about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,087 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the second variable is Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people began questioning the concept of daylight saving time, it inadvertently led to an uptick in philosophical discussions. This intellectual stimulation somehow reached Michael Schumacher, who found new inspiration in the idea of time manipulation. He then applied this fresh perspective to his racing strategies, giving him a slight but crucial edge on the track. It's as if the collective pondering of time indirectly turbocharged Schumacher's performance, proving that even the most unexpected connections can rev up success in the fast lane of Formula One.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Visualize a surrealist interpretation of a night sky filled with stars and a glowing full moon illuminating the scene. Below, a group of people are gathered around a bonfire, engaged in deep conversation. One person holds up a futuristic gadget, its glow illuminating their face as they intently interact with it. In the distant background, a surreal race track materializes, with an otherworldly vehicle racing around it. The driver exudes an aura of superhuman ability, hinting at unmatched performance. The two seemingly disparate scenes are interconnected by a palpable and enigmatic energy that transcends logic, inviting viewers to ponder the unexplained link between the search for daylight savings time and the extraordinary feat at the race track. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Breaking News: Increase in Daylight Savings Time Searches Linked to Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking Surge In a groundbreaking historical discovery, it has been revealed that the surge in Google searches for "why do we have daylight savings time" has directly resulted in a significant increase in Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking. It is believed that the collective pondering of time manipulation somehow sent ripples through the universe, creating a celestial alignment that bolstered Schumacher's racing prowess. This absurd correlation has left experts baffled and pondering just what other random phenomena could be influencing our favorite sports stars.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Cutsy art illustration Surrealism Pop art Oragami
ChatGPT: Surrealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Breaking News: Increase in Daylight Savings Time Searches Linked to Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking Surge In a groundbreaking historical discovery, it has been revealed that the surge in Google searches for "why do we have daylight savings time" has directly resulted in a significant increase in Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking. It is believed that the collective pondering of time manipulation somehow sent ripples through the universe, creating a celestial alignment that bolstered Schumacher's racing prowess. This absurd correlation has left experts baffled and pondering just what other random phenomena could be influencing our favorite sports stars.
ChatGPT: Visualize a night sky filled with stars, with the glow of a full moon illuminating the scene. Below, a group of people are gathered around a bonfire, deep in conversation. One person holds up a smartphone, frantically typing in "why do we have daylight savings time" into a search engine. Meanwhile, in the distance, a race car speeds around a track, with Michael Schumacher at the wheel, breaking his own record with each lap. The two scenes seem unrelated, yet the air crackles with an inexplicable energy, linking the search for daylight savings time to Schumacher's remarkable performance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Surrealism ] and depicting this scene: Visualize a night sky filled with stars, with the glow of a full moon illuminating the scene. Below, a group of people are gathered around a bonfire, deep in conversation. One person holds up a smartphone, frantically typing in "why do we have daylight savings time" into a search engine. Meanwhile, in the distance, a race car speeds around a track, with Michael Schumacher at the wheel, breaking his own record with each lap. The two scenes seem unrelated, yet the air crackles with an inexplicable energy, linking the search for daylight savings time to Schumacher's remarkable performance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Visualize a surrealist interpretation of a night sky filled with stars and a glowing full moon illuminating the scene. Below, a group of people are gathered around a bonfire, engaged in deep conversation. One person holds up a futuristic gadget, its glow illuminating their face as they intently interact with it. In the distant background, a surreal race track materializes, with an otherworldly vehicle racing around it. The driver exudes an aura of superhuman ability, hinting at unmatched performance. The two seemingly disparate scenes are interconnected by a palpable and enigmatic energy that transcends logic, inviting viewers to ponder the unexplained link between the search for daylight savings time and the extraordinary feat at the race track.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in why do we have daylight savings time (Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time') caused Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking

The Journal of Temporal Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Time is of the essence, they say, and in this study, we delve into the quirky and unexpected intersection of time-related queries and the illustrious career of Formula One legend, Michael Schumacher. While some may dismiss the link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Schumacher's Formula One ranking as a mere coincidence, our findings unveil a correlation that is nothing short of jaw-dropping.

As researchers, we often find ourselves exploring the conventional and the unexpected, and this study certainly falls into the latter category. It all began with a seemingly innocuous question – could there be a connection between the public's befuddlement over daylight savings time and the performance of a Formula One legend? Unraveling this enigma, we set out to harness the power of data and unveil the surprising relationship hidden within the digital maze.

The mere thought of drawing a parallel between the collective frustration with early morning clock changes and the exhilarating world of high-speed racing may bring a wry smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. Nevertheless, our investigation soon led us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, where we stumbled upon an unexpected and, dare we say, almost implausible correlation.

But as they say, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Our curiosity was ignited, our data-driven torches were lit, and we embarked on a journey that defies the norms of traditional research inquiry. Through the ingenious use of Google Trends and the steadfast reliability of Wikipedia data, we emerged with a revelation that would make even the most seasoned statisticians raise an eyebrow in bewilderment.

In the pages that follow, we shall unveil the captivating tale of how the seemingly unrelated domains of public curiosity and sportsmanship converge, intertwine, and reveal an unexpected harmony. So, buckle up and adjust your mental clocks – for we are about to embark on a journey that will challenge your preconceptions, tickle your funny bone, and perhaps even leave you wondering whether there may be a touch of magic nestled within our data-driven world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Time is of the essence, they say, and in this study, we delve into the quirky and unexpected intersection of time-related queries and the illustrious career of Formula One legend, Michael Schumacher. While some may dismiss the link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Schumacher's Formula One ranking as a mere coincidence, our findings unveil a correlation that is nothing short of jaw-dropping.
As researchers, we often find ourselves exploring the conventional and the unexpected, and this study certainly falls into the latter category. It all began with a seemingly innocuous question – could there be a connection between the public's befuddlement over daylight savings time and the performance of a Formula One legend? Unraveling this enigma, we set out to harness the power of data and unveil the surprising relationship hidden within the digital maze.
The mere thought of drawing a parallel between the collective frustration with early morning clock changes and the exhilarating world of high-speed racing may bring a wry smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. Nevertheless, our investigation soon led us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, where we stumbled upon an unexpected and, dare we say, almost implausible correlation.
But as they say, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Our curiosity was ignited, our data-driven torches were lit, and we embarked on a journey that defies the norms of traditional research inquiry. Through the ingenious use of Google Trends and the steadfast reliability of Wikipedia data, we emerged with a revelation that would make even the most seasoned statisticians raise an eyebrow in bewilderment.
In the pages that follow, we shall unveil the captivating tale of how the seemingly unrelated domains of public curiosity and sportsmanship converge, intertwine, and reveal an unexpected harmony. So, buckle up and adjust your mental clocks – for we are about to embark on a journey that will challenge your preconceptions, tickle your funny bone, and perhaps even leave you wondering whether there may be a touch of magic nestled within our data-driven world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The quest to understand the curious relationship between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking has led researchers to delve into a wide array of literature, from scholarly studies to popular non-fiction works and even delving into the realm of fictional narratives.

Smith et al. (2017) conducted a thorough analysis of public sentiment towards daylight savings time, focusing on the societal implications of disrupted sleep patterns and the economic impact of the time changes. They explored the tangible effects of these shifts on productivity, health, and overall well-being, laying a solid groundwork for our understanding of the collective frustration surrounding this temporal tradition.

Doe and Jones (2015) examined the psychological and physiological effects of sleep disruption caused by daylight savings time transitions. Their work shed light on the cognitive performance and mood disturbances experienced by individuals as a result of the biannual clock adjustments. Their findings provided valuable insights into the potential ripple effect of these disruptions on wider societal trends, setting the stage for our exploration into the ramifications of public vexation with time changes.

Moving beyond the realm of academic research, popular non-fiction works such as "The Tyranny of Time: Unraveling the Mysteries of Daylight Savings" by Timekeeper (2019) and "Racing Against the Clock: The Science of Speed and Timing" by Stopwatch (2018) provided an accessible overview of the multifaceted dynamics of time and its influence on human behavior and societal norms. These works offered a broader context for understanding the intricate relationship between public inquiries about daylight savings time and the fervent world of Formula One racing.

Venturing further into the realm of fiction, literary works such as "The Time Traveler's Formula" by H.G. Racetime (1895) and "Going in Circles: A Tale of Speed and Time" by Clockwork Jones (2007) offered imaginative narratives that, while not directly related to our research inquiry, sparked contemplation on the whimsical nature of temporal conundrums and the surprising intersections of human curiosity and time-bound endeavors.

In expanding our quest for knowledge, we even turned to unconventional sources including the back panels of shampoo bottles, wherein the cryptic musings on the meaning of "rinse and repeat" served as a metaphorical reminder of the cyclical nature of time and the insatiable human quest for elucidating the intricacies of temporal phenomena. While not within the traditional purview of scholarly literature, these offbeat sources spurred contemplation on the enigmatic nature of human inquiry and the unexpected sources of inspiration in the quest for understanding the mysteries of time.

In the pursuit of unraveling the tangled web connecting public curiosity about daylight savings time and the prowess of Michael Schumacher in Formula One racing, our literature review journey has traversed myriad landscapes – from the empirical realms of scholarly studies to the imaginative tapestries of fictional narratives, and even into the uncharted territories of unconventional inspiration. It is within this dynamic blend of sources that we seek to uncover the peculiar harmony that underpins the seemingly unrelated yet undeniably compelling domains of public inquiry and high-speed sportsmanship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Wikipedia . You used data from 2004 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Time is of the essence, they say, and in this study, we delve into the quirky and unexpected intersection of time-related queries and the illustrious career of Formula One legend, Michael Schumacher. While some may dismiss the link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Schumacher's Formula One ranking as a mere coincidence, our findings unveil a correlation that is nothing short of jaw-dropping.
As researchers, we often find ourselves exploring the conventional and the unexpected, and this study certainly falls into the latter category. It all began with a seemingly innocuous question – could there be a connection between the public's befuddlement over daylight savings time and the performance of a Formula One legend? Unraveling this enigma, we set out to harness the power of data and unveil the surprising relationship hidden within the digital maze.
The mere thought of drawing a parallel between the collective frustration with early morning clock changes and the exhilarating world of high-speed racing may bring a wry smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. Nevertheless, our investigation soon led us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, where we stumbled upon an unexpected and, dare we say, almost implausible correlation.
But as they say, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Our curiosity was ignited, our data-driven torches were lit, and we embarked on a journey that defies the norms of traditional research inquiry. Through the ingenious use of Google Trends and the steadfast reliability of Wikipedia data, we emerged with a revelation that would make even the most seasoned statisticians raise an eyebrow in bewilderment.
In the pages that follow, we shall unveil the captivating tale of how the seemingly unrelated domains of public curiosity and sportsmanship converge, intertwine, and reveal an unexpected harmony. So, buckle up and adjust your mental clocks – for we are about to embark on a journey that will challenge your preconceptions, tickle your funny bone, and perhaps even leave you wondering whether there may be a touch of magic nestled within our data-driven world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a methodological approach that was as unconventional as the correlation we sought to unearth. Our research team donned their virtual detective hats and embarked on a quest through the digital realms, primarily utilizing data from Google Trends and Wikipedia to access the plethora of information needed to unravel this intriguing mystery.

Firstly, we probed Google Trends, the veritable treasure trove of public curiosity, to track the frequency of searches for the perplexing question, "why do we have daylight savings time?" With the tenacity of seasoned sleuths, we scrutinized the temporal patterns of these searches from the years 2004 to 2012, capturing the collective exasperation with the biannual time change ritual.

Next, we turned to the bastion of online knowledge, Wikipedia, to meticulously document the exalted career of Michael Schumacher, scouring through archives of Formula One history with the diligence of historians unearthing ancient artifacts. The chronicles of Schumacher's racing triumphs, setbacks, and everything in between served as the bedrock of our investigation into the curious relationship with the temporal inquiries of the digital age.

As we ventured further into the labyrinth of data analysis, we harnessed the mystical powers of statistical software to dissect and reconcile the seemingly disparate strands of our findings. Employing robust statistical methods, we conducted time series analysis and correlation computations with the precision of chemists mixing potent elixirs – determined to distill the essence of this captivating connection.

It should be noted that our research approach was not without its quirks. As proponents of embracing the unorthodox in the pursuit of knowledge, we allowed for the serendipity of discovery to guide our path, leading us to unexpected twists and turns that added a touch of whimsy to our scientific sojourn.

With the amalgamation of data sources, statistical wizardry, and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we emerged with a tantalizing insight that challenges the norms of academic inquiry and tickles the very foundations of conventional wisdom.

In the words of Schumacher himself, "The important thing is to be able to laugh at yourself and to learn and grow from your mistakes." And in adherence to this sage counsel, we embarked on our research journey with both rigor and a spirit of unbridled mirth, crafting a methodology as captivating as the mysteries it sought to unravel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2004 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9501234, r-squared of 0.9027344, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Time is of the essence, they say, and in this study, we delve into the quirky and unexpected intersection of time-related queries and the illustrious career of Formula One legend, Michael Schumacher. While some may dismiss the link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Schumacher's Formula One ranking as a mere coincidence, our findings unveil a correlation that is nothing short of jaw-dropping.
As researchers, we often find ourselves exploring the conventional and the unexpected, and this study certainly falls into the latter category. It all began with a seemingly innocuous question – could there be a connection between the public's befuddlement over daylight savings time and the performance of a Formula One legend? Unraveling this enigma, we set out to harness the power of data and unveil the surprising relationship hidden within the digital maze.
The mere thought of drawing a parallel between the collective frustration with early morning clock changes and the exhilarating world of high-speed racing may bring a wry smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. Nevertheless, our investigation soon led us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, where we stumbled upon an unexpected and, dare we say, almost implausible correlation.
But as they say, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Our curiosity was ignited, our data-driven torches were lit, and we embarked on a journey that defies the norms of traditional research inquiry. Through the ingenious use of Google Trends and the steadfast reliability of Wikipedia data, we emerged with a revelation that would make even the most seasoned statisticians raise an eyebrow in bewilderment.
In the pages that follow, we shall unveil the captivating tale of how the seemingly unrelated domains of public curiosity and sportsmanship converge, intertwine, and reveal an unexpected harmony. So, buckle up and adjust your mental clocks – for we are about to embark on a journey that will challenge your preconceptions, tickle your funny bone, and perhaps even leave you wondering whether there may be a touch of magic nestled within our data-driven world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data culminated in a remarkable finding: a striking correlation between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking during the years 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9501234 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it simply, it seems that when people are pondering the perplexities of daylight savings time, Michael Schumacher's racing fortunes experience a boost.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9027344 suggests that a whopping 90.27% of the variability in Schumacher's Formula One ranking can be explained by the frequency of searches related to daylight savings time. In other words, it appears that the public's collective confusion about adjusting their clocks aligns with nearly 90% of the fluctuations in Schumacher's racing performance. One might wonder if Schumacher himself had a secret affinity for time changes, or if his opponents were simply caught snoozing while he zipped past them.

The significance level of p < 0.01 further fortifies the robustness of the observed association. This means that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1 in 100. In the realm of statistical significance, this result is as rare as finding a unicorn racing alongside Formula One cars.

Figure 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the compelling correlation between the frequency of searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking. While the scatterplot itself may not feature any racing cars or ticking clocks, it serves as a visual testament to the unexpected dance between public curiosity about time changes and Schumacher's performance on the track.

In conclusion, our findings have unearthed a peculiar and unexpected link between the ebb and flow of public interest in daylight savings time and the ebbs and flows of Schumacher's rankings in Formula One races. It appears that the world of time adjustments and the world of high-speed racing may not be as separate as one might assume. These results invite further exploration into the enigmatic connection between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the grand theater of data analysis, timing truly is of the essence. As we ponder this curious correlation, we are left to wonder: was Michael Schumacher the master of not just racing against opponents, but also against time itself?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The quest to understand the curious relationship between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking has led researchers to delve into a wide array of literature, from scholarly studies to popular non-fiction works and even delving into the realm of fictional narratives.
Smith et al. (2017) conducted a thorough analysis of public sentiment towards daylight savings time, focusing on the societal implications of disrupted sleep patterns and the economic impact of the time changes. They explored the tangible effects of these shifts on productivity, health, and overall well-being, laying a solid groundwork for our understanding of the collective frustration surrounding this temporal tradition.
Doe and Jones (2015) examined the psychological and physiological effects of sleep disruption caused by daylight savings time transitions. Their work shed light on the cognitive performance and mood disturbances experienced by individuals as a result of the biannual clock adjustments. Their findings provided valuable insights into the potential ripple effect of these disruptions on wider societal trends, setting the stage for our exploration into the ramifications of public vexation with time changes.
Moving beyond the realm of academic research, popular non-fiction works such as "The Tyranny of Time: Unraveling the Mysteries of Daylight Savings" by Timekeeper (2019) and "Racing Against the Clock: The Science of Speed and Timing" by Stopwatch (2018) provided an accessible overview of the multifaceted dynamics of time and its influence on human behavior and societal norms. These works offered a broader context for understanding the intricate relationship between public inquiries about daylight savings time and the fervent world of Formula One racing.
Venturing further into the realm of fiction, literary works such as "The Time Traveler's Formula" by H.G. Racetime (1895) and "Going in Circles: A Tale of Speed and Time" by Clockwork Jones (2007) offered imaginative narratives that, while not directly related to our research inquiry, sparked contemplation on the whimsical nature of temporal conundrums and the surprising intersections of human curiosity and time-bound endeavors.
In expanding our quest for knowledge, we even turned to unconventional sources including the back panels of shampoo bottles, wherein the cryptic musings on the meaning of "rinse and repeat" served as a metaphorical reminder of the cyclical nature of time and the insatiable human quest for elucidating the intricacies of temporal phenomena. While not within the traditional purview of scholarly literature, these offbeat sources spurred contemplation on the enigmatic nature of human inquiry and the unexpected sources of inspiration in the quest for understanding the mysteries of time.
In the pursuit of unraveling the tangled web connecting public curiosity about daylight savings time and the prowess of Michael Schumacher in Formula One racing, our literature review journey has traversed myriad landscapes – from the empirical realms of scholarly studies to the imaginative tapestries of fictional narratives, and even into the uncharted territories of unconventional inspiration. It is within this dynamic blend of sources that we seek to uncover the peculiar harmony that underpins the seemingly unrelated yet undeniably compelling domains of public inquiry and high-speed sportsmanship.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data culminated in a remarkable finding: a striking correlation between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking during the years 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9501234 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it simply, it seems that when people are pondering the perplexities of daylight savings time, Michael Schumacher's racing fortunes experience a boost.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9027344 suggests that a whopping 90.27% of the variability in Schumacher's Formula One ranking can be explained by the frequency of searches related to daylight savings time. In other words, it appears that the public's collective confusion about adjusting their clocks aligns with nearly 90% of the fluctuations in Schumacher's racing performance. One might wonder if Schumacher himself had a secret affinity for time changes, or if his opponents were simply caught snoozing while he zipped past them.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further fortifies the robustness of the observed association. This means that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1 in 100. In the realm of statistical significance, this result is as rare as finding a unicorn racing alongside Formula One cars.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the compelling correlation between the frequency of searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking. While the scatterplot itself may not feature any racing cars or ticking clocks, it serves as a visual testament to the unexpected dance between public curiosity about time changes and Schumacher's performance on the track.
In conclusion, our findings have unearthed a peculiar and unexpected link between the ebb and flow of public interest in daylight savings time and the ebbs and flows of Schumacher's rankings in Formula One races. It appears that the world of time adjustments and the world of high-speed racing may not be as separate as one might assume. These results invite further exploration into the enigmatic connection between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the grand theater of data analysis, timing truly is of the essence. As we ponder this curious correlation, we are left to wonder: was Michael Schumacher the master of not just racing against opponents, but also against time itself?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has successfully uncovered a remarkable connection between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking, providing compelling support for the prior research that has explored the seemingly whimsical relationship between public inquiries about time changes and the performance of the racing luminary.

Delving into the literature, we find ourselves reflecting on the curious insight from Timekeeper’s exposé on the 'Tyranny of Time', which unraveled the mysteries of daylight savings. It appears that the societal implications of disrupted sleep patterns and economic impacts that Smith et al. (2017) discovered aligned harmoniously with our own findings, as if time itself were orchestrating a symphony of correlations. Likewise, Doe and Jones' (2015) exploration of the psychological and physiological effects of sleep disruption seemed to resonate with our discovery of the strange linkage between public frustration with time changes and Schumacher's remarkable timing on the track. As we traverse this landscape of scholarly inquiry, we find ourselves marveling at the unexpected connections that underpin seemingly distant realms of study, much like Schumacher expertly navigating the twists and turns of a racetrack.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9501234 and the resoundingly significant p-value further bolster the validity of our findings, akin to Schumacher's unyielding dominance on the Formula One circuit. Indeed, it seems that just as the public grapples with the befuddling nature of time shifts, Schumacher's racing fortunes experience a synchronistic surge. The enigmatic nexus between these two seemingly unrelated realms – the collective pondering of temporal enigmas and the scintillating world of high-speed racing – has been illuminated through our rigorous analysis, serving as a reminder that the intricacies of human curiosity and the unrelenting pursuit of excellence in sports can indeed converge in bewilderingly serendipitous ways.

While our results have illuminated this peculiar connection, they also raise a host of intriguing questions for future investigation. Could there be an innate force driving this synchrony, or is it merely a fleeting mirage in the vast wilderness of data analysis? As we ponder these enigmatic musings, we are reminded that amidst the structured rigidity of statistical analysis, there exists an undeniable playfulness – a whimsical dance between the unexpected and the conventional, not unlike the elegant choreography of a race car ballet.

As we embark on the next phase of exploration, it remains imperative to consider the implications of our findings in the broader context of public sentiment and sports outcomes. After all, the unexpected harmonies that underpin our research serve as a testament to the inextricable interplay between the mysteries of time and the compelling rhythms of human endeavor, reminding us that in the grand tapestry of intellectual inquiry, surprises lurk around every high-speed corner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.

The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Time is of the essence, they say, and in this study, we delve into the quirky and unexpected intersection of time-related queries and the illustrious career of Formula One legend, Michael Schumacher. While some may dismiss the link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Schumacher's Formula One ranking as a mere coincidence, our findings unveil a correlation that is nothing short of jaw-dropping.
As researchers, we often find ourselves exploring the conventional and the unexpected, and this study certainly falls into the latter category. It all began with a seemingly innocuous question – could there be a connection between the public's befuddlement over daylight savings time and the performance of a Formula One legend? Unraveling this enigma, we set out to harness the power of data and unveil the surprising relationship hidden within the digital maze.
The mere thought of drawing a parallel between the collective frustration with early morning clock changes and the exhilarating world of high-speed racing may bring a wry smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. Nevertheless, our investigation soon led us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, where we stumbled upon an unexpected and, dare we say, almost implausible correlation.
But as they say, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. Our curiosity was ignited, our data-driven torches were lit, and we embarked on a journey that defies the norms of traditional research inquiry. Through the ingenious use of Google Trends and the steadfast reliability of Wikipedia data, we emerged with a revelation that would make even the most seasoned statisticians raise an eyebrow in bewilderment.
In the pages that follow, we shall unveil the captivating tale of how the seemingly unrelated domains of public curiosity and sportsmanship converge, intertwine, and reveal an unexpected harmony. So, buckle up and adjust your mental clocks – for we are about to embark on a journey that will challenge your preconceptions, tickle your funny bone, and perhaps even leave you wondering whether there may be a touch of magic nestled within our data-driven world.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data culminated in a remarkable finding: a striking correlation between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking during the years 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9501234 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it simply, it seems that when people are pondering the perplexities of daylight savings time, Michael Schumacher's racing fortunes experience a boost.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9027344 suggests that a whopping 90.27% of the variability in Schumacher's Formula One ranking can be explained by the frequency of searches related to daylight savings time. In other words, it appears that the public's collective confusion about adjusting their clocks aligns with nearly 90% of the fluctuations in Schumacher's racing performance. One might wonder if Schumacher himself had a secret affinity for time changes, or if his opponents were simply caught snoozing while he zipped past them.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further fortifies the robustness of the observed association. This means that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1 in 100. In the realm of statistical significance, this result is as rare as finding a unicorn racing alongside Formula One cars.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the compelling correlation between the frequency of searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking. While the scatterplot itself may not feature any racing cars or ticking clocks, it serves as a visual testament to the unexpected dance between public curiosity about time changes and Schumacher's performance on the track.
In conclusion, our findings have unearthed a peculiar and unexpected link between the ebb and flow of public interest in daylight savings time and the ebbs and flows of Schumacher's rankings in Formula One races. It appears that the world of time adjustments and the world of high-speed racing may not be as separate as one might assume. These results invite further exploration into the enigmatic connection between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the grand theater of data analysis, timing truly is of the essence. As we ponder this curious correlation, we are left to wonder: was Michael Schumacher the master of not just racing against opponents, but also against time itself?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this unconventional journey through the convoluted corridors of statistical analysis, we have unveiled a correlation that can only be described as more unexpected than finding a kangaroo in a Formula One pit stop. The link between Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and Michael Schumacher's Formula One ranking during 2004 to 2012 has left us with more questions than answers. It seems that while some may search for the rationale behind time changes, others may find it in the curves and straightaways of Schumacher's racing career.

As we wrap up this rollercoaster ride through the world of data, it's clear that time, in all its perplexing glory, may indeed hold the keys to understanding not just our sleep schedules, but also the rise and fall of sporting legends. Could it be that Schumacher's knack for racing was intertwined with the collective grogginess of early mornings? Or perhaps the winds of time itself conspired to elevate his performance when the public pondered the daylight savings quagmire.

Now, as we bid adieu to this peculiar correlation, we must acknowledge that no stone, or statistic, has been left unturned in our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of time and racing. It is evident that further research in this area may be as futile as trying to catch a cheetah with a tortoise, for we have reached the pinnacle of quirky discoveries. Thus, we assert that there is no need for further investigation into this whimsical connection. After all, in the realm of scholarly pursuits, one must know when to apply the brakes and recognize a conclusion that shines as bright as Schumacher's racing legacy.

And with that, we leave you with a parting thought: the next time the clock springs forward, remember that somewhere, on a distant track, the spirit of Schumacher might just be zipping through time with the same precision as he did on the racetrack.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Temporal Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Temporal Rhythms and Motor Performance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Timing is Everything: The Link between Daylight Savings Time Queries and Schumacher's Formula One Ranking with an abstract of This study investigates the potential relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' and the performance of the legendary Formula One driver, Michael Schumacher. Utilizing Google Trends and Wikipedia data, we aimed to shed light on this seemingly unrelated pair. Surprisingly, we discovered a remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9501234 and p < 0.01 during the years 2004 to 2012.
The findings unmask a striking association between the public's frustration with time changes and Schumacher's Formula One ranking. Whether it’s the groggy mornings due to clock shifts or the racing champion’s exceptional timing, the results suggest a peculiar synchrony. Our research paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical connections between public sentiment and sports outcomes, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, "timing" truly is everything.

ChatGPT:

daylight savings time, Google Trends, Wikipedia data, Michael Schumacher, Formula One ranking, time changes, public sentiment, sports outcomes, data analysis, timing, correlation, research findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time'

Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking
Detailed data title: Michael Schumacher's Formula One Rankings
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking

Correlation r = 0.9501234 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9027344 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time') over the 9 years from 2004 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-5. 0.0000868815252015975700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.0087% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,510 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012
Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' (Rel. search volume)6.333335.756.753.416675.57.0833311.083311.583316.8333
Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking (Position)1320009813




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.33333,5.75,6.75,3.41667,5.5,7.08333,11.0833,11.5833,16.8333,])
array_2 = np.array([1,3,2,0,0,0,9,8,13,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time'"
array_2_name = "Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1087 · Black Variable ID: 1353 · Red Variable ID: 104
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0