about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,757 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Education and the second variable is Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the use of red correction pens. With fewer red correction pens in circulation, there was a reduced demand for red ink production. This led to a surplus of red dye, which was then repurposed by a local artist in Clinton, Iowa to create environmentally friendly air filters for cars. These innovative filters somehow had the miraculous ability to purify the air, effectively reducing air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. Who would have thought that the key to cleaner air in Clinton was actually fewer Master's degrees in Education?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a group of educators standing in front of a futuristic educational institution in Clinton, Iowa. The sky above them is hazy and polluted, with towering buildings shrouded in smog. The educators proudly hold up their Master's degrees in Education, their smiles radiant and hopeful despite the unhealthy air quality. The scene should emphasize the contrast between the futuristic setting and the environmental challenges, capturing the resilience and determination of the educators in the face of adversity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Education and Unhealthy air quality in Clinton, Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Low poly Data cyber art Voxel art Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Education and Unhealthy air quality in Clinton, Iowa together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Clinton, Iowa, under the hazy sky and amidst the smog, a group of educators proudly holds up their Master's degrees in Education, smiling and celebrating their achievements despite the unhealthy air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In Clinton, Iowa, under the hazy sky and amidst the smog, a group of educators proudly holds up their Master's degrees in Education, smiling and celebrating their achievements despite the unhealthy air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that showcases a group of educators standing in front of a futuristic educational institution in Clinton, Iowa. The sky above them is hazy and polluted, with towering buildings shrouded in smog. The educators proudly hold up their Master's degrees in Education, their smiles radiant and hopeful despite the unhealthy air quality. The scene should emphasize the contrast between the futuristic setting and the environmental challenges, capturing the resilience and determination of the educators in the face of adversity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Education caused Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "the conclusion I was about to draw is not sufficient to warrant oxygen for the time being." However, in the case of Clinton, Iowa, the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us gasping for more answers. It seems like we have drifted into uncharted scientific territories, spreading a fog of curiosity around unexpected relationships.

The pursuit of knowledge and the quality of the air we breathe may seem like distant cousins at first glance, but our research has uncovered an intriguing connection that leaves us pondering over the interplay of variables in this ecological soap opera. With a confirmed correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, it's quite clear that education and air pollution have been having a clandestine rendezvous right under our noses, or should I say, right under our nostrils?

It's almost as if the pursuit of higher education in Clinton has been creating a smokescreen of pollutants, leaving us to wonder if it's the path to enlightenment or just a roundabout way to fog up the atmosphere. One could say that education in Clinton has been emitting some "silent and deadly" classroom teachings—quite literally.

On that note, let's not hold our breath for more questions to arise from this study. We should instead open the windows of our minds to welcome the fresh breeze of ideas and innovative policies that may emerge from these unexpected findings. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's essential not to let the trail of revelations become too smoky, don't you think?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "the conclusion I was about to draw is not sufficient to warrant oxygen for the time being." However, in the case of Clinton, Iowa, the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us gasping for more answers. It seems like we have drifted into uncharted scientific territories, spreading a fog of curiosity around unexpected relationships.
The pursuit of knowledge and the quality of the air we breathe may seem like distant cousins at first glance, but our research has uncovered an intriguing connection that leaves us pondering over the interplay of variables in this ecological soap opera. With a confirmed correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, it's quite clear that education and air pollution have been having a clandestine rendezvous right under our noses, or should I say, right under our nostrils?
It's almost as if the pursuit of higher education in Clinton has been creating a smokescreen of pollutants, leaving us to wonder if it's the path to enlightenment or just a roundabout way to fog up the atmosphere. One could say that education in Clinton has been emitting some "silent and deadly" classroom teachings—quite literally.
On that note, let's not hold our breath for more questions to arise from this study. We should instead open the windows of our minds to welcome the fresh breeze of ideas and innovative policies that may emerge from these unexpected findings. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's essential not to let the trail of revelations become too smoky, don't you think?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have sought to explore the nexus between educational achievements and environmental factors, with some shedding light on the potential correlation between academic pursuits and air pollution levels. Smith, in "The Academic Emissions Dilemma," discusses the complex relationship between educational institutions and environmental impact, but little attention has been given to the specific case of Master's degrees in Education and localized air pollution dynamics. As we delve into this subject, it's important to take a deep breath and recognize the gravity of the issue at hand.

Doe, in "The Pedagogical Paradox," presents an extensive analysis of educational attainment and its societal consequences, but a ventilation of literature reveals scant research focused on the intersection of academic advancements and ambient air quality in a specific locale. It's almost as if this topic has been hiding in plain sight all along, waiting to burst into the atmosphere like an unsuspecting pollutant.

Turning to more general texts related to air pollution, "Airborne Adversaries" by Jones provides a comprehensive overview of the detrimental effects of air pollutants, and "The Haze Hangover" by White delves into the societal and health implications of living in polluted environments. These works offer valuable insights into the broader implications of air pollution but fail to tackle the curious case of its connection to educational achievements.

On the more creative side, the fictional works "The Polluted Professor" by Green and "A Miasma Mystery" by Black bear titles that hint at a potential overlap between academia and air pollution. Although not grounded in empirical evidence, these imaginative pieces serve as a reminder of the intriguing curiosity that surrounds this topic. In a way, they add a breath of fresh air to this otherwise weighty subject matter.

In an effort to leave no stone unturned, we explored unconventional sources of information, including the backs of shampoo bottles, which surprisingly yielded no relevant insights into the correlation between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. It appears that this association is bubbling up in unexpected places, challenging us to think critically and with an open mind. After all, when it comes to research, we must be willing to sniff out knowledge in the unlikeliest of locations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "the conclusion I was about to draw is not sufficient to warrant oxygen for the time being." However, in the case of Clinton, Iowa, the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us gasping for more answers. It seems like we have drifted into uncharted scientific territories, spreading a fog of curiosity around unexpected relationships.
The pursuit of knowledge and the quality of the air we breathe may seem like distant cousins at first glance, but our research has uncovered an intriguing connection that leaves us pondering over the interplay of variables in this ecological soap opera. With a confirmed correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, it's quite clear that education and air pollution have been having a clandestine rendezvous right under our noses, or should I say, right under our nostrils?
It's almost as if the pursuit of higher education in Clinton has been creating a smokescreen of pollutants, leaving us to wonder if it's the path to enlightenment or just a roundabout way to fog up the atmosphere. One could say that education in Clinton has been emitting some "silent and deadly" classroom teachings—quite literally.
On that note, let's not hold our breath for more questions to arise from this study. We should instead open the windows of our minds to welcome the fresh breeze of ideas and innovative policies that may emerge from these unexpected findings. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's essential not to let the trail of revelations become too smoky, don't you think?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the knotty relationship between the awarding of Master's degrees in Education and the pollution levels in Clinton, Iowa, our research team designed a study that was as airtight as an old vacuum cleaner. We collected data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, using statistical methods that were more precise than a laser-guided air purifier. The years under scrutiny, from 2012 to 2021, were chosen because that's when things really started "heating up" in the field of educational awards and "cooled down" in environmental quality measures – pun intended.

To quantify the number of Master's degrees earned in Education, we meticulously sifted through the data like a scientist searching for oxygen on a distant planet. We then whizzed through the Environmental Protection Agency's databases with the speed of a fan in a sweltering room, extracting air pollutant levels for the same period. We knew precision was key – we couldn't leave any room for ambiguity in these inflating numbers.

Next, we performed a juggling act with the data, utilizing the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the strength and direction of the relationship. This coefficient tested the statistical significance of the association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the levels of air pollution. The results were as clear as a crisp breath of air after a summer rain – we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, which was statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if we've caught the pollutants red-handed with a smoking gun!

We then conducted a series of regression analyses to assess the impact of the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education on the levels of air pollution, factoring in other potential confounding variables. We wanted to make sure we weren't just blowing hot air with our findings.

Finally, to address concerns about potential lurking variables or assumptions that may have clouded our results, we performed sensitivity analyses. We systematically evaluated the effect of different assumptions or variations in the model to ensure that our conclusions weren't just a fleeting gust of wind.

With a methodological toolbox more comprehensive than a Swiss Army knife, our study delved into the unexpected relationship between educational achievements and environmental repercussions, clearing away clouds of ignorance to reveal intriguing insights. As we press on in our investigation, one thing's for sure – the nexus of education and air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is no longer a piece of nebulous trivia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9417938, r-squared of 0.8869756, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "the conclusion I was about to draw is not sufficient to warrant oxygen for the time being." However, in the case of Clinton, Iowa, the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us gasping for more answers. It seems like we have drifted into uncharted scientific territories, spreading a fog of curiosity around unexpected relationships.
The pursuit of knowledge and the quality of the air we breathe may seem like distant cousins at first glance, but our research has uncovered an intriguing connection that leaves us pondering over the interplay of variables in this ecological soap opera. With a confirmed correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, it's quite clear that education and air pollution have been having a clandestine rendezvous right under our noses, or should I say, right under our nostrils?
It's almost as if the pursuit of higher education in Clinton has been creating a smokescreen of pollutants, leaving us to wonder if it's the path to enlightenment or just a roundabout way to fog up the atmosphere. One could say that education in Clinton has been emitting some "silent and deadly" classroom teachings—quite literally.
On that note, let's not hold our breath for more questions to arise from this study. We should instead open the windows of our minds to welcome the fresh breeze of ideas and innovative policies that may emerge from these unexpected findings. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's essential not to let the trail of revelations become too smoky, don't you think?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa have left us both awestruck and breathless. Our statistical analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, with an r-squared value of 0.8869756 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation can't just be a mere statistical fluke; it seems that there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

From the scatterplot in Fig. 1, the positive correlation between Master's degrees in Education and levels of air pollutants is as clear as the smog on a polluted day. It's almost as if each Master's degree earned in Education comes with a complimentary smog certificate. Maybe it's time to update the graduation regalia to include a gas mask and a pollution sensor.

We found that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education soared over the years, so did the levels of air pollutants in Clinton, Iowa. It's like the pursuit of knowledge has generated a cloud of unintended consequences, leaving us to jest that maybe education should come with a "pollution-free" diploma option.

The intriguing connection between education and air pollution raises profound questions about the far-reaching impacts of educational pursuits on our environment. It's as if every diploma comes with an unintended environmental footprint, blurring the line between academic accomplishments and environmental responsibilities.

In conclusion, our study suggests that the pursuit of knowledge may have inadvertently contributed to the pollution levels in Clinton, Iowa. This unexpected relationship challenges us to reconsider the broader environmental implications of educational achievements. It's time to clear the air on the impact of education and foster policies to ensure that our pursuit of knowledge doesn't leave us breathless in more ways than one.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have sought to explore the nexus between educational achievements and environmental factors, with some shedding light on the potential correlation between academic pursuits and air pollution levels. Smith, in "The Academic Emissions Dilemma," discusses the complex relationship between educational institutions and environmental impact, but little attention has been given to the specific case of Master's degrees in Education and localized air pollution dynamics. As we delve into this subject, it's important to take a deep breath and recognize the gravity of the issue at hand.
Doe, in "The Pedagogical Paradox," presents an extensive analysis of educational attainment and its societal consequences, but a ventilation of literature reveals scant research focused on the intersection of academic advancements and ambient air quality in a specific locale. It's almost as if this topic has been hiding in plain sight all along, waiting to burst into the atmosphere like an unsuspecting pollutant.
Turning to more general texts related to air pollution, "Airborne Adversaries" by Jones provides a comprehensive overview of the detrimental effects of air pollutants, and "The Haze Hangover" by White delves into the societal and health implications of living in polluted environments. These works offer valuable insights into the broader implications of air pollution but fail to tackle the curious case of its connection to educational achievements.
On the more creative side, the fictional works "The Polluted Professor" by Green and "A Miasma Mystery" by Black bear titles that hint at a potential overlap between academia and air pollution. Although not grounded in empirical evidence, these imaginative pieces serve as a reminder of the intriguing curiosity that surrounds this topic. In a way, they add a breath of fresh air to this otherwise weighty subject matter.
In an effort to leave no stone unturned, we explored unconventional sources of information, including the backs of shampoo bottles, which surprisingly yielded no relevant insights into the correlation between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. It appears that this association is bubbling up in unexpected places, challenging us to think critically and with an open mind. After all, when it comes to research, we must be willing to sniff out knowledge in the unlikeliest of locations.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa have left us both awestruck and breathless. Our statistical analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, with an r-squared value of 0.8869756 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation can't just be a mere statistical fluke; it seems that there's more to this connection than meets the eye.
From the scatterplot in Fig. 1, the positive correlation between Master's degrees in Education and levels of air pollutants is as clear as the smog on a polluted day. It's almost as if each Master's degree earned in Education comes with a complimentary smog certificate. Maybe it's time to update the graduation regalia to include a gas mask and a pollution sensor.
We found that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education soared over the years, so did the levels of air pollutants in Clinton, Iowa. It's like the pursuit of knowledge has generated a cloud of unintended consequences, leaving us to jest that maybe education should come with a "pollution-free" diploma option.
The intriguing connection between education and air pollution raises profound questions about the far-reaching impacts of educational pursuits on our environment. It's as if every diploma comes with an unintended environmental footprint, blurring the line between academic accomplishments and environmental responsibilities.
In conclusion, our study suggests that the pursuit of knowledge may have inadvertently contributed to the pollution levels in Clinton, Iowa. This unexpected relationship challenges us to reconsider the broader environmental implications of educational achievements. It's time to clear the air on the impact of education and foster policies to ensure that our pursuit of knowledge doesn't leave us breathless in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the sweet smell of academia mingling with the pungent aroma of pollution. Our study delved into the unexpectedly pungent relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the humble hamlet of Clinton, Iowa. Our findings not only correlate with prior research but also shed light on the unanticipated consequences of educational pursuits on ambient air quality.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 between the number of Master's degrees in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is quite the statistical head-scratcher. This robust relation leaves very little room for airy speculations. It seems that educational aspirations have not just elevated the minds of the locals but also the particulate matter in the air. It's almost as if each degree earned sends a plume of pollution into the atmosphere. Perhaps the graduates should be awarded both a Master's degree and a "Master's of Smog" title.

Our results support the findings of Smith's "The Academic Emissions Dilemma" and Doe's "The Pedagogical Paradox," which indicate potential connections between academic achievements and environmental impact. It's as if the air in Clinton has been the unsuspecting guinea pig for the academic aspirations of its residents. Who knew that the pursuit of knowledge could foul the air so effectively? After all, it seems education doesn't just open minds; it also opens windows for pollutants to waft in.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 paints a clear picture of this correlation, akin to the smog alert on a really polluted day. One might say that as the number of graduates goes up, so does the smog count, creating an unintentional fog of knowledge. Let's just hope the next graduating class isn't met with a "code red" air quality advisory on their big day; that's not the kind of red carpet they were hoping for.

This study, though seemingly whimsical, raises essential environmental and educational questions that demand further exploration. It's time to clear the air on the impact of education and consider policies to ensure that our pursuit of knowledge doesn't leave us breathless in more ways than one. And perhaps, a little less air pollution wouldn't hurt either.

In the wise words of an environmentalist dad, "Did you hear about the scientist who found a correlation between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution? I guess you could say knowledge really does have a lot of emission!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.

Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."

This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "the conclusion I was about to draw is not sufficient to warrant oxygen for the time being." However, in the case of Clinton, Iowa, the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us gasping for more answers. It seems like we have drifted into uncharted scientific territories, spreading a fog of curiosity around unexpected relationships.
The pursuit of knowledge and the quality of the air we breathe may seem like distant cousins at first glance, but our research has uncovered an intriguing connection that leaves us pondering over the interplay of variables in this ecological soap opera. With a confirmed correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, it's quite clear that education and air pollution have been having a clandestine rendezvous right under our noses, or should I say, right under our nostrils?
It's almost as if the pursuit of higher education in Clinton has been creating a smokescreen of pollutants, leaving us to wonder if it's the path to enlightenment or just a roundabout way to fog up the atmosphere. One could say that education in Clinton has been emitting some "silent and deadly" classroom teachings—quite literally.
On that note, let's not hold our breath for more questions to arise from this study. We should instead open the windows of our minds to welcome the fresh breeze of ideas and innovative policies that may emerge from these unexpected findings. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's essential not to let the trail of revelations become too smoky, don't you think?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa have left us both awestruck and breathless. Our statistical analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9417938, with an r-squared value of 0.8869756 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation can't just be a mere statistical fluke; it seems that there's more to this connection than meets the eye.
From the scatterplot in Fig. 1, the positive correlation between Master's degrees in Education and levels of air pollutants is as clear as the smog on a polluted day. It's almost as if each Master's degree earned in Education comes with a complimentary smog certificate. Maybe it's time to update the graduation regalia to include a gas mask and a pollution sensor.
We found that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education soared over the years, so did the levels of air pollutants in Clinton, Iowa. It's like the pursuit of knowledge has generated a cloud of unintended consequences, leaving us to jest that maybe education should come with a "pollution-free" diploma option.
The intriguing connection between education and air pollution raises profound questions about the far-reaching impacts of educational pursuits on our environment. It's as if every diploma comes with an unintended environmental footprint, blurring the line between academic accomplishments and environmental responsibilities.
In conclusion, our study suggests that the pursuit of knowledge may have inadvertently contributed to the pollution levels in Clinton, Iowa. This unexpected relationship challenges us to reconsider the broader environmental implications of educational achievements. It's time to clear the air on the impact of education and foster policies to ensure that our pursuit of knowledge doesn't leave us breathless in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

To wrap up our findings, it's clear that the pursuit of knowledge in Clinton, Iowa has left both educationalists and environmentalists in a bit of a haze. The robust correlation we've uncovered between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution has left us all in a breathless stupor. It seems that educational aspirations have become unexpected culprits in the atmospheric drama, turning the pursuit of knowledge into a "pollution power play!"

It's almost as if each new Master's degree is accompanied by an unintentional puff of pollution, leaving us to wonder if academia is now in the business of conferring air quality issues along with diplomas. Maybe we should start measuring academic success not only in GPA but also in parts per million of pollutants—after all, it's essential to keep track of those air-freshening accomplishments!

As our research has blown the lid off this unexpected relationship, it seems we're left with more questions than answers. It's as if the academic journey in Clinton has become a journey through a smoggy, polluted stretch of highway—perhaps it's time for students there to wear "hazardous environment" gear alongside their graduation robes.

In light of these eye-opening findings, it's safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and air pollution in Clinton, Iowa has been thoroughly aired out. It's time for policy-makers and educators to take a deep breath and devise strategies to ensure that our pursuit of knowledge doesn't leave behind an environmental haze of unintended consequences. After all, we don't want our scholarly endeavors to be clouded by pollution, do we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Pedagogical Pollutants Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Master's Degrees in Education and the Miasma of Air Pollution: A Case Study of Clinton, Iowa with an abstract of The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in Clinton, Iowa is a topic that has long been up in the air. Our research team delved into this airy matter with the help of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. The findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9417938 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021, leaving no room for any hot air disputation.
Analyzing this surprising connection, we concluded that as the number of Master's degrees in Education in Clinton blew up, so did the levels of air pollutants. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in education has inadvertently fueled the pollution levels in the city. It's almost as if the educational aspirations have left an unforeseen carbon footprint, giving new meaning to the phrase "knowledge is power, but also pollution."
This unexpected relationship prompts us to rethink the phrase "clear the air" as education in Clinton seemingly clears the air in one department only to clutter it in another. This study paves the way for further investigation into the unanticipated consequences of educational achievements on environmental factors and may lead to the development of more sustainable education policies. After all, we can't let the pursuit of knowledge leave us gasping for air, can we?

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Education, air pollution correlation, Clinton Iowa, National Center for Education Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, p-value, pollution levels, educational aspirations, carbon footprint, knowledge is power, unanticipated consequences, sustainable education policies, environmental impact of education

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Education
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Education
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Education

Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Clinton, IA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa

Correlation r = 0.9417938 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8869756 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Education) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.7E-5. 0.0000467943004277650960000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.0047% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 21,370 random variables You don't actually need 21 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Education (Degrees awarded)179047164652154655146581145792145624146368146429146989153756
Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa (Bad air quality days)0.03005460.008219180.01095890.002739730.0027322400000.00547945




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([179047,164652,154655,146581,145792,145624,146368,146429,146989,153756,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0300546,0.00821918,0.0109589,0.00273973,0.00273224,0,0,0,0,0.00547945,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Education"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Clinton, Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1757 · Black Variable ID: 1319 · Red Variable ID: 21796
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0