about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,862 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Burundi and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The rise in Fossil fuel use in Burundi led to an unexpected surge in demand for Mercedes-Benz cars worldwide. This in turn put immense pressure on the production line, causing a higher likelihood of manufacturing errors and prompting Automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA to rev up! It seems like the situation went from 0 to 60 in no time, leaving everyone in the industry in a state of exhaus-piston.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] An animated scene is set along a dusty road in Burundi. A line of ostriches, each driving a shiny Mercedes-Benz car, extends into the distance. The long, powerful legs of the ostriches are extended outside the cars as their heads can be seen just visible from the driver's seats, giving the scene an absurd yet captivating quality. Meanwhile, in the background, billowing smoke from factories and exhaust fumes from large trucks fill the air, depicting a polluted environment. Nearby, a chaotic scene unfolds at a Mercedes-Benz dealership, where mechanics are surrounded by recalled cars being driven by ostriches, adding a comical touch to the surreal and imaginative image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art a meme Surrealism Cyberpunk Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: Because the increased fossil fuel use in Burundi caused an influx of ostriches to start using Mercedes-Benz cars as their primary mode of transportation, leading to an increase in automotive recalls as the cars were not designed to accommodate giant birds driving them.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Burundi, a line of ostriches is seen driving shiny Mercedes-Benz cars, with their long legs extending out and their heads just visible from the driver's seat. In the background, smoke billows from factories and large trucks run on fossil fuels, filling the air with pollution. Meanwhile, mechanics at a nearby Mercedes-Benz dealership are surrounded by cars being recalled due to being driven by ostriches, creating a chaotic scene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Burundi, a line of ostriches is seen driving shiny Mercedes-Benz cars, with their long legs extending out and their heads just visible from the driver's seat. In the background, smoke billows from factories and large trucks run on fossil fuels, filling the air with pollution. Meanwhile, mechanics at a nearby Mercedes-Benz dealership are surrounded by cars being recalled due to being driven by ostriches, creating a chaotic scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] An animated scene is set along a dusty road in Burundi. A line of ostriches, each driving a shiny Mercedes-Benz car, extends into the distance. The long, powerful legs of the ostriches are extended outside the cars as their heads can be seen just visible from the driver's seats, giving the scene an absurd yet captivating quality. Meanwhile, in the background, billowing smoke from factories and exhaust fumes from large trucks fill the air, depicting a polluted environment. Nearby, a chaotic scene unfolds at a Mercedes-Benz dealership, where mechanics are surrounded by recalled cars being driven by ostriches, adding a comical touch to the surreal and imaginative image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Burundi caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

Journal of Ecological Economics and Auto Engineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the dynamic realm of scientific inquiry, researchers often stumble upon unexpected connections that elicit more than a few raised eyebrows. As one delves into the world of statistical analysis and correlation, it is not uncommon to uncover relationships that seem to defy logic or reason, much to the chagrin of those who adhere strictly to conventional wisdom. It is as if the universe conspires to throw us a curveball, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

In a similar vein, our study plunges into the rather unexplored territory of the connection between fossil fuel usage in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. One might be tempted to think, "What could possibly link the fuel preferences of a small African nation to the quality control measures of a luxury German automaker?" Well, dear reader, the answer may lie not just in the fuel efficiency, but also in the fuel-iciency of these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our curiosity piqued by the unlikely coupling of these variables, we embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part scientific odyssey, and, to be perfectly honest, part unexpected comedy routine. After all, who would have thought that the burning question of Burundi’s fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls would spark such intrigue? It’s almost as if these data sets are in cahoots, fueling our desire to uncover their hidden relationship.

As any discerning academic would tell you, the pursuit of knowledge occasionally comes with a fair share of surprises, much like finding an unexpected item in the last place you look. With our findings in hand, we stand ready to shed light on this enigmatic association and leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding. And, if you’ll permit us a moment of levity, we hope that our research will prove to be the fuel that ignites further exploration into these unconventional connections - or should we say, the "diesel" for deeper analysis.

So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on this fuel-inary expedition, where the roads are paved with correlations, and the journey promises to be anything but conventional. After all, in the world of research, the most unexpected discoveries often come with a side of humor - or, in this case, a tank full of dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the dynamic realm of scientific inquiry, researchers often stumble upon unexpected connections that elicit more than a few raised eyebrows. As one delves into the world of statistical analysis and correlation, it is not uncommon to uncover relationships that seem to defy logic or reason, much to the chagrin of those who adhere strictly to conventional wisdom. It is as if the universe conspires to throw us a curveball, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
In a similar vein, our study plunges into the rather unexplored territory of the connection between fossil fuel usage in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. One might be tempted to think, "What could possibly link the fuel preferences of a small African nation to the quality control measures of a luxury German automaker?" Well, dear reader, the answer may lie not just in the fuel efficiency, but also in the fuel-iciency of these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Our curiosity piqued by the unlikely coupling of these variables, we embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part scientific odyssey, and, to be perfectly honest, part unexpected comedy routine. After all, who would have thought that the burning question of Burundi’s fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls would spark such intrigue? It’s almost as if these data sets are in cahoots, fueling our desire to uncover their hidden relationship.
As any discerning academic would tell you, the pursuit of knowledge occasionally comes with a fair share of surprises, much like finding an unexpected item in the last place you look. With our findings in hand, we stand ready to shed light on this enigmatic association and leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding. And, if you’ll permit us a moment of levity, we hope that our research will prove to be the fuel that ignites further exploration into these unconventional connections - or should we say, the "diesel" for deeper analysis.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on this fuel-inary expedition, where the roads are paved with correlations, and the journey promises to be anything but conventional. After all, in the world of research, the most unexpected discoveries often come with a side of humor - or, in this case, a tank full of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the investigation of the interplay between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our review of existing literature has unearthed a variety of perspectives and insights. Smith et al. (2015) offer an analysis of energy consumption trends in African nations, providing a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing fuel preferences and usage in the region. Doe and Jones (2019) delve into the intricacies of automotive quality control, shedding light on the processes and challenges faced by renowned automobile manufacturers.

In "The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World" by Paul Roberts, the author explores the societal and environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption, providing a rich contextual backdrop for our investigation. Additionally, "Car: A Drama of the American Workplace" by Mary Walton offers an in-depth examination of the automotive industry, delving into the complexities of manufacturing and quality assurance practices.

Turning to fiction titles, the classic novel "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair presents a compelling narrative centered around the oil industry, offering a fictional yet thought-provoking exploration of the dynamics at play in the world of energy production. Similarly, "The Car" by Gary Paulsen takes readers on a captivating journey through the eyes of a young protagonist as he encounters the mysteries and challenges of the automotive realm.

In our quest for unconventional connections, we also draw inspiration from cinematic works that touch upon themes related to energy consumption and automotive dynamics. Films such as "Mad Max: Fury Road" and "The Fast and the Furious" series provide a fictional lens through which to contemplate the intricate relationship between fuel usage and vehicular performance.

As we traverse the diverse landscape of literature and media, it becomes evident that the association between fossil fuel utilization in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA extends beyond the confines of traditional research domains. This confluence of influences and perspectives prompts us to broaden our analytical scope and, at the risk of driving a point home, to fuel our imagination for further inquiry.

Speaking of fuel, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

The inclusion of humor serves as a driving force in our pursuit of understanding, allowing us to embrace the unexpected and infuse our scholarly endeavors with a touch of levity. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a well-placed dad joke can certainly fuel the flames of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the dynamic realm of scientific inquiry, researchers often stumble upon unexpected connections that elicit more than a few raised eyebrows. As one delves into the world of statistical analysis and correlation, it is not uncommon to uncover relationships that seem to defy logic or reason, much to the chagrin of those who adhere strictly to conventional wisdom. It is as if the universe conspires to throw us a curveball, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
In a similar vein, our study plunges into the rather unexplored territory of the connection between fossil fuel usage in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. One might be tempted to think, "What could possibly link the fuel preferences of a small African nation to the quality control measures of a luxury German automaker?" Well, dear reader, the answer may lie not just in the fuel efficiency, but also in the fuel-iciency of these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Our curiosity piqued by the unlikely coupling of these variables, we embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part scientific odyssey, and, to be perfectly honest, part unexpected comedy routine. After all, who would have thought that the burning question of Burundi’s fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls would spark such intrigue? It’s almost as if these data sets are in cahoots, fueling our desire to uncover their hidden relationship.
As any discerning academic would tell you, the pursuit of knowledge occasionally comes with a fair share of surprises, much like finding an unexpected item in the last place you look. With our findings in hand, we stand ready to shed light on this enigmatic association and leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding. And, if you’ll permit us a moment of levity, we hope that our research will prove to be the fuel that ignites further exploration into these unconventional connections - or should we say, the "diesel" for deeper analysis.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on this fuel-inary expedition, where the roads are paved with correlations, and the journey promises to be anything but conventional. After all, in the world of research, the most unexpected discoveries often come with a side of humor - or, in this case, a tank full of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved a comprehensive data collection process from reputable sources, primarily the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. The data encompassed the period from 1980 to 2021, providing a robust historical basis for our analysis. The data were scrubbed for outliers and inconsistencies, ensuring that our subsequent statistical analysis was based on reliable information.

Our approach to examining the relationship between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA was multi-faceted. We began by conducting descriptive statistical analyses to gain a clear understanding of the trends and patterns within the data. This included calculating measures of central tendency and dispersion, as well as visualizing the data through time-series plots and trend analyses. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but "dig" the correlations that began to emerge.

Following the initial exploratory phase, we proceeded to perform inferential statistical analyses to assess the strength and significance of the relationship between the two variables. Utilizing advanced regression models and correlation analyses, we teased out the nuanced interplay between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. As we delved deeper into the statistical labyrinth, we couldn't help but wonder if these findings would "ignite" further exploration into this curious correlation.

To establish the robustness of our results, we employed rigorous hypothesis testing, determining the statistical significance of the observed associations. Our choice of statistical tests was guided by the nature of the variables and the assumptions underlying the statistical models. It was crucial to ensure that our analyses were not just academically sound, but also capable of holding their ground in the face of scrutiny. As we navigated the labyrinth of statistical tests, it was clear that our findings were not just some "fuel-sy." They were, in fact, robust and statistically reliable.

In addition to our quantitative analyses, we conducted qualitative investigations to delve into potential underlying mechanisms that could explain the observed relationship. This involved a thorough review of industry reports, automotive engineering principles, and energy consumption trends in Burundi. Our multifaceted approach sought to encompass the breadth and depth of factors contributing to the uncanny connection between fossil fuel usage and automotive recalls.

An important point to note is that our methodology was designed to withstand the winds of skepticism and the storms of scrutiny, staking its claim on a foundation of rigor and precision. We left no statistical stone unturned, ensuring that the methods utilized in this study were not just academically defensible, but also reflective of the spirit of inquiry that underpins scientific research.

In summary, our methodology comprised a careful blend of quantitative and qualitative approaches, guided by the principles of robustness, reliability, and academic integrity. As we wrap up the methodology section, we can't help but acknowledge the "fuel" of excitement that propelled us through this research, leading us to this unexpected intersection of variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9500278, r-squared of 0.9025528, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the dynamic realm of scientific inquiry, researchers often stumble upon unexpected connections that elicit more than a few raised eyebrows. As one delves into the world of statistical analysis and correlation, it is not uncommon to uncover relationships that seem to defy logic or reason, much to the chagrin of those who adhere strictly to conventional wisdom. It is as if the universe conspires to throw us a curveball, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
In a similar vein, our study plunges into the rather unexplored territory of the connection between fossil fuel usage in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. One might be tempted to think, "What could possibly link the fuel preferences of a small African nation to the quality control measures of a luxury German automaker?" Well, dear reader, the answer may lie not just in the fuel efficiency, but also in the fuel-iciency of these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Our curiosity piqued by the unlikely coupling of these variables, we embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part scientific odyssey, and, to be perfectly honest, part unexpected comedy routine. After all, who would have thought that the burning question of Burundi’s fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls would spark such intrigue? It’s almost as if these data sets are in cahoots, fueling our desire to uncover their hidden relationship.
As any discerning academic would tell you, the pursuit of knowledge occasionally comes with a fair share of surprises, much like finding an unexpected item in the last place you look. With our findings in hand, we stand ready to shed light on this enigmatic association and leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding. And, if you’ll permit us a moment of levity, we hope that our research will prove to be the fuel that ignites further exploration into these unconventional connections - or should we say, the "diesel" for deeper analysis.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on this fuel-inary expedition, where the roads are paved with correlations, and the journey promises to be anything but conventional. After all, in the world of research, the most unexpected discoveries often come with a side of humor - or, in this case, a tank full of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The empirical analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500278. This strong positive correlation signifies a consistent association between the variables over the time period from 1980 to 2021. It seems that as Burundi's fossil fuel consumption rose, so did the number of recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.

This unexpected connection might leave one pondering, "What drives this fuel-iant relationship?" It appears that the answer lies not only in the combustion of fossil fuels but also in the ignition of automotive mishaps. It's like the two variables are in an unprecedented alliance, fueling each other’s statistical significance.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) displayed a clear, upward-sloping pattern, visually capturing the strong association between the two variables. The data points seemed to form a road map of sorts, leading us to the undeniable conclusion that as one variable revved up, the other followed suit. It's almost as if the data were so well-aligned, they were driving the correlation themselves.

The r-squared value of 0.9025528 further corroborated the robustness of this relationship. This value indicated that approximately 90.26% of the variation in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA could be explained by changes in fossil fuel use in Burundi. This remarkable level of explanation leaves little room for doubt about the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by random chance. In fact, one might say that the likelihood of this correlation being a mere coincidence was as low as finding a spare tire at a unicycle convention.

In conclusion, our analysis unearthed a compelling correlation between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This unexpected finding accentuates the importance of exploring inter-industry dynamics and hints at the truly interconnected nature of global phenomena. It seems that in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fuel-cinating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the investigation of the interplay between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our review of existing literature has unearthed a variety of perspectives and insights. Smith et al. (2015) offer an analysis of energy consumption trends in African nations, providing a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing fuel preferences and usage in the region. Doe and Jones (2019) delve into the intricacies of automotive quality control, shedding light on the processes and challenges faced by renowned automobile manufacturers.
In "The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World" by Paul Roberts, the author explores the societal and environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption, providing a rich contextual backdrop for our investigation. Additionally, "Car: A Drama of the American Workplace" by Mary Walton offers an in-depth examination of the automotive industry, delving into the complexities of manufacturing and quality assurance practices.
Turning to fiction titles, the classic novel "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair presents a compelling narrative centered around the oil industry, offering a fictional yet thought-provoking exploration of the dynamics at play in the world of energy production. Similarly, "The Car" by Gary Paulsen takes readers on a captivating journey through the eyes of a young protagonist as he encounters the mysteries and challenges of the automotive realm.
In our quest for unconventional connections, we also draw inspiration from cinematic works that touch upon themes related to energy consumption and automotive dynamics. Films such as "Mad Max: Fury Road" and "The Fast and the Furious" series provide a fictional lens through which to contemplate the intricate relationship between fuel usage and vehicular performance.
As we traverse the diverse landscape of literature and media, it becomes evident that the association between fossil fuel utilization in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA extends beyond the confines of traditional research domains. This confluence of influences and perspectives prompts us to broaden our analytical scope and, at the risk of driving a point home, to fuel our imagination for further inquiry.
Speaking of fuel, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
The inclusion of humor serves as a driving force in our pursuit of understanding, allowing us to embrace the unexpected and infuse our scholarly endeavors with a touch of levity. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a well-placed dad joke can certainly fuel the flames of inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500278. This strong positive correlation signifies a consistent association between the variables over the time period from 1980 to 2021. It seems that as Burundi's fossil fuel consumption rose, so did the number of recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.
This unexpected connection might leave one pondering, "What drives this fuel-iant relationship?" It appears that the answer lies not only in the combustion of fossil fuels but also in the ignition of automotive mishaps. It's like the two variables are in an unprecedented alliance, fueling each other’s statistical significance.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) displayed a clear, upward-sloping pattern, visually capturing the strong association between the two variables. The data points seemed to form a road map of sorts, leading us to the undeniable conclusion that as one variable revved up, the other followed suit. It's almost as if the data were so well-aligned, they were driving the correlation themselves.
The r-squared value of 0.9025528 further corroborated the robustness of this relationship. This value indicated that approximately 90.26% of the variation in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA could be explained by changes in fossil fuel use in Burundi. This remarkable level of explanation leaves little room for doubt about the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by random chance. In fact, one might say that the likelihood of this correlation being a mere coincidence was as low as finding a spare tire at a unicycle convention.
In conclusion, our analysis unearthed a compelling correlation between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This unexpected finding accentuates the importance of exploring inter-industry dynamics and hints at the truly interconnected nature of global phenomena. It seems that in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fuel-cinating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study provide compelling evidence in support of the previously proposed connection between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The striking correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value align with the prior research, thereby reinforcing the notion of a direct relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that this unexpected correlation is not just a mere coincidence, but a fuel-led force to be reckoned with.

The findings echo the sentiments of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2019), who alluded to the potential interplay between energy consumption patterns and automotive quality control processes. This unexpected synergy underscores the need to reevaluate our understanding of the influences shaping automotive performance and safety. As it turns out, the road to uncovering such correlations can be filled with unexpected turns and fuel-ups of statistical significance.

While some may find the link between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA to be far-fetched, the robust statistical evidence presented in this study serves as a testament to the interconnectedness of global phenomena. This unexpected relationship may, in fact, serve as a cautionary tale, reminding us that seemingly disparate variables can indeed have a fuel-iant impact on each other.

Furthermore, the surprisingly high r-squared value elucidates the extent to which changes in Burundi's fossil fuel consumption explain variations in the number of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This level of explanatory power underscores the need to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship. It's almost as if the data themselves were driving the point, or rather, steering the conversation towards more fuel-ture research.

In closing, the empirical findings of this study provide substantial support for the unexpected correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. This unanticipated alliance between energy consumption and automotive quality serves as a poignant reminder that, in the realm of statistical analysis, even the most improbable pairings can lead to fuel-cinating discoveries. After all, statistics may seem dry, but they can certainly spark a fire of curiosity.

Why did the statistician break up with the chemist? There was no "chemistry"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.

This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the dynamic realm of scientific inquiry, researchers often stumble upon unexpected connections that elicit more than a few raised eyebrows. As one delves into the world of statistical analysis and correlation, it is not uncommon to uncover relationships that seem to defy logic or reason, much to the chagrin of those who adhere strictly to conventional wisdom. It is as if the universe conspires to throw us a curveball, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
In a similar vein, our study plunges into the rather unexplored territory of the connection between fossil fuel usage in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. One might be tempted to think, "What could possibly link the fuel preferences of a small African nation to the quality control measures of a luxury German automaker?" Well, dear reader, the answer may lie not just in the fuel efficiency, but also in the fuel-iciency of these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Our curiosity piqued by the unlikely coupling of these variables, we embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part scientific odyssey, and, to be perfectly honest, part unexpected comedy routine. After all, who would have thought that the burning question of Burundi’s fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls would spark such intrigue? It’s almost as if these data sets are in cahoots, fueling our desire to uncover their hidden relationship.
As any discerning academic would tell you, the pursuit of knowledge occasionally comes with a fair share of surprises, much like finding an unexpected item in the last place you look. With our findings in hand, we stand ready to shed light on this enigmatic association and leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding. And, if you’ll permit us a moment of levity, we hope that our research will prove to be the fuel that ignites further exploration into these unconventional connections - or should we say, the "diesel" for deeper analysis.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on this fuel-inary expedition, where the roads are paved with correlations, and the journey promises to be anything but conventional. After all, in the world of research, the most unexpected discoveries often come with a side of humor - or, in this case, a tank full of dad jokes.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500278. This strong positive correlation signifies a consistent association between the variables over the time period from 1980 to 2021. It seems that as Burundi's fossil fuel consumption rose, so did the number of recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.
This unexpected connection might leave one pondering, "What drives this fuel-iant relationship?" It appears that the answer lies not only in the combustion of fossil fuels but also in the ignition of automotive mishaps. It's like the two variables are in an unprecedented alliance, fueling each other’s statistical significance.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) displayed a clear, upward-sloping pattern, visually capturing the strong association between the two variables. The data points seemed to form a road map of sorts, leading us to the undeniable conclusion that as one variable revved up, the other followed suit. It's almost as if the data were so well-aligned, they were driving the correlation themselves.
The r-squared value of 0.9025528 further corroborated the robustness of this relationship. This value indicated that approximately 90.26% of the variation in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA could be explained by changes in fossil fuel use in Burundi. This remarkable level of explanation leaves little room for doubt about the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by random chance. In fact, one might say that the likelihood of this correlation being a mere coincidence was as low as finding a spare tire at a unicycle convention.
In conclusion, our analysis unearthed a compelling correlation between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This unexpected finding accentuates the importance of exploring inter-industry dynamics and hints at the truly interconnected nature of global phenomena. It seems that in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can lead to fuel-cinating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we not only discovered a surprising correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA, but we also found ourselves on a journey filled with twists, turns, and plenty of statistical humor. It seems that when it comes to research, the data are always ready to "fuel" our sense of curiosity, even if it means navigating through unexpected territory.

The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value certainly "drive" home the point that these variables are not just running on empty in terms of their relationship. This connection is so strong, it's almost as if the data themselves are saying, "You auto know that we're in this together."

The scatterplot provided a visual roadmap of this unlikely correlation, serving as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the path to discovery is as clear as the open road. It's almost as if the data points were lining up like cars on a highway, all heading in the same direction - toward a statistically significant relationship.

With an r-squared value of 0.9025528, we can confidently say that our findings paint a comprehensive picture of the link between Burundi's fuel choices and Mercedes-Benz recalls. The strength of this relationship is not something to take lightly - it's almost as if the data were revving their statistical engines to make sure we didn't miss their point.

As for the compelling p-value of less than 0.01, one might say that the odds of finding such a strong correlation by random chance are about as likely as finding a hybrid car at a monster truck rally - in other words, not very likely at all.

In light of these findings, we are inclined to assert that no further research is needed in this area. The evidence has driven home the point that the connection between fossil fuel use in Burundi and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is undeniably significant. It appears that in the realm of statistical analysis, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected pairings yield the most fuel-cinating results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Economics and Auto Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Transportation Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Burning Up the Roads: The Fuel-ious Relationship Between Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Automotive Recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA with an abstract of This study seeks to uncover the potential link between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we delved into this unlikely relationship with an analytical lens. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500278 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.
Though initially unrelated, our research uncovered a surprising alignment between the increase in fossil fuel usage in Burundi and the uptick in automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our analysis also brought to light a notable uptrend in vehicle malfunctions, which seems to parallel the nation's growing reliance on fossil fuels. It appears that the more fuel Burundi burns, the more heat Mercedes-Benz feels.
This unexpected synergy prompts us to reconsider the mechanisms governing automotive quality control in the face of global energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the unearthed correlation serves as a call for further investigation into the interplay between seemingly divergent industries. Perhaps, as the saying goes, we should pay attention to the "fuels" for thought.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel use, Burundi, automotive recalls, Mercedes-Benz USA, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, correlation coefficient, vehicle malfunctions, automotive quality control, global energy consumption patterns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Burundi
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Burundi in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Burundi

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.9500278 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9025528 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Burundi) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-22. 0.0000000000000000000007847578
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 7.8E-20% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,274,278,509,879,098,867,712 random variables You don't actually need 1 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Burundi (Billion kWh)0.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0120.0030.0260.0370.0330.0290.0790.105090.1229460.1167330.124204
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)2002321220311322312446534553833484618233839333849




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.001,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.001,0.001,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.012,0.003,0.026,0.037,0.033,0.029,0.079,0.10509,0.122946,0.116733,0.124204,])
array_2 = np.array([2,0,0,2,3,2,1,2,2,0,3,1,1,3,2,2,3,1,2,4,4,6,5,3,4,5,5,3,8,3,3,4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Burundi"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3862 · Black Variable ID: 23561 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0