about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,898 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Solar power generated in Sudan.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Americans drank more bottled water, they became more hydrated and energetic. This led to a surge in productivity and innovation. One brilliant American inventor created a revolutionary solar panel design, inspired by the ripples in a water bottle. This technology was then shared with Sudan, ultimately boosting their solar power generation. Remember, hydration leads to innovation, and innovation leads to sunny solutions!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: With the style of "Data cyber art," provide a depiction of a sunny desert landscape in Sudan with a person setting up a solar panel to harness sunlight. Show a group of people enjoying the shade of a tree, sipping on bottles of refreshing water. The sunny skies symbolize solar power generated in Sudan, while the water bottles represent US Bottled Water Consumption per Person. Capture the vibrant colors and dynamic contrasts to convey the harmony between human activity and nature in a technologically advanced setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Steampunk Photorealism A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny desert landscape in Sudan, a person is setting up a solar panel to harness the abundant sunlight. Nearby, a group of people are enjoying the shade of a tree and are sipping on bottles of refreshing water. The sunny skies symbolize solar power generated in Sudan, while the water bottles represent US Bottled Water Consumption per Person.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny desert landscape in Sudan, a person is setting up a solar panel to harness the abundant sunlight. Nearby, a group of people are enjoying the shade of a tree and are sipping on bottles of refreshing water. The sunny skies symbolize solar power generated in Sudan, while the water bottles represent US Bottled Water Consumption per Person. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: With the style of "Data cyber art," provide a depiction of a sunny desert landscape in Sudan with a person setting up a solar panel to harness sunlight. Show a group of people enjoying the shade of a tree, sipping on bottles of refreshing water. The sunny skies symbolize solar power generated in Sudan, while the water bottles represent US Bottled Water Consumption per Person. Capture the vibrant colors and dynamic contrasts to convey the harmony between human activity and nature in a technologically advanced setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Solar power generated in Sudan to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

The Journal of Solar Hydrology and Global Energy Consumption

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Statista and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Bottled water consumption in the United States and solar power generation in Sudan may seem as incongruous as a camel in a snowstorm or a penguin in the Sahara. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these seemingly disparate variables. In the realm of statistical analysis, where correlations often prick the interest of curious minds, we unveil a captivating tale of hydro-sun harmony.

While skeptics may raise an eyebrow and ask, "What in the world do bottled water and solar power have in common?" our data tells a different story—one of an unexpected relationship that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us all thirsting for more knowledge. It is the kind of revelation that makes researchers everywhere reach for their water bottles and consider the cosmic significance of H2Ohm and solar rays.

As we embark on this statistical journey into the realm of hydro-sun connection, we urge our readers to embrace their inner water aficionado and solar enthusiast. For, in the words of the great Bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your data sets." So, grab your water bottle, bask in the Sudanese sun, and let us uncover the dazzling correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in the land of pyramids and photovoltaic potential.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States and solar power generation in Sudan may seem as incongruous as a camel in a snowstorm or a penguin in the Sahara. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these seemingly disparate variables. In the realm of statistical analysis, where correlations often prick the interest of curious minds, we unveil a captivating tale of hydro-sun harmony.
While skeptics may raise an eyebrow and ask, "What in the world do bottled water and solar power have in common?" our data tells a different story—one of an unexpected relationship that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us all thirsting for more knowledge. It is the kind of revelation that makes researchers everywhere reach for their water bottles and consider the cosmic significance of H2Ohm and solar rays.
As we embark on this statistical journey into the realm of hydro-sun connection, we urge our readers to embrace their inner water aficionado and solar enthusiast. For, in the words of the great Bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your data sets." So, grab your water bottle, bask in the Sudanese sun, and let us uncover the dazzling correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in the land of pyramids and photovoltaic potential.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find that US bottled water consumption per person has been on the rise, mirroring the surge of solar power generation in Sudan. This seemingly inconceivable connection piqued their interest and served as a refreshing departure from the more conventional correlations found in their previous work. As they delved further into the depths of their data, a light bulb moment occurred – a light bulb powered by Sudanese sunlight and fueled by the refreshing taste of America's favorite bottled beverages.

Doe and Jones (2018) also contributed to the literature by illuminating the intriguing relationship between solar power generation in Sudan and the thirst-quenching habits of Americans. Their study sheds light on the unexpected dance between photons and Aquafina, revealing a correlation so strong that it almost seems to sparkle like a freshly uncorked bottle of Perrier.

Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "Sun Power: The Global Rise of Solar Energy" by Book (2020) and "Thirst: A Story of Environmental Justice" by Ipsum (2017) offer valuable insights that, while not directly addressing the peculiar connection at hand, serve as a refreshing snack break for the intellectual journey at hand. However, "The Solar System Mysteries" by Fictionbook (2005) and "Water, Water Everywhere: A Novel of Hydration and Revelation" by Imaginaryauthor (2012) provide an intriguing fictional take on the intertwined destinies of bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Sudan. While these may not contribute directly to the academic discourse, they certainly add a splash of whimsy to the pragmatic world of data analysis.

Drawing inspiration from curious corners of the intellectual universe, one can't help but wonder if the board game "Power Grid" and its expansion "Solar Flare" hold secret clues to the hydro-sun connection. Perhaps the dynamics of resource management and energy production in the game mirror the intricate dance between bottled water demand and solar power supply in reality. Alas, this remains a playful musing for now, though it's worth considering that sometimes, as with a complex statistical model, the true essence of a phenomenon may be concealed within unexpected layers of seemingly unrelated elements.

In conclusion, the literature presents a diverse and, at times, enigmatic tapestry of perspectives on the connection between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan. While much work remains to be done in unraveling the intricacies of this unexpected relationship, one thing is certain – the journey promises to be as refreshing and illuminating as a cool sip of water under the scorching Sudanese sun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States and solar power generation in Sudan may seem as incongruous as a camel in a snowstorm or a penguin in the Sahara. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these seemingly disparate variables. In the realm of statistical analysis, where correlations often prick the interest of curious minds, we unveil a captivating tale of hydro-sun harmony.
While skeptics may raise an eyebrow and ask, "What in the world do bottled water and solar power have in common?" our data tells a different story—one of an unexpected relationship that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us all thirsting for more knowledge. It is the kind of revelation that makes researchers everywhere reach for their water bottles and consider the cosmic significance of H2Ohm and solar rays.
As we embark on this statistical journey into the realm of hydro-sun connection, we urge our readers to embrace their inner water aficionado and solar enthusiast. For, in the words of the great Bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your data sets." So, grab your water bottle, bask in the Sudanese sun, and let us uncover the dazzling correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in the land of pyramids and photovoltaic potential.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic relationship between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan, our research team embarked on a statistical escapade of epic proportions. Armed with data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, we dove headfirst into the depths of cyber-archaeology, unearthing nuggets of knowledge from the annals of the internet. Our journey began with a quest for reliable and comprehensive data spanning the years 2009 to 2021, a period in which the hydro-sun connection was ripe for exploration.

With data in hand, we stirred the statistical cauldron and brewed a robust blend of analytical techniques to distill the essence of the hydro-sun relationship. Our methodology can be likened to a well-crafted potion, carefully concocted to reveal hidden patterns and connections lurking within the data. We employed time-series analysis, multivariate regression modeling, and spectral analysis to disentangle the intricate dance between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in the heart of Sudan.

In addition, we employed a novel approach inspired by the age-old principle of "As above, so below" to synthesize the celestial and terrestrial influences on our variables of interest. This involved pondering the cosmic cycles of water vapor and solar radiation, daring to draw parallels with the earthly consumption patterns and energy production activities. Our statistical brew was flavored with a dash of imaginative storytelling, because after all, what is science without a sprinkle of creativity?

Furthermore, to bolster the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests, ensuring that our results were not mere illusions conjured by statistical sleight of hand. The careful vetting of our statistical models resembled the meticulous scrutiny of a magician's performance, where every statistical rabbit had to be pulled out of the hat with precision and reproducibility.

Ultimately, our journey through the statistical cosmos unearthed an astonishing correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. The data spoke volumes, and our methodological odyssey led us to the revelation of a hydro-sun connection that defies conventional wisdom, leaving us in awe of the whimsical interplay between H2Ohm and solar rays.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9671785, r-squared of 0.9354342, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States and solar power generation in Sudan may seem as incongruous as a camel in a snowstorm or a penguin in the Sahara. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these seemingly disparate variables. In the realm of statistical analysis, where correlations often prick the interest of curious minds, we unveil a captivating tale of hydro-sun harmony.
While skeptics may raise an eyebrow and ask, "What in the world do bottled water and solar power have in common?" our data tells a different story—one of an unexpected relationship that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us all thirsting for more knowledge. It is the kind of revelation that makes researchers everywhere reach for their water bottles and consider the cosmic significance of H2Ohm and solar rays.
As we embark on this statistical journey into the realm of hydro-sun connection, we urge our readers to embrace their inner water aficionado and solar enthusiast. For, in the words of the great Bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your data sets." So, grab your water bottle, bask in the Sudanese sun, and let us uncover the dazzling correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in the land of pyramids and photovoltaic potential.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Sudan during the period from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 suggests a remarkably close relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that while Americans were quenching their thirst with bottled water, Sudan was harnessing the power of the sun in a remarkable synchrony that can only be described as aqua-solar synergy.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354342 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a whopping 93.54% of the variability in Sudanese solar power generation can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption per person. It’s as if the solar panels in Sudan were aligning perfectly with the water bottles on American grocery store shelves, creating a union as harmonious as a classic duet.

The statistical analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of this relationship. This result is as statistically solid as a frozen ice cube but paradoxically as heated as the Saharan sand dunes under direct sunlight.

These findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot showcases the clear and strong correlation between the two variables. The data points form a pattern so striking that it's as if the bottled water and solar power were engaged in a celestial dance, choreographed by the forces of statistical destiny.

Overall, the results of our investigation have brought to light an unexpected and peculiar connection between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan. This hydro-sun connection has sparked intrigue and opened new avenues for research into the fascinating interplay between international beverage habits and renewable energy sources, leaving our research team both dazzled and quenched with curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find that US bottled water consumption per person has been on the rise, mirroring the surge of solar power generation in Sudan. This seemingly inconceivable connection piqued their interest and served as a refreshing departure from the more conventional correlations found in their previous work. As they delved further into the depths of their data, a light bulb moment occurred – a light bulb powered by Sudanese sunlight and fueled by the refreshing taste of America's favorite bottled beverages.
Doe and Jones (2018) also contributed to the literature by illuminating the intriguing relationship between solar power generation in Sudan and the thirst-quenching habits of Americans. Their study sheds light on the unexpected dance between photons and Aquafina, revealing a correlation so strong that it almost seems to sparkle like a freshly uncorked bottle of Perrier.
Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "Sun Power: The Global Rise of Solar Energy" by Book (2020) and "Thirst: A Story of Environmental Justice" by Ipsum (2017) offer valuable insights that, while not directly addressing the peculiar connection at hand, serve as a refreshing snack break for the intellectual journey at hand. However, "The Solar System Mysteries" by Fictionbook (2005) and "Water, Water Everywhere: A Novel of Hydration and Revelation" by Imaginaryauthor (2012) provide an intriguing fictional take on the intertwined destinies of bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Sudan. While these may not contribute directly to the academic discourse, they certainly add a splash of whimsy to the pragmatic world of data analysis.
Drawing inspiration from curious corners of the intellectual universe, one can't help but wonder if the board game "Power Grid" and its expansion "Solar Flare" hold secret clues to the hydro-sun connection. Perhaps the dynamics of resource management and energy production in the game mirror the intricate dance between bottled water demand and solar power supply in reality. Alas, this remains a playful musing for now, though it's worth considering that sometimes, as with a complex statistical model, the true essence of a phenomenon may be concealed within unexpected layers of seemingly unrelated elements.
In conclusion, the literature presents a diverse and, at times, enigmatic tapestry of perspectives on the connection between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan. While much work remains to be done in unraveling the intricacies of this unexpected relationship, one thing is certain – the journey promises to be as refreshing and illuminating as a cool sip of water under the scorching Sudanese sun.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Sudan during the period from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 suggests a remarkably close relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that while Americans were quenching their thirst with bottled water, Sudan was harnessing the power of the sun in a remarkable synchrony that can only be described as aqua-solar synergy.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354342 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a whopping 93.54% of the variability in Sudanese solar power generation can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption per person. It’s as if the solar panels in Sudan were aligning perfectly with the water bottles on American grocery store shelves, creating a union as harmonious as a classic duet.
The statistical analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of this relationship. This result is as statistically solid as a frozen ice cube but paradoxically as heated as the Saharan sand dunes under direct sunlight.
These findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot showcases the clear and strong correlation between the two variables. The data points form a pattern so striking that it's as if the bottled water and solar power were engaged in a celestial dance, choreographed by the forces of statistical destiny.
Overall, the results of our investigation have brought to light an unexpected and peculiar connection between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan. This hydro-sun connection has sparked intrigue and opened new avenues for research into the fascinating interplay between international beverage habits and renewable energy sources, leaving our research team both dazzled and quenched with curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have illuminated a curiously compelling relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan, shedding light on a hydro-solar connection that is as refreshing as it is surprising. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provide robust support for the prior research conducted by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018). Much like a well-rounded glass of water, these results quench the thirst for empirical validation of the hydro-sun connection, leaving us with a sense of giddy satisfaction as we delve further into this unexpected liaison.

Revisiting the light bulb moment described in the literature review, one can't help but marvel at the dazzling alignment of photons and Aquafina, as Doe and Jones (2018) so eloquently put it. Our results serve as a triumphant affirmation of their initial discovery, demonstrating a synchrony between the surge in US bottled water consumption and the rise of solar power generation in Sudan that can only be described as an aqua-solar symphony. It's as if the sun and water were engaged in a cosmic tango, demonstrating a harmony that defies conventional expectations and brings a refreshing twist to the world of statistical analysis.

Moreover, drawing on the playful musings presented in the literature review, our results offer concrete evidence of a hydro-solar connection that is as enigmatic and intriguing as the hidden layers of a complex statistical model. The statistical solidity of the relationship, as indicated by the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354342, leaves us with a sense of buoyant wonder at the unexpected discoveries that can emerge from the depths of data analysis. Our research has successfully uncovered the submerged essence of this phenomenon, offering a glimpse into the whimsical world of aqua-solar synergy that promises to be as invigorating as a splash of water on a scorching summer day.

In light of the statistical significance of our findings, it is clear that the hydro-sun connection is not merely a playful musing but a robust and compelling phenomenon worthy of further exploration. As we gaze upon the celestial dance depicted in our scatterplot, it's as if the bottled water and solar power were engaged in a choreographed performance, capturing the imagination and sparking curiosity about the intertwined destinies of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

Our investigation has left us both dazzled and quenched with curiosity, inspiring further research into the refreshing and illuminating world of the hydro-sun connection. As we embark on this intellectual journey, we eagerly anticipate the insights and discoveries that await, brimming with the inherent potential for unexpected twists and delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Sudan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States and solar power generation in Sudan may seem as incongruous as a camel in a snowstorm or a penguin in the Sahara. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these seemingly disparate variables. In the realm of statistical analysis, where correlations often prick the interest of curious minds, we unveil a captivating tale of hydro-sun harmony.
While skeptics may raise an eyebrow and ask, "What in the world do bottled water and solar power have in common?" our data tells a different story—one of an unexpected relationship that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us all thirsting for more knowledge. It is the kind of revelation that makes researchers everywhere reach for their water bottles and consider the cosmic significance of H2Ohm and solar rays.
As we embark on this statistical journey into the realm of hydro-sun connection, we urge our readers to embrace their inner water aficionado and solar enthusiast. For, in the words of the great Bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your data sets." So, grab your water bottle, bask in the Sudanese sun, and let us uncover the dazzling correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in the land of pyramids and photovoltaic potential.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Sudan during the period from 2009 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 suggests a remarkably close relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that while Americans were quenching their thirst with bottled water, Sudan was harnessing the power of the sun in a remarkable synchrony that can only be described as aqua-solar synergy.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9354342 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a whopping 93.54% of the variability in Sudanese solar power generation can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption per person. It’s as if the solar panels in Sudan were aligning perfectly with the water bottles on American grocery store shelves, creating a union as harmonious as a classic duet.
The statistical analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of this relationship. This result is as statistically solid as a frozen ice cube but paradoxically as heated as the Saharan sand dunes under direct sunlight.
These findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot showcases the clear and strong correlation between the two variables. The data points form a pattern so striking that it's as if the bottled water and solar power were engaged in a celestial dance, choreographed by the forces of statistical destiny.
Overall, the results of our investigation have brought to light an unexpected and peculiar connection between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Sudan. This hydro-sun connection has sparked intrigue and opened new avenues for research into the fascinating interplay between international beverage habits and renewable energy sources, leaving our research team both dazzled and quenched with curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has not only quenched our curiosity but also left us basking in the glow of a truly illuminating discovery. The remarkably high correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Sudan has left us in awe, much like a thirsty traveler stumbling upon an oasis in the desert. It seems that while Americans were guzzling their way through countless plastic water bottles, the sun in Sudan was shining its approval, creating a partnership as seamless as a well-practiced salsa duo.

The statistical significance of our findings is staggering, much like the effort it takes to carry a 24-pack of bottled water from the store to your car. With a p-value lower than the temperature on the surface of the sun, there's no denying that this hydro-sun connection is as real as H2O and as powerful as solar radiation. Our results not only contribute to the scientific community but also highlight the unexpected and delightful nature of statistical exploration.

As we reflect on the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the great potential for further research in the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources. However, we are confident that our study has quenched the thirst for knowledge in this particular area. In the words of the great hydrologist, H2O, H2O, everywhere, and not a drop to compute.

In conclusion, we raise our water bottles and solar panels to toast this remarkable correlation, and we assert that no further research is needed in this area. This hydro-sun connection is as clear as crystal and as bright as a sunny day in Sudan. Cheers to the delightful dance of data and the unexpected harmony of hydro-solar synergy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Solar Hydrology and Global Energy Consumption


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Alternative Energy Research and Policy Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shedding Light on the Hydro-Sun Connection: A Solar Study of US Bottled Water Consumption and Sudanese Power Generation with an abstract of In this paper, we present the results of a study examining the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generation in Sudan. Utilizing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this peculiar investigation and emerged with some fascinating findings. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9671785 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2009 to 2021. This surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated factors has left our team both dazzled and hydrated with excitement. Our findings shed light on the hydro-sun connection and may inspire further exploration into the whimsical world of international beverage habits and renewable energy sources.

ChatGPT:

US bottled water consumption, solar power generation, study, correlation, Statista, Energy Information Administration, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, international beverage habits, renewable energy sources, hydro-sun connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Solar power generated in Sudan
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Sudan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Sudan

Correlation r = 0.9671785 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9354342 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Sudan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.9E-8. 0.0000000689625560586095800000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 6.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,500,623 random variables You don't actually need 14 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)27.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.247
Solar power generated in Sudan (Billion kWh)0.0010.0010.0040.0060.0130.0130.0130.0180.020.020.0220.0280.03416




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.001,0.004,0.006,0.013,0.013,0.013,0.018,0.02,0.02,0.022,0.028,0.03416,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Sudan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1898 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 24002
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0