about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,601 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and the second variable is Arson in United States.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fewer people were lighting up, there was a significant reduction in 'hot' opportunities for accidental fire starters. Plus, without as much smoking going on, there was a lot less 'burning' desire to commit arson.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a city park scene. In the foreground, a group of people are gathered around a picnic table, some of them smoking cigarettes. In the distance, a building can be seen with smoke billowing from a window, indicating that it is on fire. The illustration should evoke the high cigarette smoking rate among US adults and the unfortunate incidence of arson in the United States, with a focus on the simplicity of the visual elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Charcoal Pop art inspired by bauhaus A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a city park, a group of people are gathered around a picnic table, with some of them smoking cigarettes. In the distance, a building can be seen with smoke billowing from a window, indicating that it is on fire. This scene represents the high cigarette smoking rate among US adults and the unfortunate incidence of arson in the United States.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a city park, a group of people are gathered around a picnic table, with some of them smoking cigarettes. In the distance, a building can be seen with smoke billowing from a window, indicating that it is on fire. This scene represents the high cigarette smoking rate among US adults and the unfortunate incidence of arson in the United States. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a city park scene. In the foreground, a group of people are gathered around a picnic table, some of them smoking cigarettes. In the distance, a building can be seen with smoke billowing from a window, indicating that it is on fire. The illustration should evoke the high cigarette smoking rate among US adults and the unfortunate incidence of arson in the United States, with a focus on the simplicity of the visual elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults caused Arson in United States to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

The Journal of Pyrological Epidemiology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from CDC and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9446689 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Cigarette smoking has long been a hot topic of debate, igniting discussions about its impact on public health and societal behaviors. While the connection between smoking and well-known health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease has been extensively researched, the potential link between cigarette smoking and arson incidents remains largely unexplored. In this study, we embark on a fiery investigation to examine the ash-tounding correlation between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States.

It is well known that smoking is a combustible issue, with its fiery proponents and smoldering opponents. However, the smoky haze surrounding the potential association between smoking and arson has not been adequately cleared. The rationale for delving into this scorching topic stems from the intriguing possibility that smoking habits, beyond their widely acknowledged health impacts, may also have incendiary consequences related to arson incidents. Indeed, while smoking rates have been on a slow burn of decline over the past few decades, the extent to which smoking behaviors may bolster the incidence of fire-related crimes remains a smoldering question.

The sparks of curiosity that have fueled our investigation are further stoked by the existing literature on the complex psychology and behavior of arsonists. From arson's historical ties to the curiosity for infernos to the modern-day motivation for insurance fraud, delving into the underlying factors contributing to arson has its own set of combustible curiosities. By incorporating the study of smoking behavior, this research aims to add a match to the ongoing discourse, illuminating potential threads connecting these seemingly disparate phenomena.

As we delve into this fiery exploration, we aim to not only light a fire under the existing literature but also to spark a blaze of fresh insights into the potential relationship between smoking habits and arson incidents. With our inferno of statistical analysis, we seek to set ablaze the conventional wisdom and ignite a new understanding of the potential influence of smoking behavior on fire-related crimes. Our findings promise to set the stage for a conflagration of discussions and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the smoky dynamics at play.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will kindle the flames of inquiry by presenting the methodology, data sources, and results of our scorching investigation. The findings stand to shed a burning light on the often overlooked interplay between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, providing essential tinder for further exploration and potential policy considerations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cigarette smoking has long been a hot topic of debate, igniting discussions about its impact on public health and societal behaviors. While the connection between smoking and well-known health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease has been extensively researched, the potential link between cigarette smoking and arson incidents remains largely unexplored. In this study, we embark on a fiery investigation to examine the ash-tounding correlation between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States.
It is well known that smoking is a combustible issue, with its fiery proponents and smoldering opponents. However, the smoky haze surrounding the potential association between smoking and arson has not been adequately cleared. The rationale for delving into this scorching topic stems from the intriguing possibility that smoking habits, beyond their widely acknowledged health impacts, may also have incendiary consequences related to arson incidents. Indeed, while smoking rates have been on a slow burn of decline over the past few decades, the extent to which smoking behaviors may bolster the incidence of fire-related crimes remains a smoldering question.
The sparks of curiosity that have fueled our investigation are further stoked by the existing literature on the complex psychology and behavior of arsonists. From arson's historical ties to the curiosity for infernos to the modern-day motivation for insurance fraud, delving into the underlying factors contributing to arson has its own set of combustible curiosities. By incorporating the study of smoking behavior, this research aims to add a match to the ongoing discourse, illuminating potential threads connecting these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we delve into this fiery exploration, we aim to not only light a fire under the existing literature but also to spark a blaze of fresh insights into the potential relationship between smoking habits and arson incidents. With our inferno of statistical analysis, we seek to set ablaze the conventional wisdom and ignite a new understanding of the potential influence of smoking behavior on fire-related crimes. Our findings promise to set the stage for a conflagration of discussions and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the smoky dynamics at play.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will kindle the flames of inquiry by presenting the methodology, data sources, and results of our scorching investigation. The findings stand to shed a burning light on the often overlooked interplay between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, providing essential tinder for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The pervading haze of scholarly inquiry into the correlation between cigarette smoking rates among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States is a smoldering tapestry, interwoven with a myriad of academic contributions. Smith (2005) delves into the psychology of arsonists, shedding a flickering light on the complex motivations and behaviors that underpin fire-related crimes. Doe (2010) explores the historical roots of arson, igniting discussions on the cultural and societal factors that have contributed to the prevalence of these incendiary acts.

Jones (2017) offers a scorching analysis of the socioeconomic dynamics that may fuel arson incidents, uncovering a hotbed of inequalities and systemic issues that add fuel to the fire. These incendiary works have laid the groundwork for our own investigation, providing kindling for the exploration of the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits.

Furthermore, notable non-fiction works such as "Fire: A Brief History" by Stephen J. Pyne and "Pyromaniacs: A Burning Desire" by John F. Eastwood have cast a blazing spotlight on the historical, cultural, and psychological dimensions of arson, illuminating the fiery tapestry that surrounds this often-overlooked phenomenon.

Through the flickering lens of fiction, novels such as "Smoke and Mirrors" by Neil Gaiman and "Ashes, Ashes" by Jo Treggiari have tantalized readers with smoky narratives that, while not directly related to our inquiry, have undoubtedly stoked the flames of our imagination.

As we delve deeper into the tinderbox of literature, it is important to note that our inquiry has not been confined to traditional academic sources alone. In the spirit of thoroughness, we have also perused a wide array of eclectic materials, including the backs of shampoo bottles, back-of-the-napkin doodles, and the etchings of smoke signals in our quest to unearth any embers of evidence that may shed light on the sizzling correlation between smoking behavior and arson incidents.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from CDC and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2001 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cigarette smoking has long been a hot topic of debate, igniting discussions about its impact on public health and societal behaviors. While the connection between smoking and well-known health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease has been extensively researched, the potential link between cigarette smoking and arson incidents remains largely unexplored. In this study, we embark on a fiery investigation to examine the ash-tounding correlation between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States.
It is well known that smoking is a combustible issue, with its fiery proponents and smoldering opponents. However, the smoky haze surrounding the potential association between smoking and arson has not been adequately cleared. The rationale for delving into this scorching topic stems from the intriguing possibility that smoking habits, beyond their widely acknowledged health impacts, may also have incendiary consequences related to arson incidents. Indeed, while smoking rates have been on a slow burn of decline over the past few decades, the extent to which smoking behaviors may bolster the incidence of fire-related crimes remains a smoldering question.
The sparks of curiosity that have fueled our investigation are further stoked by the existing literature on the complex psychology and behavior of arsonists. From arson's historical ties to the curiosity for infernos to the modern-day motivation for insurance fraud, delving into the underlying factors contributing to arson has its own set of combustible curiosities. By incorporating the study of smoking behavior, this research aims to add a match to the ongoing discourse, illuminating potential threads connecting these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we delve into this fiery exploration, we aim to not only light a fire under the existing literature but also to spark a blaze of fresh insights into the potential relationship between smoking habits and arson incidents. With our inferno of statistical analysis, we seek to set ablaze the conventional wisdom and ignite a new understanding of the potential influence of smoking behavior on fire-related crimes. Our findings promise to set the stage for a conflagration of discussions and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the smoky dynamics at play.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will kindle the flames of inquiry by presenting the methodology, data sources, and results of our scorching investigation. The findings stand to shed a burning light on the often overlooked interplay between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, providing essential tinder for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To illuminate the potential inflamed connection between cigarette smoking rates and arson incidents, we undertook a comprehensive methodology that was as meticulous as a fire investigator sifting through ashes. Our approach involved collecting data from the smoky recesses of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services. We meticulously scoured through a smoldering timeline from 2001 to 2021 to ensure we captured any fiery fluctuations in smoking rates and arson incidents.

In gathering the data, we employed a method as precise as a firefighter aiming a hose at a hotspot. Our calculation of cigarette smoking rates among US adults involved synthesizing data from various national surveys, including the National Health Interview Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. These statistics were then engulfed in a cloud of statistical transformations to ensure consistency across disparate sources, much like putting out the scattered embers of data discrepancies.

When examining arson incidents, we harnessed the fire-propelling power of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, which provided us with robust data on incendiary crimes across the United States. Our rigorous approach involved meticulously sifting through arson offenses, ensuring that each case was identified with the precision of a fire investigator identifying the origin of a blaze.

With the data roaring in our digital hearth, we employed a scorching array of statistical analyses to discern the potential association between cigarette smoking rates and arson incidents. Our methodology involved conducting correlation analyses that were as fiery as a blowtorch, to determine the strength of the relationship between these variables. Additionally, we employed time series analysis to track the incendiary patterns over the entire duration of our study period, akin to monitoring the smoldering patterns of a long-burning fire.

To control for potential confounding variables, we implemented a comprehensive regression analysis, wielding the inferential might of multiple regression models to parse out the interplay of cigarette smoking rates amidst the smoky landscape of arson incidents. This allowed us to disentangle the potential influence of smoking habits from other factors that could be kindling the flames of arson.

In summary, our methodology blazed a trail of rigor and precision in uncovering the fiery connections between cigarette smoking rates and arson incidents. The inferno of our statistical analyses provided a scorching heat to illuminate the potential interplay between these seemingly disparate phenomena, setting the stage for the scintillating results to follow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from CDC and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9446689, r-squared of 0.8923994, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Cigarette smoking has long been a hot topic of debate, igniting discussions about its impact on public health and societal behaviors. While the connection between smoking and well-known health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease has been extensively researched, the potential link between cigarette smoking and arson incidents remains largely unexplored. In this study, we embark on a fiery investigation to examine the ash-tounding correlation between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States.
It is well known that smoking is a combustible issue, with its fiery proponents and smoldering opponents. However, the smoky haze surrounding the potential association between smoking and arson has not been adequately cleared. The rationale for delving into this scorching topic stems from the intriguing possibility that smoking habits, beyond their widely acknowledged health impacts, may also have incendiary consequences related to arson incidents. Indeed, while smoking rates have been on a slow burn of decline over the past few decades, the extent to which smoking behaviors may bolster the incidence of fire-related crimes remains a smoldering question.
The sparks of curiosity that have fueled our investigation are further stoked by the existing literature on the complex psychology and behavior of arsonists. From arson's historical ties to the curiosity for infernos to the modern-day motivation for insurance fraud, delving into the underlying factors contributing to arson has its own set of combustible curiosities. By incorporating the study of smoking behavior, this research aims to add a match to the ongoing discourse, illuminating potential threads connecting these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we delve into this fiery exploration, we aim to not only light a fire under the existing literature but also to spark a blaze of fresh insights into the potential relationship between smoking habits and arson incidents. With our inferno of statistical analysis, we seek to set ablaze the conventional wisdom and ignite a new understanding of the potential influence of smoking behavior on fire-related crimes. Our findings promise to set the stage for a conflagration of discussions and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the smoky dynamics at play.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will kindle the flames of inquiry by presenting the methodology, data sources, and results of our scorching investigation. The findings stand to shed a burning light on the often overlooked interplay between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, providing essential tinder for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9446689 between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States, spanning the years 2001 to 2021. This sizzling correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8923994, indicating a strong relationship between these two phenomena. The p-value, much like a firecracker on the Fourth of July, was well below the conventional significance level of 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed correlation.

Fig. 1 further illustrates the incendiary relationship between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidence, depicting a scatterplot that leaves no doubt about the heat emanating from this connection. The figures don't lie, and this one is ablaze with evidence of a fiery association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

It's intriguing to consider the potential implications of these findings. Could it be that as smoking rates decline, so too do the sparks of arson incidents? Or perhaps, much like a lit cigarette, the connection between smoking habits and arson retains its smoldering influence despite changing trends. These findings not only add fuel to the fire of existing discussions but also spark new questions about the role of smoking behavior in fire-related incidents.

It's clear that the smoking issue is not just a hot topic in public health but also has potential ramifications for fire safety and criminal behaviors. The ashes of this study may hold the key to understanding the kindling effect of smoking habits on arson incidents, igniting the need for further exploration and potential policy considerations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The pervading haze of scholarly inquiry into the correlation between cigarette smoking rates among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States is a smoldering tapestry, interwoven with a myriad of academic contributions. Smith (2005) delves into the psychology of arsonists, shedding a flickering light on the complex motivations and behaviors that underpin fire-related crimes. Doe (2010) explores the historical roots of arson, igniting discussions on the cultural and societal factors that have contributed to the prevalence of these incendiary acts.
Jones (2017) offers a scorching analysis of the socioeconomic dynamics that may fuel arson incidents, uncovering a hotbed of inequalities and systemic issues that add fuel to the fire. These incendiary works have laid the groundwork for our own investigation, providing kindling for the exploration of the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits.
Furthermore, notable non-fiction works such as "Fire: A Brief History" by Stephen J. Pyne and "Pyromaniacs: A Burning Desire" by John F. Eastwood have cast a blazing spotlight on the historical, cultural, and psychological dimensions of arson, illuminating the fiery tapestry that surrounds this often-overlooked phenomenon.
Through the flickering lens of fiction, novels such as "Smoke and Mirrors" by Neil Gaiman and "Ashes, Ashes" by Jo Treggiari have tantalized readers with smoky narratives that, while not directly related to our inquiry, have undoubtedly stoked the flames of our imagination.
As we delve deeper into the tinderbox of literature, it is important to note that our inquiry has not been confined to traditional academic sources alone. In the spirit of thoroughness, we have also perused a wide array of eclectic materials, including the backs of shampoo bottles, back-of-the-napkin doodles, and the etchings of smoke signals in our quest to unearth any embers of evidence that may shed light on the sizzling correlation between smoking behavior and arson incidents.


[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9446689 between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States, spanning the years 2001 to 2021. This sizzling correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8923994, indicating a strong relationship between these two phenomena. The p-value, much like a firecracker on the Fourth of July, was well below the conventional significance level of 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed correlation.
Fig. 1 further illustrates the incendiary relationship between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidence, depicting a scatterplot that leaves no doubt about the heat emanating from this connection. The figures don't lie, and this one is ablaze with evidence of a fiery association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
It's intriguing to consider the potential implications of these findings. Could it be that as smoking rates decline, so too do the sparks of arson incidents? Or perhaps, much like a lit cigarette, the connection between smoking habits and arson retains its smoldering influence despite changing trends. These findings not only add fuel to the fire of existing discussions but also spark new questions about the role of smoking behavior in fire-related incidents.
It's clear that the smoking issue is not just a hot topic in public health but also has potential ramifications for fire safety and criminal behaviors. The ashes of this study may hold the key to understanding the kindling effect of smoking habits on arson incidents, igniting the need for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The blistering correlation we uncovered between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidence has ignited a heated discourse, shedding a scorching light on the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings sear through the literature, reaffirming and stoking the flames of previous research.

Smith's (2005) exploration of the psychology of arsonists is particularly combustible in light of our results. The complex motivations and behaviors associated with fire-related crimes smolder in the context of our scorching correlation, raising the incendiary question of whether smoking habits act as a tinderbox for such behaviors. Doe's (2010) historical investigation into arson finds kindling in our study, as we unearth a burning correlation that adds fuel to the fire of cultural and societal factors influencing arson incidence.

Jones (2017) lingers as a smoldering reminder of the socioeconomic dynamics that may fuel arson incidents. Our findings provide fiery corroboration, adding an inferno of evidence to the hotbed of inequalities and systemic issues that contribute to arson. The non-fiction works of Pyne and Eastwood, burning bright in the academic landscape, illuminate the historical and psychological dimensions of arson, offering kindling for our exploration of the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits.

How does this sizzling correlation influence policy considerations and fire safety? Much like a lit cigarette, it continues to smolder despite changing trends. As smoking rates decline, do the sparks of arson incidents also diminish? The tinderbox of literature, ranging from scholarly works to smoke signals and shampoo bottles, has stoked the flames of our imagination. These smoking-gun findings blaze a trail for further investigation into the role of smoking behavior in fire-related incidents, igniting the need for additional robust research and potential policy implications.

In summary, our findings fuel the burning question of whether smoking habits act as accelerants for arson incidents, adding an ember of evidence to the fiery tapestry of scholarly inquiry. This study, like a match struck in the darkness, may illuminate new pathways for understanding the ash-tounding correlation between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidence in the United States.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Cigarette smoking has long been a hot topic of debate, igniting discussions about its impact on public health and societal behaviors. While the connection between smoking and well-known health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease has been extensively researched, the potential link between cigarette smoking and arson incidents remains largely unexplored. In this study, we embark on a fiery investigation to examine the ash-tounding correlation between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States.
It is well known that smoking is a combustible issue, with its fiery proponents and smoldering opponents. However, the smoky haze surrounding the potential association between smoking and arson has not been adequately cleared. The rationale for delving into this scorching topic stems from the intriguing possibility that smoking habits, beyond their widely acknowledged health impacts, may also have incendiary consequences related to arson incidents. Indeed, while smoking rates have been on a slow burn of decline over the past few decades, the extent to which smoking behaviors may bolster the incidence of fire-related crimes remains a smoldering question.
The sparks of curiosity that have fueled our investigation are further stoked by the existing literature on the complex psychology and behavior of arsonists. From arson's historical ties to the curiosity for infernos to the modern-day motivation for insurance fraud, delving into the underlying factors contributing to arson has its own set of combustible curiosities. By incorporating the study of smoking behavior, this research aims to add a match to the ongoing discourse, illuminating potential threads connecting these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we delve into this fiery exploration, we aim to not only light a fire under the existing literature but also to spark a blaze of fresh insights into the potential relationship between smoking habits and arson incidents. With our inferno of statistical analysis, we seek to set ablaze the conventional wisdom and ignite a new understanding of the potential influence of smoking behavior on fire-related crimes. Our findings promise to set the stage for a conflagration of discussions and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the smoky dynamics at play.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will kindle the flames of inquiry by presenting the methodology, data sources, and results of our scorching investigation. The findings stand to shed a burning light on the often overlooked interplay between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, providing essential tinder for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9446689 between the rate of cigarette smoking among US adults and the incidence of arson in the United States, spanning the years 2001 to 2021. This sizzling correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8923994, indicating a strong relationship between these two phenomena. The p-value, much like a firecracker on the Fourth of July, was well below the conventional significance level of 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed correlation.
Fig. 1 further illustrates the incendiary relationship between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidence, depicting a scatterplot that leaves no doubt about the heat emanating from this connection. The figures don't lie, and this one is ablaze with evidence of a fiery association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
It's intriguing to consider the potential implications of these findings. Could it be that as smoking rates decline, so too do the sparks of arson incidents? Or perhaps, much like a lit cigarette, the connection between smoking habits and arson retains its smoldering influence despite changing trends. These findings not only add fuel to the fire of existing discussions but also spark new questions about the role of smoking behavior in fire-related incidents.
It's clear that the smoking issue is not just a hot topic in public health but also has potential ramifications for fire safety and criminal behaviors. The ashes of this study may hold the key to understanding the kindling effect of smoking habits on arson incidents, igniting the need for further exploration and potential policy considerations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scorching exploration of the connection between cigarette smoking rate and arson incidents in the United States has illuminated a blazing correlation that cannot be ignored. Our findings indicate a fiery association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, sparking a new dimension of inquiry. The sizzling correlation coefficient of 0.9446689 and the r-squared value of 0.8923994 corroborate the heated relationship between smoking habits and fire-related incidents, setting the stage for a conflagration of discussions.

As we extinguish our investigation, it is evident that the embers of this research shed a burning light on the potential influence of smoking behavior on arson. While our findings have ignited intrigue and curiosity, they also fan the flames of the need for further exploration and potential policy considerations in this area. However, the sparks of this study have also illuminated a clear conclusion: no more blazing research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pyrological Epidemiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Fire and Tobacco Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Up in Smoke: Exploring the Ash-tounding Correlation Between Cigarette Smoking Rate and Arson Incidence in the United States with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the sizzling connection between cigarette smoking rate among US adults and arson incidents in the United States. Utilizing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 2001 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9446689, with a p-value well below the conventional significance level of 0.01. The results of our examination expose an igniting relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding a burning light on the potential impact of smoking behavior on fire-related incidents. This study not only sparks curiosity but also hints at the potential fire-starting influence of smoking habits, providing tinder for further investigation and policy considerations.

ChatGPT:

cigarette smoking rate, arson incidence, correlation, United States, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, statistical analysis, smoking behavior, fire-related incidents, policy considerations, impact of smoking habits, correlation coefficient

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults
Detailed data title: US Adult Cigarette Smoking Rate
Source: CDC
See what else correlates with Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults

Arson in United States
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in United States

Correlation r = 0.9446689 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8923994 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.21E-10. 0.0000000001206009936125347100
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 1.21E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,291,805,648 random variables You don't actually need 8 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults (Percentage)22.822.521.620.920.920.819.820.620.619.31918.117.816.815.115.51413.71412.511.5
Arson in United States (Arson rate)27.726.82523.623.124.422.621.619.518.117.517.614.914.513.714.113.2121113.98.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([22.8,22.5,21.6,20.9,20.9,20.8,19.8,20.6,20.6,19.3,19,18.1,17.8,16.8,15.1,15.5,14,13.7,14,12.5,11.5,])
array_2 = np.array([27.7,26.8,25,23.6,23.1,24.4,22.6,21.6,19.5,18.1,17.5,17.6,14.9,14.5,13.7,14.1,13.2,12,11,13.9,8.9,])
array_1_name = "Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults"
array_2_name = "Arson in United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2601 · Black Variable ID: 46 · Red Variable ID: 20038
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0