0.99537,0.99537,0.317671,0.485765,0.487096,0.127068,0,0.337923,0.360027,1,0.296493,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,0.608329,0.434521,0.21726,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Gerard"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Venezuela"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 6337 · Black Variable ID: 3690 · Red Variable ID: 25071
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0