about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,427 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With cleaner air, people were simply not being as 'heart-pressed' to find unconventional remedies, leading to a drop in searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding.'

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover with a scene depicting a hazy sky and smog over Manchester, New Hampshire. Show people on the streets searching for "how to treat internal bleeding" on their phones amid the polluted air. The image should be rich in detail and convey the feeling of concern and urgency in the city due to the poor air quality and people seeking medical information. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cybernetic art Cute 2D animation A Discovery magazine cover image A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Manchester, New Hampshire, the air quality is poor, with a hazy sky and smog hanging over the city. On the streets, people are seen searching on their phones for "how to treat internal bleeding" as they walk through the polluted air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Manchester, New Hampshire, the air quality is poor, with a hazy sky and smog hanging over the city. On the streets, people are seen searching on their phones for "how to treat internal bleeding" as they walk through the polluted air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover with a scene depicting a hazy sky and smog over Manchester, New Hampshire. Show people on the streets searching for "how to treat internal bleeding" on their phones amid the polluted air. The image should be rich in detail and convey the feeling of concern and urgency in the city due to the poor air quality and people seeking medical information.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire caused how to treat internal bleeding (Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

Journal of Peculiar Pathogens and Perplexing Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2011.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

"Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" delves into the unexpected link between air pollution and internet searches for "how to treat internal bleeding." While the connection may seem outlandish at first glance, it tantalizingly beckons us to explore the whims of human behavior amidst environmental peril. As researchers, we couldn't resist the allure of unraveling this peculiar relationship, and so we embarked on a journey to marry the realms of atmospheric contaminants and online inquiries in a delightful dance of data analysis.

The inquiry was not without its initial moments of levity, as we found ourselves marveling at the possibility of air pollution triggering a sudden surge of interest in clandestine hemorrhage remedies. Indeed, the thought of haphazardly typing "how to treat internal bleeding" into a search engine while city smog encroaches upon one's nostrils evokes an image that veers dangerously close to the comical. Yet, it is precisely this blend of the bizarre and the thought-provoking that sparked our curiosity to delve deeper into this enigmatic connection.

We couldn't ignore the irony of Manchester, New Hampshire serving as the backdrop for our investigation. A city known for its industrious spirit, Manchester has weathered the winds of change while grappling with environmental concerns. As we sifted through the data from the Environmental Protection Agency, it was impossible not to appreciate the idiosyncrasies of this city's atmospheric tumult and its potential impact on the public's digital inquiries for medical solutions.

With gusto and a dash of mirth, we set out to decipher the puzzle of Manchester's miasma and its potential meddling with mortality. The journey that ensued was filled with moments of statistical serendipity, provoking both furrowed brows and bemused chuckles as we charted the path towards uncovering the surprising correlation between air pollution and the enchanting allure of searching for internal bleeding remedies. Join us as we embark on this whimsical yet illuminating exploration at the crossroads of environmental health and the human penchant for seeking medical knowledge amidst the digital vastness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" delves into the unexpected link between air pollution and internet searches for "how to treat internal bleeding." While the connection may seem outlandish at first glance, it tantalizingly beckons us to explore the whims of human behavior amidst environmental peril. As researchers, we couldn't resist the allure of unraveling this peculiar relationship, and so we embarked on a journey to marry the realms of atmospheric contaminants and online inquiries in a delightful dance of data analysis.
The inquiry was not without its initial moments of levity, as we found ourselves marveling at the possibility of air pollution triggering a sudden surge of interest in clandestine hemorrhage remedies. Indeed, the thought of haphazardly typing "how to treat internal bleeding" into a search engine while city smog encroaches upon one's nostrils evokes an image that veers dangerously close to the comical. Yet, it is precisely this blend of the bizarre and the thought-provoking that sparked our curiosity to delve deeper into this enigmatic connection.
We couldn't ignore the irony of Manchester, New Hampshire serving as the backdrop for our investigation. A city known for its industrious spirit, Manchester has weathered the winds of change while grappling with environmental concerns. As we sifted through the data from the Environmental Protection Agency, it was impossible not to appreciate the idiosyncrasies of this city's atmospheric tumult and its potential impact on the public's digital inquiries for medical solutions.
With gusto and a dash of mirth, we set out to decipher the puzzle of Manchester's miasma and its potential meddling with mortality. The journey that ensued was filled with moments of statistical serendipity, provoking both furrowed brows and bemused chuckles as we charted the path towards uncovering the surprising correlation between air pollution and the enchanting allure of searching for internal bleeding remedies. Join us as we embark on this whimsical yet illuminating exploration at the crossroads of environmental health and the human penchant for seeking medical knowledge amidst the digital vastness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To set the stage for our investigation into the confluence of air pollution and online quests for the treatment of internal bleeding, it is crucial to examine prior literature that may shed light on this curious correlation. Smith et al. purported stringent air quality standards, reinforcing the perils posed by atmospheric contaminants on public health. Likewise, Doe's work delved into the intricacies of online search behavior, unearthing the capricious nature of internet queries in response to perceived health threats. Furthermore, Jones' study on the physiological effects of air pollution laid the groundwork for understanding the potential medical concerns stemming from prolonged exposure to noxious fumes.

While these scholarly musings beckon us to tread the path of academic sobriety, one cannot overlook the lighthearted insights offered by popular non-fiction works such as "Air Pollution and Respiratory Health" and "The Internet and Medical Curiosity: A Digital Odyssey." These tomes, adorned with the veneer of scholarly gravitas, flirt with the whimsical notion that the hazy veil of airborne pollutants might provoke a waltz of curiosity in the labyrinthine corridors of the virtual realm.

In the realm of fiction, the works of "Smoke and Mirrors: A Tale of Twisted Vapors" and "The Polluted Portal: A Saga of Internet Inquiries" beckon us into the fantastical realm of allegory, tantalizing us with the possibility of a metaphysical tango between the ethereal tendrils of pollution and the enigmatic allure of clandestine medical remedies. Additionally, the mystique of board games like "Pandemic" and "Air Pollutant Conundrum" serves as a whimsical reminder of the playful yet ponderous nature of our research endeavor.

The juxtaposition of these serious and whimsical sources sets the stage for our exploration of Manchester's miasma and its peculiar resonance with the online exploration of internal bleeding treatments. As we navigate the buoyant currents of academic inquiry and absurdist whimsy, we aim to illuminate the unforeseen interplay between environmental duress and the quirks of human inquisitiveness in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2011

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" delves into the unexpected link between air pollution and internet searches for "how to treat internal bleeding." While the connection may seem outlandish at first glance, it tantalizingly beckons us to explore the whims of human behavior amidst environmental peril. As researchers, we couldn't resist the allure of unraveling this peculiar relationship, and so we embarked on a journey to marry the realms of atmospheric contaminants and online inquiries in a delightful dance of data analysis.
The inquiry was not without its initial moments of levity, as we found ourselves marveling at the possibility of air pollution triggering a sudden surge of interest in clandestine hemorrhage remedies. Indeed, the thought of haphazardly typing "how to treat internal bleeding" into a search engine while city smog encroaches upon one's nostrils evokes an image that veers dangerously close to the comical. Yet, it is precisely this blend of the bizarre and the thought-provoking that sparked our curiosity to delve deeper into this enigmatic connection.
We couldn't ignore the irony of Manchester, New Hampshire serving as the backdrop for our investigation. A city known for its industrious spirit, Manchester has weathered the winds of change while grappling with environmental concerns. As we sifted through the data from the Environmental Protection Agency, it was impossible not to appreciate the idiosyncrasies of this city's atmospheric tumult and its potential impact on the public's digital inquiries for medical solutions.
With gusto and a dash of mirth, we set out to decipher the puzzle of Manchester's miasma and its potential meddling with mortality. The journey that ensued was filled with moments of statistical serendipity, provoking both furrowed brows and bemused chuckles as we charted the path towards uncovering the surprising correlation between air pollution and the enchanting allure of searching for internal bleeding remedies. Join us as we embark on this whimsical yet illuminating exploration at the crossroads of environmental health and the human penchant for seeking medical knowledge amidst the digital vastness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Processing:
The collected data on air pollution levels in Manchester, New Hampshire was as rich and varied as the city's culinary offerings. We sourced atmospheric contaminants data from the Environmental Protection Agency, carefully sifting through the digital smog to capture the essence of Manchester's miasma. Our infatuation with data, much like the lingering scent of industrial effluents in the city's air, led us to the Google Trends platform to plumb the depths of online inquiries regarding the treatment of internal bleeding. We cast our virtual nets wide, snaring search data from 2004 to 2011, an era teeming with curiosity and inquiry as vibrant as the city's ever-evolving skyline.

Statistical Analysis:
With an arsenal of statistical tools at our disposal, we embarked on a multifaceted analysis to unravel the enigmatic dance between air pollutants and digital quests for hidden hemorrhage remedies. Our initial foray into the labyrinth of statistical methods resembled a daring expedition through uncharted territory, teeming with the excitement of discovery and the occasional statistical mishap. We crunched numbers with the fervor of culinary connoisseurs seasoning a complex dish, crafting mathematical models that mirrored the ebb and flow of Manchester's atmospheric composition.

Correlation Calculation:
The heart of our statistical escapade lay in the pursuit of correlation, that elusive flirtation between two seemingly disparate entities: air pollution and internet searches for internal bleeding treatments. With bated breath and a twinkle of statistical optimism, we calculated the correlation coefficient, watching as the numbers pirouetted across our screens in a delightful display of numerical choreography. Lastly, we beckoned the p-value, that capricious gatekeeper of statistical significance, to join the fray. Together, these statistical stalwarts enabled us to elucidate the connection between Manchester's atmospheric tableau and the public's inquisitive cyber-odyssey for internal bleeding remedies.

Limitations and Caveats:
As with any scholarly expedition, we encountered a few gusts of statistical headwinds along the way. The limitations of our methodology and the potential confounding variables danced like mischievous imps around our findings. While we endeavored to account for various factors, there remains a smidgen of uncertainty akin to a riddle awaiting its final unraveling. Nonetheless, armed with a sense of scholarly gusto and a penchant for statistical whimsy, we navigated these challenges with the agility of intellectual acrobats.

Ethical Considerations:
Ethical winds guided our research compass, steering our endeavors towards a steadfast commitment to scholarly integrity and the responsible utilization of data. With the same fervor that fuels societal altruism, we handled data with the reverence and caution befitting a delicate scientific endeavor, ensuring that each datum was safeguarded against the perils of exploitation and misrepresentation.

In conclusion, our methodology transcended the mere juggling of numbers, encapsulating a spirited quest for statistical enlightenment and academic merriment. Join us, dear reader, as we unravel the whims of statistical fate and embark on a lighthearted odyssey through the tumultuous airs of Manchester and the captivating allure of internet inquiries in the face of potential health hazards.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2011, you found a correlation 0.9774893, r-squared of 0.9554853, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
"Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" delves into the unexpected link between air pollution and internet searches for "how to treat internal bleeding." While the connection may seem outlandish at first glance, it tantalizingly beckons us to explore the whims of human behavior amidst environmental peril. As researchers, we couldn't resist the allure of unraveling this peculiar relationship, and so we embarked on a journey to marry the realms of atmospheric contaminants and online inquiries in a delightful dance of data analysis.
The inquiry was not without its initial moments of levity, as we found ourselves marveling at the possibility of air pollution triggering a sudden surge of interest in clandestine hemorrhage remedies. Indeed, the thought of haphazardly typing "how to treat internal bleeding" into a search engine while city smog encroaches upon one's nostrils evokes an image that veers dangerously close to the comical. Yet, it is precisely this blend of the bizarre and the thought-provoking that sparked our curiosity to delve deeper into this enigmatic connection.
We couldn't ignore the irony of Manchester, New Hampshire serving as the backdrop for our investigation. A city known for its industrious spirit, Manchester has weathered the winds of change while grappling with environmental concerns. As we sifted through the data from the Environmental Protection Agency, it was impossible not to appreciate the idiosyncrasies of this city's atmospheric tumult and its potential impact on the public's digital inquiries for medical solutions.
With gusto and a dash of mirth, we set out to decipher the puzzle of Manchester's miasma and its potential meddling with mortality. The journey that ensued was filled with moments of statistical serendipity, provoking both furrowed brows and bemused chuckles as we charted the path towards uncovering the surprising correlation between air pollution and the enchanting allure of searching for internal bleeding remedies. Join us as we embark on this whimsical yet illuminating exploration at the crossroads of environmental health and the human penchant for seeking medical knowledge amidst the digital vastness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the connection between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding" yielded some rather intriguing findings. The statistically sassy correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 and a r-squared of 0.9554853 illuminated a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena for the years 2004 to 2011. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our confidence in this connection was as strong as the odor of a back-alley fish market on a sweltering summer day.

To visually capture the essence of this revelatory relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable bond between air pollution levels and the public's inquisitive nature regarding clandestine hemorrhage remedies. It's a real showstopper, depicting this unexpected dance between environmental maladies and medical queries with a flair that even the most seasoned Hollywood choreographer would envy!

These findings offer a captivating glimpse into the intricate dance of digital intrigue amidst atmospheric turmoil. Imagine the denizens of Manchester, their nostrils filled with city smog, furiously typing away at their keyboards in search of obscure medical remedies. It's a spectacle that's both amusing and thought-provoking, much like a circus tightrope walker juggling cabbages – unexpected, risky, and undeniably entertaining.

Our results bring to light the whimsical yet compelling interplay between environmental health and the human propensity for seeking medical know-how in the digital realm. They beckon us to ponder the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards and remind us that even in the most unlikely places, there are curious connections waiting to be uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To set the stage for our investigation into the confluence of air pollution and online quests for the treatment of internal bleeding, it is crucial to examine prior literature that may shed light on this curious correlation. Smith et al. purported stringent air quality standards, reinforcing the perils posed by atmospheric contaminants on public health. Likewise, Doe's work delved into the intricacies of online search behavior, unearthing the capricious nature of internet queries in response to perceived health threats. Furthermore, Jones' study on the physiological effects of air pollution laid the groundwork for understanding the potential medical concerns stemming from prolonged exposure to noxious fumes.
While these scholarly musings beckon us to tread the path of academic sobriety, one cannot overlook the lighthearted insights offered by popular non-fiction works such as "Air Pollution and Respiratory Health" and "The Internet and Medical Curiosity: A Digital Odyssey." These tomes, adorned with the veneer of scholarly gravitas, flirt with the whimsical notion that the hazy veil of airborne pollutants might provoke a waltz of curiosity in the labyrinthine corridors of the virtual realm.
In the realm of fiction, the works of "Smoke and Mirrors: A Tale of Twisted Vapors" and "The Polluted Portal: A Saga of Internet Inquiries" beckon us into the fantastical realm of allegory, tantalizing us with the possibility of a metaphysical tango between the ethereal tendrils of pollution and the enigmatic allure of clandestine medical remedies. Additionally, the mystique of board games like "Pandemic" and "Air Pollutant Conundrum" serves as a whimsical reminder of the playful yet ponderous nature of our research endeavor.
The juxtaposition of these serious and whimsical sources sets the stage for our exploration of Manchester's miasma and its peculiar resonance with the online exploration of internal bleeding treatments. As we navigate the buoyant currents of academic inquiry and absurdist whimsy, we aim to illuminate the unforeseen interplay between environmental duress and the quirks of human inquisitiveness in the digital age.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding" yielded some rather intriguing findings. The statistically sassy correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 and a r-squared of 0.9554853 illuminated a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena for the years 2004 to 2011. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our confidence in this connection was as strong as the odor of a back-alley fish market on a sweltering summer day.
To visually capture the essence of this revelatory relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable bond between air pollution levels and the public's inquisitive nature regarding clandestine hemorrhage remedies. It's a real showstopper, depicting this unexpected dance between environmental maladies and medical queries with a flair that even the most seasoned Hollywood choreographer would envy!
These findings offer a captivating glimpse into the intricate dance of digital intrigue amidst atmospheric turmoil. Imagine the denizens of Manchester, their nostrils filled with city smog, furiously typing away at their keyboards in search of obscure medical remedies. It's a spectacle that's both amusing and thought-provoking, much like a circus tightrope walker juggling cabbages – unexpected, risky, and undeniably entertaining.
Our results bring to light the whimsical yet compelling interplay between environmental health and the human propensity for seeking medical know-how in the digital realm. They beckon us to ponder the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards and remind us that even in the most unlikely places, there are curious connections waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation has laid bare the captivating correlation between Manchester's miasma and the enigmatic allure of clandestine medical remedies for internal bleeding. The statistically sassy correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 has highlighted the surprising resonance between atmospheric contaminants and the public's quest for unconventional solutions to internal hemorrhages. It seems that as the air in Manchester becomes heavier with pollutants, so does the weight of curiosity about unconventional medical treatments.

Our findings not only align with previous research on air quality standards and the physiological effects of air pollution but also resonate with the lighthearted insights from popular non-fiction works and the allegorical musings of fictional tales. The juxtaposition of these serious and whimsical sources not only sets the stage for our exploration of Manchester's miasma but also serves as a whimsical reminder of the playful yet ponderous nature of our research endeavor. It's as if the statistical analysis itself donned a jester's cap and invited us to dance with this unexpected relationship between pollution and medical queries.

The results of our study have, figuratively speaking, unveiled a real "smog-and-dance routine" in the digital realm. The strong correlation between air pollution levels and public interest in internal bleeding treatments playfully waltzes through the hazy corridors of internet inquiries, akin to a cryptic, non-Newtonian tango. It's not often that statistical analysis offers such captivating glimpses into the whimsical yet compelling interplay between environmental health and human curiosity. Imagine the elevated intrigue of those furiously typing away at their keyboards in search of obscure medical remedies amidst the city smog, creating an unexpected spectacle that's both amusing and thought-provoking, much like a circus tightrope walker juggling cabbages.

Our results not only illuminate the unforeseen interplay between environmental duress and the quirks of human inquisitiveness in the digital age but also beckon us to ponder the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards. They remind us that even in the most unlikely places, there are curious connections waiting to be uncovered, much like a clown car hiding in plain sight at a bustling intersection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" delves into the unexpected link between air pollution and internet searches for "how to treat internal bleeding." While the connection may seem outlandish at first glance, it tantalizingly beckons us to explore the whims of human behavior amidst environmental peril. As researchers, we couldn't resist the allure of unraveling this peculiar relationship, and so we embarked on a journey to marry the realms of atmospheric contaminants and online inquiries in a delightful dance of data analysis.
The inquiry was not without its initial moments of levity, as we found ourselves marveling at the possibility of air pollution triggering a sudden surge of interest in clandestine hemorrhage remedies. Indeed, the thought of haphazardly typing "how to treat internal bleeding" into a search engine while city smog encroaches upon one's nostrils evokes an image that veers dangerously close to the comical. Yet, it is precisely this blend of the bizarre and the thought-provoking that sparked our curiosity to delve deeper into this enigmatic connection.
We couldn't ignore the irony of Manchester, New Hampshire serving as the backdrop for our investigation. A city known for its industrious spirit, Manchester has weathered the winds of change while grappling with environmental concerns. As we sifted through the data from the Environmental Protection Agency, it was impossible not to appreciate the idiosyncrasies of this city's atmospheric tumult and its potential impact on the public's digital inquiries for medical solutions.
With gusto and a dash of mirth, we set out to decipher the puzzle of Manchester's miasma and its potential meddling with mortality. The journey that ensued was filled with moments of statistical serendipity, provoking both furrowed brows and bemused chuckles as we charted the path towards uncovering the surprising correlation between air pollution and the enchanting allure of searching for internal bleeding remedies. Join us as we embark on this whimsical yet illuminating exploration at the crossroads of environmental health and the human penchant for seeking medical knowledge amidst the digital vastness.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding" yielded some rather intriguing findings. The statistically sassy correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 and a r-squared of 0.9554853 illuminated a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena for the years 2004 to 2011. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our confidence in this connection was as strong as the odor of a back-alley fish market on a sweltering summer day.
To visually capture the essence of this revelatory relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable bond between air pollution levels and the public's inquisitive nature regarding clandestine hemorrhage remedies. It's a real showstopper, depicting this unexpected dance between environmental maladies and medical queries with a flair that even the most seasoned Hollywood choreographer would envy!
These findings offer a captivating glimpse into the intricate dance of digital intrigue amidst atmospheric turmoil. Imagine the denizens of Manchester, their nostrils filled with city smog, furiously typing away at their keyboards in search of obscure medical remedies. It's a spectacle that's both amusing and thought-provoking, much like a circus tightrope walker juggling cabbages – unexpected, risky, and undeniably entertaining.
Our results bring to light the whimsical yet compelling interplay between environmental health and the human propensity for seeking medical know-how in the digital realm. They beckon us to ponder the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards and remind us that even in the most unlikely places, there are curious connections waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of our investigation into the whimsical world of "Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality" have left us both astounded and amused. The tantalizing tango between air pollution and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding" has brought forth a treasure trove of statistical serendipity and unexpected merriment.

As we reflect on our findings, it's hard not to conjure an image of citizens in Manchester fervently typing away on their dusty keyboards, seeking elusive remedies amidst the city's atmospheric tumult. It's almost as if the city's pollution levels are whispering a cheeky prompt to the denizens, "Hey, feeling under the weather? Google it!" The correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 and the p-value less than 0.01 serve as a resounding chorus to this curious dance of environmental maladies and medical queries, leaving us in awe of the human spirit's blend of pragmatism and eccentricity.

Our journey through the enigmatic labyrinth of data analysis has not only tickled our statistical fancies but also sparked philosophical ponderings on the quirks of humanity in the digital age. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 stands as a testament to this delightfully unexpected connection, inviting us to acknowledge the whimsy that lurks within the realms of scientific inquiry.

Therefore, it is with a merry twinkle in our eyes that we assert the unwavering confidence in our results and posit that no further research is needed in this area. For has not our study revealed the capricious nature of human curiosity and the unassuming dance of environmental influence on our digital quests for medical wisdom? Let us bid adieu to this captivating chapter of statistical folly, cherishing the quirks it has unearthed and embracing the mirthful mysteries of the multifaceted human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Peculiar Pathogens and Perplexing Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Mischievous Maladies Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Moniker of Maladies: Manchester's Miasma and Meddling with Mortality with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for "how to treat internal bleeding". Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis to uncover the potential connection between atmospheric contaminants and medical curiosity. Surprisingly, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9774893 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2011. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels rise, so does public interest in treating hidden hemorrhages. This study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of environmental health and internet inquiries, shedding light on the quirks of human behavior in the face of potential health hazards.

ChatGPT:

Manchester air pollution, New Hampshire air quality, Google search trends, Environmental Protection Agency data, internal bleeding treatment, atmospheric contaminants, medical curiosity, public interest in medical conditions, air pollution health effects, internet search behavior, environmental health impact, human behavior quirks

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Manchester-Nashua, NH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire

Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'

Correlation r = 0.9774893 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9554853 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire) over the 8 years from 2004 through 2011.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-5. 0.0000280379623522032050000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.0028% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 35,666 random variables You don't actually need 35 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011
Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire (Bad air quality days)0.8196721.095890.2739730.5479450.273224000.273973
Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding' (Rel. search volume)14.583316.41673.256.416673.833330.4166671.333334.41667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.819672,1.09589,0.273973,0.547945,0.273224,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([14.5833,16.4167,3.25,6.41667,3.83333,0.416667,1.33333,4.41667,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Manchester, New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 1427 · Black Variable ID: 20864 · Red Variable ID: 1413
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0