about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,919 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the second variable is Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO cotton inadvertently emitted a faint odor that smells like new leather, revving engines, and freedom, triggering a subconscious urge in the UK to embrace the motorcycle lifestyle.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that embodies the whimsical partnership between genetically modified cotton fields in North Carolina and Yamaha motorcycle engineers in the UK. Show the cotton plants glistening under the sun as the engineers in the UK inspect the fibres, with a sense of inspiration sparking. Depict riders throughout the UK enjoying the comfort of Yamaha motorcycles with luxurious seats made from the cotton fibres. Capture the increase in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles due to the allure of these new luxurious seats. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Macabre Sci-fi fantacy Whimsical illustration Surrealism
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK, in the following situation: The increase in GMO use in cotton in North Carolina caused the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK to increase because the genetically modified cotton fibers were so soft and durable that they inspired Yamaha engineers to create a new line of super-smooth, high-performance motorcycle seats. The superior comfort of these seats attracted more riders to choose Yamaha, leading to a surge in Yamaha motorcycle registrations in the UK.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A field in North Carolina filled with rows of genetically modified cotton plants, their soft and durable fibers glistening under the sun. Yamaha motorcycle engineers in the UK carefully inspecting the cotton fibers, inspiration sparking as they imagine the potential for super-smooth, high-performance motorcycle seats. Riders throughout the UK relaxing comfortably on Yamaha motorcycles, drawn in by the allure of these new luxurious seats, leading to a noticeable increase in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: A field in North Carolina filled with rows of genetically modified cotton plants, their soft and durable fibers glistening under the sun. Yamaha motorcycle engineers in the UK carefully inspecting the cotton fibers, inspiration sparking as they imagine the potential for super-smooth, high-performance motorcycle seats. Riders throughout the UK relaxing comfortably on Yamaha motorcycles, drawn in by the allure of these new luxurious seats, leading to a noticeable increase in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that embodies the whimsical partnership between genetically modified cotton fields in North Carolina and Yamaha motorcycle engineers in the UK. Show the cotton plants glistening under the sun as the engineers in the UK inspect the fibres, with a sense of inspiration sparking. Depict riders throughout the UK enjoying the comfort of Yamaha motorcycles with luxurious seats made from the cotton fibres. Capture the increase in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles due to the allure of these new luxurious seats.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in North Carolina caused Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Transportation Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8493484 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of agriculture and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest, with the nuances of these two domains often carrying implications that reach beyond their apparent boundaries. In the case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the discourse has been particularly contentious, prompting researchers to explore their impact on a multitude of industries. One of the more peculiar and unexpected connections to emerge from this exploration is the correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom.

Drawing inspiration from the adage "as different as chalk and cheese," the juxtaposition of GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles at first seems as disparate as, well, chalk and cheese. However, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic link between these seemingly incongruous entities, and in doing so, we aim to highlight the intricate web that connects agricultural practices to consumer behaviors, woven with threads of unforeseen influence. It is indeed this unexpected entanglement that we seek to bring to the fore, like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in the fabric of socioeconomic relationships.

As the world navigates the tumultuous seas of technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, our study offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay between the agricultural and automotive sectors. While some may consider this connection to be as unlikely as a fish riding a bicycle, our findings bear testament to a compelling correlation that demands attention, much like an elusive puzzle piece waiting to be placed in its rightful position.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest, with the nuances of these two domains often carrying implications that reach beyond their apparent boundaries. In the case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the discourse has been particularly contentious, prompting researchers to explore their impact on a multitude of industries. One of the more peculiar and unexpected connections to emerge from this exploration is the correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom.
Drawing inspiration from the adage "as different as chalk and cheese," the juxtaposition of GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles at first seems as disparate as, well, chalk and cheese. However, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic link between these seemingly incongruous entities, and in doing so, we aim to highlight the intricate web that connects agricultural practices to consumer behaviors, woven with threads of unforeseen influence. It is indeed this unexpected entanglement that we seek to bring to the fore, like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in the fabric of socioeconomic relationships.
As the world navigates the tumultuous seas of technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, our study offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay between the agricultural and automotive sectors. While some may consider this connection to be as unlikely as a fish riding a bicycle, our findings bear testament to a compelling correlation that demands attention, much like an elusive puzzle piece waiting to be placed in its rightful position.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Jones (2005) established the groundwork for understanding the impact of genetically modified cotton on agricultural practices, while Doe (2010) delved into the intricate world of consumer preferences in the automotive industry. Parallel to these analyses, "The GMO Debate: Controversies and Concerns" by Allen and "Consumer Behavior: Buying and Having" by Solomon provided valuable insights into the contentious debate surrounding GMOs and the complex nature of purchasing decisions. As we transition into the realm of seemingly unrelated literature, "The Cotton Club" by James and "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Pirsig stand out as culturally resonant works that, while not directly addressing our research question, offer symbolic nods to the underpinning themes of our study.

In a departure from traditional academic discourse, we found unexpected inspiration in the unlikeliest of places – the humble CVS receipt. As we meticulously analyzed the minutiae of purchase histories, we stumbled upon an assortment of seemingly unrelated items – cotton swabs, motor oil, and a peculiar number of discounted candy bars. While not directly pertinent to our research, this serendipitous discovery prompted us to ponder the eccentricities of consumer behavior and its potential tie-ins to our investigation. After all, who can resist the allure of a discounted candy bar or the convenience of a trusty cotton swab?

Just as the intersection of cotton fields and country roads appears to be as unexpected as finding a needle in a haystack, our journey through the literature similarly led us through winding paths and unexpected turns, illuminating the peculiarities that lie at the heart of our research question.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest, with the nuances of these two domains often carrying implications that reach beyond their apparent boundaries. In the case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the discourse has been particularly contentious, prompting researchers to explore their impact on a multitude of industries. One of the more peculiar and unexpected connections to emerge from this exploration is the correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom.
Drawing inspiration from the adage "as different as chalk and cheese," the juxtaposition of GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles at first seems as disparate as, well, chalk and cheese. However, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic link between these seemingly incongruous entities, and in doing so, we aim to highlight the intricate web that connects agricultural practices to consumer behaviors, woven with threads of unforeseen influence. It is indeed this unexpected entanglement that we seek to bring to the fore, like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in the fabric of socioeconomic relationships.
As the world navigates the tumultuous seas of technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, our study offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay between the agricultural and automotive sectors. While some may consider this connection to be as unlikely as a fish riding a bicycle, our findings bear testament to a compelling correlation that demands attention, much like an elusive puzzle piece waiting to be placed in its rightful position.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom, a multifaceted approach was adopted. In the spirit of adventure, our research journey began with a comprehensive mining of data from a plethora of sources, akin to prospecting for hidden treasures in a vast information landscape. The primary sources of data for this investigation were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, recognized as havens for statistical riches. The period of inquiry spanned from the year 2000 to 2021, allowing for a substantial temporal canvas upon which to paint our correlation analyses.

The methodology involved a careful curation of raw data from the USDA, akin to sifting through a massive haystack in search of the elusive needle—albeit with the help of modern technological tools. The data on GMO cotton cultivation in North Carolina was meticulously scrutinized, with particular attention paid to planting areas, yield per acre, and adoption rates over the years. Concurrently, data on the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom from Statista was collected and scrutinized, resembling a detective's cataloging of evidence in pursuit of a cryptic case. The temporal parallelism of these data sources allowed for an orchestration of temporal motifs into a symphony of statistical inquiry.

Subsequently, these datasets were harmonized through rigorous statistical analyses, employing techniques reminiscent of blending seemingly disparate musical notes into a harmonious melody. The data underwent a tango with correlation coefficients, dance-offs with scatter plots, and rigorous interrogations via regression analyses. This analytical choreography not only elucidated the presence of a substantial correlation but also revealed the nuanced nuances in the association between GMO cotton cultivation and Yamaha motorcycle registrations, akin to uncovering the intricate steps of a well-executed dance routine.

Finally, to ensure the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of potential confounding factors, akin to cross-examining witness testimonies in a court of law. These analyses sought to tease apart the threads of causality from the fabric of correlation, eliminating the proverbial red herrings and reinforcing the authenticity of the discerned link.

Instruments such as SPSS and RStudio served as the trusted tools of the trade, akin to the compass and map that guide intrepid explorers through uncharted territories, facilitating the navigation of complex statistical terrain. By embracing a methodology that mirrored the quest for hidden treasures and the deciphering of cryptic clues, our research team endeavored to unearth the elusive connection between GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles, shedding light on a correlation that stands as a testament to the intricate tapestry of interconnected industries.

The robustness of this methodology seeks to mirror the strength of our findings, inviting readers to join us on this academic adventure and revel in the unexpected revelations that lay hidden within the folds of statistical analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8493484, r-squared of 0.7213927, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agriculture and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest, with the nuances of these two domains often carrying implications that reach beyond their apparent boundaries. In the case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the discourse has been particularly contentious, prompting researchers to explore their impact on a multitude of industries. One of the more peculiar and unexpected connections to emerge from this exploration is the correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom.
Drawing inspiration from the adage "as different as chalk and cheese," the juxtaposition of GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles at first seems as disparate as, well, chalk and cheese. However, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic link between these seemingly incongruous entities, and in doing so, we aim to highlight the intricate web that connects agricultural practices to consumer behaviors, woven with threads of unforeseen influence. It is indeed this unexpected entanglement that we seek to bring to the fore, like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in the fabric of socioeconomic relationships.
As the world navigates the tumultuous seas of technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, our study offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay between the agricultural and automotive sectors. While some may consider this connection to be as unlikely as a fish riding a bicycle, our findings bear testament to a compelling correlation that demands attention, much like an elusive puzzle piece waiting to be placed in its rightful position.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a substantial correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Over the period of 2000 to 2021, we found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, signifying a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7213927 emphasizes that approximately 72% of the variation in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK can be explained by the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, adding weight to the observed correlation.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected relationship, showcasing the striking correlation between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK.

While this relationship may seem as odd as a cow on roller skates, the empirical evidence from our study strongly suggests a tangible link between these disparate domains. The conventional wisdom may be shaken, but it appears that the gears of agricultural and automotive industries are indeed turning in unison.

These findings not only contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences but also raise compelling questions for further investigation. The seeds sown by this research may yield fruitful insights into the far-reaching impact of GMOs and their unforeseen connections, challenging us to reconsider the interconnected nature of seemingly unrelated industries. This unanticipated correlation presents a rich tapestry of inquiry, weaving together the fabric of agricultural innovation and consumer behavior in a manner that demands further exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Jones (2005) established the groundwork for understanding the impact of genetically modified cotton on agricultural practices, while Doe (2010) delved into the intricate world of consumer preferences in the automotive industry. Parallel to these analyses, "The GMO Debate: Controversies and Concerns" by Allen and "Consumer Behavior: Buying and Having" by Solomon provided valuable insights into the contentious debate surrounding GMOs and the complex nature of purchasing decisions. As we transition into the realm of seemingly unrelated literature, "The Cotton Club" by James and "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Pirsig stand out as culturally resonant works that, while not directly addressing our research question, offer symbolic nods to the underpinning themes of our study.
In a departure from traditional academic discourse, we found unexpected inspiration in the unlikeliest of places – the humble CVS receipt. As we meticulously analyzed the minutiae of purchase histories, we stumbled upon an assortment of seemingly unrelated items – cotton swabs, motor oil, and a peculiar number of discounted candy bars. While not directly pertinent to our research, this serendipitous discovery prompted us to ponder the eccentricities of consumer behavior and its potential tie-ins to our investigation. After all, who can resist the allure of a discounted candy bar or the convenience of a trusty cotton swab?
Just as the intersection of cotton fields and country roads appears to be as unexpected as finding a needle in a haystack, our journey through the literature similarly led us through winding paths and unexpected turns, illuminating the peculiarities that lie at the heart of our research question.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a substantial correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Over the period of 2000 to 2021, we found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, signifying a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7213927 emphasizes that approximately 72% of the variation in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK can be explained by the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, adding weight to the observed correlation.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected relationship, showcasing the striking correlation between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK.
While this relationship may seem as odd as a cow on roller skates, the empirical evidence from our study strongly suggests a tangible link between these disparate domains. The conventional wisdom may be shaken, but it appears that the gears of agricultural and automotive industries are indeed turning in unison.
These findings not only contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences but also raise compelling questions for further investigation. The seeds sown by this research may yield fruitful insights into the far-reaching impact of GMOs and their unforeseen connections, challenging us to reconsider the interconnected nature of seemingly unrelated industries. This unanticipated correlation presents a rich tapestry of inquiry, weaving together the fabric of agricultural innovation and consumer behavior in a manner that demands further exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence to support the intriguing relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. These findings align with existing literature that had hinted at the potential interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences. Our research serves as a firm foundation, breathing life into seemingly whimsical connections that have captured the imagination of scholars and enthusiasts alike.

We cannot discount the relevance of the serendipitous discovery on CVS receipts. While initially deemed irrelevant, these inconspicuous items – cotton swabs, motor oil, and discounted candy bars – may hold a deeper significance when viewed through the lens of consumer behavior. As much as we are lured by discounted candy bars, it is equally captivating to ponder the allure of Yamaha motorcycles in the UK and the impact of GMOs on cotton fields in North Carolina. Our study, much like the winding paths that led us through the curious literature, illuminates the unexpected linkages that underpin the dynamics of consumer choice.

In addition to these amusing parallels, the robust statistical correlation between GMO use in cotton and Yamaha motorcycle registrations cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. The r-squared value underscores the substantial proportion of variation in motorcycle registrations that can be elucidated by GMO use in cotton cultivation, akin to the precision of a well-tuned engine. The statistical significance of this correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, further solidifies the import of our findings, resonating like the powerful roar of a cruising motorcycle.

While the conventional wisdom may stutter at the sheer unexpectedness of this connection, our study posits a plausible linkage that cannot be brushed aside. As odd as a cow on roller skates, the correlation we unveil urges further exploration of the uncharted territories where agriculture and consumer preferences intersect. The gears of progress in agricultural innovation and consumer behavior align, forging intriguing inquiries that beckon us to delve deeper into the fertile depths of these unexpected associations.

In conclusion, the GMO-motorcycle connection we present in our study is as real as the wind in the open country road. Our findings urge a reevaluation of the intertwined dynamics between seemingly disparate industries and, much like the melody of a humming motorbike, resonate across scientific and societal spheres. The discoveries unearthed by this research effort serve as a testament to the rich tapestry of inquiry that awaits those who dare to unravel the unexpected connections that lie dormant beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest, with the nuances of these two domains often carrying implications that reach beyond their apparent boundaries. In the case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the discourse has been particularly contentious, prompting researchers to explore their impact on a multitude of industries. One of the more peculiar and unexpected connections to emerge from this exploration is the correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom.
Drawing inspiration from the adage "as different as chalk and cheese," the juxtaposition of GMO cotton and Yamaha motorcycles at first seems as disparate as, well, chalk and cheese. However, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic link between these seemingly incongruous entities, and in doing so, we aim to highlight the intricate web that connects agricultural practices to consumer behaviors, woven with threads of unforeseen influence. It is indeed this unexpected entanglement that we seek to bring to the fore, like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in the fabric of socioeconomic relationships.
As the world navigates the tumultuous seas of technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, our study offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay between the agricultural and automotive sectors. While some may consider this connection to be as unlikely as a fish riding a bicycle, our findings bear testament to a compelling correlation that demands attention, much like an elusive puzzle piece waiting to be placed in its rightful position.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a substantial correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Over the period of 2000 to 2021, we found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, signifying a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7213927 emphasizes that approximately 72% of the variation in the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK can be explained by the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. Additionally, the p-value less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, adding weight to the observed correlation.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating this unexpected relationship, showcasing the striking correlation between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK.
While this relationship may seem as odd as a cow on roller skates, the empirical evidence from our study strongly suggests a tangible link between these disparate domains. The conventional wisdom may be shaken, but it appears that the gears of agricultural and automotive industries are indeed turning in unison.
These findings not only contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences but also raise compelling questions for further investigation. The seeds sown by this research may yield fruitful insights into the far-reaching impact of GMOs and their unforeseen connections, challenging us to reconsider the interconnected nature of seemingly unrelated industries. This unanticipated correlation presents a rich tapestry of inquiry, weaving together the fabric of agricultural innovation and consumer behavior in a manner that demands further exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a perplexing yet robust association between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, akin to finding a needle in a haystack, underscores the unexpectedly strong relationship between these two distinct realms. This discovery not only challenges conventional thinking but also invites a whimsical pondering of agricultural-engineered motorcycling enthusiasts. Our findings reignite the age-old debate about whether nature or nurture sways consumers, even if it means considering the possibility of genetically modified cotton whispering sweet nothings to prospective Yamaha motorcycle owners across the pond.

As we lean back in our chairs and ponder this peculiar correlation, we acknowledge that while this research has raised eyebrows and drawn curiosity, the pursuit of further investigation in this domain resembles searching for a unicorn in a misty forest – quite elusive and perhaps unnecessary. Therefore, we posit that no more research is needed in unravelling the enigmatic GMO-motorcycle connection, as sometimes, mysteries are best left untethered to the winds of academic inquiry. With that said, we bid adieu to this unusual dalliance between cotton and motorcycles, leaving it with its enigmatic charm intact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Transportation Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Advancements and Transportation Research (SAATR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Cotton Fields to Country Roads: Unraveling the GMO-Motorcycle Connection with an abstract of Given the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential impact on various industries, our research team sought to delve into the peculiar correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and the number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the United Kingdom. Through a rigorous analysis of data obtained from the USDA and Statista spanning the years 2000 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8493484, indicating a striking connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 further underscores the significance of this finding. Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also prompts a reevaluation of the interwoven dynamics between agricultural practices and consumer preferences, offering a fresh perspective that may reverberate across both scientific and societal spheres.

ChatGPT:

GMO, cotton cultivation, North Carolina, Yamaha motorcycles, correlation, statistical analysis, consumer preferences, agricultural practices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in North Carolina genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in North Carolina

Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK

Correlation r = 0.8493484 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7213927 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in North Carolina) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.7E-7. 0.0000005747722494357638000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 5.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,739,820 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in North Carolina (GMO cotton %)76848693919598939596979696949797969693979694
Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK (Registered Motorcycles)135318138769148734157444164578164713162421165881168301173178169385168066164478162157161369163077164883161120159495156591158038161733




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([76,84,86,93,91,95,98,93,95,96,97,96,96,94,97,97,96,96,93,97,96,94,])
array_2 = np.array([135318,138769,148734,157444,164578,164713,162421,165881,168301,173178,169385,168066,164478,162157,161369,163077,164883,161120,159495,156591,158038,161733,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3919 · Black Variable ID: 809 · Red Variable ID: 477
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0