about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,750 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in Mauritius and the second variable is Google searches for 'smol'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the wind turbines spun, they emitted tiny, inaudible whispers of encouragement, somehow making everyone feel inexplicably small yet oh so cute. It's a gust-have effect on the entire nation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure, here's an improved image generation prompt using your selected style and scene: "A stunning TIME magazine cover featuring the scene in Mauritius, with a breathtaking landscape of a brightly colored wind turbine farm set against the backdrop of a clear blue sky. The powerful turbine blades are strikingly spinning in the wind, while a group of people are gathered around a laptop nearby, eagerly searching for the latest "smol" trends on Google. The image captures the harmony of technology and nature, showcasing the excitement of embracing new trends amidst the serene beauty of the environment." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting A TIME magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Charcoal Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Mauritius, a brightly colored wind turbine farm stands against the clear blue sky, with the powerful blades spinning in the wind. Nearby, a group of people are gathered around a laptop, eagerly searching for the latest "smol" trends on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Mauritius, a brightly colored wind turbine farm stands against the clear blue sky, with the powerful blades spinning in the wind. Nearby, a group of people are gathered around a laptop, eagerly searching for the latest "smol" trends on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure, here's an improved image generation prompt using your selected style and scene: "A stunning TIME magazine cover featuring the scene in Mauritius, with a breathtaking landscape of a brightly colored wind turbine farm set against the backdrop of a clear blue sky. The powerful turbine blades are strikingly spinning in the wind, while a group of people are gathered around a laptop nearby, eagerly searching for the latest "smol" trends on Google. The image captures the harmony of technology and nature, showcasing the excitement of embracing new trends amidst the serene beauty of the environment."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Mauritius caused smol (Google searches for 'smol') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

The Journal of Quirky Renewable Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Wind power has long been recognized as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the power of the atmosphere's never-ending supply of dad jokes. Meanwhile, the term 'smol' has crept into modern lingo, referring to anything small, cute, or endearing – much like a pint-sized physicist. In this paper, we embark on an unexpected journey to explore the mysterious correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.'

It’s not every day that wind power and internet searches collide like this – it’s enough to make even the staunchest statistician perk up and take notice! The whimsical fusion of these two seemingly unrelated subjects invites a chuckle and a head scratch – much like the notorious chicken-and-egg debate, or the never-ending mystery of socks that vanish in the laundry.

As we tiptoe through the tulips of empirical data, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected associations, like finding a ten-dollar bill in a jacket you haven’t worn in years. With the wind at our backs and 'smol' on the brain, we delved into the statistical realm to illuminate the peculiar relationship between wind power output and 'smol' searches, hoping to shed light on this unassuming yet captivating linkage.

The convergence of wind power and 'smol' searches might seem as improbable as a penguin doing the cha-cha, but the results of our inquiry have left us both intrigued and mildly bemused. So grab your cup of tea, cozy up to the statistical fireplace, and let’s explore the enchanting dance between renewable energy and internet whimsy – for as we know, there's nothing quite like a pun game to keep things light and breezy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Wind power has long been recognized as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the power of the atmosphere's never-ending supply of dad jokes. Meanwhile, the term 'smol' has crept into modern lingo, referring to anything small, cute, or endearing – much like a pint-sized physicist. In this paper, we embark on an unexpected journey to explore the mysterious correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.'
It’s not every day that wind power and internet searches collide like this – it’s enough to make even the staunchest statistician perk up and take notice! The whimsical fusion of these two seemingly unrelated subjects invites a chuckle and a head scratch – much like the notorious chicken-and-egg debate, or the never-ending mystery of socks that vanish in the laundry.
As we tiptoe through the tulips of empirical data, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected associations, like finding a ten-dollar bill in a jacket you haven’t worn in years. With the wind at our backs and 'smol' on the brain, we delved into the statistical realm to illuminate the peculiar relationship between wind power output and 'smol' searches, hoping to shed light on this unassuming yet captivating linkage.
The convergence of wind power and 'smol' searches might seem as improbable as a penguin doing the cha-cha, but the results of our inquiry have left us both intrigued and mildly bemused. So grab your cup of tea, cozy up to the statistical fireplace, and let’s explore the enchanting dance between renewable energy and internet whimsy – for as we know, there's nothing quite like a pun game to keep things light and breezy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the unexpected correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol' beckons us to review the existing literature in renewable energy and internet behavior. Smith et al. (2018) explored the optimization of wind power in small island nations, highlighting the crucial role of wind energy in reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Meanwhile, Doe (2020) delved into the enigmatic world of internet search trends, shedding light on the curious patterns of online queries and their societal implications. Jones (2017) provided insight into the linguistic evolution of internet slang, including the emergence of 'smol' as a term of endearment and its cultural significance.

In "Renewable Energy for Dummies," the authors lay out the fundamentals of wind power and its potential for sustainable electricity generation, but they unfortunately overlook the peculiar ties to 'smol' internet searches. Conversely, "The Joy of Internet Linguistics" delves into the whimsical world of online communication, yet fails to anticipate the curious coalescence of 'smol' queries and wind power output.

Turning to fiction, "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell presents a classic tale of romance and intrigue, evoking the tempestuous nature of turbulent relationships – much like the unexpected bond between wind power and 'smol' searches. "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami embarks on a surreal journey through a labyrinth of enigmatic events, akin to our exploration of the unexpected linkage between renewable energy and internet curiosity.

During our forays into television research, shows such as "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" and "The Windsors" provided brief moments of levity, yet failed to offer substantive insights into the curious correlation between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches. However, "Windy City Rehab" offered a gust of inspiration, reminding us to embrace the unexpected and revitalize our perspectives.

As the wind of empirical evidence propels us forward and 'smol' searches beckon in the digital ether, we find ourselves standing at the crossroads of renewable energy and online whimsy, ready to uncover the delightful and unexpected connections that await.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Wind power has long been recognized as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the power of the atmosphere's never-ending supply of dad jokes. Meanwhile, the term 'smol' has crept into modern lingo, referring to anything small, cute, or endearing – much like a pint-sized physicist. In this paper, we embark on an unexpected journey to explore the mysterious correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.'
It’s not every day that wind power and internet searches collide like this – it’s enough to make even the staunchest statistician perk up and take notice! The whimsical fusion of these two seemingly unrelated subjects invites a chuckle and a head scratch – much like the notorious chicken-and-egg debate, or the never-ending mystery of socks that vanish in the laundry.
As we tiptoe through the tulips of empirical data, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected associations, like finding a ten-dollar bill in a jacket you haven’t worn in years. With the wind at our backs and 'smol' on the brain, we delved into the statistical realm to illuminate the peculiar relationship between wind power output and 'smol' searches, hoping to shed light on this unassuming yet captivating linkage.
The convergence of wind power and 'smol' searches might seem as improbable as a penguin doing the cha-cha, but the results of our inquiry have left us both intrigued and mildly bemused. So grab your cup of tea, cozy up to the statistical fireplace, and let’s explore the enchanting dance between renewable energy and internet whimsy – for as we know, there's nothing quite like a pun game to keep things light and breezy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our whimsical investigation, we obtained wind power generation data from the Energy Information Administration, specifically focusing on the lovely island of Mauritius. The data spanned from 2004 to 2021, giving us a panoramic view of the swirling winds and whimsical breezes that power the turbines like invisible maestros conducting an outdoor concert. We calculated the total wind power production in kilowatt-hours and embarked on our adventure to explore the relation between this renewable energy source and the enigmatic term 'smol.'

Next, we set our sights on the realm of internet search trends, turning to our trusty companion, Google Trends. The search term 'smol' captured our imagination with its endearing charm, and we gleefully gathered search volume data from 2004 to 2021. Like intrepid explorers trekking through the digital jungle, we navigated the peaks and valleys of search interest, always on the lookout for elusive digital treasures that would shed light on our peculiar hypothesis.

For our data analysis, we employed a robust statistical approach that could stand the gusty scrutiny of any wind turbine. We calculated the correlation coefficient between wind power production and 'smol' searches, delighting in the whimsy of this unexpected pairing. Our statistical model incorporated a time-series analysis to capture the evolving patterns of wind power generation and 'smol' searches over the years, akin to watching the ebb and flow of a waltzing windstorm performing an intricate ballet with the digital musings of internet users.

In fitting fashion, our methodology conveys an earnestness worthy of the topic itself, but we cannot resist the temptation to add a dash of levity to our scholarly pursuit. After all, statistical analyses and puns share a common trait – both are a play on numbers, with one aiming to tickle the funny bone and the other striving to illuminate patterns in data. Like two peas in a pod, they make for an unexpectedly harmonious pair, unfolding a tale as whimsical as a knock-knock joke in a library.

With our data meticulously gathered and our statistical sails billowing with anticipation, we embarked on our fanciful endeavor to unravel the winding connection between wind power and 'smol' searches, exploring an unexpected correlation that tickles the imagination and promises to breathe fresh air into the dry halls of analytic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9672111, r-squared of 0.9354973, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Wind power has long been recognized as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the power of the atmosphere's never-ending supply of dad jokes. Meanwhile, the term 'smol' has crept into modern lingo, referring to anything small, cute, or endearing – much like a pint-sized physicist. In this paper, we embark on an unexpected journey to explore the mysterious correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.'
It’s not every day that wind power and internet searches collide like this – it’s enough to make even the staunchest statistician perk up and take notice! The whimsical fusion of these two seemingly unrelated subjects invites a chuckle and a head scratch – much like the notorious chicken-and-egg debate, or the never-ending mystery of socks that vanish in the laundry.
As we tiptoe through the tulips of empirical data, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected associations, like finding a ten-dollar bill in a jacket you haven’t worn in years. With the wind at our backs and 'smol' on the brain, we delved into the statistical realm to illuminate the peculiar relationship between wind power output and 'smol' searches, hoping to shed light on this unassuming yet captivating linkage.
The convergence of wind power and 'smol' searches might seem as improbable as a penguin doing the cha-cha, but the results of our inquiry have left us both intrigued and mildly bemused. So grab your cup of tea, cozy up to the statistical fireplace, and let’s explore the enchanting dance between renewable energy and internet whimsy – for as we know, there's nothing quite like a pun game to keep things light and breezy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. This high correlation coefficient can be interpreted as a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as wind power generation in Mauritius increased, so did the frequency of searches for 'smol' on Google. It seems that the wind is not the only thing blowing through Mauritius – the search for 'smol' is also gaining momentum!

In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call 'smol' would, by any other name, still be adorable." It seems that the allure of 'smol' is not lost on the residents of Mauritius, and they have quite literally put wind in its sails.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354973 further emphasizes the strength of the association between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, indicating that a whopping 93.55% of the variation in 'smol' searches can be explained by changes in wind power generation. This finding certainly blows away any doubts about the significance of this relationship – it's as clear as the wind whistling through the trees.

Now, it may seem as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistical significance, but the robustness of our results leaves little room for skepticism. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between wind power generation and 'smol' searches. In other words, there's a greater chance of stumbling upon a rare albino squirrel than there is of this correlation occurring by pure coincidence.

The Figure 1 scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, providing a snapshot of the data's wind-swept journey through the whimsical landscape of statistical associations. It's as clear as day – there's a definite gust of 'smol' following in the wake of wind power in Mauritius.

In summary, our findings indicate an intriguing and statistically significant relationship between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.' This unexpected association adds a breath of fresh air to the field of renewable energy research and tickles the funny bone with its whimsical twist. As we wrap up this discussion, let's remember to appreciate the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can uncover, much like finding the punchline to a well-hidden dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the unexpected correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol' beckons us to review the existing literature in renewable energy and internet behavior. Smith et al. (2018) explored the optimization of wind power in small island nations, highlighting the crucial role of wind energy in reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Meanwhile, Doe (2020) delved into the enigmatic world of internet search trends, shedding light on the curious patterns of online queries and their societal implications. Jones (2017) provided insight into the linguistic evolution of internet slang, including the emergence of 'smol' as a term of endearment and its cultural significance.
In "Renewable Energy for Dummies," the authors lay out the fundamentals of wind power and its potential for sustainable electricity generation, but they unfortunately overlook the peculiar ties to 'smol' internet searches. Conversely, "The Joy of Internet Linguistics" delves into the whimsical world of online communication, yet fails to anticipate the curious coalescence of 'smol' queries and wind power output.
Turning to fiction, "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell presents a classic tale of romance and intrigue, evoking the tempestuous nature of turbulent relationships – much like the unexpected bond between wind power and 'smol' searches. "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami embarks on a surreal journey through a labyrinth of enigmatic events, akin to our exploration of the unexpected linkage between renewable energy and internet curiosity.
During our forays into television research, shows such as "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" and "The Windsors" provided brief moments of levity, yet failed to offer substantive insights into the curious correlation between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches. However, "Windy City Rehab" offered a gust of inspiration, reminding us to embrace the unexpected and revitalize our perspectives.
As the wind of empirical evidence propels us forward and 'smol' searches beckon in the digital ether, we find ourselves standing at the crossroads of renewable energy and online whimsy, ready to uncover the delightful and unexpected connections that await.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. This high correlation coefficient can be interpreted as a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as wind power generation in Mauritius increased, so did the frequency of searches for 'smol' on Google. It seems that the wind is not the only thing blowing through Mauritius – the search for 'smol' is also gaining momentum!
In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call 'smol' would, by any other name, still be adorable." It seems that the allure of 'smol' is not lost on the residents of Mauritius, and they have quite literally put wind in its sails.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354973 further emphasizes the strength of the association between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, indicating that a whopping 93.55% of the variation in 'smol' searches can be explained by changes in wind power generation. This finding certainly blows away any doubts about the significance of this relationship – it's as clear as the wind whistling through the trees.
Now, it may seem as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistical significance, but the robustness of our results leaves little room for skepticism. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between wind power generation and 'smol' searches. In other words, there's a greater chance of stumbling upon a rare albino squirrel than there is of this correlation occurring by pure coincidence.
The Figure 1 scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, providing a snapshot of the data's wind-swept journey through the whimsical landscape of statistical associations. It's as clear as day – there's a definite gust of 'smol' following in the wake of wind power in Mauritius.
In summary, our findings indicate an intriguing and statistically significant relationship between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.' This unexpected association adds a breath of fresh air to the field of renewable energy research and tickles the funny bone with its whimsical twist. As we wrap up this discussion, let's remember to appreciate the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can uncover, much like finding the punchline to a well-hidden dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a compelling and unexpected relationship between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' The results of our analysis have lent credence to the earlier research by Smith et al. (2018) on the optimization of wind power in small island nations. It appears that as wind power production increases in Mauritius, there is a notable surge in the frequency of 'smol' searches on Google. This finding adds a whimsical dimension to the field of renewable energy research, hinting at the potential influence of internet trends on energy consumption patterns.

It's almost as if the winds of change are blowing through both the energy landscape and the digital realm, and the residents of Mauritius are seeking out 'smol' joys in sync with the wind's rhythm. This unexpected bond between renewable energy and internet slang transcends the mere statistical significance and nudges us to ponder the quirky intricacies of human behavior.

Our results also align with the work of Jones (2017) on the linguistic evolution of internet slang. The emergence of the term 'smol' as an endearing descriptor seems to resonate with the residents of Mauritius, echoing through their online searches as wind turbines swirl gracefully in the island's breeze. It's as if the wind is whispering its approval to the endearing charm of 'smol' in the digital expanse.

As we mull over the implications of this peculiar correlation, it becomes evident that our findings have shone a light on the intersection of renewable energy and internet culture. The robust correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination affirm the strength and explanatory power of the link between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, leaving little room for skepticism. It's as convincing as winning an argument with an economist – the evidence speaks for itself with undeniable force.

In the grand tapestry of statistical inquiries, our study has unraveled a thread of amusement and wonder, much like stumbling upon a well-crafted dad joke. The wind power-'smol' connection stands as a testament to the delightful surprises that research can unearth, reminding us to embrace the unexpected with open arms, much like encountering a particularly unexpected yet fitting dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.

The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Wind power has long been recognized as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the power of the atmosphere's never-ending supply of dad jokes. Meanwhile, the term 'smol' has crept into modern lingo, referring to anything small, cute, or endearing – much like a pint-sized physicist. In this paper, we embark on an unexpected journey to explore the mysterious correlation between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.'
It’s not every day that wind power and internet searches collide like this – it’s enough to make even the staunchest statistician perk up and take notice! The whimsical fusion of these two seemingly unrelated subjects invites a chuckle and a head scratch – much like the notorious chicken-and-egg debate, or the never-ending mystery of socks that vanish in the laundry.
As we tiptoe through the tulips of empirical data, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected associations, like finding a ten-dollar bill in a jacket you haven’t worn in years. With the wind at our backs and 'smol' on the brain, we delved into the statistical realm to illuminate the peculiar relationship between wind power output and 'smol' searches, hoping to shed light on this unassuming yet captivating linkage.
The convergence of wind power and 'smol' searches might seem as improbable as a penguin doing the cha-cha, but the results of our inquiry have left us both intrigued and mildly bemused. So grab your cup of tea, cozy up to the statistical fireplace, and let’s explore the enchanting dance between renewable energy and internet whimsy – for as we know, there's nothing quite like a pun game to keep things light and breezy!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. This high correlation coefficient can be interpreted as a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as wind power generation in Mauritius increased, so did the frequency of searches for 'smol' on Google. It seems that the wind is not the only thing blowing through Mauritius – the search for 'smol' is also gaining momentum!
In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call 'smol' would, by any other name, still be adorable." It seems that the allure of 'smol' is not lost on the residents of Mauritius, and they have quite literally put wind in its sails.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354973 further emphasizes the strength of the association between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, indicating that a whopping 93.55% of the variation in 'smol' searches can be explained by changes in wind power generation. This finding certainly blows away any doubts about the significance of this relationship – it's as clear as the wind whistling through the trees.
Now, it may seem as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistical significance, but the robustness of our results leaves little room for skepticism. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between wind power generation and 'smol' searches. In other words, there's a greater chance of stumbling upon a rare albino squirrel than there is of this correlation occurring by pure coincidence.
The Figure 1 scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, providing a snapshot of the data's wind-swept journey through the whimsical landscape of statistical associations. It's as clear as day – there's a definite gust of 'smol' following in the wake of wind power in Mauritius.
In summary, our findings indicate an intriguing and statistically significant relationship between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol.' This unexpected association adds a breath of fresh air to the field of renewable energy research and tickles the funny bone with its whimsical twist. As we wrap up this discussion, let's remember to appreciate the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can uncover, much like finding the punchline to a well-hidden dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the whimsical dance between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for 'smol' has blown us away with its unexpected findings. The sky's the limit when it comes to uncovering correlations, and this study has certainly left us winded from the sheer exhilaration of its results.

As we reflect on the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 between wind power generation and 'smol' searches, one can't help but marvel at the wind's ability to stir up not only energy but also internet whimsy. It's almost as if the wind is whispering, "What do you call a small psychic at large? A small medium at large!" The residents of Mauritius seem to be embracing the 'smol' trend with open arms, riding the gusts of laughter and delight it brings.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354973 further strengthens the case for this enchanting connection, leaving no doubt that the wind and 'smol' are twirling together in a delightful statistical waltz. As the saying goes, "A good pun is its own reword," and the statistical link we've uncovered certainly rewards us with a playful twist on the traditional narrative of renewable energy research.

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a solid punchline to our findings, operating as the comedic relief in the grand theater of statistical inquiry. It's as if the wind and 'smol' have crafted their own comedy routine, leaving no room for doubt that their partnership is as strong as the wind's timeless ability to tousle hair and provoke laughter.

In light of these compelling results, it's safe to say that further research in this area would be akin to trying to teach a tree to tell a joke - fruitless. The winds of change have certainly blown through the realm of renewable energy research and internet whimsy, and we eagerly anticipate the laughter and surprise that future studies in this vein will undoubtedly bring. It's been a whirlwind of wonder and laughter, but as we close the proverbial book on this study, we leave with a smile as wide as the statistical horizon.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Renewable Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Renewable Energy Innovation and Conservation (IREIC)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Whimsical Wind Power: Waltzing with 'Smol' Searches in Mauritius with an abstract of In this study, we undertake a lighthearted investigation into the connection between wind power generation in Mauritius and Google searches for the term 'smol.' We utilized data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify wind power production in Mauritius, and Google Trends provided us with the frequency of searches related to 'smol' from 2004 to 2021. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9672111 and p < 0.01 between wind power and 'smol' searches, tantalizingly suggesting a curious relationship between the two.
The statistical link we uncovered between wind power in Mauritius and 'smol' searches could blow anyone away! However, our results leave us pondering - are the residents of Mauritius simply seeking out 'smol' delights in their leisure time, or could there be a windswept connection between the two phenomena? This unexpected association certainly lends itself to humorous commentary, as we wind our way through the implications of these findings.

ChatGPT:

wind power, Mauritius, Google searches, 'smol', correlation coefficient, energy production, Google Trends, Mauritius residents, 'smol' delights

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in Mauritius
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Mauritius in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Mauritius

Google searches for 'smol'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'smol' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'smol'

Correlation r = 0.9672111 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9354973 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'smol') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Mauritius) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.06E-11. 0.0000000000606105704320375000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 6.06E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,498,772,291 random variables You don't actually need 16 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Wind power generated in Mauritius (Billion kWh)0.00040.00040.00040.00040.00040.0020.0030.0030.0040.0040.0030.0030.0180.0150.0150.0150.0180.018
Google searches for 'smol' (Rel. search volume)12.2513.510.666712.166713.083318.519.520.333321.333326.532.08334674.833385.166786.333384.2589.083383.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0004,0.0004,0.0004,0.0004,0.0004,0.002,0.003,0.003,0.004,0.004,0.003,0.003,0.018,0.015,0.015,0.015,0.018,0.018,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,13.5,10.6667,12.1667,13.0833,18.5,19.5,20.3333,21.3333,26.5,32.0833,46,74.8333,85.1667,86.3333,84.25,89.0833,83.1667,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Mauritius"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'smol'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1750 · Black Variable ID: 23820 · Red Variable ID: 1370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0