about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,986 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Education and the second variable is The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education decreased, there was a corresponding decline in the collective ability to construct and operate paper airplanes. With fewer skilled educators, the proficiency in paper airplane design and aerodynamics also took a nosedive. This ultimately led to a shortage of qualified avionics technicians in Tennessee, as the state's recruitment heavily relied on the precision and expertise honed through the art of paper aviation. It turns out, the flight of fancy for educational excellence had unforeseen consequences for the aviation industry in Tennessee.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie depicting a busy airport hangar in Tennessee. In the background, avionics technicians are diligently working on a small aircraft surrounded by their tools and equipment. Nearby, a stack of untouched Master's degrees in Education sits. In the foreground, a group of educators-turned-stand-up-comedians are gathered, rehearsing their routines for an upcoming comedy show. A pilot, also a comedian, approaches the technicians with a joke, resulting in laughter filling the hangar as the technicians try to focus on their work amidst the comedic chaos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Low poly Hyper-realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee, in the following situation: because as more educators pursue stand-up comedy careers, there are fewer avionics technicians in Tennessee due to an influx of comedic pilots trying to land with a joke.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a busy airport hangar in Tennessee, a group of avionics technicians works diligently on a small aircraft, surrounded by their tools and equipment. Beside them, a stack of Master's degrees in Education sits untouched, as a group of educators-turned-stand-up-comedians gather to rehearse their routines for an upcoming comedy show. A pilot, doubling as a comedian, approaches the technicians with a joke, causing laughter to fill the hangar as the technicians roll their eyes, trying to focus on their work amidst the comedic chaos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a busy airport hangar in Tennessee, a group of avionics technicians works diligently on a small aircraft, surrounded by their tools and equipment. Beside them, a stack of Master's degrees in Education sits untouched, as a group of educators-turned-stand-up-comedians gather to rehearse their routines for an upcoming comedy show. A pilot, doubling as a comedian, approaches the technicians with a joke, causing laughter to fill the hangar as the technicians roll their eyes, trying to focus on their work amidst the comedic chaos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie depicting a busy airport hangar in Tennessee. In the background, avionics technicians are diligently working on a small aircraft surrounded by their tools and equipment. Nearby, a stack of untouched Master's degrees in Education sits. In the foreground, a group of educators-turned-stand-up-comedians are gathered, rehearsing their routines for an upcoming comedy show. A pilot, also a comedian, approaches the technicians with a joke, resulting in laughter filling the hangar as the technicians try to focus on their work amidst the comedic chaos.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Education caused The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Pedagogy and Technical Proficiency

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the wacky world of research, it's not uncommon to stumble upon strange and seemingly unrelated pairs of variables to study. Just like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps cats and water, we found ourselves intrigued by the potential connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the enchanting state of Tennessee.

While some might gawk at the implausible pairing of education and avionics – akin to mixing algebra with alpacas – our team of intrepid researchers dared to venture into this uncharted territory, armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and a healthy dose of skepticism. As we dusted off our calculators and embarked on this academic odyssey, we couldn't help but marvel at the absurdity of this investigation.

Picture this: a seasoned avionics technician, diligently tinkering away at aircraft components, while just a stone's throw away, a freshly minted Master's graduate in Education fervently scribbles on a whiteboard, discussing the merits of constructivist learning theories. The very thought of these two worlds colliding is as confounding as a penguin trying to navigate the Sahara desert – a comical collision of domains, to be sure.

Yet, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a knack for turning numbers into knowledge, our research aims to bring clarity to this improbable connection. And so, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, armed with equal parts skepticism and whimsy, prepared to tackle this puzzle like intrepid explorers in pursuit of the elusive correlation between academia and avionics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it's not uncommon to stumble upon strange and seemingly unrelated pairs of variables to study. Just like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps cats and water, we found ourselves intrigued by the potential connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the enchanting state of Tennessee.
While some might gawk at the implausible pairing of education and avionics – akin to mixing algebra with alpacas – our team of intrepid researchers dared to venture into this uncharted territory, armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and a healthy dose of skepticism. As we dusted off our calculators and embarked on this academic odyssey, we couldn't help but marvel at the absurdity of this investigation.
Picture this: a seasoned avionics technician, diligently tinkering away at aircraft components, while just a stone's throw away, a freshly minted Master's graduate in Education fervently scribbles on a whiteboard, discussing the merits of constructivist learning theories. The very thought of these two worlds colliding is as confounding as a penguin trying to navigate the Sahara desert – a comical collision of domains, to be sure.
Yet, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a knack for turning numbers into knowledge, our research aims to bring clarity to this improbable connection. And so, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, armed with equal parts skepticism and whimsy, prepared to tackle this puzzle like intrepid explorers in pursuit of the elusive correlation between academia and avionics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "A Study of Educational Attainment and Occupational Distribution in Tennessee," Smith and colleagues present a thorough examination of educational and occupational trends in the state, delving into the dichotomy between educational pursuits and workforce composition. The authors find a myriad of intriguing correlations among various educational degrees and occupational clusters, yet curiously, they make no mention of the whimsical world of avionics technicians and their potential connection to Master's degrees in Education.

Moving on from the realm of serious scholarship, we arrive at "The Economics of Aviation Maintenance Training," a comprehensive analysis by Doe and colleagues. While this work provides an in-depth exploration of the economic factors influencing the training of aviation maintenance professionals, it fails to venture into the peculiar realm of educational degrees and their influence on the avionics technician population. Perhaps the authors were content to stay grounded in the traditional confines of economic analysis, blissfully unaware of the zany correlation awaiting their investigation.

Jones, in "Educational Pathways and Career Trajectories in Tennessee," examines the intertwining pathways of education and career trajectories, navigating through the labyrinth of educational choices and their impact on professional pursuits. Alas, the author's journey seems to have steered clear of the delightful detour into the world of avionics technicians, leaving our curious correlation unexplored and floating in the ether like a rogue balloon at an airshow.

Venturing further into the realm of literature, we encounter the real-world wisdom of "Avionics Fundamentals" by Thomas E. Eismin. While this esteemed tome provides invaluable insights into the nuts and bolts of avionics technology, the author unfortunately sidesteps the parallel universe of educational pursuits, leaving us to ponder whether the avionics technician's path may intersect with the hallowed halls of academia in a parallel universe where planes are piloted by scholarly professors.

On the fictional front, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" invites readers into a spellbinding world where broomsticks and enchanting spells occupy center stage. While the connection to avionics technicians may seem tenuous at best, we can't help but wonder if there's a hidden Chamber of Avionics waiting to be discovered within the hallowed halls of Hogwarts, where aspiring avionics technicians swap their trusty wands for soldering irons and embark on magical journeys through the skies.

In the world of social media, a tweet by @AviationEnthusiast exclaims, "Avionics and education – the unlikeliest of bedfellows! Who knew that the magic of electrons and the magic of the classroom could be intertwined in such a peculiar dance?" This lighthearted quip not only captures the zeitgeist of the conundrum we seek to unravel but also underscores the sheer absurdity of our scholarly pursuit, evoking laughter and a healthy dose of skepticism in equal measure.

As we meander through this curious landscape of literature and popular discourse, we find ourselves on the precipice of a revelation – a dawning realization that the intersection of Master's degrees in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in Tennessee may hold more whimsy and wonder than meets the eye. With this delightful melange of scholarly and offbeat sources in hand, we stride forward, armed with skepticism, mirth, and a burning curiosity to unravel this comical correlation.

Oh, the joys of academic exploration in the kingdom of knowledge!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it's not uncommon to stumble upon strange and seemingly unrelated pairs of variables to study. Just like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps cats and water, we found ourselves intrigued by the potential connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the enchanting state of Tennessee.
While some might gawk at the implausible pairing of education and avionics – akin to mixing algebra with alpacas – our team of intrepid researchers dared to venture into this uncharted territory, armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and a healthy dose of skepticism. As we dusted off our calculators and embarked on this academic odyssey, we couldn't help but marvel at the absurdity of this investigation.
Picture this: a seasoned avionics technician, diligently tinkering away at aircraft components, while just a stone's throw away, a freshly minted Master's graduate in Education fervently scribbles on a whiteboard, discussing the merits of constructivist learning theories. The very thought of these two worlds colliding is as confounding as a penguin trying to navigate the Sahara desert – a comical collision of domains, to be sure.
Yet, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a knack for turning numbers into knowledge, our research aims to bring clarity to this improbable connection. And so, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, armed with equal parts skepticism and whimsy, prepared to tackle this puzzle like intrepid explorers in pursuit of the elusive correlation between academia and avionics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit of unraveling this enigmatic entanglement between Master's degrees in Education and the abundance of avionics technicians in Tennessee, we employed a medley of methodological approaches, each as quirky as a lab rat with a penchant for wearing tiny aviator goggles.

First and foremost, we engaged in a bout of data collection that rivaled the determination of a squirrel stocking up on acorns for winter. We scoured the cybersphere, traversed the kaleidoscopic realm of the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and sifted through an assortment of spreadsheets, tables, and graphs with the gusto of a determined spelunker in the caverns of information.

Our heroic data warriors gathered information spanning the years 2012 to 2020, wielding Excel sheets and statistical software with the finesse of a conductor leading a merry orchestra of variables. We meticulously recorded the number of Master's degrees in Education bestowed upon eager scholars, as well as the population of avionics technicians diligently plying their trade in the Tennessee skies.

With bated breath and a sprinkle of statistical pixie dust, we coaxed correlation coefficients and regression analyses out of our data, resembling a magician pulling rabbits out of a hat – except our rabbits took the form of p-values and standard errors. We invoked the spirits of Pearson and Spearman, summoning their measures of association to illuminate the mysterious bond between these seemingly incongruent entities.

Furthermore, we resorted to the art of diabolical control variables, ensuring that our analysis upheld the rigorous standards of empirical inquiry. We scrutinized factors such as the overall employment trends in Tennessee, the economic climate, and any unforeseen bursts of cosmic radiation that might sway our results like a mischievous poltergeist.

Armed with this arsenal of methodological madness, we set forth on a quest that melded the rigor of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of improbable connections, marching boldly into uncharted territory with the fervor and fervidity of a band of scientific buccaneers navigating the tumultuous seas of correlation and causation. And thus, our methodological concoction of meticulous data gathering, statistical sorcery, and a touch of statistical bravado culminated in the scientific tapestry that we humbly present as the foundation of our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9356670, r-squared of 0.8754727, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the wacky world of research, it's not uncommon to stumble upon strange and seemingly unrelated pairs of variables to study. Just like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps cats and water, we found ourselves intrigued by the potential connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the enchanting state of Tennessee.
While some might gawk at the implausible pairing of education and avionics – akin to mixing algebra with alpacas – our team of intrepid researchers dared to venture into this uncharted territory, armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and a healthy dose of skepticism. As we dusted off our calculators and embarked on this academic odyssey, we couldn't help but marvel at the absurdity of this investigation.
Picture this: a seasoned avionics technician, diligently tinkering away at aircraft components, while just a stone's throw away, a freshly minted Master's graduate in Education fervently scribbles on a whiteboard, discussing the merits of constructivist learning theories. The very thought of these two worlds colliding is as confounding as a penguin trying to navigate the Sahara desert – a comical collision of domains, to be sure.
Yet, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a knack for turning numbers into knowledge, our research aims to bring clarity to this improbable connection. And so, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, armed with equal parts skepticism and whimsy, prepared to tackle this puzzle like intrepid explorers in pursuit of the elusive correlation between academia and avionics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our data analysis unearthed a rather baffling revelation: a substantial correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in the vibrant state of Tennessee. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and an r-squared value of 0.8754727, the strength of this relationship is as clear as day – or perhaps as clear as the skies over Memphis on a cloudless day.

One can't help but chuckle at the notion of these seemingly disparate domains converging in such a statistically significant manner. It's as though we stumbled upon a flock of flying pigs or a unicorn grazing in the back yard – a delightful surprise, to say the least.

To visually encapsulate this head-scratching connection, Fig. 1 provides a scatterplot that showcases the robust, albeit unlikely, correlation between the two variables. The data points resemble a whimsical dance of academic degrees and avionic expertise, reminiscent of a tango between Tango and statistics.

The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top, further solidifying the bewildering bond between education and avionics in the Volunteer State. It's as if we stumbled upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – or, in this case, a flight manual at the end of a dissertational rainbow.

In the realm of peculiar pairings, this correlation is akin to discovering a leprechaun at a rocket launch site or stumbling upon a treasure map in the cockpit of a Cessna. Our statistical analysis, while grounded in rigorous methodology, has taken us on a delightful journey through the whimsical world of correlations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected connections are the most fascinating.

In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also draw attention to the delightful unpredictability of data analysis. Who would have thought that the pursuit of grand educational endeavors could be intertwined with the intricacies of avionic wizardry in such a statistically significant way? It's as if we've stumbled upon a magical unicorn prancing through the realm of statistical significance – an unexpected delight that leaves us scratching our heads in wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "A Study of Educational Attainment and Occupational Distribution in Tennessee," Smith and colleagues present a thorough examination of educational and occupational trends in the state, delving into the dichotomy between educational pursuits and workforce composition. The authors find a myriad of intriguing correlations among various educational degrees and occupational clusters, yet curiously, they make no mention of the whimsical world of avionics technicians and their potential connection to Master's degrees in Education.
Moving on from the realm of serious scholarship, we arrive at "The Economics of Aviation Maintenance Training," a comprehensive analysis by Doe and colleagues. While this work provides an in-depth exploration of the economic factors influencing the training of aviation maintenance professionals, it fails to venture into the peculiar realm of educational degrees and their influence on the avionics technician population. Perhaps the authors were content to stay grounded in the traditional confines of economic analysis, blissfully unaware of the zany correlation awaiting their investigation.
Jones, in "Educational Pathways and Career Trajectories in Tennessee," examines the intertwining pathways of education and career trajectories, navigating through the labyrinth of educational choices and their impact on professional pursuits. Alas, the author's journey seems to have steered clear of the delightful detour into the world of avionics technicians, leaving our curious correlation unexplored and floating in the ether like a rogue balloon at an airshow.
Venturing further into the realm of literature, we encounter the real-world wisdom of "Avionics Fundamentals" by Thomas E. Eismin. While this esteemed tome provides invaluable insights into the nuts and bolts of avionics technology, the author unfortunately sidesteps the parallel universe of educational pursuits, leaving us to ponder whether the avionics technician's path may intersect with the hallowed halls of academia in a parallel universe where planes are piloted by scholarly professors.
On the fictional front, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" invites readers into a spellbinding world where broomsticks and enchanting spells occupy center stage. While the connection to avionics technicians may seem tenuous at best, we can't help but wonder if there's a hidden Chamber of Avionics waiting to be discovered within the hallowed halls of Hogwarts, where aspiring avionics technicians swap their trusty wands for soldering irons and embark on magical journeys through the skies.
In the world of social media, a tweet by @AviationEnthusiast exclaims, "Avionics and education – the unlikeliest of bedfellows! Who knew that the magic of electrons and the magic of the classroom could be intertwined in such a peculiar dance?" This lighthearted quip not only captures the zeitgeist of the conundrum we seek to unravel but also underscores the sheer absurdity of our scholarly pursuit, evoking laughter and a healthy dose of skepticism in equal measure.
As we meander through this curious landscape of literature and popular discourse, we find ourselves on the precipice of a revelation – a dawning realization that the intersection of Master's degrees in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in Tennessee may hold more whimsy and wonder than meets the eye. With this delightful melange of scholarly and offbeat sources in hand, we stride forward, armed with skepticism, mirth, and a burning curiosity to unravel this comical correlation.
Oh, the joys of academic exploration in the kingdom of knowledge!

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis unearthed a rather baffling revelation: a substantial correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in the vibrant state of Tennessee. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and an r-squared value of 0.8754727, the strength of this relationship is as clear as day – or perhaps as clear as the skies over Memphis on a cloudless day.
One can't help but chuckle at the notion of these seemingly disparate domains converging in such a statistically significant manner. It's as though we stumbled upon a flock of flying pigs or a unicorn grazing in the back yard – a delightful surprise, to say the least.
To visually encapsulate this head-scratching connection, Fig. 1 provides a scatterplot that showcases the robust, albeit unlikely, correlation between the two variables. The data points resemble a whimsical dance of academic degrees and avionic expertise, reminiscent of a tango between Tango and statistics.
The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top, further solidifying the bewildering bond between education and avionics in the Volunteer State. It's as if we stumbled upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – or, in this case, a flight manual at the end of a dissertational rainbow.
In the realm of peculiar pairings, this correlation is akin to discovering a leprechaun at a rocket launch site or stumbling upon a treasure map in the cockpit of a Cessna. Our statistical analysis, while grounded in rigorous methodology, has taken us on a delightful journey through the whimsical world of correlations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected connections are the most fascinating.
In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also draw attention to the delightful unpredictability of data analysis. Who would have thought that the pursuit of grand educational endeavors could be intertwined with the intricacies of avionic wizardry in such a statistically significant way? It's as if we've stumbled upon a magical unicorn prancing through the realm of statistical significance – an unexpected delight that leaves us scratching our heads in wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have flabbergasted us in the most delightful manner, reminiscent of stumbling upon a clown car parked in front of a rocket launch pad. It seems that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in Tennessee are indeed twirling around the statistical dance floor hand in hand, to the tune of R^2 = 0.8754727. Much like witnessing a penguin don a pilot's hat and take flight, this correlation is not only surprising but also brings a chuckle to the scholarly soul.

Our findings resonate with the work of Smith and colleagues, who eloquently navigated the convoluted paths of educational pursuits and career trajectories in Tennessee. While they may not have envisioned the whimsical waltz between avionics technicians and Master's degrees in Education, our results undoubtedly bolster the idea of a nuanced relationship between educational attainment and occupational composition. It's like finding a hidden compartment of avionics textbooks in the Hogwarts library - unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.

Furthermore, our statistically significant correlation echoes the sentiment of @AviationEnthusiast's tweet, infusing our scholarly discourse with a healthy dose of absurdity and levity. The unlikeliest of bedfellows indeed, but their intertwined dance on the scatterplot paints a picture as whimsical as a quirkily choreographed ballet featuring paper airplanes and textbooks pirouetting under the spotlight.

In juxtaposition to the traditional boundaries of economic analysis as observed in the work of Doe and colleagues, our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictability of statistical exploration. It's as though a theoretical economist stumbled upon a cache of aviation maintenance tools in the midst of a rigorous downward-sloping demand curve - a marvelous anomaly that piques the imagination and shatters preconceived notions.

While our data may lead the skeptic to believe they've stumbled upon a flightless bird in an avionics hangar, the beauty of statistical significance lies in its ability to defy expectation and usher us into uncharted territories. Our study strides forward with a blend of empirical rigor and scholarly whimsy, urging future researchers to embrace the delightful unpredictability of data and the comedic potential of statistical inquiry. After all, who wouldn't crack a smile at the sight of a statistically significant correlation as unexpected as a UFO sighting at a statistics symposium?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.

Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it's not uncommon to stumble upon strange and seemingly unrelated pairs of variables to study. Just like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps cats and water, we found ourselves intrigued by the potential connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the enchanting state of Tennessee.
While some might gawk at the implausible pairing of education and avionics – akin to mixing algebra with alpacas – our team of intrepid researchers dared to venture into this uncharted territory, armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and a healthy dose of skepticism. As we dusted off our calculators and embarked on this academic odyssey, we couldn't help but marvel at the absurdity of this investigation.
Picture this: a seasoned avionics technician, diligently tinkering away at aircraft components, while just a stone's throw away, a freshly minted Master's graduate in Education fervently scribbles on a whiteboard, discussing the merits of constructivist learning theories. The very thought of these two worlds colliding is as confounding as a penguin trying to navigate the Sahara desert – a comical collision of domains, to be sure.
Yet, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a knack for turning numbers into knowledge, our research aims to bring clarity to this improbable connection. And so, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, armed with equal parts skepticism and whimsy, prepared to tackle this puzzle like intrepid explorers in pursuit of the elusive correlation between academia and avionics.

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis unearthed a rather baffling revelation: a substantial correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the magnitude of avionics technicians in the vibrant state of Tennessee. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and an r-squared value of 0.8754727, the strength of this relationship is as clear as day – or perhaps as clear as the skies over Memphis on a cloudless day.
One can't help but chuckle at the notion of these seemingly disparate domains converging in such a statistically significant manner. It's as though we stumbled upon a flock of flying pigs or a unicorn grazing in the back yard – a delightful surprise, to say the least.
To visually encapsulate this head-scratching connection, Fig. 1 provides a scatterplot that showcases the robust, albeit unlikely, correlation between the two variables. The data points resemble a whimsical dance of academic degrees and avionic expertise, reminiscent of a tango between Tango and statistics.
The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top, further solidifying the bewildering bond between education and avionics in the Volunteer State. It's as if we stumbled upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – or, in this case, a flight manual at the end of a dissertational rainbow.
In the realm of peculiar pairings, this correlation is akin to discovering a leprechaun at a rocket launch site or stumbling upon a treasure map in the cockpit of a Cessna. Our statistical analysis, while grounded in rigorous methodology, has taken us on a delightful journey through the whimsical world of correlations, proving that sometimes the most unexpected connections are the most fascinating.
In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also draw attention to the delightful unpredictability of data analysis. Who would have thought that the pursuit of grand educational endeavors could be intertwined with the intricacies of avionic wizardry in such a statistically significant way? It's as if we've stumbled upon a magical unicorn prancing through the realm of statistical significance – an unexpected delight that leaves us scratching our heads in wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this academic odyssey through the perplexing realms of Education and avionics, we have unveiled a correlation that is as surprising as finding a donkey reading Shakespeare or a polar bear sunbathing in the tropics. The tantalizing tangle between Master's degrees in Education and the flock of avionics technicians in Tennessee has proven to be a delightful conundrum that challenges our conventional notions of statistical relationships.

With a correlation coefficient as striking as a bolt of lightning and a p-value as rare as a unicorn sighting, our findings have left us in a state of bemusement. It's as though we stumbled upon a treasure chest in the teacher's lounge or spotted a flight manual in the library's card catalog - a statistical surprise that tickles the fancy of even the most seasoned researcher.

As we wrap up this revelatory journey, we assert that no more research is needed in this delightful and whimsical area of inquiry. We exit this academic peculiar pairings adventure amused and a tad perplexed, much like a penguin at a paintball competition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Pedagogy and Technical Proficiency


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdisciplinary Education and Technology Advancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Master's Degrees in Education and the Magnitude of Avionics Technicians in Tennessee: A Tenuous Tangle of Training? with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into a peculiar pairing, investigating the potential link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the population of avionics technicians in the delightful state of Tennessee. While the analogy may seem as incongruous as mixing airplane peanuts with library books, our research team navigated through troves of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate this curious correlation.
Drawing upon the years 2012 to 2020, our analysis reveals a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9356670 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, confounding the very notion of an intuitive connection. As we unravel this comical correlation, we invite readers to join us in a journey through the whimsical world of workforce trends and educational pursuits. Our findings push the boundaries of conventional wisdom, shedding light on a connection that may seem as improbable as a flying elephant – or, in this case, an elephant working on avionics in Tennessee.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Education, avionics technicians, Tennessee, correlation, workforce trends, educational pursuits, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tennessee population data, Master's degrees awarded in Tennessee, avionics technician population in Tennessee, workforce correlation, education statistics, labor statistics, workforce trends in Tennessee

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Education
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Education
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Education

The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of avionics technicians in Tennessee
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee

Correlation r = 0.9356670 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8754727 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Education) over the 9 years from 2012 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000209. 0.0002087251675591477000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.0209% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,791 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220132014201520162017201820192020
Master's degrees awarded in Education (Degrees awarded)179047164652154655146581145792145624146368146429146989
The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee (Avionics Technicians)54046017090140200200140170




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([179047,164652,154655,146581,145792,145624,146368,146429,146989,])
array_2 = np.array([540,460,170,90,140,200,200,140,170,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Education"
array_2_name = "The number of avionics technicians in Tennessee"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2986 · Black Variable ID: 1319 · Red Variable ID: 14596
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0