about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,746 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Texas and the second variable is Pirate attacks globally.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in cotton decreased in Texas, it led to a reduction in the production of pirate-themed cotton clothing. This, in turn, caused a decline in people dressing up as pirates for 'Talk Like a Pirate Day', ultimately leading to a global decrease in pirate-related shenanigans. In other words, it seems that the Texas GMO change has truly 'sailed' the high seas of fashion and folklore!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A funny image you would see on Reddit] Create an image of a Texas field where a farmer is pulling out genetically modified cotton plants, showcasing the decrease in GMO use. Alongside, feature a clothing store with fewer pirate-themed cotton shirts being produced. Show people in the background frowning as they put down pirate hats and costumes, indicating the decline in 'Talk Like a Pirate Day' celebrations. Lastly, include a map of the world displaying a decrease in pirate-related shenanigans, symbolizing the global impact of the Texas GMO change. Keep the visual simple, without any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Macabre Cyberpunk A Discovery magazine cover image Oragami
ChatGPT: A funny image you would see on Reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally, in the following situation: As GMO use in cotton decreased in Texas, it led to a reduction in the production of pirate-themed cotton clothing. This, in turn, caused a decline in people dressing up as pirates for 'Talk Like a Pirate Day', ultimately leading to a global decrease in pirate-related shenanigans. In other words, it seems that the Texas GMO change has truly 'sailed' the high seas of fashion and folklore! . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Texas field, a farmer is removing genetically modified cotton plants, signifying the decrease in GMO use. Meanwhile, at a clothing store, there are fewer pirate-themed cotton shirts being produced. In the background, people are seen frowning as they put down pirate hats and costumes, referencing the decline in 'Talk Like a Pirate Day' celebrations. Lastly, a map of the world displays a decrease in pirate-related shenanigans, symbolizing the global impact of the Texas GMO change.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A funny image you would see on Reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a Texas field, a farmer is removing genetically modified cotton plants, signifying the decrease in GMO use. Meanwhile, at a clothing store, there are fewer pirate-themed cotton shirts being produced. In the background, people are seen frowning as they put down pirate hats and costumes, referencing the decline in 'Talk Like a Pirate Day' celebrations. Lastly, a map of the world displays a decrease in pirate-related shenanigans, symbolizing the global impact of the Texas GMO change. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A funny image you would see on Reddit] Create an image of a Texas field where a farmer is pulling out genetically modified cotton plants, showcasing the decrease in GMO use. Alongside, feature a clothing store with fewer pirate-themed cotton shirts being produced. Show people in the background frowning as they put down pirate hats and costumes, indicating the decline in 'Talk Like a Pirate Day' celebrations. Lastly, include a map of the world displaying a decrease in pirate-related shenanigans, symbolizing the global impact of the Texas GMO change. Keep the visual simple, without any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Texas caused Pirate attacks globally to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and piracy may seem like a plot twist in a B-list science fiction movie, but the curious correlation between the adoption of GMO technology in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally is far from fictitious. While one may ponder how a field of cotton in the Lone Star State could possibly influence the swashbuckling adventures on the high seas, this paper aims to unravel the enigmatic link that has emerged from the depths of agricultural data and maritime activity.

The use of GMO technology in agriculture has sparked debates and discussions, igniting passions akin to an academic rumble in the jungle. With proponents touting bolstered yields and pest resistance, and critics voicing concerns about environmental impact and cross-pollination conundrums, the landscape of GMO cultivation is as contentious as a duel at high noon. Meanwhile, the world of piracy conjures images of eyepatches, peg legs, and jolly rogers, embodying a peculiar mix of historical lore and contemporary maritime challenges worthy of a swashbuckling saga.

In an era where data analysis and statistical wizardry hold sway, this paper presents an empirical investigation into the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. Through the perusal of data meticulously curated from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and a p-value less than 0.01 emerged, leading us down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations and intriguing implications.

This unanticipated relationship unearthed in our research not only raises eyebrows but also paints a picture of interconnectedness that expands beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we embark on this academic voyage, we invite the reader to join us in delving into the labyrinthine network of variables, from the physiological traits of GMO cotton to the geopolitical factors shaping maritime security, with all the enthusiasm of a treasure hunter seeking the elusive bounty of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and piracy may seem like a plot twist in a B-list science fiction movie, but the curious correlation between the adoption of GMO technology in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally is far from fictitious. While one may ponder how a field of cotton in the Lone Star State could possibly influence the swashbuckling adventures on the high seas, this paper aims to unravel the enigmatic link that has emerged from the depths of agricultural data and maritime activity.
The use of GMO technology in agriculture has sparked debates and discussions, igniting passions akin to an academic rumble in the jungle. With proponents touting bolstered yields and pest resistance, and critics voicing concerns about environmental impact and cross-pollination conundrums, the landscape of GMO cultivation is as contentious as a duel at high noon. Meanwhile, the world of piracy conjures images of eyepatches, peg legs, and jolly rogers, embodying a peculiar mix of historical lore and contemporary maritime challenges worthy of a swashbuckling saga.
In an era where data analysis and statistical wizardry hold sway, this paper presents an empirical investigation into the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. Through the perusal of data meticulously curated from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and a p-value less than 0.01 emerged, leading us down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations and intriguing implications.
This unanticipated relationship unearthed in our research not only raises eyebrows but also paints a picture of interconnectedness that expands beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we embark on this academic voyage, we invite the reader to join us in delving into the labyrinthine network of variables, from the physiological traits of GMO cotton to the geopolitical factors shaping maritime security, with all the enthusiasm of a treasure hunter seeking the elusive bounty of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe," the authors find the effects of genetically modified organism (GMO) cultivation on agricultural productivity in Texas (Smith & Doe, 2015). While their focus remains squarely on crop yields, the potential spillover effects of GMO adoption on a broader spectrum of phenomena incline one to explore uncharted territories beyond the conventional scope of agriculture.

The literature surrounding the maritime world offers a divergent but peculiarly fitting angle for our investigation. "Jones" delves into the historical evolution of piracy and its enduring impact on global trade and security, shedding light on the complex dynamics intertwined with maritime activities (Jones, 2017). Transitioning from historical reality to fictitious narratives, "Blackbeard: The Hunt for Pirate Gold" delves into the legendary exploits of the notorious pirate and his quest for hidden treasures, offering a captivating yet tenuous connection to our inquiry into GMO and piracy (Author, 2008). Moreover, fictional works such as "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl" offer a whimsical yet oddly relevant cultural backdrop to situate our unexpected juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and maritime chicanery (Director, 2003).

Turning our attention to unconventional sources, an analysis of popular culture reveals a treasure trove of insights concealed within children's television programming. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" impart ecological messages, inadvertently bridging the gap between agrarian practices and maritime sustainability, albeit in a mildly didactic manner (Creator, 1990). Additionally, the nautical escapades chronicled in "SpongeBob SquarePants" elicit laughter and intrigue, all the while providing an unwittingly captivating tableau of life under the sea, albeit sans any discernible relevance to GMO cotton farming (Creator, 1999).

The confluence of these divergent sources, ranging from scholarly to fictional and even whimsical, signals the unorthodox approach our inquiry undertakes, embracing the unconventional with the enthusiasm of a pirate setting sail in pursuit of buried academic treasures.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and piracy may seem like a plot twist in a B-list science fiction movie, but the curious correlation between the adoption of GMO technology in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally is far from fictitious. While one may ponder how a field of cotton in the Lone Star State could possibly influence the swashbuckling adventures on the high seas, this paper aims to unravel the enigmatic link that has emerged from the depths of agricultural data and maritime activity.
The use of GMO technology in agriculture has sparked debates and discussions, igniting passions akin to an academic rumble in the jungle. With proponents touting bolstered yields and pest resistance, and critics voicing concerns about environmental impact and cross-pollination conundrums, the landscape of GMO cultivation is as contentious as a duel at high noon. Meanwhile, the world of piracy conjures images of eyepatches, peg legs, and jolly rogers, embodying a peculiar mix of historical lore and contemporary maritime challenges worthy of a swashbuckling saga.
In an era where data analysis and statistical wizardry hold sway, this paper presents an empirical investigation into the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. Through the perusal of data meticulously curated from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and a p-value less than 0.01 emerged, leading us down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations and intriguing implications.
This unanticipated relationship unearthed in our research not only raises eyebrows but also paints a picture of interconnectedness that expands beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we embark on this academic voyage, we invite the reader to join us in delving into the labyrinthine network of variables, from the physiological traits of GMO cotton to the geopolitical factors shaping maritime security, with all the enthusiasm of a treasure hunter seeking the elusive bounty of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The pursuit of unraveling the confounding relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified cotton in Texas and global pirate activities was no simple expedition. Amidst the sea of data, our research team navigated the treacherous waters of scientific inquiry, employing a combination of quantitative analysis and obscure statistical methods concealed within the depths of academic literature.

To commence this intrepid quest, data on GMO cotton cultivation in Texas were obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), serving as the anchor for our investigation. The statistics on global pirate attacks, on the other hand, were sourced from Statista, providing the wind in our research sails. These datasets, spanning the years 2009 to 2022, formed the twin stars guiding our empirical voyage.

Utilizing advanced statistical software and a compass of scientific rigor, we ventured forth to calculate the correlation between the prevalence of GMO cotton in the fields of Texas and the incidence of pirate attacks across the seven seas. Through time-series analysis and sophisticated econometric models, we sought to demystify the tangled web linking these seemingly disparate realms.

In our endeavor to untangle the knotty association between GMO cotton and piracy, a series of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the veracity of our findings. While we did encounter some statistical storms along the way, including the occasional heteroskedasticity squalls and multicollinearity whirlpools, our data remained steadfast in charting the course towards empirical enlightenment.

Additionally, attention was paid to potential confounding variables, such as economic indicators, geopolitical events, and climate patterns, which may have influenced the observed correlation. While navigating these murky waters of data adjustment, we remained ever vigilant in safeguarding against the siren call of spurious correlations and statistical mirages.

Conclusively, the methodology employed in this investigation amalgamates the rigor of quantitative analysis with the intrigue of unexpected research syntheses, eliciting a sense of academic adventure akin to unearthing buried scientific treasures. As we cast our methodological net wide to capture the essence of this GMO-pirate nexus, we invite the scholarly community to join us in this unconventional odyssey of empirical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9481692, r-squared of 0.8990249, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and piracy may seem like a plot twist in a B-list science fiction movie, but the curious correlation between the adoption of GMO technology in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally is far from fictitious. While one may ponder how a field of cotton in the Lone Star State could possibly influence the swashbuckling adventures on the high seas, this paper aims to unravel the enigmatic link that has emerged from the depths of agricultural data and maritime activity.
The use of GMO technology in agriculture has sparked debates and discussions, igniting passions akin to an academic rumble in the jungle. With proponents touting bolstered yields and pest resistance, and critics voicing concerns about environmental impact and cross-pollination conundrums, the landscape of GMO cultivation is as contentious as a duel at high noon. Meanwhile, the world of piracy conjures images of eyepatches, peg legs, and jolly rogers, embodying a peculiar mix of historical lore and contemporary maritime challenges worthy of a swashbuckling saga.
In an era where data analysis and statistical wizardry hold sway, this paper presents an empirical investigation into the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. Through the perusal of data meticulously curated from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and a p-value less than 0.01 emerged, leading us down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations and intriguing implications.
This unanticipated relationship unearthed in our research not only raises eyebrows but also paints a picture of interconnectedness that expands beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we embark on this academic voyage, we invite the reader to join us in delving into the labyrinthine network of variables, from the physiological traits of GMO cotton to the geopolitical factors shaping maritime security, with all the enthusiasm of a treasure hunter seeking the elusive bounty of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data spanning from 2009 to 2022 revealed an intriguing association between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) technology in Texas cotton fields and the incidence of pirate attacks globally. The correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, capturing the attention of researchers like a captivating tale of two disparate worlds colliding.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8990249 signified that approximately 89.9% of the variation in pirate attacks could be explained by the adoption of GMO technology in cotton farming. This substantial proportion of explained variance drew parallels to the meticulous planning and execution required for a successful high-seas raid, underscoring the significance of this unexpected connection.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, cementing the validity of the identified correlation. This statistical significance served as a beacon, guiding the research team through the uncharted waters of unanticipated linkages between agricultural practices and global maritime affairs.

Upon plotting the data in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), the striking linear relationship between the use of GMO technology in cotton cultivation and the frequency of pirate attacks became visually evident. The scatterplot, akin to a treasure map revealing hidden patterns, showcased the tight clustering of data points, leaving little room for skepticism regarding the strength of the association.

In summary, the findings of this investigation not only shed light on an unexpected nexus between GMO cotton in Texas and international pirate activity but also offer a compelling narrative of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. This discovery invites further exploration into the underlying causal mechanisms, presenting a trove of opportunities for future research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe," the authors find the effects of genetically modified organism (GMO) cultivation on agricultural productivity in Texas (Smith & Doe, 2015). While their focus remains squarely on crop yields, the potential spillover effects of GMO adoption on a broader spectrum of phenomena incline one to explore uncharted territories beyond the conventional scope of agriculture.
The literature surrounding the maritime world offers a divergent but peculiarly fitting angle for our investigation. "Jones" delves into the historical evolution of piracy and its enduring impact on global trade and security, shedding light on the complex dynamics intertwined with maritime activities (Jones, 2017). Transitioning from historical reality to fictitious narratives, "Blackbeard: The Hunt for Pirate Gold" delves into the legendary exploits of the notorious pirate and his quest for hidden treasures, offering a captivating yet tenuous connection to our inquiry into GMO and piracy (Author, 2008). Moreover, fictional works such as "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl" offer a whimsical yet oddly relevant cultural backdrop to situate our unexpected juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and maritime chicanery (Director, 2003).
Turning our attention to unconventional sources, an analysis of popular culture reveals a treasure trove of insights concealed within children's television programming. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" impart ecological messages, inadvertently bridging the gap between agrarian practices and maritime sustainability, albeit in a mildly didactic manner (Creator, 1990). Additionally, the nautical escapades chronicled in "SpongeBob SquarePants" elicit laughter and intrigue, all the while providing an unwittingly captivating tableau of life under the sea, albeit sans any discernible relevance to GMO cotton farming (Creator, 1999).
The confluence of these divergent sources, ranging from scholarly to fictional and even whimsical, signals the unorthodox approach our inquiry undertakes, embracing the unconventional with the enthusiasm of a pirate setting sail in pursuit of buried academic treasures.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2009 to 2022 revealed an intriguing association between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) technology in Texas cotton fields and the incidence of pirate attacks globally. The correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, capturing the attention of researchers like a captivating tale of two disparate worlds colliding.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8990249 signified that approximately 89.9% of the variation in pirate attacks could be explained by the adoption of GMO technology in cotton farming. This substantial proportion of explained variance drew parallels to the meticulous planning and execution required for a successful high-seas raid, underscoring the significance of this unexpected connection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, cementing the validity of the identified correlation. This statistical significance served as a beacon, guiding the research team through the uncharted waters of unanticipated linkages between agricultural practices and global maritime affairs.
Upon plotting the data in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), the striking linear relationship between the use of GMO technology in cotton cultivation and the frequency of pirate attacks became visually evident. The scatterplot, akin to a treasure map revealing hidden patterns, showcased the tight clustering of data points, leaving little room for skepticism regarding the strength of the association.
In summary, the findings of this investigation not only shed light on an unexpected nexus between GMO cotton in Texas and international pirate activity but also offer a compelling narrative of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. This discovery invites further exploration into the underlying causal mechanisms, presenting a trove of opportunities for future research endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study validate the initial hypothesis regarding the unforeseen relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p-value of <0.01 provide robust statistical evidence supporting the existence of a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This unexpected connection unveils the intricate web of interactions that extends beyond the boundaries of conventional disciplinary boundaries.

The literature review, albeit delving into unconventional and at times whimsical sources, presented a foundation for this investigation by illuminating the broader context of agricultural biotechnology and maritime affairs. While seemingly divergent, the scholarly work of Smith and Doe (2015) provided an essential understanding of the impact of GMO cultivation on agricultural productivity, forming the groundwork for exploring the spillover effects into uncharted territories. The parallel drawn to historical and fictional accounts of piracy, as well as children's television programming, may have appeared fanciful at first glance but uncovered a treasure trove of insights that ultimately resonated with the unexpected correlation between GMO cotton and pirate attacks.

The r-squared value of 0.8990249 signifies that nearly 90% of the variation in pirate attacks can be explained by the adoption of GMO technology in cotton farming. This statistical proportion not only underscores the strength of the association but also accentuates the significant role played by GMO technology in the occurrence of pirate activities on the high seas. The striking linear relationship revealed in the scatterplot evokes a sense of revelation akin to uncovering hidden patterns on a treasure map, solidifying the visual manifestation of this unexpected nexus.

While the findings of this study may elicit a wry smile due to their unexpected nature, they carry substantial implications for both the scientific and maritime communities. The humorous juxtaposition of GMO cotton and pirate attacks belies the serious ramifications of this discovery, prompting further investigation into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this inexplicable linkage. This unexpected amalgamation of agricultural biotechnology and global maritime security serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of academic inquiry, emphasizing the value of embracing unorthodox perspectives with the enthusiasm of a pirate seeking buried academic treasures.

In conclusion, this study not only uncovers an unlikely relationship between GMO cotton in Texas and international pirate activity but also invites a reevaluation of disciplinary boundaries and conventional research paradigms. The unexpected convergence of these disparate domains emphasizes the interconnectedness of global phenomena, fostering a spirit of academic adventure akin to the intrepid voyages of those who sail the high seas in search of uncharted territories. Further research endeavors in this domain hold the promise of unraveling the intricacies of this unexpected relationship, offering a bounty of knowledge and understanding as rich as any pirate's treasure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Pirate attacks globally. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and piracy may seem like a plot twist in a B-list science fiction movie, but the curious correlation between the adoption of GMO technology in Texas cotton fields and the occurrence of pirate attacks globally is far from fictitious. While one may ponder how a field of cotton in the Lone Star State could possibly influence the swashbuckling adventures on the high seas, this paper aims to unravel the enigmatic link that has emerged from the depths of agricultural data and maritime activity.
The use of GMO technology in agriculture has sparked debates and discussions, igniting passions akin to an academic rumble in the jungle. With proponents touting bolstered yields and pest resistance, and critics voicing concerns about environmental impact and cross-pollination conundrums, the landscape of GMO cultivation is as contentious as a duel at high noon. Meanwhile, the world of piracy conjures images of eyepatches, peg legs, and jolly rogers, embodying a peculiar mix of historical lore and contemporary maritime challenges worthy of a swashbuckling saga.
In an era where data analysis and statistical wizardry hold sway, this paper presents an empirical investigation into the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. Through the perusal of data meticulously curated from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and a p-value less than 0.01 emerged, leading us down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations and intriguing implications.
This unanticipated relationship unearthed in our research not only raises eyebrows but also paints a picture of interconnectedness that expands beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we embark on this academic voyage, we invite the reader to join us in delving into the labyrinthine network of variables, from the physiological traits of GMO cotton to the geopolitical factors shaping maritime security, with all the enthusiasm of a treasure hunter seeking the elusive bounty of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2009 to 2022 revealed an intriguing association between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) technology in Texas cotton fields and the incidence of pirate attacks globally. The correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, capturing the attention of researchers like a captivating tale of two disparate worlds colliding.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8990249 signified that approximately 89.9% of the variation in pirate attacks could be explained by the adoption of GMO technology in cotton farming. This substantial proportion of explained variance drew parallels to the meticulous planning and execution required for a successful high-seas raid, underscoring the significance of this unexpected connection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, cementing the validity of the identified correlation. This statistical significance served as a beacon, guiding the research team through the uncharted waters of unanticipated linkages between agricultural practices and global maritime affairs.
Upon plotting the data in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), the striking linear relationship between the use of GMO technology in cotton cultivation and the frequency of pirate attacks became visually evident. The scatterplot, akin to a treasure map revealing hidden patterns, showcased the tight clustering of data points, leaving little room for skepticism regarding the strength of the association.
In summary, the findings of this investigation not only shed light on an unexpected nexus between GMO cotton in Texas and international pirate activity but also offer a compelling narrative of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. This discovery invites further exploration into the underlying causal mechanisms, presenting a trove of opportunities for future research endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The unanticipated correlation between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and global pirate attacks uncovered in this research has laid bare a tangled web of unexpected linkages. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and the p-value of < 0.01 serve as the lighthouse guiding our understanding of this unlikely association, akin to a beacon amidst the murky waters of academic inquiry.

The relationship between these seemingly disparate domains provokes a sense of bewilderment, akin to stumbling upon a treasure chest in the unlikeliest of places. However, as with any treasure hunt, this discovery raises more questions than answers. Could it be that the physiological traits of GMO cotton emit a scent irresistible to swashbucklers? Or perhaps the geographic proximity of Texas to international waters invokes the spirit of adventure in unsuspecting pirates?

While the statistical rigour of this investigation is as solid as a ship's hull, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations inherent in correlational research. Causation remains elusive, much like the proverbial X marking the spot on a pirate's map, beckoning further exploration. As such, the findings must be interpreted with caution, akin to navigating treacherous waters with only a compass and a flickering light for guidance.

In conclusion, the unexpected nexus between GMO cotton in Texas and global pirate activities offers a bountiful sea of opportunities for future research, inviting scholars to embark on this academic voyage with the vigour of intrepid adventurers. Nevertheless, the findings of this study underscore the need to approach unexpected correlations with both curiosity and circumspection. As such, it is our ardent recommendation that no further research in this area is necessary, lest we find ourselves lost in a sea of peculiar associations and whimsical correlations.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Anomalies Research and Investigation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalk, Ship, and Swagger: The Unlikely Link Between GMO Cotton in Texas and Global Pirate Attacks with an abstract of This paper investigates the unforeseen connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the cotton fields of Texas and the occurrence of pirate attacks worldwide. Through the meticulous analysis of data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, a correlation coefficient of 0.9481692 and p < 0.01 was established for the period spanning 2009 to 2022. Remarkably, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong association between the use of GMO technology in cotton farming and the frequency of pirate activities on the high seas. The findings prompt further exploration into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, offering a novel perspective on the complex interplay between agricultural practices and global maritime security.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Texas, global pirate attacks, GMO technology, cotton farming, maritime security, USDA data, pirate activities, causal mechanisms, agricultural practices, correlation coefficient, Statista, unforeseen connection, pirate attacks, genetically modified organisms

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Texas that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Texas

Pirate attacks globally
Detailed data title: Global Pirate Attack Count
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Pirate attacks globally

Correlation r = 0.9481692 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8990249 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Pirate attacks globally) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Texas) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-7. 0.0000002501985693610261000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 2.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,996,825 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Texas (GMO cotton %)151318118454533522
Pirate attacks globally (Number of Attacks)410445439297264245246191180201162195132115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15,13,18,11,8,4,5,4,5,3,3,5,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([410,445,439,297,264,245,246,191,180,201,162,195,132,115,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Texas"
array_2_name = "Pirate attacks globally"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1746 · Black Variable ID: 776 · Red Variable ID: 488
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0