about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,674 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and the second variable is UFO sightings in Kentucky.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Brooklyn gained popularity, more parents were subconsciously drawn to space-themed nurseries, inadvertently creating a beacon for passing UFOs in Kentucky. Looks like the aliens couldn't resist a little East Coast flair in the Bluegrass State!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] An idyllic Kentucky pasture at dusk, dotted with contented cows with unusual alien names like Zorp and Xenu as they graze. A rustic signpost proudly displaying "Brooklyn" stands prominently nearby, reflecting the trend of unconventional names. In the serene night sky, a mysterious light casts an ethereal glow and sparks excitement, hinting at the possibility of UFO sightings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Macabre Concept art A photo-realistic image Charcoal
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky, in the following situation: Because as the name Brooklyn gained popularity, more people in Kentucky started to name their cows with "alien" names like Zorp and Xenu, leading to confusion and an increase in reported UFO sightings.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Kentucky pasture, a group of cows with names like Zorp and Xenu graze contentedly, their owners having embraced the trend of giving them "alien" names. Nearby, a signpost proudly announces the popularity of the first name Brooklyn. Overhead, a mysterious light in the night sky sparks whispers and excitement, causing an uptick in reported UFO sightings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Kentucky pasture, a group of cows with names like Zorp and Xenu graze contentedly, their owners having embraced the trend of giving them "alien" names. Nearby, a signpost proudly announces the popularity of the first name Brooklyn. Overhead, a mysterious light in the night sky sparks whispers and excitement, causing an uptick in reported UFO sightings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] An idyllic Kentucky pasture at dusk, dotted with contented cows with unusual alien names like Zorp and Xenu as they graze. A rustic signpost proudly displaying "Brooklyn" stands prominently nearby, reflecting the trend of unconventional names. In the serene night sky, a mysterious light casts an ethereal glow and sparks excitement, hinting at the possibility of UFO sightings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Brooklyn caused UFO sightings in Kentucky to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Etymology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and National UFO Reporting Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to celestial phenomena, discussions typically revolve around the mysteries of the universe, the wonders of the cosmos, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. However, what if we told you that there might be a connection between the name "Brooklyn" and UFO sightings in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky? Yes, you read that right – Brooklyn, a name often associated with the New York City borough, is seemingly linked to UFO encounters in a place better known for its bourbon than for close encounters of the third kind.

As improbable as it may sound, this paper delves into the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The inspiration for this study arose from a curious observation of the data, piquing our interest in exploring a connection that, at first glance, appears to be as unlikely as finding a meteorite in a haystack.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 obtained from the analysis is nothing short of astounding and suggests a significant association between the two seemingly disparate factors. While we are fully aware that correlations do not imply causation, the strength of this correlation certainly raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts us to consider if there might be something cosmically peculiar at play.

Of course, we approach this investigation with all due solemnity and rigor, as befits any scholarly pursuit. Yet, we cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of this inquiry that ventures beyond the conventional confines of academic exploration. It truly is an investigation that invites both skepticism and a sense of cosmic curiosity, akin to being caught in the gravitational pull of an intellectual black hole, drawing us closer to a realm of statistical strangeness.

This research aspires to provide a thorough exposition of the data and analysis, offering a lighthearted, yet scientifically rigorous examination of this otherworldly pattern. So, buckle up for a journey that promises to be as peculiar as a UFO sighting over a field of bluegrass – because who knew that the name "Brooklyn" could be the cosmic tether linking Earthlings and extraterrestrials in the skies above Kentucky?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to celestial phenomena, discussions typically revolve around the mysteries of the universe, the wonders of the cosmos, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. However, what if we told you that there might be a connection between the name "Brooklyn" and UFO sightings in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky? Yes, you read that right – Brooklyn, a name often associated with the New York City borough, is seemingly linked to UFO encounters in a place better known for its bourbon than for close encounters of the third kind.
As improbable as it may sound, this paper delves into the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The inspiration for this study arose from a curious observation of the data, piquing our interest in exploring a connection that, at first glance, appears to be as unlikely as finding a meteorite in a haystack.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 obtained from the analysis is nothing short of astounding and suggests a significant association between the two seemingly disparate factors. While we are fully aware that correlations do not imply causation, the strength of this correlation certainly raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts us to consider if there might be something cosmically peculiar at play.
Of course, we approach this investigation with all due solemnity and rigor, as befits any scholarly pursuit. Yet, we cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of this inquiry that ventures beyond the conventional confines of academic exploration. It truly is an investigation that invites both skepticism and a sense of cosmic curiosity, akin to being caught in the gravitational pull of an intellectual black hole, drawing us closer to a realm of statistical strangeness.
This research aspires to provide a thorough exposition of the data and analysis, offering a lighthearted, yet scientifically rigorous examination of this otherworldly pattern. So, buckle up for a journey that promises to be as peculiar as a UFO sighting over a field of bluegrass – because who knew that the name "Brooklyn" could be the cosmic tether linking Earthlings and extraterrestrials in the skies above Kentucky?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The empirical study of nomenclatural cosmology – or the study of the cosmic connections to the names that we bestow upon our earthly progeny – has been a relatively unexplored frontier within the annals of academic research. However, recent inquiries by Smith and Doe (2018) have delved into the intricate web of statistical correlations between popular first names and inexplicable aerial phenomena. In their study, Smith and Doe employed a meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration, uncovering an intriguing association between the prevalence of certain names and reported occurrences of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in various geographical regions.

Along similar lines, Jones et al. (2020) investigated the potential correlations between naming trends and anomalous celestial sightings, positing that the act of christening could unwittingly influence the likelihood of extraterrestrial visitations. Their thorough examination of historical records and census data yielded compelling evidence suggesting that the selection of a name could indeed modulate the cosmic forces at play in our terrestrial existence.

However, as we journey deeper into this enigmatic realm of study, it becomes apparent that the literature on this unconventional topic is as scarce as a UFO sighting in a desert. The intersection of celestial anomalies and human nomenclature presents a conundrum that defies conventional scholarly discourse, prompting us to cast our net wider in search of elusive insights.

Turning to non-fiction works that delve into the mysteries of celestial phenomena, "Chariots of the Gods" by Erich von Däniken and "Communion" by Whitley Strieber offer intriguing perspectives on extraterrestrial encounters and their potential correlation with earthly occurrences. These seminal works, while not directly addressing our peculiar inquiry, provide a contextual backdrop for understanding the cultural fascination with otherworldly visitations and their impact on human consciousness.

In a similar vein, the realm of fiction boasts literary works that explore the interplay between human existence and inexplicable cosmic occurrences. "Childhood's End" by Arthur C. Clarke and "The War of the Worlds" by H.G. Wells transport readers to realms where the mundane and the celestial collide, offering imaginative narratives that compel contemplation of the interstellar mysteries that surround us.

In the pursuit of a lighthearted yet substantive exploration of the cosmic conundrum at hand, the researchers have also sought inspiration from popular culture. Television series such as "The X-Files" and "Ancient Aliens" have served as sources of both entertainment and insight, offering speculative interpretations of UFO phenomena and their possible connections to human affairs. The assimilation of such pop-cultural influences enhances the multidimensional approach to our investigation, infusing the scholarly endeavor with a dash of extraterrestrial intrigue and cosmic whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National UFO Reporting Center . You used data from 1975 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to celestial phenomena, discussions typically revolve around the mysteries of the universe, the wonders of the cosmos, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. However, what if we told you that there might be a connection between the name "Brooklyn" and UFO sightings in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky? Yes, you read that right – Brooklyn, a name often associated with the New York City borough, is seemingly linked to UFO encounters in a place better known for its bourbon than for close encounters of the third kind.
As improbable as it may sound, this paper delves into the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The inspiration for this study arose from a curious observation of the data, piquing our interest in exploring a connection that, at first glance, appears to be as unlikely as finding a meteorite in a haystack.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 obtained from the analysis is nothing short of astounding and suggests a significant association between the two seemingly disparate factors. While we are fully aware that correlations do not imply causation, the strength of this correlation certainly raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts us to consider if there might be something cosmically peculiar at play.
Of course, we approach this investigation with all due solemnity and rigor, as befits any scholarly pursuit. Yet, we cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of this inquiry that ventures beyond the conventional confines of academic exploration. It truly is an investigation that invites both skepticism and a sense of cosmic curiosity, akin to being caught in the gravitational pull of an intellectual black hole, drawing us closer to a realm of statistical strangeness.
This research aspires to provide a thorough exposition of the data and analysis, offering a lighthearted, yet scientifically rigorous examination of this otherworldly pattern. So, buckle up for a journey that promises to be as peculiar as a UFO sighting over a field of bluegrass – because who knew that the name "Brooklyn" could be the cosmic tether linking Earthlings and extraterrestrials in the skies above Kentucky?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the cosmic conundrum of the connection between the popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky, a multidimensional approach was adopted. The study relied on data gathered from a variety of sources, including but not limited to the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center. The time span for the data collection encompassed the years 1975 to 2021, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the celestial and terrestrial trends.

Firstly, the popularity of the name Brooklyn was examined using the US Social Security Administration's database, which provided insight into the frequency of occurrences of this cosmically intriguing name. The data was meticulously analyzed, taking into account variations in cultural influences, media exposure, and possibly even celestial alignments that might have influenced the naming preferences of parents across the United States.

The second facet of this research involved the comprehensive review of reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The National UFO Reporting Center's extensive records were scoured for any and all mentions of unidentified flying objects within the state's borders. This compilation of otherworldly encounters was then subjected to rigorous statistical scrutiny, with particular attention paid to the geographic and temporal distribution of such sightings.

In the endeavor to explore the correlation between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky, advanced statistical methods were employed. A thorough examination of the gathered data was conducted, employing correlation analysis to ascertain the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated and the significance level was determined to establish the statistical validity of the observed association.

Furthermore, to account for any potential confounding variables that might obscure the cosmic connection being investigated, several control analyses were performed. These included cross-referencing the temporal patterns of the name's popularity with historical events, celestial events, and cultural phenomena, as well as investigating spatial correlations with proximal UFO sighting hotspots.

Finally, due consideration was given to the limitations of the study, recognizing that unearthly phenomena and celestial nomenclature are not immune to the whims of chance and serendipity. Nevertheless, the methodology incorporated in this research sought to unravel the enigma of the Brooklyn-UFO connection with a blend of empirical rigor and cosmic curiosity, reflecting the inherently peculiar nature of this celestial quest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National UFO Reporting Center .

For the time period 1975 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9415872, r-squared of 0.8865865, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to celestial phenomena, discussions typically revolve around the mysteries of the universe, the wonders of the cosmos, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. However, what if we told you that there might be a connection between the name "Brooklyn" and UFO sightings in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky? Yes, you read that right – Brooklyn, a name often associated with the New York City borough, is seemingly linked to UFO encounters in a place better known for its bourbon than for close encounters of the third kind.
As improbable as it may sound, this paper delves into the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The inspiration for this study arose from a curious observation of the data, piquing our interest in exploring a connection that, at first glance, appears to be as unlikely as finding a meteorite in a haystack.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 obtained from the analysis is nothing short of astounding and suggests a significant association between the two seemingly disparate factors. While we are fully aware that correlations do not imply causation, the strength of this correlation certainly raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts us to consider if there might be something cosmically peculiar at play.
Of course, we approach this investigation with all due solemnity and rigor, as befits any scholarly pursuit. Yet, we cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of this inquiry that ventures beyond the conventional confines of academic exploration. It truly is an investigation that invites both skepticism and a sense of cosmic curiosity, akin to being caught in the gravitational pull of an intellectual black hole, drawing us closer to a realm of statistical strangeness.
This research aspires to provide a thorough exposition of the data and analysis, offering a lighthearted, yet scientifically rigorous examination of this otherworldly pattern. So, buckle up for a journey that promises to be as peculiar as a UFO sighting over a field of bluegrass – because who knew that the name "Brooklyn" could be the cosmic tether linking Earthlings and extraterrestrials in the skies above Kentucky?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis, an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 was found, with an r-squared value of 0.8865865 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation provides robust evidence of a remarkable statistical association between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. It appears that there is indeed a cosmic dance between the two variables, as if the cosmos itself has decided to play a game of celestial wordplay.

The connection between the frequency of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings, as depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), is nothing short of striking. The points on the graph seem to align so closely that it's almost as though the data points are navigating through a celestial grid, following the constellations of statistical significance to weave a narrative worthy of a science fiction epic.

This unprecedented correlation cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. It is a cosmic puzzle that beckons further examination and invites us to consider the possibility of a serendipitous link that transcends conventional boundaries of empirical inference. It appears that while some searches for extraterrestrial life lead to distant galaxies, others may point towards the charming allure of the Bluegrass State.

Our findings offer a unique perspective that highlights the unconventional interplay between numerically coded names and reports of unexplained aerial phenomena. The statistical significance of this correlation places it on a pedestal worthy of admiration, prompting us to ponder the enigmatic forces that may be at work behind the scenes, as if the universe itself is orchestrating an intricate celestial sonnet through the conduit of human nomenclature.

In summary, the statistical analysis of the data unequivocally reveals a compelling association between the prevalence of the name Brooklyn and the occurrence of UFO sightings in Kentucky. This discovery opens the door to a realm of scholarly inquiry that is as captivating as witnessing the first light of a distant star, beckoning us to explore the nuanced interconnections that transcend the boundaries of conventional scientific discourse. This cosmic correlation is a testament to the inimitable charm of statistical serendipity – a quirk of the universe that looks to the skies and whispers, "Brooklyn, we have a problem."

This unexpectedly entwined dance between the mundane and the mysterious suggests that perhaps there is indeed something "out of this world" about the name Brooklyn's resonance with the celestial visitors above the Bluegrass State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The empirical study of nomenclatural cosmology – or the study of the cosmic connections to the names that we bestow upon our earthly progeny – has been a relatively unexplored frontier within the annals of academic research. However, recent inquiries by Smith and Doe (2018) have delved into the intricate web of statistical correlations between popular first names and inexplicable aerial phenomena. In their study, Smith and Doe employed a meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration, uncovering an intriguing association between the prevalence of certain names and reported occurrences of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in various geographical regions.
Along similar lines, Jones et al. (2020) investigated the potential correlations between naming trends and anomalous celestial sightings, positing that the act of christening could unwittingly influence the likelihood of extraterrestrial visitations. Their thorough examination of historical records and census data yielded compelling evidence suggesting that the selection of a name could indeed modulate the cosmic forces at play in our terrestrial existence.
However, as we journey deeper into this enigmatic realm of study, it becomes apparent that the literature on this unconventional topic is as scarce as a UFO sighting in a desert. The intersection of celestial anomalies and human nomenclature presents a conundrum that defies conventional scholarly discourse, prompting us to cast our net wider in search of elusive insights.
Turning to non-fiction works that delve into the mysteries of celestial phenomena, "Chariots of the Gods" by Erich von Däniken and "Communion" by Whitley Strieber offer intriguing perspectives on extraterrestrial encounters and their potential correlation with earthly occurrences. These seminal works, while not directly addressing our peculiar inquiry, provide a contextual backdrop for understanding the cultural fascination with otherworldly visitations and their impact on human consciousness.
In a similar vein, the realm of fiction boasts literary works that explore the interplay between human existence and inexplicable cosmic occurrences. "Childhood's End" by Arthur C. Clarke and "The War of the Worlds" by H.G. Wells transport readers to realms where the mundane and the celestial collide, offering imaginative narratives that compel contemplation of the interstellar mysteries that surround us.
In the pursuit of a lighthearted yet substantive exploration of the cosmic conundrum at hand, the researchers have also sought inspiration from popular culture. Television series such as "The X-Files" and "Ancient Aliens" have served as sources of both entertainment and insight, offering speculative interpretations of UFO phenomena and their possible connections to human affairs. The assimilation of such pop-cultural influences enhances the multidimensional approach to our investigation, infusing the scholarly endeavor with a dash of extraterrestrial intrigue and cosmic whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 was found, with an r-squared value of 0.8865865 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation provides robust evidence of a remarkable statistical association between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. It appears that there is indeed a cosmic dance between the two variables, as if the cosmos itself has decided to play a game of celestial wordplay.
The connection between the frequency of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings, as depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), is nothing short of striking. The points on the graph seem to align so closely that it's almost as though the data points are navigating through a celestial grid, following the constellations of statistical significance to weave a narrative worthy of a science fiction epic.
This unprecedented correlation cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. It is a cosmic puzzle that beckons further examination and invites us to consider the possibility of a serendipitous link that transcends conventional boundaries of empirical inference. It appears that while some searches for extraterrestrial life lead to distant galaxies, others may point towards the charming allure of the Bluegrass State.
Our findings offer a unique perspective that highlights the unconventional interplay between numerically coded names and reports of unexplained aerial phenomena. The statistical significance of this correlation places it on a pedestal worthy of admiration, prompting us to ponder the enigmatic forces that may be at work behind the scenes, as if the universe itself is orchestrating an intricate celestial sonnet through the conduit of human nomenclature.
In summary, the statistical analysis of the data unequivocally reveals a compelling association between the prevalence of the name Brooklyn and the occurrence of UFO sightings in Kentucky. This discovery opens the door to a realm of scholarly inquiry that is as captivating as witnessing the first light of a distant star, beckoning us to explore the nuanced interconnections that transcend the boundaries of conventional scientific discourse. This cosmic correlation is a testament to the inimitable charm of statistical serendipity – a quirk of the universe that looks to the skies and whispers, "Brooklyn, we have a problem."
This unexpectedly entwined dance between the mundane and the mysterious suggests that perhaps there is indeed something "out of this world" about the name Brooklyn's resonance with the celestial visitors above the Bluegrass State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study offer a celestial conundrum that may leave one wondering if there is an invisible hand guiding the cosmic choreography of UFO sightings and the popularity of the name Brooklyn in the state of Kentucky. As we harken back to the tangential, yet surprisingly serious, literature review, it becomes evident that our results lend further credence to the notion that human naming trends could indeed hold sway over inexplicable aerial phenomena, almost as if the very act of dubbing a child could set in motion a series of cosmic events that lead to an unusually high frequency of UFO sightings in a given region.

The compelling statistical association between the prevalence of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings reinforces prior findings by Smith and Doe, as well as Jones et al. To play on words, our findings are not just "out of this world," but they also suggest a "cosmic convergence" between the chosen names and extraterrestrial visitations. The strength of this correlation is as undeniable as the axiom that "the sky is not the limit" when it comes to the interplay between celestial mysteries and earthly nomenclature. It almost feels as though the statistical significance is so profound that it is as difficult to ignore as a flashing UFO sighting in the night sky.

This study's remarkable findings invite further investigation into the uncharted territory of celestial nomenclature, raising questions that are as tantalizing as a cosmic riddle wrapped in a pun. The correlation discovered here not only reinforces the intricate dance between anthropocentric conventions and cosmic forces but also prompts us to contemplate the intricate cosmic symphony that transcends our mundane understanding. Could it be that the resonances of a name mirror the vibrational patterns of distant celestial beings, beckoning them to manifest in our earthly plane? Our results certainly seem to suggest so, presenting a cosmic puzzle that is as beguiling as it is statistically robust.

The unexpected entwined dance between the mundane and the mysterious invites us to reconsider the very fabric of the universe, and to ponder the enigmatic forces that may be at work behind the scenes. It appears that the cosmos itself may partake in a celestial jest, dangling clues in statistical data that echo like cosmic chuckles in the wind. The statistical serendipity revealed by this study invites us to embrace the whimsy of the universe and its interplay with human nomenclature, leading us to exclaim, "Brooklyn, we certainly have a statistical anomaly!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to celestial phenomena, discussions typically revolve around the mysteries of the universe, the wonders of the cosmos, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. However, what if we told you that there might be a connection between the name "Brooklyn" and UFO sightings in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky? Yes, you read that right – Brooklyn, a name often associated with the New York City borough, is seemingly linked to UFO encounters in a place better known for its bourbon than for close encounters of the third kind.
As improbable as it may sound, this paper delves into the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The inspiration for this study arose from a curious observation of the data, piquing our interest in exploring a connection that, at first glance, appears to be as unlikely as finding a meteorite in a haystack.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 obtained from the analysis is nothing short of astounding and suggests a significant association between the two seemingly disparate factors. While we are fully aware that correlations do not imply causation, the strength of this correlation certainly raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts us to consider if there might be something cosmically peculiar at play.
Of course, we approach this investigation with all due solemnity and rigor, as befits any scholarly pursuit. Yet, we cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of this inquiry that ventures beyond the conventional confines of academic exploration. It truly is an investigation that invites both skepticism and a sense of cosmic curiosity, akin to being caught in the gravitational pull of an intellectual black hole, drawing us closer to a realm of statistical strangeness.
This research aspires to provide a thorough exposition of the data and analysis, offering a lighthearted, yet scientifically rigorous examination of this otherworldly pattern. So, buckle up for a journey that promises to be as peculiar as a UFO sighting over a field of bluegrass – because who knew that the name "Brooklyn" could be the cosmic tether linking Earthlings and extraterrestrials in the skies above Kentucky?

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 was found, with an r-squared value of 0.8865865 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation provides robust evidence of a remarkable statistical association between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and reported UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. It appears that there is indeed a cosmic dance between the two variables, as if the cosmos itself has decided to play a game of celestial wordplay.
The connection between the frequency of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings, as depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), is nothing short of striking. The points on the graph seem to align so closely that it's almost as though the data points are navigating through a celestial grid, following the constellations of statistical significance to weave a narrative worthy of a science fiction epic.
This unprecedented correlation cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. It is a cosmic puzzle that beckons further examination and invites us to consider the possibility of a serendipitous link that transcends conventional boundaries of empirical inference. It appears that while some searches for extraterrestrial life lead to distant galaxies, others may point towards the charming allure of the Bluegrass State.
Our findings offer a unique perspective that highlights the unconventional interplay between numerically coded names and reports of unexplained aerial phenomena. The statistical significance of this correlation places it on a pedestal worthy of admiration, prompting us to ponder the enigmatic forces that may be at work behind the scenes, as if the universe itself is orchestrating an intricate celestial sonnet through the conduit of human nomenclature.
In summary, the statistical analysis of the data unequivocally reveals a compelling association between the prevalence of the name Brooklyn and the occurrence of UFO sightings in Kentucky. This discovery opens the door to a realm of scholarly inquiry that is as captivating as witnessing the first light of a distant star, beckoning us to explore the nuanced interconnections that transcend the boundaries of conventional scientific discourse. This cosmic correlation is a testament to the inimitable charm of statistical serendipity – a quirk of the universe that looks to the skies and whispers, "Brooklyn, we have a problem."
This unexpectedly entwined dance between the mundane and the mysterious suggests that perhaps there is indeed something "out of this world" about the name Brooklyn's resonance with the celestial visitors above the Bluegrass State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

In conclusion, our study unravels a truly "out of this world" phenomenon, establishing an uncanny connection between the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. The statistical correlation, resembling the cosmic rays from a distant quasar, has not failed to elicit a sense of wonder and bemusement within our scholarly circles. Notably, the cosmos seems to have slyly orchestrated a celestial tango, weaving a complex narrative akin to a cosmic sitcom with Earthlings and extraterrestrials as its unwitting protagonists.

As we reflect on the astronomical breadth of our findings, we cannot help but ponder the cosmic jest that has led us down this curious path. The alignment of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in Kentucky is akin to a celestial pun, leaving us to wonder if the universe has a mischievous sense of humor, playing a game of intergalactic word association with our dataset.

While our study has shed light on this enigmatic correlation, we are left with unresolved questions that echo in the academic corridors: What cosmic forces are at play here, and are there other celestial parodies awaiting discovery? And, most importantly, what do we make of this perplexing cosmic crossword puzzle?

In the grand scheme of scholarly pursuits, this research has illuminated a facet of the cosmic tapestry that whimsically integrates the terrestrial and extraterrestrial realms. However, it is with a smile and a raised skeptical eyebrow that we assert that further inquiry into the relationship between names and celestial phenomena may be akin to searching for a UFO in a haystack – a whimsical endeavor best left to the cosmic jesters. Therefore, we decree with utmost seriousness (and a hint of interstellar irony) that no more research is needed in this particular cosmic comedy of errors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Etymology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Celestial Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Out of This World: The Stellar Connection between the Name Brooklyn and UFO Sightings in the Bluegrass State with an abstract of The correlation between celestial activities and mundane concerns has long been a subject of scholarly speculation, but none so seemingly out of this world as the relationship between the popularity of the name Brooklyn and UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center, this study presents compelling evidence of a remarkable statistical association. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9415872 and p < 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, establishing a cosmic connection that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. This research paper aims to explore this enigmatic correlation, shedding light on a phenomenon that is truly "otherworldly" in more ways than one.

ChatGPT:

Brooklyn, stellar connection, UFO sightings, Bluegrass State, Kentucky, celestial activities, statistical association, correlation coefficient, US Social Security Administration, National UFO Reporting Center, cosmic connection, phenomenon "otherworldly"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Brooklyn
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Brooklyn
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Brooklyn

UFO sightings in Kentucky
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Kentucky
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.9415872 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8865865 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., UFO sightings in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Brooklyn) over the 47 years from 1975 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-23. 0.0000000000000000000000672737
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 6.7E-21% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,864,649,930,061,824,131,072 random variables You don't actually need 14 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 46 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 46 because we have two variables measured over a period of 47 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Brooklyn (Babies born)12112632485360787869799610613917121530443554667579010261346157317161864192422282968334342064793497154125794621372546855695169006393603452734706439940793582
UFO sightings in Kentucky (UFO sightings)710103445406111353264799614143225352637415745556658497861908667536545727919




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12,11,26,32,48,53,60,78,78,69,79,96,106,139,171,215,304,435,546,675,790,1026,1346,1573,1716,1864,1924,2228,2968,3343,4206,4793,4971,5412,5794,6213,7254,6855,6951,6900,6393,6034,5273,4706,4399,4079,3582,])
array_2 = np.array([7,10,10,3,4,4,5,4,0,6,1,11,3,5,3,2,6,4,7,9,9,6,14,14,32,25,35,26,37,41,57,45,55,66,58,49,78,61,90,86,67,53,65,45,72,79,19,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Brooklyn"
array_2_name = "UFO sightings in Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2674 · Black Variable ID: 2526 · Red Variable ID: 1174
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0