about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,163 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of fashion designers in Washington and the second variable is Google searches for 'dollar store near me'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As more fashion designers set up shop in Washington, the demand for unique, high-end clothing soared. This led people to search for cheaper accessories and basics to complement their designer looks, hence the increased interest in dollar stores. You could say the fashion wave created a ripple effect all the way to the dollar store, proving that in the world of retail, every outfit needs a budget-friendly accessory to truly 'dollar' it up!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute cartoon ] Depict downtown Washington with vibrant and whimsical fashion boutiques lining the streets, each showcasing the latest designer creations. Stylishly dressed individuals can be seen browsing through the racks and admiring the luxurious garments. In the midst of this, people, dressed in trendy outfits, are seen on their smartphones, typing in "dollar stores near me" and a surge in foot traffic leading into a nearby dollar store. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Celtic art Cute cartoon Cutsy graphics Oragami
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me', in the following situation: As more fashion designers set up shop in Washington, the demand for unique, high-end clothing soared. This led people to search for cheaper accessories and basics to complement their designer looks, hence the increased interest in dollar stores. You could say the fashion wave created a ripple effect all the way to the dollar store, proving that in the world of retail, every outfit needs a budget-friendly accessory to truly 'dollar' it up!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Washington, a row of trendy fashion boutiques lines the streets, each adorned with vibrant window displays showcasing the latest designer creations. Crowds of stylishly dressed individuals can be seen browsing through the racks and admiring the luxurious garments. Amidst this stylish scene, a steady stream of people can be observed on their smartphones, furiously typing in "dollar stores near me" into the search bar, their fashion-forward outfits contrasting with the practicality of their search. A nearby dollar store, tucked into a corner, experiences a surge in foot traffic as people flock in to find affordable accessories and basics to complement their high-end ensembles. The fashion wave has indeed created a ripple effect, proving that even the most upscale outfit needs a touch of budget-friendly flair.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Washington, a row of trendy fashion boutiques lines the streets, each adorned with vibrant window displays showcasing the latest designer creations. Crowds of stylishly dressed individuals can be seen browsing through the racks and admiring the luxurious garments. Amidst this stylish scene, a steady stream of people can be observed on their smartphones, furiously typing in "dollar stores near me" into the search bar, their fashion-forward outfits contrasting with the practicality of their search. A nearby dollar store, tucked into a corner, experiences a surge in foot traffic as people flock in to find affordable accessories and basics to complement their high-end ensembles. The fashion wave has indeed created a ripple effect, proving that even the most upscale outfit needs a touch of budget-friendly flair. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute cartoon ] Depict downtown Washington with vibrant and whimsical fashion boutiques lining the streets, each showcasing the latest designer creations. Stylishly dressed individuals can be seen browsing through the racks and admiring the luxurious garments. In the midst of this, people, dressed in trendy outfits, are seen on their smartphones, typing in "dollar stores near me" and a surge in foot traffic leading into a nearby dollar store.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of fashion designers in Washington positively influenced dollar store near me (Google searches for 'dollar store near me'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

The Journal of Aesthetic Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between societal trends and consumer behavior has long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny in the fields of economics and social sciences. In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, specifically exploring the connection between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. While this may seem like a peculiar pairing, the potential interplay between the fashion industry and frugal shopping habits presents an intriguing avenue for investigation.

Amidst the bustling creativity of the fashion realm, a sartorial symphony of style and innovation intertwined with the practicality of frugal finds becomes an enigmatic cacophony of consumer behavior. The allure of budget-friendly clothing and accessories intertwines with the allure of discounted treasures from dollar stores, beckoning us to unravel the threads of correlation and causation. Is this simply a case of fashion-conscious individuals seeking clever bargains, or are we witnessing a deeper symbiotic relationship between the burgeoning world of fashion design and the quest for economic thriftiness?

This unexplored landscape of sartorial synchronization and thrifty tendencies calls for a rigorous analysis, supported by robust statistical methodologies and a penchant for uncovering hidden patterns. It raises the question, are frugal shoppers skimming the seams of dollar stores for household essentials, or are they surreptitiously acquiring materials for their own DIY fashion endeavors? Furthermore, does the thrifty mindset fuel the surge in fashion design pursuits, or do the burgeoning aspirations of budding designers catalyze an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options?

In this paper, we endeavor to elucidate these connections and adorn the scientific canvas with findings that not only contribute to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality but also tickle the intellect with unexpected insights into the interplay of consumer proclivities and economic phenomena. By scrutinizing the quirks and flutters of these seemingly disparate variables, we aim to unravel a hitherto unexplored panorama of economic and cultural dynamics with endeavors that are both serious and stylish.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between societal trends and consumer behavior has long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny in the fields of economics and social sciences. In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, specifically exploring the connection between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. While this may seem like a peculiar pairing, the potential interplay between the fashion industry and frugal shopping habits presents an intriguing avenue for investigation.
Amidst the bustling creativity of the fashion realm, a sartorial symphony of style and innovation intertwined with the practicality of frugal finds becomes an enigmatic cacophony of consumer behavior. The allure of budget-friendly clothing and accessories intertwines with the allure of discounted treasures from dollar stores, beckoning us to unravel the threads of correlation and causation. Is this simply a case of fashion-conscious individuals seeking clever bargains, or are we witnessing a deeper symbiotic relationship between the burgeoning world of fashion design and the quest for economic thriftiness?
This unexplored landscape of sartorial synchronization and thrifty tendencies calls for a rigorous analysis, supported by robust statistical methodologies and a penchant for uncovering hidden patterns. It raises the question, are frugal shoppers skimming the seams of dollar stores for household essentials, or are they surreptitiously acquiring materials for their own DIY fashion endeavors? Furthermore, does the thrifty mindset fuel the surge in fashion design pursuits, or do the burgeoning aspirations of budding designers catalyze an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options?
In this paper, we endeavor to elucidate these connections and adorn the scientific canvas with findings that not only contribute to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality but also tickle the intellect with unexpected insights into the interplay of consumer proclivities and economic phenomena. By scrutinizing the quirks and flutters of these seemingly disparate variables, we aim to unravel a hitherto unexplored panorama of economic and cultural dynamics with endeavors that are both serious and stylish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study examining the proliferation of fashion designers in urban areas and its potential impact on consumer behavior. Their analysis hinted at a positive correlation between the number of fashion designers and the prevalence of frugal spending habits among consumers. However, their findings were met with skepticism, as some scholars argued that the influx of fashion designers may simply reflect the quirkiness of certain neighborhoods rather than a genuine influence on frugal shopping tendencies.

In "Economics of Style" by Doe (2018), the author delves into the economic implications of fashion trends and consumer spending habits. The book presents a thought-provoking analysis of the link between fashion innovation and budget-conscious shopping, offering a nuanced perspective on the sartorial landscape. Doe argues that the allure of affordable fashion options intertwines with the creativity of local designers, creating a whimsical dance of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

Jones (2012) explored the interplay between creative industries and consumer behavior in her seminal work "The Art of Thrift: A Sociological Perspective". While her focus was on broader trends in creative industries, her observations about the intersection of artistic expression and frugal living provide intriguing insights into the potential connection between fashion designers and thrifty shopping habits.

Turning to non-fiction literature that touches on the tangential aspects of our study, "Frugal Fashion: A Practical Guide to Stylish Savings" by Maria Simmons (2019) serves as a compelling resource for understanding the motivations behind budget-friendly fashion choices. Simmons masterfully combines practical tips with an insightful exploration of consumer psychology, shedding light on the intersecting realms of fashion creativity and economic thriftiness.

In the realm of fiction, "The Thrifty Couturier" by Rebecca Green (2007) immerses readers in a whimsical world where fashion designers double as savvy bargain hunters, infusing their creations with the spirit of frugality. While a work of fiction, Green's narrative offers a playful exploration of the potential synergies between fashion design and frugal shopping, albeit through the lens of storytelling and creative embellishments.

Anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media snippets further underscores the idiosyncratic intersection of fashion and frugality. A tweet by @FashionFinds123 asserted, "Chic doesn't have to break the bank! Discovering hidden gems at dollar stores is my style secret. #FrugalFashion" This proclamation hints at a potential nexus between fashion sensibilities and budget-conscious shopping strategies, albeit in 280 characters or less.

As we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, both scholarly and anecdotal, exploring the whimsical realm of fashion and frugality, it becomes evident that unraveling the intertwined threads of correlation and causation requires a delicate balance of serious inquiry and the occasional leap of imagination. With this understanding, we embark on our quest to illuminate the intriguing nexus of fashion designers and frugal finds with both intellectual rigor and a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between societal trends and consumer behavior has long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny in the fields of economics and social sciences. In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, specifically exploring the connection between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. While this may seem like a peculiar pairing, the potential interplay between the fashion industry and frugal shopping habits presents an intriguing avenue for investigation.
Amidst the bustling creativity of the fashion realm, a sartorial symphony of style and innovation intertwined with the practicality of frugal finds becomes an enigmatic cacophony of consumer behavior. The allure of budget-friendly clothing and accessories intertwines with the allure of discounted treasures from dollar stores, beckoning us to unravel the threads of correlation and causation. Is this simply a case of fashion-conscious individuals seeking clever bargains, or are we witnessing a deeper symbiotic relationship between the burgeoning world of fashion design and the quest for economic thriftiness?
This unexplored landscape of sartorial synchronization and thrifty tendencies calls for a rigorous analysis, supported by robust statistical methodologies and a penchant for uncovering hidden patterns. It raises the question, are frugal shoppers skimming the seams of dollar stores for household essentials, or are they surreptitiously acquiring materials for their own DIY fashion endeavors? Furthermore, does the thrifty mindset fuel the surge in fashion design pursuits, or do the burgeoning aspirations of budding designers catalyze an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options?
In this paper, we endeavor to elucidate these connections and adorn the scientific canvas with findings that not only contribute to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality but also tickle the intellect with unexpected insights into the interplay of consumer proclivities and economic phenomena. By scrutinizing the quirks and flutters of these seemingly disparate variables, we aim to unravel a hitherto unexplored panorama of economic and cultural dynamics with endeavors that are both serious and stylish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To undertake this curious exploration into the interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me', our research team embarked on a whimsical journey employing a deft blend of data collection and statistical analysis. The data utilized in this study were primarily sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, spanning the years 2004 to 2022.

The numerical abundance of fashion designers in Washington was meticulously compiled, shedding light on the ever-fluctuating landscape of sartorial innovation. The robust methodology involved traversing the annals of labor statistics with the precision of a fashionista selecting the perfect ensemble, capturing the vibrant tapestry of designers weaving their creativity into the fabric of our economy.

Concurrently, the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was scrutinized with the fervor of a treasure hunter scouring for hidden gems, delving into the digital realm to discern the ebb and flow of frugal inclinations. Utilizing Google Trends, we traced the undulating wave of interest in bargain-hunting, uncovering the clandestine yearnings of consumers seeking economic treasure troves in the form of dollar store delights.

The correlation between these divergent yet strangely harmonious variables was explored with a statistical fervor akin to unraveling a complex knitted pattern. Employing rigorous statistical methodologies, including the calculation of correlation coefficients and significance levels with the aplomb of a maestro orchestrating a symphony, we unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This statistical tango unveiled a compelling association between the proliferation of fashion designers and the proclivity for frugal finds, infusing the empirical landscape with a dash of sass and intrigue.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests with the meticulousness of a couturier perfecting the fit of a bespoke garment. Sensitivity analyses allowed us to assess the stability of our results, while diagnostic tests enabled us to scrutinize the health of our statistical models, akin to a fashion designer examining the stitching of their latest creation.

In essence, our methodology melded the scientific rigor of statistics with the enigmatic charm of societal trends, uncovering a captivating relationship between the world of fashion design and the allure of frugal discoveries. This endeavor not only epitomizes the fusion of quirky research with a touch of whimsy but also underscores the boundless potential for unveiling hidden insights in the delightful dance of data and discovery.

And remember, in the world of statistics and fashion, it's all about finding the perfect fit, whether it's with data or a fabulous find at the dollar store!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8307008, r-squared of 0.6900638, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between societal trends and consumer behavior has long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny in the fields of economics and social sciences. In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, specifically exploring the connection between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. While this may seem like a peculiar pairing, the potential interplay between the fashion industry and frugal shopping habits presents an intriguing avenue for investigation.
Amidst the bustling creativity of the fashion realm, a sartorial symphony of style and innovation intertwined with the practicality of frugal finds becomes an enigmatic cacophony of consumer behavior. The allure of budget-friendly clothing and accessories intertwines with the allure of discounted treasures from dollar stores, beckoning us to unravel the threads of correlation and causation. Is this simply a case of fashion-conscious individuals seeking clever bargains, or are we witnessing a deeper symbiotic relationship between the burgeoning world of fashion design and the quest for economic thriftiness?
This unexplored landscape of sartorial synchronization and thrifty tendencies calls for a rigorous analysis, supported by robust statistical methodologies and a penchant for uncovering hidden patterns. It raises the question, are frugal shoppers skimming the seams of dollar stores for household essentials, or are they surreptitiously acquiring materials for their own DIY fashion endeavors? Furthermore, does the thrifty mindset fuel the surge in fashion design pursuits, or do the burgeoning aspirations of budding designers catalyze an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options?
In this paper, we endeavor to elucidate these connections and adorn the scientific canvas with findings that not only contribute to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality but also tickle the intellect with unexpected insights into the interplay of consumer proclivities and economic phenomena. By scrutinizing the quirks and flutters of these seemingly disparate variables, we aim to unravel a hitherto unexplored panorama of economic and cultural dynamics with endeavors that are both serious and stylish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

A robust analysis of the correlation between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 during the time period of 2004 to 2022. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6900638, emphasizes the compelling relationship between the proliferation of fashion creativity and the inclination toward thrifty spending habits.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 showcases this association with as much enthusiasm as a well-dressed mannequin in a dollar store window display. The data points are clustered together with all the harmony of a fashion designer's color palette, demonstrating a clear and linear trend. It's almost as though the number of fashion designers and searches for dollar stores have crafted their very own runway show, strutting their statistical significance for all to admire.

The observed correlation, significant at p < 0.01, not only underscores the statistical validity of our findings but also beckons a myriad of whimsical interpretations. It raises the playful ponderings of whether frugal shoppers are donning shrewdly acquired accessories or simply draping themselves in the fabric of cost-effective DIY projects. Moreover, it tantalizingly hints at the question of whether the desire for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers sparks an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options.

In unraveling this entwined tapestry of fashion and frugality, our research not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also nudges the boundaries of conventional economic analysis with a stylish and spirited flair. These findings underscore the captivating relevance of statistical inquiry in the quirky realms of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, posing the lively question: are we witnessing a sartorial symbiosis of thriftiness and trendiness?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study examining the proliferation of fashion designers in urban areas and its potential impact on consumer behavior. Their analysis hinted at a positive correlation between the number of fashion designers and the prevalence of frugal spending habits among consumers. However, their findings were met with skepticism, as some scholars argued that the influx of fashion designers may simply reflect the quirkiness of certain neighborhoods rather than a genuine influence on frugal shopping tendencies.
In "Economics of Style" by Doe (2018), the author delves into the economic implications of fashion trends and consumer spending habits. The book presents a thought-provoking analysis of the link between fashion innovation and budget-conscious shopping, offering a nuanced perspective on the sartorial landscape. Doe argues that the allure of affordable fashion options intertwines with the creativity of local designers, creating a whimsical dance of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.
Jones (2012) explored the interplay between creative industries and consumer behavior in her seminal work "The Art of Thrift: A Sociological Perspective". While her focus was on broader trends in creative industries, her observations about the intersection of artistic expression and frugal living provide intriguing insights into the potential connection between fashion designers and thrifty shopping habits.
Turning to non-fiction literature that touches on the tangential aspects of our study, "Frugal Fashion: A Practical Guide to Stylish Savings" by Maria Simmons (2019) serves as a compelling resource for understanding the motivations behind budget-friendly fashion choices. Simmons masterfully combines practical tips with an insightful exploration of consumer psychology, shedding light on the intersecting realms of fashion creativity and economic thriftiness.
In the realm of fiction, "The Thrifty Couturier" by Rebecca Green (2007) immerses readers in a whimsical world where fashion designers double as savvy bargain hunters, infusing their creations with the spirit of frugality. While a work of fiction, Green's narrative offers a playful exploration of the potential synergies between fashion design and frugal shopping, albeit through the lens of storytelling and creative embellishments.
Anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media snippets further underscores the idiosyncratic intersection of fashion and frugality. A tweet by @FashionFinds123 asserted, "Chic doesn't have to break the bank! Discovering hidden gems at dollar stores is my style secret. #FrugalFashion" This proclamation hints at a potential nexus between fashion sensibilities and budget-conscious shopping strategies, albeit in 280 characters or less.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, both scholarly and anecdotal, exploring the whimsical realm of fashion and frugality, it becomes evident that unraveling the intertwined threads of correlation and causation requires a delicate balance of serious inquiry and the occasional leap of imagination. With this understanding, we embark on our quest to illuminate the intriguing nexus of fashion designers and frugal finds with both intellectual rigor and a touch of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
A robust analysis of the correlation between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 during the time period of 2004 to 2022. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6900638, emphasizes the compelling relationship between the proliferation of fashion creativity and the inclination toward thrifty spending habits.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 showcases this association with as much enthusiasm as a well-dressed mannequin in a dollar store window display. The data points are clustered together with all the harmony of a fashion designer's color palette, demonstrating a clear and linear trend. It's almost as though the number of fashion designers and searches for dollar stores have crafted their very own runway show, strutting their statistical significance for all to admire.
The observed correlation, significant at p < 0.01, not only underscores the statistical validity of our findings but also beckons a myriad of whimsical interpretations. It raises the playful ponderings of whether frugal shoppers are donning shrewdly acquired accessories or simply draping themselves in the fabric of cost-effective DIY projects. Moreover, it tantalizingly hints at the question of whether the desire for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers sparks an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options.
In unraveling this entwined tapestry of fashion and frugality, our research not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also nudges the boundaries of conventional economic analysis with a stylish and spirited flair. These findings underscore the captivating relevance of statistical inquiry in the quirky realms of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, posing the lively question: are we witnessing a sartorial symbiosis of thriftiness and trendiness?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In this discussion, we revel in the serendipitous synergy between the flourishing community of fashion designers and the quest for budget-friendly bargains, as manifested in the correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01. The results of our study robustly support prior research that hinted at a positive correlation between the number of fashion designers and the prevalence of frugal spending habits among consumers. Smith et al.'s skepticism about the potential influence of quirkiness on the proliferation of fashion designers is intriguing, but our findings add a layer of statistical sophistication to the whimsical tapestry of this relationship.

The delightful dance between fashion creativity and frugal shopping is further accentuated by the r-squared value of 0.6900638, capturing the vibrant essence of this seemingly enigmatic correlation. Like a daring fashion statement that defies convention, our findings challenge preconceived notions and beckon the scholarly community to embrace the playful nuances of statistical analysis.

Drawing inspiration from the interwoven worlds of literature and data, our discussion swirls with the whimsical ebullience of a fashion show, where every statistical inference struts its significance on the runway of academic inquiry. The scatterplot, akin to a captivating ensemble commanding attention on the statistical catwalk, underscores the compelling narrative of the association between fashion designers and the allure of dollar store treasures.

As we reflect on the implications of our findings, the lively question emerges: are consumers channeling their inner couturier by seeking out budget-friendly accessories, poised to embellish their ensembles, or are they embracing the DIY ethos by sourcing cost-effective materials for their sartorial endeavors? This evocative query infuses our discussion with the charm of speculative inquiry, inviting researchers to ponder the underlying motivations driving the interplay between fashion design and frugal consumer behavior.

In summary, our research not only adds a dash of statistical flair to the discourse on consumer preferences and economic dynamics but also imparts a delightful reminder that even in the realm of academic inquiry, the juxtaposition of fashion and frugality can spark joy and curiosity. Embracing the whimsical with vigor, we invite future studies to waltz into this enchanting domain, where the fusion of fashion creativity and frugal finds continues to inspire colorful conversations and captivating statistical revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fashion designers in Washington and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between societal trends and consumer behavior has long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny in the fields of economics and social sciences. In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, specifically exploring the connection between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. While this may seem like a peculiar pairing, the potential interplay between the fashion industry and frugal shopping habits presents an intriguing avenue for investigation.
Amidst the bustling creativity of the fashion realm, a sartorial symphony of style and innovation intertwined with the practicality of frugal finds becomes an enigmatic cacophony of consumer behavior. The allure of budget-friendly clothing and accessories intertwines with the allure of discounted treasures from dollar stores, beckoning us to unravel the threads of correlation and causation. Is this simply a case of fashion-conscious individuals seeking clever bargains, or are we witnessing a deeper symbiotic relationship between the burgeoning world of fashion design and the quest for economic thriftiness?
This unexplored landscape of sartorial synchronization and thrifty tendencies calls for a rigorous analysis, supported by robust statistical methodologies and a penchant for uncovering hidden patterns. It raises the question, are frugal shoppers skimming the seams of dollar stores for household essentials, or are they surreptitiously acquiring materials for their own DIY fashion endeavors? Furthermore, does the thrifty mindset fuel the surge in fashion design pursuits, or do the burgeoning aspirations of budding designers catalyze an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options?
In this paper, we endeavor to elucidate these connections and adorn the scientific canvas with findings that not only contribute to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality but also tickle the intellect with unexpected insights into the interplay of consumer proclivities and economic phenomena. By scrutinizing the quirks and flutters of these seemingly disparate variables, we aim to unravel a hitherto unexplored panorama of economic and cultural dynamics with endeavors that are both serious and stylish.

[[RESULTS]]
A robust analysis of the correlation between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 during the time period of 2004 to 2022. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6900638, emphasizes the compelling relationship between the proliferation of fashion creativity and the inclination toward thrifty spending habits.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 showcases this association with as much enthusiasm as a well-dressed mannequin in a dollar store window display. The data points are clustered together with all the harmony of a fashion designer's color palette, demonstrating a clear and linear trend. It's almost as though the number of fashion designers and searches for dollar stores have crafted their very own runway show, strutting their statistical significance for all to admire.
The observed correlation, significant at p < 0.01, not only underscores the statistical validity of our findings but also beckons a myriad of whimsical interpretations. It raises the playful ponderings of whether frugal shoppers are donning shrewdly acquired accessories or simply draping themselves in the fabric of cost-effective DIY projects. Moreover, it tantalizingly hints at the question of whether the desire for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers sparks an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options.
In unraveling this entwined tapestry of fashion and frugality, our research not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also nudges the boundaries of conventional economic analysis with a stylish and spirited flair. These findings underscore the captivating relevance of statistical inquiry in the quirky realms of consumer preferences and economic dynamics, posing the lively question: are we witnessing a sartorial symbiosis of thriftiness and trendiness?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has uncovered a captivating correlation between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me', with a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 during the period of 2004 to 2022. The statistical significance of this relationship, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6900638, not only highlights the compelling interplay between fashion creativity and thrifty spending habits but also adds a splash of fashionable flair to the world of economic analysis.

It's almost as if these variables have choreographed their very own high-fashion runway display, strutting their statistical significance with all the poise and precision of a seasoned model. The scatterplot, reminiscent of a well-coordinated color palette, showcases this association with as much visual appeal as a designer dress. The data points, like fashion-forward accessories on display, cluster together to create a clear and linear trend that is as unmistakable as a classic little black dress.

Our findings not only underscore the statistical validity of this connection but also beckon a myriad of whimsical interpretations. Are frugal shoppers fashioning their own style with shrewdly acquired accessories, or are they weaving their preferences into cost-effective DIY projects? The tantalizing possibility of a symbiotic relationship between frugality and fashion creativity opens the door to a world of playful ponderings and stylish speculation.

With its enigmatic allure, our study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question of whether the desire for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits or if the rise in fashion designers sparks a surge in the quest for frugal shopping options. In unraveling this entwined tapestry of fashion and frugality, our research not only nudges the boundaries of conventional economic analysis but also adds an unexpected twist of stylish and spirited flair to the discourse on consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

In light of these findings, it is evident that the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics is ripe for further exploration and sartorial scrutiny. However, given the compelling nature of our results, it may be safe to say that no further research is needed in this area; the connection between fashion designers and frugal finds has been stylishly stitched into the fabric of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Aesthetic Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Style Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fashionably Frugal: The Fluttering Fluctuations Between Fashion Designers and Frugal Finds with an abstract of The interplay between the number of fashion designers in Washington and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' was examined using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. Employing robust statistical methodologies, a correlation coefficient of 0.8307008 with a significance level of p < 0.01 was observed for the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings suggest a tantalizing link between the proliferation of fashion creativity and an inclination toward thrifty spending habits. This study not only sheds light on consumer behavior but also beckons the question: are frugal shoppers seeking budget-friendly accessories or simply in search of affordable fabric for their DIY fashion projects? Moreover, it raises the specter of whether the urge for frugality drives an increase in fashion design pursuits, or if the rise in fashion designers spurs an upsurge in the quest for frugal shopping options. Our research thus contributes to the discourse on the fusion of fashion and frugality and underscores the need for further exploration into the whimsical world of consumer preferences and economic dynamics.

ChatGPT:

fashion designers, frugal finds, budget-friendly accessories, DIY fashion projects, thrifty spending habits, consumer behavior, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, significance level, proliferation of fashion creativity, affordable fabric, frugal shoppers, fashion design pursuits, consumer preferences, economic dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of fashion designers in Washington
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of fashion designers in Washington
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of fashion designers in Washington

Google searches for 'dollar store near me'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'dollar store near me'

Correlation r = 0.8307008 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6900638 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'dollar store near me') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of fashion designers in Washington) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.06E-5. 0.0000106396865851331970000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00106% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 93,988 random variables You don't actually need 93 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of fashion designers in Washington (Fashion Designers)190190180190120250210300220210120150280360500410560410240
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' (Rel. search volume)0.5833330.4166670.1666670.181818000013.255.7516.083330.7545.833356.833369.166772.566.916756.4167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([190,190,180,190,120,250,210,300,220,210,120,150,280,360,500,410,560,410,240,])
array_2 = np.array([0.583333,0.416667,0.166667,0.181818,0,0,0,0,1,3.25,5.75,16.0833,30.75,45.8333,56.8333,69.1667,72.5,66.9167,56.4167,])
array_1_name = "The number of fashion designers in Washington"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'dollar store near me'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4163 · Black Variable ID: 15695 · Red Variable ID: 1375
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0