about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,272 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption melted upward, so did CoStar Group's stock price. It seems the market just couldn't resist the gouda news!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a family gathering in a modern backyard patio, sitting around a sleek wooden dining table. They are all smiling and enjoying classic cheeseburgers with juicy beef patties, crisp lettuce, and thick slices of American cheese. The setting exudes a laid-back and comfortable atmosphere, with the subtle glow of string lights framing the scene. The family members are engaged in a casual conversation, fully engaged with each other while discussing CoStar Group's stock price. Create an ambiance that embraces the fusion of traditional family dinner with contemporary elements and technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cubism Cyberpunk Scalar art Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A family enjoying classic cheeseburgers with thick slices of American cheese while casually discussing CoStar Group's stock price on their backyard patio.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: A family enjoying classic cheeseburgers with thick slices of American cheese while casually discussing CoStar Group's stock price on their backyard patio. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a family gathering in a modern backyard patio, sitting around a sleek wooden dining table. They are all smiling and enjoying classic cheeseburgers with juicy beef patties, crisp lettuce, and thick slices of American cheese. The setting exudes a laid-back and comfortable atmosphere, with the subtle glow of string lights framing the scene. The family members are engaged in a casual conversation, fully engaged with each other while discussing CoStar Group's stock price. Create an ambiance that embraces the fusion of traditional family dinner with contemporary elements and technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance

Journal of Dairy Investment and Culinary Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Cheese and stock prices might seem like an odd pairing, akin to mixing blue cheese with a fine Bordeaux. However, as the saying goes, there's no use crying over spilt milk, and there's certainly no harm in exploring the seemingly "holey" relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP). In this paper, we aim to curate a flavorful discussion centered around the potential link between a beloved dairy product and the financial performance of a leading real estate data company.

As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "grater" pursuit of knowledge, seeking to "wedge" our way into uncovering uncharted connections that may appear to be as puzzling as a Swiss cheese. This study utilizes data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, blending together the worlds of dairy production and stock market analytics in a fondue of statistical analysis.

By embracing the "brie-lliance" of modern data analysis techniques, we have channeled our inner "muenster" and embarked on a journey to uncover whether the consumption of American cheese has truly been "cheddar-ing" the course of CoStar Group's stock performance. Our findings not only provide a fresh perspective on the potential influence of a dairy staple on financial markets but also contribute to the extensive literature on peculiar indicators in economic and financial research. So, without further ado, let us "brie-f"ly embark on this "gouda" journey of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cheese and stock prices might seem like an odd pairing, akin to mixing blue cheese with a fine Bordeaux. However, as the saying goes, there's no use crying over spilt milk, and there's certainly no harm in exploring the seemingly "holey" relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP). In this paper, we aim to curate a flavorful discussion centered around the potential link between a beloved dairy product and the financial performance of a leading real estate data company.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "grater" pursuit of knowledge, seeking to "wedge" our way into uncovering uncharted connections that may appear to be as puzzling as a Swiss cheese. This study utilizes data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, blending together the worlds of dairy production and stock market analytics in a fondue of statistical analysis.
By embracing the "brie-lliance" of modern data analysis techniques, we have channeled our inner "muenster" and embarked on a journey to uncover whether the consumption of American cheese has truly been "cheddar-ing" the course of CoStar Group's stock performance. Our findings not only provide a fresh perspective on the potential influence of a dairy staple on financial markets but also contribute to the extensive literature on peculiar indicators in economic and financial research. So, without further ado, let us "brie-f"ly embark on this "gouda" journey of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. in "Cheese and the Economy: A Holy Matrimony" conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of cheese consumption on various economic indicators. Their study found a positive correlation between cheese consumption and consumer spending, highlighting the potential influence of dairy products on economic activity. Similarly, Doe and Jones in "The Dairy Dilemma: Exploring Unconventional Economic Indicators" explored the relationship between dairy product consumption and stock market performance, uncovering intriguing patterns that suggest a plausible connection between cheese consumption and market trends.

Building on the research of these scholars, we delve into a diverse range of literature that touches upon the tangential relationship between food consumption and economic factors. "Big Macs and Big Bux: Unconventional Indicators in the Global Economy" by McStudent investigates the correlation between fast-food consumption and stock market volatility, providing an insightful backdrop for our exploration of cheese and financial performance. In a different vein, "The Wealthy Walnut: Nutritious Investments or Nutty Speculation?" by Nutty Professor delves into the pecuniary implications of nut consumption, offering a nuanced perspective that resonates with our study's theme of unconventional economic indicators.

Transitioning from the realms of non-fiction to fiction, we encounter "The Gouda Code" by Dan Fondue, a thrilling narrative that intertwines the mysteries of cheese with cryptic stock market algorithms, igniting the imagination and serving as a paragon of intriguing literary twists. Meanwhile, "Brie and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, though seemingly unrelated to our research, piques interest with its titular pun and its potential to inspire a whimsical approach to serious subjects.

In the realm of animated entertainment, the cartoon series "Cheesy Adventures" follows the escapades of a group of anthropomorphic cheeses navigating the complexities of the stock market, underscoring the potential for cheese-related themes to permeate popular culture. Additionally, the beloved children's show "The Cheddar-ship Enterprise" introduces young audiences to the concept of financial decision-making through the perspective of sentient cheese wheels exploring the cosmos, enticing viewers with the whimsy of cheese-themed storytelling.

While these sources may seem outlandish in their peripheral relevance to our study, they serve as an "edam-ple" of the diverse inspirations that can fuel intellectual inquiry and infuse levity into scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cheese and stock prices might seem like an odd pairing, akin to mixing blue cheese with a fine Bordeaux. However, as the saying goes, there's no use crying over spilt milk, and there's certainly no harm in exploring the seemingly "holey" relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP). In this paper, we aim to curate a flavorful discussion centered around the potential link between a beloved dairy product and the financial performance of a leading real estate data company.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "grater" pursuit of knowledge, seeking to "wedge" our way into uncovering uncharted connections that may appear to be as puzzling as a Swiss cheese. This study utilizes data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, blending together the worlds of dairy production and stock market analytics in a fondue of statistical analysis.
By embracing the "brie-lliance" of modern data analysis techniques, we have channeled our inner "muenster" and embarked on a journey to uncover whether the consumption of American cheese has truly been "cheddar-ing" the course of CoStar Group's stock performance. Our findings not only provide a fresh perspective on the potential influence of a dairy staple on financial markets but also contribute to the extensive literature on peculiar indicators in economic and financial research. So, without further ado, let us "brie-f"ly embark on this "gouda" journey of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed an assortment of analytical methods that could rival the selection at a cheese tasting event. The first step involved compiling data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), where the research team engaged in what could be described as a "grate" hunt across the depths of the internet. The data spanned the period from 2002 to 2021, providing us with a wedge of time to thoroughly investigate the potential relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock performance of CoStar Group (CSGP).

To analyze this "gouda" correlation, we applied a smorgasbord of statistical techniques, some of which were sharp as cheddar and others as complex as a brie. Our exploration included time-series analysis to discern any trends over the years, and we utilized regression models to measure the strength and direction of the association between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock prices.

Furthermore, in an effort to peel back the layers of this intriguing relationship, we employed other econometric methods such as autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and perhaps even threw in a bit of "cheese-fitting" to see if the relationship melted into place. Our statistical toolkit resembled a cheese platter adorned with a variety of flavors, each method adding its own distinct taste to the analysis.

In addition to these methods, we undertook a comprehensive gruyere, I mean, literature review to ensure that our approach was as solid as a block of aged cheddar. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure that the results were not as full of holes as a slice of Emmental cheese.

To "brie-f"ly sum it up, our research methodology was designed to slice through the complexities of this "whey-ward" inquiry, providing a rigorous examination of the potential connection between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance. With this methodology in place, we aimed to serve up a credible and "brie-lliant" analysis, and to ensure that our findings could be savored like a fine wheel of cheese.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8593004, r-squared of 0.7383971, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Cheese and stock prices might seem like an odd pairing, akin to mixing blue cheese with a fine Bordeaux. However, as the saying goes, there's no use crying over spilt milk, and there's certainly no harm in exploring the seemingly "holey" relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP). In this paper, we aim to curate a flavorful discussion centered around the potential link between a beloved dairy product and the financial performance of a leading real estate data company.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "grater" pursuit of knowledge, seeking to "wedge" our way into uncovering uncharted connections that may appear to be as puzzling as a Swiss cheese. This study utilizes data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, blending together the worlds of dairy production and stock market analytics in a fondue of statistical analysis.
By embracing the "brie-lliance" of modern data analysis techniques, we have channeled our inner "muenster" and embarked on a journey to uncover whether the consumption of American cheese has truly been "cheddar-ing" the course of CoStar Group's stock performance. Our findings not only provide a fresh perspective on the potential influence of a dairy staple on financial markets but also contribute to the extensive literature on peculiar indicators in economic and financial research. So, without further ado, let us "brie-f"ly embark on this "gouda" journey of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock performance, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as American cheese consumption goes up, it appears that CSGP stock price does too, proving that there's more to this cheesy delight than meets the eye.

The r-squared value of 0.7383971 further cements the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 73.8% of the variability in CSGP stock price can be explained by changes in American cheese consumption. This statistical parameter serves as a testament to the magnitude of influence that cheese might have on the stock market, making one question whether the "big cheese" in the financial world is not just a metaphor after all.

Notably, the p-value less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke, but a deftly woven fabric of evidence pointing toward a tangible association between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock price. It seems that in the world of finance, the age-old question "to brie or not to brie" may hold more weight than previously thought.

Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the compelling correlation between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance, illustrating a linear pattern that is as convincing as a perfectly melted slice of American cheese on a burger. This visual representation leaves a lasting impression, akin to the delightful aftertaste of a well-crafted cheese board at a fine-dining establishment.

Our findings not only provide food for thought but represent a stepping stone in the "gouda" journey of uncovering unorthodox indicators in the realm of financial markets. It appears that the stock market might indeed have a "feta-ish" for dairy products, and who knows – perhaps the next time someone mentions "investing in cheese," they might be onto something "grate" after all.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. in "Cheese and the Economy: A Holy Matrimony" conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of cheese consumption on various economic indicators. Their study found a positive correlation between cheese consumption and consumer spending, highlighting the potential influence of dairy products on economic activity. Similarly, Doe and Jones in "The Dairy Dilemma: Exploring Unconventional Economic Indicators" explored the relationship between dairy product consumption and stock market performance, uncovering intriguing patterns that suggest a plausible connection between cheese consumption and market trends.
Building on the research of these scholars, we delve into a diverse range of literature that touches upon the tangential relationship between food consumption and economic factors. "Big Macs and Big Bux: Unconventional Indicators in the Global Economy" by McStudent investigates the correlation between fast-food consumption and stock market volatility, providing an insightful backdrop for our exploration of cheese and financial performance. In a different vein, "The Wealthy Walnut: Nutritious Investments or Nutty Speculation?" by Nutty Professor delves into the pecuniary implications of nut consumption, offering a nuanced perspective that resonates with our study's theme of unconventional economic indicators.
Transitioning from the realms of non-fiction to fiction, we encounter "The Gouda Code" by Dan Fondue, a thrilling narrative that intertwines the mysteries of cheese with cryptic stock market algorithms, igniting the imagination and serving as a paragon of intriguing literary twists. Meanwhile, "Brie and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, though seemingly unrelated to our research, piques interest with its titular pun and its potential to inspire a whimsical approach to serious subjects.
In the realm of animated entertainment, the cartoon series "Cheesy Adventures" follows the escapades of a group of anthropomorphic cheeses navigating the complexities of the stock market, underscoring the potential for cheese-related themes to permeate popular culture. Additionally, the beloved children's show "The Cheddar-ship Enterprise" introduces young audiences to the concept of financial decision-making through the perspective of sentient cheese wheels exploring the cosmos, enticing viewers with the whimsy of cheese-themed storytelling.
While these sources may seem outlandish in their peripheral relevance to our study, they serve as an "edam-ple" of the diverse inspirations that can fuel intellectual inquiry and infuse levity into scholarly discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock performance, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as American cheese consumption goes up, it appears that CSGP stock price does too, proving that there's more to this cheesy delight than meets the eye.
The r-squared value of 0.7383971 further cements the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 73.8% of the variability in CSGP stock price can be explained by changes in American cheese consumption. This statistical parameter serves as a testament to the magnitude of influence that cheese might have on the stock market, making one question whether the "big cheese" in the financial world is not just a metaphor after all.
Notably, the p-value less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke, but a deftly woven fabric of evidence pointing toward a tangible association between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock price. It seems that in the world of finance, the age-old question "to brie or not to brie" may hold more weight than previously thought.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the compelling correlation between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance, illustrating a linear pattern that is as convincing as a perfectly melted slice of American cheese on a burger. This visual representation leaves a lasting impression, akin to the delightful aftertaste of a well-crafted cheese board at a fine-dining establishment.
Our findings not only provide food for thought but represent a stepping stone in the "gouda" journey of uncovering unorthodox indicators in the realm of financial markets. It appears that the stock market might indeed have a "feta-ish" for dairy products, and who knows – perhaps the next time someone mentions "investing in cheese," they might be onto something "grate" after all.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis have provided compelling evidence for a significant positive correlation between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance, aligning with previous research suggesting that unconventional indicators indeed hold a "gouda" deal of influence on financial markets. The findings affirm the curdious speculation put forth by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, articulating a "cheesy" correlation between dairy consumption and economic activity. It seems that the connection between cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance is not just a "whey-ward" mystery after all.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 underscores the magnitude of the relationship, lending further credibility to the notion that there may be more to cheese consumption than meets the eye. This correlation is as "gouda" as it gets in the world of financial research, indicating a strong positive association between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock price. The r-squared value of 0.7383971 echoes the subtle yet profound influence of cheese on stock performance, akin to the rich flavor profile of a well-aged cheddar.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the p-value less than 0.01 reinforces the veracity of the observed correlation, accentuating the "cheese-mystique" that permeates the world of financial markets. The scatterplot reveals a linear pattern as compelling as a perfectly melted slice of American cheese, visually solidifying the hypothesis that there may be a direct link between cheese consumption and stock performance.

In essence, our findings not only add a slice of provolone to the dialogue about unconventional indicators but also illustrate the "feta-l" potential of dairy products in shaping market trends. Perhaps, the next time someone mentions "investing in cheese," they might be on to something "grate" after all. So let's embrace the "brie-lliance" of our results and continue to explore the "cheesy" opportunities for uncovering unorthodox predictors of financial performance.

As this research continues to mature, we encourage further investigation into the "power of provolone" and the "mystique of mozzarella" in influencing stock performance, acknowledging that the financial world may indeed have a "feta-ish" for dairy products. This study serves as a reminder that within the sober arena of economic research, there's always room for a little "cheese-y" investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Cheese and stock prices might seem like an odd pairing, akin to mixing blue cheese with a fine Bordeaux. However, as the saying goes, there's no use crying over spilt milk, and there's certainly no harm in exploring the seemingly "holey" relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP). In this paper, we aim to curate a flavorful discussion centered around the potential link between a beloved dairy product and the financial performance of a leading real estate data company.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a "grater" pursuit of knowledge, seeking to "wedge" our way into uncovering uncharted connections that may appear to be as puzzling as a Swiss cheese. This study utilizes data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, blending together the worlds of dairy production and stock market analytics in a fondue of statistical analysis.
By embracing the "brie-lliance" of modern data analysis techniques, we have channeled our inner "muenster" and embarked on a journey to uncover whether the consumption of American cheese has truly been "cheddar-ing" the course of CoStar Group's stock performance. Our findings not only provide a fresh perspective on the potential influence of a dairy staple on financial markets but also contribute to the extensive literature on peculiar indicators in economic and financial research. So, without further ado, let us "brie-f"ly embark on this "gouda" journey of discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 between American cheese consumption and CoStar Group's stock performance, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as American cheese consumption goes up, it appears that CSGP stock price does too, proving that there's more to this cheesy delight than meets the eye.
The r-squared value of 0.7383971 further cements the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 73.8% of the variability in CSGP stock price can be explained by changes in American cheese consumption. This statistical parameter serves as a testament to the magnitude of influence that cheese might have on the stock market, making one question whether the "big cheese" in the financial world is not just a metaphor after all.
Notably, the p-value less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke, but a deftly woven fabric of evidence pointing toward a tangible association between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock price. It seems that in the world of finance, the age-old question "to brie or not to brie" may hold more weight than previously thought.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the compelling correlation between American cheese consumption and CSGP stock performance, illustrating a linear pattern that is as convincing as a perfectly melted slice of American cheese on a burger. This visual representation leaves a lasting impression, akin to the delightful aftertaste of a well-crafted cheese board at a fine-dining establishment.
Our findings not only provide food for thought but represent a stepping stone in the "gouda" journey of uncovering unorthodox indicators in the realm of financial markets. It appears that the stock market might indeed have a "feta-ish" for dairy products, and who knows – perhaps the next time someone mentions "investing in cheese," they might be onto something "grate" after all.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has gratefully contributed to the expanding body of evidence regarding the unexpected influence of American cheese consumption on the stock market, particularly in the context of CoStar Group's performance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings indicate a caws for understanding the role of dairy in financial markets. The r-squared value of 0.7383971 proves that the impact of cheese on CSGP stock price is not just a muenster-sized myth, but a statistically significant reality. The cheese stands alone as a potential indicator of market fluctuations, leaving us with a taste for further investigation into the wheyward ways of unusual economic indicators.

We must acknowledge the potential limitations of our study, such as the possibility of confounding variables or the unpredictability of market dynamics, but we remain confident in the validity and relevance of our results. As the literature continues to mature, our research injects a fresh slice of provolone into the mix, expanding the horizons of financial analysis in ways that may seem unconventional but are undeniably captivating.

Ultimately, our findings urge us to reconsider the idiom "the big cheese in the stock market" and embrace the notion that there may be more to this than meets the eye. We must "brie" proud of the strides we have made in unraveling this "gouda" mystery. Our study lightheartedly invites fellow researchers to further explore the intriguing interplay between dairy products and financial markets, but for now, it's time to "whey" no more. It seems that the age-old financial question of "blue chips or cheese slices" may have found its dairying answer, and we assert that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Dairy Investment and Culinary Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Dairy Economics and Research Analysis (SDERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Say Cheese: A Gouda Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and CoStar Group's Stock Performance with an abstract of This paper examines the relationship between American cheese consumption and the stock price of CoStar Group (CSGP) using data from USDA and LSEG Analytics. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8593004 and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a cheese-cowlation between the two variables, shedding light on a potential "cheddar and cheddar" relationship. The results add a slice of provolone to the ongoing discourse about unusual indicators in financial and economic research. This paper aims to redefine the age-old saying "the big cheese in the stock market" with empirical evidence, while leaving some room for speculation about the "wheyward" influence of American cheese on CSGP's performance.

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, CoStar Group, stock performance, correlation, USDA, LSEG Analytics, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, unusual indicators, financial research, economic research, cheddar, empirical evidence

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP)
Detailed data title: Opening price of CoStar Group (CSGP) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP)

Correlation r = 0.8593004 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7383971 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000012175960136482773000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 821,290 random variables You don't actually need 821 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)12.831412.561912.861212.64913.065612.792913.130613.355313.304813.039213.256913.357313.665614.044414.362115.090115.402715.538915.516.1
CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP) (Stock price)2.451.914.124.64.345.44.713.34.245.816.829.1518.3918.4620.3318.9329.8333.2860.593.22




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12.8314,12.5619,12.8612,12.649,13.0656,12.7929,13.1306,13.3553,13.3048,13.0392,13.2569,13.3573,13.6656,14.0444,14.3621,15.0901,15.4027,15.5389,15.5,16.1,])
array_2 = np.array([2.45,1.91,4.12,4.6,4.34,5.4,4.71,3.3,4.24,5.81,6.82,9.15,18.39,18.46,20.33,18.93,29.83,33.28,60.5,93.22,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "CoStar Group's stock price (CSGP)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 2272 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 1821
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0