about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,173 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and the second variable is The divorce rate in Connecticut.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Due to the Cubs' improved performance, fans experienced heightened emotions, leading to a surge in marriage counseling services. The frequency of heated arguments over baseball statistics and game strategies put a strain on relationships. As a result, the divorce rate in Connecticut increased, as couples realized they were not compatible in their team loyalties.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room in Connecticut, a couple shares a couch but sits with their backs to each other, engrossed in their phones. On the TV screen, a baseball game shows the Chicago Cubs playing, and the announcer mentions the team's declining total runs scored in the National League. The tension in the room mirrors the decreasing love and affection in marriages across the state, as the news of the Cubs' struggle seems to affect the atmosphere at home. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Photorealism Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut, in the following situation: As the Chicago Cubs batting average dropped, so did the love and affection in marriages across Connecticut. The lack of home runs from the Cubs led to a lack of home runs in the bedroom. It's a 'strike out' for marital bliss when the Cubs couldn't seem to 'catcher' a break, leaving Connecticut couples feeling like they were 'out at first base' in their relationships. The decline in Total Runs Scored by the Cubs left Connecticut spouses feeling like they were always in a 'inning' battle, and they just couldn't 'field' the love anymore. It seems like when the Cubs couldn't hit it off on the field, Connecticut couples couldn't make it work off the field either.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a living room in Connecticut, a couple sits on the couch, their backs to each other, each focused on their own phone. On the TV screen, the Chicago Cubs are playing, and the announcer mentions the team's declining total runs scored in the National League. The tension in the room mirrors the decreasing love and affection in marriages across the state, as the news of the Cubs' struggle seems to affect the atmosphere at home.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a living room in Connecticut, a couple sits on the couch, their backs to each other, each focused on their own phone. On the TV screen, the Chicago Cubs are playing, and the announcer mentions the team's declining total runs scored in the National League. The tension in the room mirrors the decreasing love and affection in marriages across the state, as the news of the Cubs' struggle seems to affect the atmosphere at home. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room in Connecticut, a couple shares a couch but sits with their backs to each other, engrossed in their phones. On the TV screen, a baseball game shows the Chicago Cubs playing, and the announcer mentions the team's declining total runs scored in the National League. The tension in the room mirrors the decreasing love and affection in marriages across the state, as the news of the Cubs' struggle seems to affect the atmosphere at home.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) positively influenced The divorce rate in Connecticut.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

The Journal of Peculiar Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Baseball Reference and CDC National Vital Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of sports and social phenomena often seem as distant as a fly ball sailing over the outfield fence. However, as unlikely as it may sound, our research has uncovered a peculiar relationship between the performance of the Chicago Cubs, a perennially perplexing baseball team, and the divorce rates in Connecticut, a state known more for its scenic beauty than for its statistical quirkiness. This investigation arose from the recognition of a curiosity that could not be easily dismissed – could there be an underlying connection between the crack of the bat and the cracks in marital harmony? Though it may seem like a curveball, we set out to rigorously analyze and explore this beguiling pattern.

While most might balk at the notion that a baseball team's prowess could influence the personal relationships of individuals in another state, we approached this investigation with the gravity and precision that one might apply to calculating a batting average or a standard deviation. Our study encompasses data spanning from 1999 to 2021, encompassing the highs and lows of both the Cubs' performance and the Connecticut divorce rates. By examining the total runs scored by the Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions, and juxtaposing this with the divorce statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden threads binding the realm of sports entertainment and the often tumultuous landscape of human relationships.

It is important to note that our foray into this unexpected correlation is not without humor and a sense of bemusement. After all, the alchemy of conjuring connections between a beloved sports team and the sobering reality of divorce rates in a particular state could easily be mistaken for a tall tale spun by a bard around a campfire. However, the statistical analysis herein presents a rather unexpected conclusion, one that may elicit not only raised eyebrows but also a chuckle or two, for our findings are as amusing as they are compelling.

As we delve into the intricacies of this analysis, we invite the reader to embrace the whimsy and wonder that sometimes surfaces when worlds collide in the arena of empirical observation. This paper aims to celebrate not only the rigor of statistical investigation but also the delight of uncovering unexpected links in the grand tapestry of human experience... and perhaps the occasional home run-induced marital discord.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports and social phenomena often seem as distant as a fly ball sailing over the outfield fence. However, as unlikely as it may sound, our research has uncovered a peculiar relationship between the performance of the Chicago Cubs, a perennially perplexing baseball team, and the divorce rates in Connecticut, a state known more for its scenic beauty than for its statistical quirkiness. This investigation arose from the recognition of a curiosity that could not be easily dismissed – could there be an underlying connection between the crack of the bat and the cracks in marital harmony? Though it may seem like a curveball, we set out to rigorously analyze and explore this beguiling pattern.
While most might balk at the notion that a baseball team's prowess could influence the personal relationships of individuals in another state, we approached this investigation with the gravity and precision that one might apply to calculating a batting average or a standard deviation. Our study encompasses data spanning from 1999 to 2021, encompassing the highs and lows of both the Cubs' performance and the Connecticut divorce rates. By examining the total runs scored by the Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions, and juxtaposing this with the divorce statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden threads binding the realm of sports entertainment and the often tumultuous landscape of human relationships.
It is important to note that our foray into this unexpected correlation is not without humor and a sense of bemusement. After all, the alchemy of conjuring connections between a beloved sports team and the sobering reality of divorce rates in a particular state could easily be mistaken for a tall tale spun by a bard around a campfire. However, the statistical analysis herein presents a rather unexpected conclusion, one that may elicit not only raised eyebrows but also a chuckle or two, for our findings are as amusing as they are compelling.
As we delve into the intricacies of this analysis, we invite the reader to embrace the whimsy and wonder that sometimes surfaces when worlds collide in the arena of empirical observation. This paper aims to celebrate not only the rigor of statistical investigation but also the delight of uncovering unexpected links in the grand tapestry of human experience... and perhaps the occasional home run-induced marital discord.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between seemingly disparate phenomena in the realm of sport and social behavior has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. Smith (2010) explored the connection between sports team performance and regional socio-economic indicators, shedding light on the potential influence of athletic achievements on broader societal trends. Similarly, Doe (2013) examined the impact of baseball statistics on local community engagement, offering insights into the far-reaching implications of sports outcomes beyond the confines of the playing field.

Jones (2015) delved into the intricate web of correlations between unconventional variables, uncovering unexpected relationships that challenge traditional statistical paradigms. The author provocatively questioned the notion of separateness between ostensibly unrelated factors, laying the groundwork for the exploration of connections that defy conventional wisdom.

Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) presents a compelling case for the hidden influences and unexpected connections that underpin social phenomena. Their exploration of unconventional causality and seemingly unrelated correlations serves as a source of inspiration for our present investigation.

"Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell (2008) offers a provocative examination of factors that contribute to extraordinary achievements, peeling back layers of convention to reveal the intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. This insightful work stirs the imagination and prompts the reader to contemplate the unorthodox pathways that may lead to unforeseen associations.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the enigmatic world of probability and chance in Paul Auster's "New York Trilogy" (1987) proffers a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the unexpected threads that bind together disparate elements. Auster's narrative prowess casts a captivating spell, beckoning the reader to consider the seemingly improbable relationships that weave through the fabric of human existence.

In a departure from the conventional scholarly sources, the authors also encountered a trove of unexpected insights from the unlikeliest of places – the backs of shampoo bottles. Through a systematic exploration of the chemical compositions and whimsical advertising quips adorning these everyday products, the researchers gleaned unexpected nuggets of wisdom that resonated with the spirit of unconventional connection-seeking that pervades this inquiry. While unconventional, this eclectic source of inspiration sparked moments of levity and mirth within the unyielding rigors of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and CDC National Vital Statistics . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports and social phenomena often seem as distant as a fly ball sailing over the outfield fence. However, as unlikely as it may sound, our research has uncovered a peculiar relationship between the performance of the Chicago Cubs, a perennially perplexing baseball team, and the divorce rates in Connecticut, a state known more for its scenic beauty than for its statistical quirkiness. This investigation arose from the recognition of a curiosity that could not be easily dismissed – could there be an underlying connection between the crack of the bat and the cracks in marital harmony? Though it may seem like a curveball, we set out to rigorously analyze and explore this beguiling pattern.
While most might balk at the notion that a baseball team's prowess could influence the personal relationships of individuals in another state, we approached this investigation with the gravity and precision that one might apply to calculating a batting average or a standard deviation. Our study encompasses data spanning from 1999 to 2021, encompassing the highs and lows of both the Cubs' performance and the Connecticut divorce rates. By examining the total runs scored by the Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions, and juxtaposing this with the divorce statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden threads binding the realm of sports entertainment and the often tumultuous landscape of human relationships.
It is important to note that our foray into this unexpected correlation is not without humor and a sense of bemusement. After all, the alchemy of conjuring connections between a beloved sports team and the sobering reality of divorce rates in a particular state could easily be mistaken for a tall tale spun by a bard around a campfire. However, the statistical analysis herein presents a rather unexpected conclusion, one that may elicit not only raised eyebrows but also a chuckle or two, for our findings are as amusing as they are compelling.
As we delve into the intricacies of this analysis, we invite the reader to embrace the whimsy and wonder that sometimes surfaces when worlds collide in the arena of empirical observation. This paper aims to celebrate not only the rigor of statistical investigation but also the delight of uncovering unexpected links in the grand tapestry of human experience... and perhaps the occasional home run-induced marital discord.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the perplexing conundrum of the purported link between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and the divorce rates in Connecticut, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey that blended the art of statistical analysis with the whimsy of a baseball fan pondering the mysteries of the universe. Our approach, though grounded in traditional quantitative methods, was sprinkled with a pinch of playfulness and a dash of absurdity, acknowledging the unconventional nature of our inquiry.

Data Collection:
Like intrepid explorers of the statistical seas, we scoured the vast expanses of the internet, sifting through the treasure troves of Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics database. Eagerly, we gathered data spanning the years 1999 to 2021, capturing the tumultuous tides of both the Chicago Cubs' performances and the evolving landscape of divorce rates in Connecticut.

Measurements and Variables:
Our quest for clarity and understanding led us to focus on two primary variables: the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions and the divorce rates in the state of Connecticut. Embracing the spirit of lighthearted inquiry, we approached these seemingly disparate measures with a blend of reverence and irreverence, recognizing the delightful incongruity of our investigation.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of curiosity, we set about unleashing the power of correlation analysis. With bated breath, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the total runs scored by the Cubs and the divorce rates in Connecticut, unveiling the mysterious dance of numbers that seemed to suggest an unexpected alignment between the realms of home runs and heartaches.

Significance Testing:
In our pursuit of scholarly rigor and scientific sobriety, we subjected our findings to the crucible of significance testing. With p-values as our guiding stars, we sought to discern whether the observed relationship between baseball prowess and marital dissolution was a mere statistical fluke or a revelation worthy of attention and amusement.

Ethical Considerations:
As stewards of empirical truth and purveyors of statistical merriment, we approached the intertwining of these seemingly unrelated domains with a sense of responsibility and respect. Our research was conducted with an unwavering commitment to the principles of academic integrity, all while embracing the delightful absurdity inherent in the exploration of unconventional correlations.

In closing, our methodology stands as a testament to the convergence of scholarly rigor and whimsical wonder, crafting a fitting framework for the investigation of this most peculiar connection between the trials and triumphs of a baseball team and the ebbs and flows of human relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and CDC National Vital Statistics .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7987100, r-squared of 0.6379377, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of sports and social phenomena often seem as distant as a fly ball sailing over the outfield fence. However, as unlikely as it may sound, our research has uncovered a peculiar relationship between the performance of the Chicago Cubs, a perennially perplexing baseball team, and the divorce rates in Connecticut, a state known more for its scenic beauty than for its statistical quirkiness. This investigation arose from the recognition of a curiosity that could not be easily dismissed – could there be an underlying connection between the crack of the bat and the cracks in marital harmony? Though it may seem like a curveball, we set out to rigorously analyze and explore this beguiling pattern.
While most might balk at the notion that a baseball team's prowess could influence the personal relationships of individuals in another state, we approached this investigation with the gravity and precision that one might apply to calculating a batting average or a standard deviation. Our study encompasses data spanning from 1999 to 2021, encompassing the highs and lows of both the Cubs' performance and the Connecticut divorce rates. By examining the total runs scored by the Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions, and juxtaposing this with the divorce statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden threads binding the realm of sports entertainment and the often tumultuous landscape of human relationships.
It is important to note that our foray into this unexpected correlation is not without humor and a sense of bemusement. After all, the alchemy of conjuring connections between a beloved sports team and the sobering reality of divorce rates in a particular state could easily be mistaken for a tall tale spun by a bard around a campfire. However, the statistical analysis herein presents a rather unexpected conclusion, one that may elicit not only raised eyebrows but also a chuckle or two, for our findings are as amusing as they are compelling.
As we delve into the intricacies of this analysis, we invite the reader to embrace the whimsy and wonder that sometimes surfaces when worlds collide in the arena of empirical observation. This paper aims to celebrate not only the rigor of statistical investigation but also the delight of uncovering unexpected links in the grand tapestry of human experience... and perhaps the occasional home run-induced marital discord.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut has yielded some remarkable findings. Over the period of 1999 to 2021, we found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100. In other words, the relationship between these two variables is about as strong as an outfielder's throwing arm. The r-squared value of 0.6379377 further bolsters the case for a substantial connection, indicating that a significant proportion of the variance in divorce rates can be explained by the total runs scored by the Cubs.

Perhaps most eyebrow-raising of all is the significance level of p < 0.01, which essentially means that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is lower than the chances of a full moon occurring during a day game at Wrigley Field. In other words, the probability of these results being a fluke is about as slim as a bat handle.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the robust association between the total runs scored by the Cubs and the divorce rates in Connecticut. The data points form a nearly linear pattern, reminiscent of a well-executed double play, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings.

These results not only underscore the unexpected nature of our research inquiry but also highlight the intriguing interplay between sports performance and societal dynamics. It appears that the crack of the bat may indeed have reverberations beyond the confines of the baseball diamond, reaching into the realm of interpersonal relationships and marital stability.

In conclusion, our analysis of the connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and divorce rates in Connecticut reveals a compelling and statistically significant relationship. While this correlation may initially seem as implausible as a Cubs World Series victory (prior to 2016, of course), our findings robustly support the existence of this intriguing link. This paper not only adds a touch of whimsy to the often staid world of statistical analysis but also beckons researchers to explore the uncharted territory where sports and social phenomena intersect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between seemingly disparate phenomena in the realm of sport and social behavior has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. Smith (2010) explored the connection between sports team performance and regional socio-economic indicators, shedding light on the potential influence of athletic achievements on broader societal trends. Similarly, Doe (2013) examined the impact of baseball statistics on local community engagement, offering insights into the far-reaching implications of sports outcomes beyond the confines of the playing field.
Jones (2015) delved into the intricate web of correlations between unconventional variables, uncovering unexpected relationships that challenge traditional statistical paradigms. The author provocatively questioned the notion of separateness between ostensibly unrelated factors, laying the groundwork for the exploration of connections that defy conventional wisdom.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) presents a compelling case for the hidden influences and unexpected connections that underpin social phenomena. Their exploration of unconventional causality and seemingly unrelated correlations serves as a source of inspiration for our present investigation.
"Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell (2008) offers a provocative examination of factors that contribute to extraordinary achievements, peeling back layers of convention to reveal the intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. This insightful work stirs the imagination and prompts the reader to contemplate the unorthodox pathways that may lead to unforeseen associations.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the enigmatic world of probability and chance in Paul Auster's "New York Trilogy" (1987) proffers a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the unexpected threads that bind together disparate elements. Auster's narrative prowess casts a captivating spell, beckoning the reader to consider the seemingly improbable relationships that weave through the fabric of human existence.
In a departure from the conventional scholarly sources, the authors also encountered a trove of unexpected insights from the unlikeliest of places – the backs of shampoo bottles. Through a systematic exploration of the chemical compositions and whimsical advertising quips adorning these everyday products, the researchers gleaned unexpected nuggets of wisdom that resonated with the spirit of unconventional connection-seeking that pervades this inquiry. While unconventional, this eclectic source of inspiration sparked moments of levity and mirth within the unyielding rigors of academic inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut has yielded some remarkable findings. Over the period of 1999 to 2021, we found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100. In other words, the relationship between these two variables is about as strong as an outfielder's throwing arm. The r-squared value of 0.6379377 further bolsters the case for a substantial connection, indicating that a significant proportion of the variance in divorce rates can be explained by the total runs scored by the Cubs.
Perhaps most eyebrow-raising of all is the significance level of p < 0.01, which essentially means that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is lower than the chances of a full moon occurring during a day game at Wrigley Field. In other words, the probability of these results being a fluke is about as slim as a bat handle.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the robust association between the total runs scored by the Cubs and the divorce rates in Connecticut. The data points form a nearly linear pattern, reminiscent of a well-executed double play, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings.
These results not only underscore the unexpected nature of our research inquiry but also highlight the intriguing interplay between sports performance and societal dynamics. It appears that the crack of the bat may indeed have reverberations beyond the confines of the baseball diamond, reaching into the realm of interpersonal relationships and marital stability.
In conclusion, our analysis of the connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and divorce rates in Connecticut reveals a compelling and statistically significant relationship. While this correlation may initially seem as implausible as a Cubs World Series victory (prior to 2016, of course), our findings robustly support the existence of this intriguing link. This paper not only adds a touch of whimsy to the often staid world of statistical analysis but also beckons researchers to explore the uncharted territory where sports and social phenomena intersect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis have illuminated a remarkably strong correlation between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. The statistical relationship we uncovered is as substantial as a towering home run, resonating with an effect size that is difficult to overlook.

In line with Smith's (2010) investigation on sports team performance and regional socio-economic indicators, our findings amplify the potential ripple effects of athletic accomplishments on societal constructs. The connection between the Cubs' run production and divorce rates appears to lend credence to the notion that sports outcomes hold sway over broader social dynamics. While this linkage may seem as unlikely as a designated hitter enjoying success in the National League, the statistical evidence we have amassed unequivocally supports this unorthodox association.

Doe's (2013) exploration of baseball statistics and community engagement takes on renewed relevance in light of our study. The unexpected correlation between the total runs scored by the Cubs and divorce rates prompts us to consider the multifaceted impact of sports statistics on community well-being. The notion that a team's offensive firepower might intersect with marital stability may seem as improbable as a triple play, but our analysis affirms the robustness of this relationship.

The statistical significance we have unearthed aligns closely with the spirit of inquiry exemplified by Jones (2015). The unconventional web of correlations between seemingly unrelated variables, which Jones provocatively unraveled, finds resonance in our unexpected discovery of a substantial link between baseball performance and divorce rates. The statistical validity of this association is as palpable as a well-worn baseball glove, serving as a testament to the intricate tapestry of connections that can surface within the realm of statistical analysis.

Levitt and Dubner's (2005) exploration of hidden influences and unexpected correlations resonates with the nature of our investigation. The seemingly whimsical relationship between the Cubs' run scoring and divorce rates embodies the unanticipated connections that underpin social phenomena. The statistical robustness of this connection is as undeniable as a rain delay at Wrigley Field, cementing its place in the canon of unexpected associations.

Emerging from the realm of popular non-fiction literature, Gladwell's (2008) examination of factors contributing to extraordinary achievements exerts an intriguing influence on our study. Our unearthing of an unexpected connection between baseball statistics and divorce rates echoes the provocative examination of interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. The parallel between these two realms of inquiry stands as vivid as a seventh-inning stretch, embellishing the fabric of unconventional connections that pervade both scholarly and empirical landscapes.

Throughout our investigation, we have sought inspiration from diverse sources, including Paul Auster's (1987) narrative prowess and, in a comically unexpected turn, the back of shampoo bottles. These sources of inspiration have lent a touch of levity and mirth to our rigorous academic pursuit. As seemingly incongruous as the connection between the Cubs' runs and divorce rates, these whimsical influences underscore the serendipitous nature of discovery and the inherent unpredictability of scholarly inquiry.

In sum, the connection we have delineated between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and divorce rates in Connecticut not only affirms the unexpected nature of our research endeavor but also underscores the far-reaching implications of sports performance on societal dynamics. Our findings add a dash of whimsy to the often staid world of statistical analysis while prompting scholars to contemplate the unorthodox pathways that may give rise to unforeseen associations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) and The divorce rate in Connecticut. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of sports and social phenomena often seem as distant as a fly ball sailing over the outfield fence. However, as unlikely as it may sound, our research has uncovered a peculiar relationship between the performance of the Chicago Cubs, a perennially perplexing baseball team, and the divorce rates in Connecticut, a state known more for its scenic beauty than for its statistical quirkiness. This investigation arose from the recognition of a curiosity that could not be easily dismissed – could there be an underlying connection between the crack of the bat and the cracks in marital harmony? Though it may seem like a curveball, we set out to rigorously analyze and explore this beguiling pattern.
While most might balk at the notion that a baseball team's prowess could influence the personal relationships of individuals in another state, we approached this investigation with the gravity and precision that one might apply to calculating a batting average or a standard deviation. Our study encompasses data spanning from 1999 to 2021, encompassing the highs and lows of both the Cubs' performance and the Connecticut divorce rates. By examining the total runs scored by the Cubs in the National League's Central and East Divisions, and juxtaposing this with the divorce statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden threads binding the realm of sports entertainment and the often tumultuous landscape of human relationships.
It is important to note that our foray into this unexpected correlation is not without humor and a sense of bemusement. After all, the alchemy of conjuring connections between a beloved sports team and the sobering reality of divorce rates in a particular state could easily be mistaken for a tall tale spun by a bard around a campfire. However, the statistical analysis herein presents a rather unexpected conclusion, one that may elicit not only raised eyebrows but also a chuckle or two, for our findings are as amusing as they are compelling.
As we delve into the intricacies of this analysis, we invite the reader to embrace the whimsy and wonder that sometimes surfaces when worlds collide in the arena of empirical observation. This paper aims to celebrate not only the rigor of statistical investigation but also the delight of uncovering unexpected links in the grand tapestry of human experience... and perhaps the occasional home run-induced marital discord.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut has yielded some remarkable findings. Over the period of 1999 to 2021, we found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100. In other words, the relationship between these two variables is about as strong as an outfielder's throwing arm. The r-squared value of 0.6379377 further bolsters the case for a substantial connection, indicating that a significant proportion of the variance in divorce rates can be explained by the total runs scored by the Cubs.
Perhaps most eyebrow-raising of all is the significance level of p < 0.01, which essentially means that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is lower than the chances of a full moon occurring during a day game at Wrigley Field. In other words, the probability of these results being a fluke is about as slim as a bat handle.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the robust association between the total runs scored by the Cubs and the divorce rates in Connecticut. The data points form a nearly linear pattern, reminiscent of a well-executed double play, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings.
These results not only underscore the unexpected nature of our research inquiry but also highlight the intriguing interplay between sports performance and societal dynamics. It appears that the crack of the bat may indeed have reverberations beyond the confines of the baseball diamond, reaching into the realm of interpersonal relationships and marital stability.
In conclusion, our analysis of the connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and divorce rates in Connecticut reveals a compelling and statistically significant relationship. While this correlation may initially seem as implausible as a Cubs World Series victory (prior to 2016, of course), our findings robustly support the existence of this intriguing link. This paper not only adds a touch of whimsy to the often staid world of statistical analysis but also beckons researchers to explore the uncharted territory where sports and social phenomena intersect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our analysis has illuminated a rather unexpected and statistically significant correlation between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs and divorce rates in Connecticut. The robust relationship, with a correlation coefficient as glaring as a well-hit line drive, and a significance level as rare as a perfect game, underscores the intriguing interplay between the realm of sports and the often unpredictable landscape of human relationships.

While the notion of a baseball team's performance influencing divorce rates may initially seem as unlikely as a designated hitter winning a Gold Glove, our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this captivating link. However, given the unforeseen nature of this correlation and the delightful surprise it brings to the world of statistical analysis, it seems we have hit a home run with this inquiry. No further research is needed in this area; the bases are loaded, and it's time to call it a game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Peculiar Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Sports Psychology and Social Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Chicago Cubs' Total Runs Scored and Divorce Rates in Connecticut with an abstract of This research paper delves into the rather unconventional connection between the total runs scored by the Chicago Cubs team in the National League (Central and East Division) and the divorce rate in Connecticut. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our team investigates this seemingly peculiar correlation over the period of 1999 to 2021. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7987100 and a significance level of p < 0.01, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between the wildly unpredictable world of baseball and the seemingly unrelated realm of marital stability. This paper not only underscores the statistical significance of the connection but also pokes fun at the unconventional nature of some of our research inquiries.

ChatGPT:

Chicago Cubs, total runs scored, divorce rates, Connecticut, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, Baseball Reference, CDC National Vital Statistics, 1999-2021

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division)
Source: Baseball Reference
See what else correlates with Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division)

The divorce rate in Connecticut
Source: CDC National Vital Statistics
See what else correlates with The divorce rate in Connecticut

Correlation r = 0.7987100 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6379377 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The divorce rate in Connecticut) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division)) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.9E-6. 0.0000049014572478079970000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.00049% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 204,021 random variables You don't actually need 204 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) (Runs Scored)747764777706724789703716752855707685654613602614689808822761814265705
The divorce rate in Connecticut (Divorce rate)33.33.23.33.23.133.13.23.432.93.12.72.761622.577663.12823.16852.870532.853612.690391.556932.47837




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([747,764,777,706,724,789,703,716,752,855,707,685,654,613,602,614,689,808,822,761,814,265,705,])
array_2 = np.array([3,3.3,3.2,3.3,3.2,3.1,3,3.1,3.2,3.4,3,2.9,3.1,2.7,2.76162,2.57766,3.1282,3.1685,2.87053,2.85361,2.69039,1.55693,2.47837,])
array_1_name = "Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division)"
array_2_name = "The divorce rate in Connecticut"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1173 · Black Variable ID: 206 · Red Variable ID: 19793
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0