about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,405 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in Kindergarten and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Suriname.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more kindergarteners learned about airplanes and the wonders of flight, they expressed a strong desire to visit Suriname, leading to a surge in air travel. This, in turn, necessitated an increase in the production and consumption of jet fuel to keep up with the unexpectedly high demand from this pint-sized demographic.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a bustling classroom in Suriname where 25 kindergarteners are engaged in a lesson with their teacher. Meanwhile, outside the window, depict a small plane being refueled with jet fuel at the nearby airport, preparing for its next flight. Keep the overall composition bright, cheerful, and simple, with a hint of wonder and curiosity on the kids' faces as they look out the window. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Symbolism Cyber folk Cyberpunk Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom in Suriname, there are 25 kindergarteners eagerly gathering around their teacher for a lesson. Just outside the window, a small plane is being fueled up with jet fuel at the nearby airport, getting ready for its next flight.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom in Suriname, there are 25 kindergarteners eagerly gathering around their teacher for a lesson. Just outside the window, a small plane is being fueled up with jet fuel at the nearby airport, getting ready for its next flight. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a bustling classroom in Suriname where 25 kindergarteners are engaged in a lesson with their teacher. Meanwhile, outside the window, depict a small plane being refueled with jet fuel at the nearby airport, preparing for its next flight. Keep the overall composition bright, cheerful, and simple, with a hint of wonder and curiosity on the kids' faces as they look out the window.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of public school students in Kindergarten caused Jet fuel used in Suriname to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between seemingly disparate variables has long been a focus of fascination and conjecture within the realm of scientific inquiry. The study at hand rather amusingly explores the perplexing association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the utilization of jet fuel in the picturesque country of Suriname. It seems that this unexpected correlation has taken flight in the world of statistical analysis.

One might imagine that the innocent laughter and playful antics of Kindergarteners could possibly fuel the aviation industry, but alas, that would be a dubious hypothesis. As a dad joke, we could attempt to weave in a pun about "fueling education," but such jests may be better suited for less academically inclined audiences!

At first glance, the connection between these variables might appear to be a mere statistical quirk, but our research has revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings emphatically suggest a substantial link between the enrollment of little ones in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname over the period from 1990 to 2021.

As we embark on this scientific journey, let us not forget to pack our sense of humor, for delving into such an unconventional correlation demands a lighthearted approach. Just like preparing for any other research endeavor, it is crucial to have a "pun-derful" attitude and an open mind when wading into uncharted and unexpectedly amusing waters of academia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between seemingly disparate variables has long been a focus of fascination and conjecture within the realm of scientific inquiry. The study at hand rather amusingly explores the perplexing association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the utilization of jet fuel in the picturesque country of Suriname. It seems that this unexpected correlation has taken flight in the world of statistical analysis.
One might imagine that the innocent laughter and playful antics of Kindergarteners could possibly fuel the aviation industry, but alas, that would be a dubious hypothesis. As a dad joke, we could attempt to weave in a pun about "fueling education," but such jests may be better suited for less academically inclined audiences!
At first glance, the connection between these variables might appear to be a mere statistical quirk, but our research has revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings emphatically suggest a substantial link between the enrollment of little ones in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname over the period from 1990 to 2021.
As we embark on this scientific journey, let us not forget to pack our sense of humor, for delving into such an unconventional correlation demands a lighthearted approach. Just like preparing for any other research endeavor, it is crucial to have a "pun-derful" attitude and an open mind when wading into uncharted and unexpectedly amusing waters of academia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several scholarly studies have previously investigated the curious connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Smith et al. (2010) explored the relationship between early childhood education and environmental factors. Doe and Jones (2015) conducted an analysis of aviation fuel consumption in various global regions. These serious and somber explorations into the respective fields of education and energy have laid the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname.

In "Greening of Early Childhood Education," the authors find that environmental sustainability has become an increasingly important consideration in the field of early childhood education. They emphasize the importance of instilling eco-friendly practices in young children, but fail to make any jests about potential connections to aviation fuel consumption. Similarly, "Aviation Fuel Usage in Developing Countries" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing jet fuel consumption, but lacks any lighthearted commentary on the possibility of young children exerting an unseen influence on the aviation industry.

Moving beyond the conventional academic literature, we find potential insights in non-fiction books such as "The Energy Bus" and "The Magic School Bus Explores the Sky." While these sources do not directly address the intersection of Kindergarten enrollment and jet fuel consumption, they offer valuable perspectives on energy usage and the wonders of the sky, which, when combined, form a field ripe for unexpected correlations.

Delving into the realm of fiction, "The Little Engine That Could" and "Goodnight Moon" also provide rich fodder for imaginative and whimsical interpretations of the link between Kindergarten students and jet fuel. While not traditionally considered works of scholarly inquiry, these beloved children's stories impart valuable wisdom on determination, resourcefulness, and the potential influence of youthful exuberance on the transportation industry.

On a lighter note, we extend our review to the realm of children's television, where "Paw Patrol" and "Thomas the Tank Engine" offer entertaining yet potentially informative glimpses into the world of transportation and the endearing charm of childhood innocence. While not peer-reviewed in the traditional sense, these educational programs may offer subtle insights into the underlying dynamics of our cryptic correlation.

As we strive to unravel the enigmatic nexus between Kindergarten and jet fuel usage in Suriname, we cannot discount the potential value of unconventional sources in shedding light on this unlikely relationship. While maintaining the rigors of scholarly inquiry, it behooves us to infuse our explorations with a dash of humor and creativity, for the journey into uncharted correlations is often filled with unexpected twists and delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between seemingly disparate variables has long been a focus of fascination and conjecture within the realm of scientific inquiry. The study at hand rather amusingly explores the perplexing association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the utilization of jet fuel in the picturesque country of Suriname. It seems that this unexpected correlation has taken flight in the world of statistical analysis.
One might imagine that the innocent laughter and playful antics of Kindergarteners could possibly fuel the aviation industry, but alas, that would be a dubious hypothesis. As a dad joke, we could attempt to weave in a pun about "fueling education," but such jests may be better suited for less academically inclined audiences!
At first glance, the connection between these variables might appear to be a mere statistical quirk, but our research has revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings emphatically suggest a substantial link between the enrollment of little ones in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname over the period from 1990 to 2021.
As we embark on this scientific journey, let us not forget to pack our sense of humor, for delving into such an unconventional correlation demands a lighthearted approach. Just like preparing for any other research endeavor, it is crucial to have a "pun-derful" attitude and an open mind when wading into uncharted and unexpectedly amusing waters of academia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to examine the peculiar relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname, our research team employed a comprehensive data collection and analysis process. Data on the number of public school students in Kindergarten was gathered from the National Center for Education Statistics, while information on the utilization of jet fuel in Suriname was sourced from the Energy Information Administration. The years 1990 to 2021 were chosen to capture a wide span of time and provide a robust dataset for analysis.

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, we utilized a combination of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, time series analysis, and cross-correlation analysis. We also applied advanced econometric models to account for potential confounding variables and to establish a firm understanding of the relationship between the variables under investigation.

The research team also took into consideration the potential influence of external factors, such as changes in educational policies, economic conditions, and advancements in aviation technology, on the observed correlation. Robustness checks were conducted to validate the consistency of the findings across different sub-periods and to assess the stability of the relationship over time.

In a rather 'plane' manner of speaking, we sought to navigate through the vast expanse of data and statistical techniques to arrive at a clearer understanding of the connection between Kindergarten students and jet fuel consumption in the charming nation of Suriname.

In addition, we utilized robustness checks like a pilot checking the instruments before takeoff, to ensure that the findings were not mere statistical flukes. The thoroughness of our approach is intended to reassure readers that our analysis soared above any potential data quality concerns!

In line with the unconventional nature of this investigation, the methodology employed a mix of traditional statistical methods and imaginative data analysis techniques. This 'out-of-the-box' approach allowed us to soar beyond the constraints of conventional research and to embrace the unexpected and humorous nature of the correlation under scrutiny.

Overall, our methodology combined rigorous statistical analysis with a lighthearted approach, capturing the essence of this playful yet thought-provoking exploration into the whimsical relationship between Kindergarten students and jet fuel consumption in Suriname.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9182391, r-squared of 0.8431630, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between seemingly disparate variables has long been a focus of fascination and conjecture within the realm of scientific inquiry. The study at hand rather amusingly explores the perplexing association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the utilization of jet fuel in the picturesque country of Suriname. It seems that this unexpected correlation has taken flight in the world of statistical analysis.
One might imagine that the innocent laughter and playful antics of Kindergarteners could possibly fuel the aviation industry, but alas, that would be a dubious hypothesis. As a dad joke, we could attempt to weave in a pun about "fueling education," but such jests may be better suited for less academically inclined audiences!
At first glance, the connection between these variables might appear to be a mere statistical quirk, but our research has revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings emphatically suggest a substantial link between the enrollment of little ones in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname over the period from 1990 to 2021.
As we embark on this scientific journey, let us not forget to pack our sense of humor, for delving into such an unconventional correlation demands a lighthearted approach. Just like preparing for any other research endeavor, it is crucial to have a "pun-derful" attitude and an open mind when wading into uncharted and unexpectedly amusing waters of academia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation of 0.9182391 between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the jet fuel used in Suriname from 1990 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8431630 further underscored the robustness of this correlation. As a tablespoon of statistical humor, this correlation is so strong you could say it's as unbreakable as the bonds formed during circle time!

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the substantial correlation between the two variables, with each data point resembling a tiny, jet-fueled rocket ready to take off into the world of academic oddities. One might humorously quip that it seems that the sight of kindergarteners heading to school is enough to fuel the airplanes, or perhaps it's the thought of naptime that propels aircraft to their destinations!

An interesting finding of this research is the potential implications for the aviation industry in Suriname. It appears that as the number of young scholars entering Kindergarten increases, so does the demand for jet fuel in the country. This could lead to a whole new approach to fueling aircraft – harnessing the exuberant energy of Kindergarteners, metaphorically or perhaps even literally speaking. As a research team, we are torn on whether to suggest developing "kiddie-powered flights" as a new sustainable aviation initiative, but we believe that the aviation industry may not be ready for such a high-flying idea just yet.

The strong correlation uncovered in this study calls for a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to this unexpected relationship. The next steps in research may involve exploring the sociocultural and economic dynamics that potentially drive this connection, as we ponder the enigmatic interplay between the innocent curiosity of young learners and the high-flying technology that powers modern air travel. As an amusing aside, one could humorously suggest that perhaps the children's dreams of becoming astronauts and pilots are enough to fuel Suriname's aviation industry!

In conclusion, the results of this study shed light on a quirky yet intriguing relationship between the enrollment of students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname. Although our findings may prompt a chuckle, they nonetheless highlight the need for further investigation into this charmingly perplexing correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several scholarly studies have previously investigated the curious connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Smith et al. (2010) explored the relationship between early childhood education and environmental factors. Doe and Jones (2015) conducted an analysis of aviation fuel consumption in various global regions. These serious and somber explorations into the respective fields of education and energy have laid the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname.
In "Greening of Early Childhood Education," the authors find that environmental sustainability has become an increasingly important consideration in the field of early childhood education. They emphasize the importance of instilling eco-friendly practices in young children, but fail to make any jests about potential connections to aviation fuel consumption. Similarly, "Aviation Fuel Usage in Developing Countries" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing jet fuel consumption, but lacks any lighthearted commentary on the possibility of young children exerting an unseen influence on the aviation industry.
Moving beyond the conventional academic literature, we find potential insights in non-fiction books such as "The Energy Bus" and "The Magic School Bus Explores the Sky." While these sources do not directly address the intersection of Kindergarten enrollment and jet fuel consumption, they offer valuable perspectives on energy usage and the wonders of the sky, which, when combined, form a field ripe for unexpected correlations.
Delving into the realm of fiction, "The Little Engine That Could" and "Goodnight Moon" also provide rich fodder for imaginative and whimsical interpretations of the link between Kindergarten students and jet fuel. While not traditionally considered works of scholarly inquiry, these beloved children's stories impart valuable wisdom on determination, resourcefulness, and the potential influence of youthful exuberance on the transportation industry.
On a lighter note, we extend our review to the realm of children's television, where "Paw Patrol" and "Thomas the Tank Engine" offer entertaining yet potentially informative glimpses into the world of transportation and the endearing charm of childhood innocence. While not peer-reviewed in the traditional sense, these educational programs may offer subtle insights into the underlying dynamics of our cryptic correlation.
As we strive to unravel the enigmatic nexus between Kindergarten and jet fuel usage in Suriname, we cannot discount the potential value of unconventional sources in shedding light on this unlikely relationship. While maintaining the rigors of scholarly inquiry, it behooves us to infuse our explorations with a dash of humor and creativity, for the journey into uncharted correlations is often filled with unexpected twists and delightful surprises.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation of 0.9182391 between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the jet fuel used in Suriname from 1990 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8431630 further underscored the robustness of this correlation. As a tablespoon of statistical humor, this correlation is so strong you could say it's as unbreakable as the bonds formed during circle time!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the substantial correlation between the two variables, with each data point resembling a tiny, jet-fueled rocket ready to take off into the world of academic oddities. One might humorously quip that it seems that the sight of kindergarteners heading to school is enough to fuel the airplanes, or perhaps it's the thought of naptime that propels aircraft to their destinations!
An interesting finding of this research is the potential implications for the aviation industry in Suriname. It appears that as the number of young scholars entering Kindergarten increases, so does the demand for jet fuel in the country. This could lead to a whole new approach to fueling aircraft – harnessing the exuberant energy of Kindergarteners, metaphorically or perhaps even literally speaking. As a research team, we are torn on whether to suggest developing "kiddie-powered flights" as a new sustainable aviation initiative, but we believe that the aviation industry may not be ready for such a high-flying idea just yet.
The strong correlation uncovered in this study calls for a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to this unexpected relationship. The next steps in research may involve exploring the sociocultural and economic dynamics that potentially drive this connection, as we ponder the enigmatic interplay between the innocent curiosity of young learners and the high-flying technology that powers modern air travel. As an amusing aside, one could humorously suggest that perhaps the children's dreams of becoming astronauts and pilots are enough to fuel Suriname's aviation industry!
In conclusion, the results of this study shed light on a quirky yet intriguing relationship between the enrollment of students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname. Although our findings may prompt a chuckle, they nonetheless highlight the need for further investigation into this charmingly perplexing correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence to support the unexpected yet remarkably robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname. Our findings align with prior research, as they corroborate the curious correlation identified by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015). It seems that the enchanting giggles of Kindergarteners can indeed wield an unseen influence on the aviation industry, much like the way a good dad joke has a subtle yet undeniable impact on the atmosphere in a room.

The positive correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 observed in our study resonates with the serious tone of previous scholarly inquiries into aviation fuel consumption and early childhood education. It seems that our results lend credence to the potential interplay between the innocent wonder of childhood and the relentless power of technological progress, much like the way a well-timed pun can penetrate even the most solemn of academic discussions.

Our findings may prompt a lighthearted chuckle, but they call for a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship. It appears that as the number of young scholars embarking on their educational journey increases, so does the demand for jet fuel in Suriname, almost akin to the way the demand for coffee increases during late-night research sessions. This correlation is so strong that one might jest that maybe the sight of Kindergarteners heading to school provides enough motivation for the aviation industry to reach new heights, quite literally.

The implications of our research raise tantalizing prospects for the aviation industry. Perhaps this correlation could even inspire a new, environmentally friendly, and oh so heartwarming concept: kiddie-powered flights. However, we recognize that such an unconventional approach may encounter turbulence before it takes off, much like a paper airplane attempting a transcontinental flight. Nevertheless, the potential energy latent within the playful spirits of Kindergarteners poses an intriguing avenue for future research, resembling the way a well-crafted punchline leaves the audience eagerly awaiting the next installment of wit and wisdom.

In conclusion, the unexpected correlation between Kindergarten enrollment and jet fuel consumption in Suriname offers a delightful departure from traditional research inquiries. Our study provides a lighthearted yet earnest step toward unraveling the enigmatic nexus between the innocence of childhood and the technological manifestations of mankind's ingenuity, much like the way a clever quip injects a welcome dose of levity into a dry academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in Kindergarten and Jet fuel used in Suriname. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!

Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between seemingly disparate variables has long been a focus of fascination and conjecture within the realm of scientific inquiry. The study at hand rather amusingly explores the perplexing association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the utilization of jet fuel in the picturesque country of Suriname. It seems that this unexpected correlation has taken flight in the world of statistical analysis.
One might imagine that the innocent laughter and playful antics of Kindergarteners could possibly fuel the aviation industry, but alas, that would be a dubious hypothesis. As a dad joke, we could attempt to weave in a pun about "fueling education," but such jests may be better suited for less academically inclined audiences!
At first glance, the connection between these variables might appear to be a mere statistical quirk, but our research has revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings emphatically suggest a substantial link between the enrollment of little ones in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname over the period from 1990 to 2021.
As we embark on this scientific journey, let us not forget to pack our sense of humor, for delving into such an unconventional correlation demands a lighthearted approach. Just like preparing for any other research endeavor, it is crucial to have a "pun-derful" attitude and an open mind when wading into uncharted and unexpectedly amusing waters of academia!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation of 0.9182391 between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the jet fuel used in Suriname from 1990 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8431630 further underscored the robustness of this correlation. As a tablespoon of statistical humor, this correlation is so strong you could say it's as unbreakable as the bonds formed during circle time!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the substantial correlation between the two variables, with each data point resembling a tiny, jet-fueled rocket ready to take off into the world of academic oddities. One might humorously quip that it seems that the sight of kindergarteners heading to school is enough to fuel the airplanes, or perhaps it's the thought of naptime that propels aircraft to their destinations!
An interesting finding of this research is the potential implications for the aviation industry in Suriname. It appears that as the number of young scholars entering Kindergarten increases, so does the demand for jet fuel in the country. This could lead to a whole new approach to fueling aircraft – harnessing the exuberant energy of Kindergarteners, metaphorically or perhaps even literally speaking. As a research team, we are torn on whether to suggest developing "kiddie-powered flights" as a new sustainable aviation initiative, but we believe that the aviation industry may not be ready for such a high-flying idea just yet.
The strong correlation uncovered in this study calls for a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to this unexpected relationship. The next steps in research may involve exploring the sociocultural and economic dynamics that potentially drive this connection, as we ponder the enigmatic interplay between the innocent curiosity of young learners and the high-flying technology that powers modern air travel. As an amusing aside, one could humorously suggest that perhaps the children's dreams of becoming astronauts and pilots are enough to fuel Suriname's aviation industry!
In conclusion, the results of this study shed light on a quirky yet intriguing relationship between the enrollment of students in Kindergarten and the consumption of jet fuel in Suriname. Although our findings may prompt a chuckle, they nonetheless highlight the need for further investigation into this charmingly perplexing correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light the surprisingly strong association between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the usage of jet fuel in Suriname, spanning from 1990 to 2021. This delightful correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391, has truly taken off into the world of statistical oddities, much like a child's first day of school - full of excitement and wonder. As a lighthearted nod to our findings, one might humorously remark that it seems like the enthusiasm of Kindergarteners is giving the aviation industry a real "boost"!

The implications of this study may span far and wide, igniting discussions on the potential impact of early childhood education on the energy demands of the aviation sector. The adorable giggles of Kindergarteners may hold a remarkable power, not only in brightening our days but also in fueling planes! Oh, the wonder of statistical whimsy!

As we wrap up this investigation, we must acknowledge that our findings might prompt some raised eyebrows and quizzical looks, akin to the expression on a child's face when learning a new, intriguing concept. The unexpected connection we've uncovered calls for a moment of reflection on the delightful mysteries that abound in the world of research and data analysis.

Ultimately, our study's results humorously underpin the need for further exploration into the delightful interplay between the innocent exuberance of young learners and the high-flying technology that propels modern air travel. As an amusing suggestion, perhaps we should start considering "kindie-power" as an alternative energy source for aviation fuel – after all, the boundless energy of children surely has the potential to propel us to new scientific heights!

In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as this study has illuminated the captivating relationship between Kindergarten enrollment and jet fuel consumption in Suriname. After all, like a skilled stand-up comedian, sometimes the best punchline is knowing when to leave the audience wanting more!

In conclusion, let us part ways with a scientific quip: "May our future endeavors in research be as intriguing and unpredictable as the correlation between kiddies in Kindergarten and kerosene in Suriname!"

[Word Count: 307]


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Quirky Quotidian Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kiddies in Kindergarten and Kerosene in Suriname: A Correlational Study with an abstract of This research paper investigates the seemingly arbitrary yet surprisingly robust relationship between the number of public school students in Kindergarten and the amount of jet fuel used in Suriname. Our research team utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration to analyze this quirky connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9182391 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021, the results highlight the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
With this finding, one might assume that the more kids enter Kindergarten, the more jet fuel the aviation industry in Suriname consumes. As a dad joke, we suggest that perhaps this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that preschoolers and planes both require a lot of energy to stay airborne!
Our study delves into the intriguing question of how the innocent giggles of Kindergarteners might be intricately linked to the roaring engines of jet aircraft in a country renowned for its stunning natural beauty. The implications of this research, while amusing, call for further investigation into the potential interplay between early childhood education and aviation fuel consumption.

ChatGPT:

Kindergarten students, public school, correlation study, jet fuel consumption, Suriname, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration, quirky relationship, correlation coefficient, aviation industry, preschoolers, fuel consumption, childhood education, aircraft fuel consumption, Suriname education data, Suriname fuel consumption, Kindergarten enrollment, jet fuel usage, student population, early education, aviation fuel, education statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of public school students in Kindergarten
Detailed data title: Kindergarten enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in Kindergarten

Jet fuel used in Suriname
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Suriname in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Suriname

Correlation r = 0.9182391 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8431630 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Suriname) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in Kindergarten) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-13. 0.0000000000001336719321360568
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.3E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,481,002,062,439 random variables You don't actually need 7 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Number of public school students in Kindergarten (Students)33063303310930331278033770003444280353623035322603503490344287033972003381580337915034339003503280354355036194203631000360941036397503677970368209037464203830980383353037724103713100369916036842403681160371602033779003554410
Jet fuel used in Suriname (Million Barrels/Day)0.30.50.40.40.40.40.50.50.40.40.4766670.4714550.6365730.6648160.6933330.7278220.7604110.7951730.8298330.8690410.9168380.9472550.9836671.025471.04068110.9776710.949270.9559450.5431510.543151




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3306330,3310930,3312780,3377000,3444280,3536230,3532260,3503490,3442870,3397200,3381580,3379150,3433900,3503280,3543550,3619420,3631000,3609410,3639750,3677970,3682090,3746420,3830980,3833530,3772410,3713100,3699160,3684240,3681160,3716020,3377900,3554410,])
array_2 = np.array([0.3,0.5,0.4,0.4,0.4,0.4,0.5,0.5,0.4,0.4,0.476667,0.471455,0.636573,0.664816,0.693333,0.727822,0.760411,0.795173,0.829833,0.869041,0.916838,0.947255,0.983667,1.02547,1.04068,1,1,0.977671,0.94927,0.955945,0.543151,0.543151,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in Kindergarten"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Suriname"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1405 · Black Variable ID: 1297 · Red Variable ID: 24951
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0