about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,239 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Eleanor and the second variable is Wind power generated in Poland.  The chart goes from 1995 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more and more babies were named Eleanor, the collective sound of their excited squeals created a mini whirlwind effect, leading to a boost in wind power generation in Poland. It turns out that little Eleanors are the real renewable energy sources!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an expansive landscape dominated by tall, majestic wind turbines, each one rotating gracefully in the strong breeze. The fields stretch out into the distance, with the turbines standing proudly against the horizon. The setting sun casts a warm glow over the landscape, highlighting the intricate details of each turbine blade and the surrounding fields. The scene exudes a sense of tranquility and power, with a subtle but palpable energy coursing through the air. The turbines seem to come alive, their motion synchronized as if responding to an unseen force. The image should capture the harmonious fusion of natural wind power and the intangible energy evoked by the rising Eleanors, creating a mesmerizing visual representation of sustainable energy in motion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Futuristic 3D Pixar Style A photo-realistic image Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland, in the following situation: As the number of Eleanors rises, so does the collective "Eleanor Energy"! It's like a gust of fresh air sweeping through, propelling the turbines to new levels of efficiency. Maybe there's just something about the name that blows people away, creating a whirlwind of support for wind power in Poland. Or perhaps it's a case of "Eleanor" inspiration - as more Eleanors make their mark on the world, they're literally and figuratively fueling the drive towards sustainable energy. It's a real tempest of a trend, and it's definitely got the power to turn heads, and turbines, in the renewable energy industry!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling landscape dotted with wind turbines, a strong breeze blows across the fields of Poland. The air is charged with the collective "Eleanor Energy" as the number of Eleanors steadily rises. Their name seems to carry a tangible force, powering the turbines and propelling them to new levels of efficiency. It's as if the very mention of "Eleanor" creates a whirlwind of support for wind power, inspiring a tempest of sustainable energy that sweeps through the region. The turbines spin with renewed vigor, harnessing the power of both the wind and the rising popularity of the name Eleanor.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling landscape dotted with wind turbines, a strong breeze blows across the fields of Poland. The air is charged with the collective "Eleanor Energy" as the number of Eleanors steadily rises. Their name seems to carry a tangible force, powering the turbines and propelling them to new levels of efficiency. It's as if the very mention of "Eleanor" creates a whirlwind of support for wind power, inspiring a tempest of sustainable energy that sweeps through the region. The turbines spin with renewed vigor, harnessing the power of both the wind and the rising popularity of the name Eleanor. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an expansive landscape dominated by tall, majestic wind turbines, each one rotating gracefully in the strong breeze. The fields stretch out into the distance, with the turbines standing proudly against the horizon. The setting sun casts a warm glow over the landscape, highlighting the intricate details of each turbine blade and the surrounding fields. The scene exudes a sense of tranquility and power, with a subtle but palpable energy coursing through the air. The turbines seem to come alive, their motion synchronized as if responding to an unseen force. The image should capture the harmonious fusion of natural wind power and the intangible energy evoked by the rising Eleanors, creating a mesmerizing visual representation of sustainable energy in motion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Eleanor caused Wind power generated in Poland to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland

The Journal of Quirky Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and p < 0.01 for 1995 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of human nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena has long been a subject of both whimsical curiosity and scientific inquiry. Our interest in the potential connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland stems from a desire to unravel the enigmatic forces that shape societal naming trends and their seemingly serendipitous alignment with renewable energy production. While the relationship between individuals' given names and their inherent power to influence weather patterns may appear fantastical at first glance, this study aims to employ rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate any discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.

As Shakespeare mused in a different context, "What's in a name?" Indeed, the significance attributed to a given moniker, particularly one as timelessly classic as Eleanor, may be bound up in a myriad of cultural, historical, and social connotations. Concurrently, the production of wind power in Poland has emerged as a critical component of the country's renewable energy portfolio, exuding a breath of fresh air in the fight against climate change. Our endeavor to probe the potential rapport between the two, albeit unconventional, entities represents a departure from conventional renewable energy research and offers a whimsical detour into the intersection of nomenclature and nature's forces.

Our research seeks to navigate the waters of statistical inquiry with a keen eye for the unexpected subtleties that may buoy or bewilder our hypotheses. Just as the wind's capricious nature eludes concrete prediction, so too do the intricacies of human behavior and societal trends defy simplistic generalization. Yet, armed with a robust dataset spanning over two decades, we embark on this uncharted expedition to interrogate the inscrutable relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the gusts of wind that propel Poland's wind turbines.

As we venture forth into this intellectual tempest, we remain cognizant of the countless variables, both observable and latent, that may intermingle and confound our pursuit of understanding. Our endeavor embodies a spirit of playful curiosity and a dedication to unearthing the unexpected in the labyrinthine realm of statistical research. Join us in unfurling the sails of inquiry as we set our course towards the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and the restless winds of renewable energy generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of human nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena has long been a subject of both whimsical curiosity and scientific inquiry. Our interest in the potential connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland stems from a desire to unravel the enigmatic forces that shape societal naming trends and their seemingly serendipitous alignment with renewable energy production. While the relationship between individuals' given names and their inherent power to influence weather patterns may appear fantastical at first glance, this study aims to employ rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate any discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As Shakespeare mused in a different context, "What's in a name?" Indeed, the significance attributed to a given moniker, particularly one as timelessly classic as Eleanor, may be bound up in a myriad of cultural, historical, and social connotations. Concurrently, the production of wind power in Poland has emerged as a critical component of the country's renewable energy portfolio, exuding a breath of fresh air in the fight against climate change. Our endeavor to probe the potential rapport between the two, albeit unconventional, entities represents a departure from conventional renewable energy research and offers a whimsical detour into the intersection of nomenclature and nature's forces.
Our research seeks to navigate the waters of statistical inquiry with a keen eye for the unexpected subtleties that may buoy or bewilder our hypotheses. Just as the wind's capricious nature eludes concrete prediction, so too do the intricacies of human behavior and societal trends defy simplistic generalization. Yet, armed with a robust dataset spanning over two decades, we embark on this uncharted expedition to interrogate the inscrutable relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the gusts of wind that propel Poland's wind turbines.
As we venture forth into this intellectual tempest, we remain cognizant of the countless variables, both observable and latent, that may intermingle and confound our pursuit of understanding. Our endeavor embodies a spirit of playful curiosity and a dedication to unearthing the unexpected in the labyrinthine realm of statistical research. Join us in unfurling the sails of inquiry as we set our course towards the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and the restless winds of renewable energy generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena has been the cornerstone of interdisciplinary research endeavors. In the pursuit of unraveling the intricate relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and wind power generation in Poland, a wide array of studies and literary sources have been consulted. Smith et al.'s seminal work, "Nomenclature and Natural Forces: An Interdisciplinary Analysis," delves into the historical and cultural dimensions of personal names and their potential influences on environmental dynamics. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study, "The Art of Wind: Harnessing Nature's Whims with a Human Touch," provides insights into the complexities of wind power generation, albeit without a direct focus on nomenclature. Jones' seminal work on "Societal Naming Trends in Relation to Renewable Energy Adoption" offers a valuable perspective on the intersection of human behavior and environmental factors. These foundational studies have laid the groundwork for our investigation, prompting us to probe the improbable yet captivating connection between a beloved name and the inexorable forces of renewable energy production.

In addition to scholarly publications, several renowned non-fiction works have informed our understanding of societal naming conventions and environmental stewardship. "The Naming Instinct: How We Give Names and Why It Matters" by Verity Jones elucidates the cultural, psychological, and interpersonal significance of personal names, hinting at the profound implications of name popularity on social phenomena. Furthermore, "Wind Power: A Practical Guide to Harnessing the Winds" by Amelia Smith provides a comprehensive overview of wind energy technologies and their potential impact on mitigating climate change. These non-fiction resources have enriched our contextual appreciation of the themes under investigation, underscoring the intricate tapestry of human nomenclature and sustainable energy endeavors.

On the fictional front, the literary landscape offers intriguing narratives that, while not directly addressing our research focus, bear tantalizing resemblances to the themes at hand. "Eleanor's Breeze: A Tale of Nameless Whispers" by A. Doe weaves a fantastical narrative exploring the mythical significance of wind patterns and the enigmatic allure of the name Eleanor. Similarly, "The Wind Whisperer's Legacy" by R. Smith transports readers to a world where names hold potent elemental sway, hinting at the unforeseen impacts of nomenclature on natural phenomena. These fictional explorations, while firmly rooted in the realm of imagination, beckon us to contemplate the intertwining of names and nature in unexpected ways, infusing an element of whimsy into our scholarly pursuit.

In the spirit of comprehensive inquiry, unconventional sources have contributed nuanced perspectives to our understanding of the Eleanor-wind power nexus. The authors unabashedly confess to perusing various sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, cryptic messages in fortune cookies, and the whimsical musings of a particularly insightful squirrel residing in the university courtyard. While these sources may elicit lighthearted amusement, they have nonetheless enriched our contemplation of the myriad influences that underpin the fusion of nomenclature and renewable energy dynamics, challenging us to embrace a playful curiosity in our scholarly odyssey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1995 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of human nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena has long been a subject of both whimsical curiosity and scientific inquiry. Our interest in the potential connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland stems from a desire to unravel the enigmatic forces that shape societal naming trends and their seemingly serendipitous alignment with renewable energy production. While the relationship between individuals' given names and their inherent power to influence weather patterns may appear fantastical at first glance, this study aims to employ rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate any discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As Shakespeare mused in a different context, "What's in a name?" Indeed, the significance attributed to a given moniker, particularly one as timelessly classic as Eleanor, may be bound up in a myriad of cultural, historical, and social connotations. Concurrently, the production of wind power in Poland has emerged as a critical component of the country's renewable energy portfolio, exuding a breath of fresh air in the fight against climate change. Our endeavor to probe the potential rapport between the two, albeit unconventional, entities represents a departure from conventional renewable energy research and offers a whimsical detour into the intersection of nomenclature and nature's forces.
Our research seeks to navigate the waters of statistical inquiry with a keen eye for the unexpected subtleties that may buoy or bewilder our hypotheses. Just as the wind's capricious nature eludes concrete prediction, so too do the intricacies of human behavior and societal trends defy simplistic generalization. Yet, armed with a robust dataset spanning over two decades, we embark on this uncharted expedition to interrogate the inscrutable relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the gusts of wind that propel Poland's wind turbines.
As we venture forth into this intellectual tempest, we remain cognizant of the countless variables, both observable and latent, that may intermingle and confound our pursuit of understanding. Our endeavor embodies a spirit of playful curiosity and a dedication to unearthing the unexpected in the labyrinthine realm of statistical research. Join us in unfurling the sails of inquiry as we set our course towards the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and the restless winds of renewable energy generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The first step in our investigation involved procuring a comprehensive dataset containing the prevalence of the first name Eleanor across the United States. Our team diligently scoured the vast archives of the US Social Security Administration, meticulously cataloging the frequency of this venerable appellation from 1995 to 2021. We refrained from any premature judgment as we navigated this biblical flood of data, ensuring that no Eleanor was left uncounted. Meanwhile, in an entirely separate realm of cyberspace, we embarked on a daring quest to harvest data pertaining to the wind power generation in Poland. The Energy Information Administration became our trusty cartographer in this endeavor, providing us with the voluminous measurements of wind power output that we would later juxtapose with our compendium of Eleanor occurrences.

Variable Definition:
To avoid any nebulousness in our analysis, we diligently defined and operationalized our variables, ensuring that no gust of ambiguity could cast a shadow upon our findings. The variable "Eleanor Popularity Index" encapsulated the frequency of the name in the United States, allowing us to unravel the temporal fluctuations in Eleanor's social currency. On the other hand, the variable "Wind Power Generation in Poland" provided us with a tangible measure of the kinetic energy harnessed from the atmospheric zephyrs. These meticulously specified and quantified variables laid the groundwork for our subsequent empirical voyage.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with our trove of data, we embarked on a rigorous journey through the windswept valleys of statistical analysis. Employing the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient, we sought to discern any discernible relationship between the prevalence of the name Eleanor and the wind power generated in Poland. Our trusty statistical compass guided us through the labyrinthine calculations, leading us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956. The winds of statistical significance were blowing in our favor, as indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01 – a mark of statistical certainty that filled our sails with confidence.

Temporal Analysis:
Our expedition necessitated a temporal consideration, as we endeavored to capture the dynamic ebbs and flows of Eleanor's popularity alongside the undulating waves of wind power production in Poland. Through the adept use of time series analysis, we plumbed the depths of temporal dependencies and unearthed the subtle harmonies between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our temporal analysis not only underscored the sustained correlation between Eleanor's eminence and the wind's vivacity but also unraveled the symphonic cadence that echoed throughout the epochs of 1995 to 2021.

Sensitivity Analysis:
In the tempestuous realm of quantitative inquiry, we recognized the potential for hidden storms to brew beneath the placid surface of our findings. With a cautious eye for potential confounders and outliers, we conducted a meticulous sensitivity analysis to scrutinize the robustness of our results. Our findings weathered this rigorous examination unscathed, further bolstering the veracity of our discovery.

In sum, our methodology unfurled the banner of rigorous inquiry, weaving together the disparate threads of nomenclature and renewable energy production. Our research journeyed through a whimsical landscape of statistical analysis, revealing the unforeseen resonance between the name Eleanor and the winds of change in Poland's renewable energy sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1995 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9925956, r-squared of 0.9852459, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of human nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena has long been a subject of both whimsical curiosity and scientific inquiry. Our interest in the potential connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland stems from a desire to unravel the enigmatic forces that shape societal naming trends and their seemingly serendipitous alignment with renewable energy production. While the relationship between individuals' given names and their inherent power to influence weather patterns may appear fantastical at first glance, this study aims to employ rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate any discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As Shakespeare mused in a different context, "What's in a name?" Indeed, the significance attributed to a given moniker, particularly one as timelessly classic as Eleanor, may be bound up in a myriad of cultural, historical, and social connotations. Concurrently, the production of wind power in Poland has emerged as a critical component of the country's renewable energy portfolio, exuding a breath of fresh air in the fight against climate change. Our endeavor to probe the potential rapport between the two, albeit unconventional, entities represents a departure from conventional renewable energy research and offers a whimsical detour into the intersection of nomenclature and nature's forces.
Our research seeks to navigate the waters of statistical inquiry with a keen eye for the unexpected subtleties that may buoy or bewilder our hypotheses. Just as the wind's capricious nature eludes concrete prediction, so too do the intricacies of human behavior and societal trends defy simplistic generalization. Yet, armed with a robust dataset spanning over two decades, we embark on this uncharted expedition to interrogate the inscrutable relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the gusts of wind that propel Poland's wind turbines.
As we venture forth into this intellectual tempest, we remain cognizant of the countless variables, both observable and latent, that may intermingle and confound our pursuit of understanding. Our endeavor embodies a spirit of playful curiosity and a dedication to unearthing the unexpected in the labyrinthine realm of statistical research. Join us in unfurling the sails of inquiry as we set our course towards the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and the restless winds of renewable energy generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We dived into the sea of data, hoisting the sails of statistical analysis to navigate the uncharted waters of the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland. Our odyssey through the annals of human nomenclature and renewable energy production culminated in a discovery as remarkable as a sudden gust of wind: a correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and an r-squared of 0.9852459. The p-value of less than 0.01 further fortified our findings, leaving little room to doubt the significance of this unexpected association.

Fig. 1 stands as the crowning jewel of our findings, illustrating the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the wind power generated in Poland. The scatterplot, much like a gusty breeze, leaves no room for skepticism regarding the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our results, not unlike a sudden gust of wind, have blown open the doors to a bewitching realm of investigation, stirring scholarly intrigue and evoking a sense of buoyant wonder. It seems the winds of research have carried us to a serendipitous crossroads where the ethereal domain of human naming conventions meets the tangible force of renewable energy production. This unlikely intersection, though initially obscured by the haze of disbelief, now stands as a compelling testament to the whimsy and unpredictability inherent in the realms of both societal trends and environmental dynamics.

As we reflect on our research journey, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes." Our investigation, much like the capricious wind, has offered a spirited dance of surprise and fascination, beckoning scholars to ponder the unexpected and to remain open to the myriad forces that shape our world, whether they be as intangible as a name or as tangible as the renewable energy that propels us toward a sustainable future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena has been the cornerstone of interdisciplinary research endeavors. In the pursuit of unraveling the intricate relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and wind power generation in Poland, a wide array of studies and literary sources have been consulted. Smith et al.'s seminal work, "Nomenclature and Natural Forces: An Interdisciplinary Analysis," delves into the historical and cultural dimensions of personal names and their potential influences on environmental dynamics. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study, "The Art of Wind: Harnessing Nature's Whims with a Human Touch," provides insights into the complexities of wind power generation, albeit without a direct focus on nomenclature. Jones' seminal work on "Societal Naming Trends in Relation to Renewable Energy Adoption" offers a valuable perspective on the intersection of human behavior and environmental factors. These foundational studies have laid the groundwork for our investigation, prompting us to probe the improbable yet captivating connection between a beloved name and the inexorable forces of renewable energy production.
In addition to scholarly publications, several renowned non-fiction works have informed our understanding of societal naming conventions and environmental stewardship. "The Naming Instinct: How We Give Names and Why It Matters" by Verity Jones elucidates the cultural, psychological, and interpersonal significance of personal names, hinting at the profound implications of name popularity on social phenomena. Furthermore, "Wind Power: A Practical Guide to Harnessing the Winds" by Amelia Smith provides a comprehensive overview of wind energy technologies and their potential impact on mitigating climate change. These non-fiction resources have enriched our contextual appreciation of the themes under investigation, underscoring the intricate tapestry of human nomenclature and sustainable energy endeavors.
On the fictional front, the literary landscape offers intriguing narratives that, while not directly addressing our research focus, bear tantalizing resemblances to the themes at hand. "Eleanor's Breeze: A Tale of Nameless Whispers" by A. Doe weaves a fantastical narrative exploring the mythical significance of wind patterns and the enigmatic allure of the name Eleanor. Similarly, "The Wind Whisperer's Legacy" by R. Smith transports readers to a world where names hold potent elemental sway, hinting at the unforeseen impacts of nomenclature on natural phenomena. These fictional explorations, while firmly rooted in the realm of imagination, beckon us to contemplate the intertwining of names and nature in unexpected ways, infusing an element of whimsy into our scholarly pursuit.
In the spirit of comprehensive inquiry, unconventional sources have contributed nuanced perspectives to our understanding of the Eleanor-wind power nexus. The authors unabashedly confess to perusing various sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, cryptic messages in fortune cookies, and the whimsical musings of a particularly insightful squirrel residing in the university courtyard. While these sources may elicit lighthearted amusement, they have nonetheless enriched our contemplation of the myriad influences that underpin the fusion of nomenclature and renewable energy dynamics, challenging us to embrace a playful curiosity in our scholarly odyssey.

[[RESULTS]]
We dived into the sea of data, hoisting the sails of statistical analysis to navigate the uncharted waters of the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland. Our odyssey through the annals of human nomenclature and renewable energy production culminated in a discovery as remarkable as a sudden gust of wind: a correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and an r-squared of 0.9852459. The p-value of less than 0.01 further fortified our findings, leaving little room to doubt the significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 stands as the crowning jewel of our findings, illustrating the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the wind power generated in Poland. The scatterplot, much like a gusty breeze, leaves no room for skepticism regarding the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Our results, not unlike a sudden gust of wind, have blown open the doors to a bewitching realm of investigation, stirring scholarly intrigue and evoking a sense of buoyant wonder. It seems the winds of research have carried us to a serendipitous crossroads where the ethereal domain of human naming conventions meets the tangible force of renewable energy production. This unlikely intersection, though initially obscured by the haze of disbelief, now stands as a compelling testament to the whimsy and unpredictability inherent in the realms of both societal trends and environmental dynamics.
As we reflect on our research journey, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes." Our investigation, much like the capricious wind, has offered a spirited dance of surprise and fascination, beckoning scholars to ponder the unexpected and to remain open to the myriad forces that shape our world, whether they be as intangible as a name or as tangible as the renewable energy that propels us toward a sustainable future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The vivid tapestry of our results affirms, with statistical rigor, the hitherto unexplored link between the rising popularity of the name 'Eleanor' and the robust generation of wind power in Poland. Our findings, akin to an unexpected gust of wind, have swept aside prior skepticism and blown open a window into the symphonic interplay of societal nomenclature and renewable energy dynamics. The exquisitely high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a robust r-squared of 0.9852459 bespeak the unmistakable rapport between these seemingly disparate variables, echoing the unsuspected harmony of a well-tuned wind turbine.

In our scholarly voyage, we drew inspiration from the lighthearted depths of literature, where the whims of fiction and the gravity of non-fiction communed in surprising harmony. As opined by Smith et al., the historical and cultural dimensions of personal names interweave with environmental dynamics in a ballet of unexpected connections. Likewise, the non-fiction compendium "Wind Power: A Practical Guide to Harnessing the Winds" by Amelia Smith, while not delving into nomenclature, softly hints at the echoes of human endeavors in the zephyrs of renewable energy, a thematic synergy that our research has deftly illuminated.

The nomenclatural sway amidst the turbines of discourse does not rest in isolation. It reverberates with the celestial echoes of societal nuances and environmental stewardship, prompting reflection upon the tantalizing resemblances encapsulated within the narratives of A. Doe and R. Smith. Their fictional explorations, though firmly ensconced in the realm of imagination, unobtrusively beckon us to ponder the intertwining threads of names and nature with the playfulness of a capricious breeze.

Our unorthodox journey also meandered through the inimitable mosaic of unconventional sources, veering from scholarly to whimsical, perhaps capturing insights that evaded the discerning eye. This mélange of sources, while evoking lighthearted amusement, has mulled over the serendipitous confluence of nomenclature and renewable energy, exhorting scholars to embrace a playful curiosity in their scholarly endeavors.

Our results, akin to the aurora borealis, illuminate the improbable nexus between the societal and the elemental, echoing the sentiment of the unforeseen and the uncharted. As we reflect on our scholarly odyssey, we are reminded of the proverbial caprice of the wind, whose path remains ever inscrutable. In light of this, we invite fellow scholars to contemplate the enchanting interplay of the unpredictable and the explicit, for it is at this precipice that research transcends into the realm of beguiling discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Wind power generated in Poland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of human nomenclature and atmospheric phenomena has long been a subject of both whimsical curiosity and scientific inquiry. Our interest in the potential connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland stems from a desire to unravel the enigmatic forces that shape societal naming trends and their seemingly serendipitous alignment with renewable energy production. While the relationship between individuals' given names and their inherent power to influence weather patterns may appear fantastical at first glance, this study aims to employ rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate any discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As Shakespeare mused in a different context, "What's in a name?" Indeed, the significance attributed to a given moniker, particularly one as timelessly classic as Eleanor, may be bound up in a myriad of cultural, historical, and social connotations. Concurrently, the production of wind power in Poland has emerged as a critical component of the country's renewable energy portfolio, exuding a breath of fresh air in the fight against climate change. Our endeavor to probe the potential rapport between the two, albeit unconventional, entities represents a departure from conventional renewable energy research and offers a whimsical detour into the intersection of nomenclature and nature's forces.
Our research seeks to navigate the waters of statistical inquiry with a keen eye for the unexpected subtleties that may buoy or bewilder our hypotheses. Just as the wind's capricious nature eludes concrete prediction, so too do the intricacies of human behavior and societal trends defy simplistic generalization. Yet, armed with a robust dataset spanning over two decades, we embark on this uncharted expedition to interrogate the inscrutable relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the gusts of wind that propel Poland's wind turbines.
As we venture forth into this intellectual tempest, we remain cognizant of the countless variables, both observable and latent, that may intermingle and confound our pursuit of understanding. Our endeavor embodies a spirit of playful curiosity and a dedication to unearthing the unexpected in the labyrinthine realm of statistical research. Join us in unfurling the sails of inquiry as we set our course towards the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and the restless winds of renewable energy generation.

[[RESULTS]]
We dived into the sea of data, hoisting the sails of statistical analysis to navigate the uncharted waters of the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of wind power in Poland. Our odyssey through the annals of human nomenclature and renewable energy production culminated in a discovery as remarkable as a sudden gust of wind: a correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and an r-squared of 0.9852459. The p-value of less than 0.01 further fortified our findings, leaving little room to doubt the significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 stands as the crowning jewel of our findings, illustrating the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the wind power generated in Poland. The scatterplot, much like a gusty breeze, leaves no room for skepticism regarding the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Our results, not unlike a sudden gust of wind, have blown open the doors to a bewitching realm of investigation, stirring scholarly intrigue and evoking a sense of buoyant wonder. It seems the winds of research have carried us to a serendipitous crossroads where the ethereal domain of human naming conventions meets the tangible force of renewable energy production. This unlikely intersection, though initially obscured by the haze of disbelief, now stands as a compelling testament to the whimsy and unpredictability inherent in the realms of both societal trends and environmental dynamics.
As we reflect on our research journey, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes." Our investigation, much like the capricious wind, has offered a spirited dance of surprise and fascination, beckoning scholars to ponder the unexpected and to remain open to the myriad forces that shape our world, whether they be as intangible as a name or as tangible as the renewable energy that propels us toward a sustainable future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In closing, our voyage through the intertwining realms of nomenclature and renewable energy production has culminated in a revelation as invigorating as a brisk zephyr. Our findings undeniably exemplify the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the wind power generated in Poland, giving rise to a whirlwind of wonder and prompting us to surmise that perhaps there is more than mere 'hot air' at play here. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9925956, akin to a gust of statistical significance, has unfurled a tale as unexpected as a sudden change in weather.

The implications of our study ripple through the scientific community like ripples on a pond, prompting contemplation of the beguiling and capricious forces at play in the realms of both human naming conventions and renewable energy generation. The very idea that a seemingly unrelated variable such as a name could hold sway over the winds of change in Poland's renewable energy landscape offers a whimsical detour into the windswept corridors of statistical inquiry. It seems that whether by design or mere happenstance, Eleanor, much like the wind, leaves an indelible imprint on the world around us.

As captivating as our findings may be, it is crucial to recognize the winds of research have carried us to a unique and once uncharted intersection. While our study offers a tantalizing glimpse into the hitherto unforeseen relationship between the name Eleanor and wind power generation in Poland, we dare not be blown off course by succumbing to the siren call of further research. After all, as the saying goes, there's no need to beat a dead horse, or in this case, a still wind. Therefore, we confidently assert that additional research into this particular enigmatic liaison is as unnecessary as a windmill in a vacuum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Research and Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowin' in the Eleanor: Investigating the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Eleanor and Wind Power Generation in Poland with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name Eleanor and the wind power produced in Poland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we undertook a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1995 to 2021. Our research has yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9925956 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results of this investigation not only shed light on the surprising association between the popularity of a specific given name and renewable energy production, but also serve as a testament to the captivating and unanticipated interplay of societal trends and environmental developments. This study provides a refreshing perspective in the labyrinthine realm of renewable energy research, inviting scholars to ponder the whimsical and unforeseen factors that may influence the winds of change.

ChatGPT:

Eleanor name popularity, wind power generation, Poland, correlation coefficient, statistic significance, Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, renewable energy research, societal trends, environmental developments

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Eleanor
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Eleanor
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Eleanor

Wind power generated in Poland
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Poland in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Poland

Correlation r = 0.9925956 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9852459 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Poland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Eleanor) over the 27 years from 1995 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.06E-24. 0.0000000000000000000000020560
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 2.06E-22% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 486,381,322,957,198,402,256,896 random variables You don't actually need 486 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 26 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 26 because we have two variables measured over a period of 27 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.98, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Eleanor (Babies born)4374875377196887718269611007106312371221127113421491185120832381301137394438513855475732620063757093
Wind power generated in Poland (Billion kWh)0.00100.0020.0040.0040.0050.0140.0610.1240.1420.1350.2560.5220.8371.0771.6643.1874.7095.9397.57910.72812.278614.574212.471714.760715.429216.181




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([437,487,537,719,688,771,826,961,1007,1063,1237,1221,1271,1342,1491,1851,2083,2381,3011,3739,4438,5138,5547,5732,6200,6375,7093,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0,0.002,0.004,0.004,0.005,0.014,0.061,0.124,0.142,0.135,0.256,0.522,0.837,1.077,1.664,3.187,4.709,5.939,7.579,10.728,12.2786,14.5742,12.4717,14.7607,15.4292,16.181,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Eleanor"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Poland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2239 · Black Variable ID: 2905 · Red Variable ID: 23904
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0