about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,190 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of sociologists in North Carolina and the second variable is Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of sociologists in North Carolina rose, so did the understanding of social dynamics. This led to a surge in Mr. Beast's fans trying to figure out the best strategies to win his challenges and ultimately befriend a local sociologist - who then went on to analyze Mr. Beast's impact on society, leading to even more research and further fueling the cycle of internet stardom. It's a sociological phenomenon in the making!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image representing the scenario in North Carolina where sociologists and Mr. Beast enthusiasts converge in a bustling library. Show a group of sociologists engaged in lively discussions, surrounded by fascinated fans intently researching Mr. Beast's challenges on computers. The local sociologist should be depicted amidst a group of eager fans, passionately analyzing the impact of Mr. Beast on society. The image should capture the atmosphere of intellectual curiosity and internet fandom, illustrating the collision of academic inquiry and internet stardom. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Sci-fi fantacy Symbolism Symbolism 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast', in the following situation: As the number of sociologists in North Carolina rose, so did the understanding of social dynamics. This led to a surge in Mr. Beast's fans trying to figure out the best strategies to win his challenges and ultimately befriend a local sociologist - who then went on to analyze Mr. Beast's impact on society, leading to even more research and further fueling the cycle of internet stardom. It's a sociological phenomenon in the making!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In North Carolina, the number of sociologists increased, and alongside this, Google searches for "Mr. Beast" skyrocketed. In a bustling library, sociologists engaged in animated discussions, while eager fans huddled around computers, excitedly searching for the best strategies to win Mr. Beast's challenges. The local sociologist, surrounded by a group of intrigued fans, eagerly delved into analyzing Mr. Beast's impact on society, sparking a wave of research and fueling the cycle of internet stardom.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In North Carolina, the number of sociologists increased, and alongside this, Google searches for "Mr. Beast" skyrocketed. In a bustling library, sociologists engaged in animated discussions, while eager fans huddled around computers, excitedly searching for the best strategies to win Mr. Beast's challenges. The local sociologist, surrounded by a group of intrigued fans, eagerly delved into analyzing Mr. Beast's impact on society, sparking a wave of research and fueling the cycle of internet stardom. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image representing the scenario in North Carolina where sociologists and Mr. Beast enthusiasts converge in a bustling library. Show a group of sociologists engaged in lively discussions, surrounded by fascinated fans intently researching Mr. Beast's challenges on computers. The local sociologist should be depicted amidst a group of eager fans, passionately analyzing the impact of Mr. Beast on society. The image should capture the atmosphere of intellectual curiosity and internet fandom, illustrating the collision of academic inquiry and internet stardom.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of sociologists in North Carolina caused Mr. Beast (Google searches for 'Mr. Beast') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches

Journal of Sociological Search Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of sociological research is often characterized by its serious and meticulous approach to studying human behavior and societal trends. However, in the spirit of unearthing unexpected connections and shedding light on the peculiarities of modern society, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to investigate the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for the internet phenomenon known as "Mr. Beast."

The internet, with its infinite sea of information and enigmatic trends, has become a virtual playground for sociological inquiry. The rise of online personalities and digital influencers has captivated the attention of both scholars and the general public, providing a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of popular culture and academic curiosity.

In this paper, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital musings of individuals seeking out "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. While this inquiry may initially seem more suited to a lighthearted cocktail party conversation than a scholarly journal, the statistical findings yielded by our investigation have unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation that challenges conventional expectations.

The quest to understand this unanticipated association has taken us on a delightful journey through the data landscape, where we have confronted statistical nuances and embarked on a quest for understanding the underlying sociocultural factors that may underpin this curious correlation. While the seriousness of traditional sociological research may lead one to question the scholarly merit of such an exploration, we argue that embracing the unexpected fosters a spirit of intellectual curiosity and reminds us that academia is not immune to the allure of the peculiar.

In a society overflowing with data and digital footprints, our investigation serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the domain of social science, there exists the potential for delightful surprises and intriguing juxtapositions. Our foray into this unconventional correlation is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis, but rather a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on a journey through the maze of sociological inquiry and internet curiosities, as our findings may just leave you searching for Mr. Beast in more ways than one!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sociological research is often characterized by its serious and meticulous approach to studying human behavior and societal trends. However, in the spirit of unearthing unexpected connections and shedding light on the peculiarities of modern society, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to investigate the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for the internet phenomenon known as "Mr. Beast."
The internet, with its infinite sea of information and enigmatic trends, has become a virtual playground for sociological inquiry. The rise of online personalities and digital influencers has captivated the attention of both scholars and the general public, providing a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of popular culture and academic curiosity.
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital musings of individuals seeking out "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. While this inquiry may initially seem more suited to a lighthearted cocktail party conversation than a scholarly journal, the statistical findings yielded by our investigation have unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation that challenges conventional expectations.
The quest to understand this unanticipated association has taken us on a delightful journey through the data landscape, where we have confronted statistical nuances and embarked on a quest for understanding the underlying sociocultural factors that may underpin this curious correlation. While the seriousness of traditional sociological research may lead one to question the scholarly merit of such an exploration, we argue that embracing the unexpected fosters a spirit of intellectual curiosity and reminds us that academia is not immune to the allure of the peculiar.
In a society overflowing with data and digital footprints, our investigation serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the domain of social science, there exists the potential for delightful surprises and intriguing juxtapositions. Our foray into this unconventional correlation is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis, but rather a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on a journey through the maze of sociological inquiry and internet curiosities, as our findings may just leave you searching for Mr. Beast in more ways than one!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe," the authors explore the trends in labor markets for sociologists and their implications on societal behaviors. The study provides insightful analyses on the distribution and concentration of sociologists in various regions, shedding light on the dynamics of this scholarly profession. Similarly, "Jones" investigates the patterns of online search behavior and the factors influencing individuals' digital inquiries. The authors' comprehensive examination of search trends serves as a foundation for understanding the complexities of internet exploration in modern society.

Moving away from the conventional academic literature, "The Sociological Significance of Online Phenomena" by Lorem Ipsum offers a lighthearted take on the intersection of sociological inquiry and internet culture. Its whimsical perspective on the quirks of digital fascination adds a dash of levity to the otherwise serious realm of sociological studies.

On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "The Curious Case of Mr. Beast" and "Sociologists and the Search for Serendipity" present fanciful narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, offer imaginative portrayals of the potential connections between sociological explorations and internet phenomena. These literary works bring a creative dimension to the otherwise methodical world of sociological inquiry, inviting readers to ponder the boundaries of scholarly exploration.

Moreover, anecdotal evidence from social media posts suggests a growing interest in the juxtaposition of sociological themes and internet curiosities. A tweet by @SocioEnigma muses, "Are we searching for 'Mr. Beast' because sociologists are studying us, or are sociologists studying us because we're searching for 'Mr. Beast'? The chicken or the egg? #SociologicalMystery." Such musings, while rooted in humor, reflect the underlying curiosity and intrigue surrounding the relationship between sociological trends and digital phenomena.

As we navigate through this diverse array of literature and digital discourse, we are reminded that scholarly inquiry, even when delving into offbeat connections, presents a captivating blend of the serious and the whimsical. The varied sources we have examined set the stage for our playful yet rigorous exploration of the correlation between sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sociological research is often characterized by its serious and meticulous approach to studying human behavior and societal trends. However, in the spirit of unearthing unexpected connections and shedding light on the peculiarities of modern society, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to investigate the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for the internet phenomenon known as "Mr. Beast."
The internet, with its infinite sea of information and enigmatic trends, has become a virtual playground for sociological inquiry. The rise of online personalities and digital influencers has captivated the attention of both scholars and the general public, providing a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of popular culture and academic curiosity.
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital musings of individuals seeking out "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. While this inquiry may initially seem more suited to a lighthearted cocktail party conversation than a scholarly journal, the statistical findings yielded by our investigation have unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation that challenges conventional expectations.
The quest to understand this unanticipated association has taken us on a delightful journey through the data landscape, where we have confronted statistical nuances and embarked on a quest for understanding the underlying sociocultural factors that may underpin this curious correlation. While the seriousness of traditional sociological research may lead one to question the scholarly merit of such an exploration, we argue that embracing the unexpected fosters a spirit of intellectual curiosity and reminds us that academia is not immune to the allure of the peculiar.
In a society overflowing with data and digital footprints, our investigation serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the domain of social science, there exists the potential for delightful surprises and intriguing juxtapositions. Our foray into this unconventional correlation is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis, but rather a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on a journey through the maze of sociological inquiry and internet curiosities, as our findings may just leave you searching for Mr. Beast in more ways than one!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The charmingly audacious quest to unravel the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast" involved a multifaceted approach that balanced statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy. Our research team, armed with an insatiable curiosity and an arsenal of data-mining tools, combed through an array of sources including the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends. The years under scrutiny spanned from 2004 to 2019, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of trends over a 15-year period.

To commence our endeavors, the Bureau of Labor Statistics provided a treasure trove of information regarding the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we meticulously collated data on the number of sociologists employed in the state and their corresponding employment trends over the designated timeframe. This meticulous curation of labor market statistics formed the bedrock of our analysis, offering a grounded perspective on the professional landscape of sociologists in this charming southern state.

In parallel, our intrepid voyage led us to the ephemeral terrain of Google Trends, where we embarked on a digital odyssey to capture the fervor surrounding the elusive "Mr. Beast." With Google's virtual looking glass as our guide, we harnessed the power of search query data to quantify the frequency of searches related to "Mr. Beast" emanating from the digital hinterlands of North Carolina. This playful pursuit allowed us to juxtapose the intellectual pursuits of sociologists with the whimsical musings of internet denizens, unveiling a peculiar interplay between academia and digital curiosity.

The statistical underpinning of our investigation employed robust methodologies to tease out the nuances of the correlation in question. Leveraging the arcane arts of correlation analysis, we meticulously calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to discern the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of sociologists and the interest in "Mr. Beast." To cement the veracity of our findings, a two-tailed t-test was conducted to ascertain the statistical significance of the observed correlation, fortifying our assertions with a level of confidence befitting the scholarly gravity of our inquiry.

Having traversed the realms of sociological labor markets and digital fancies, our methodological odyssey culminated in a tapestry of data-driven insight and lighthearted revelation. This approach, while unconventional in its subject matter, exemplifies the whimsical charm that underscores the unanticipated discoveries harbored within the annals of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.7860927, r-squared of 0.6179417, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of sociological research is often characterized by its serious and meticulous approach to studying human behavior and societal trends. However, in the spirit of unearthing unexpected connections and shedding light on the peculiarities of modern society, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to investigate the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for the internet phenomenon known as "Mr. Beast."
The internet, with its infinite sea of information and enigmatic trends, has become a virtual playground for sociological inquiry. The rise of online personalities and digital influencers has captivated the attention of both scholars and the general public, providing a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of popular culture and academic curiosity.
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital musings of individuals seeking out "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. While this inquiry may initially seem more suited to a lighthearted cocktail party conversation than a scholarly journal, the statistical findings yielded by our investigation have unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation that challenges conventional expectations.
The quest to understand this unanticipated association has taken us on a delightful journey through the data landscape, where we have confronted statistical nuances and embarked on a quest for understanding the underlying sociocultural factors that may underpin this curious correlation. While the seriousness of traditional sociological research may lead one to question the scholarly merit of such an exploration, we argue that embracing the unexpected fosters a spirit of intellectual curiosity and reminds us that academia is not immune to the allure of the peculiar.
In a society overflowing with data and digital footprints, our investigation serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the domain of social science, there exists the potential for delightful surprises and intriguing juxtapositions. Our foray into this unconventional correlation is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis, but rather a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on a journey through the maze of sociological inquiry and internet curiosities, as our findings may just leave you searching for Mr. Beast in more ways than one!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7860927, indicating a strong relationship between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for "Mr. Beast." The r-squared value of 0.6179417 further elucidates that 61.79% of the variation in "Mr. Beast" searches can be explained by the number of sociologists in North Carolina. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 signifies a statistically significant association, affirming the robustness of the correlation. This engenders a level of confidence in the reliability of the observed relationship, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving such an unexpected connection.

Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the two variables.

The findings of this investigation do not merely serve as an interesting statistical anomaly but evoke a sense of curiosity about the societal currents that intertwine the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital explorations of "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. The statistical robustness of the correlation challenges conventional expectations and provokes contemplation regarding the societal undercurrents that may fuel such an unexpected association. This serendipitous discovery invites further exploration of the intersection of labor dynamics and online search behavior, leaving scholars and society at large pondering the enigmatic relationship between sociological pursuits and digital curiosity.

The unexpectedly strong correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for "Mr. Beast" highlights the whimsical nature of societal trends and the captivating potential of unconventional academic inquiry. This revelatory finding underscores the notion that scholarly exploration can yield delightfully peculiar revelations, adding a touch of lighthearted intrigue to the hallowed halls of sociological investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe," the authors explore the trends in labor markets for sociologists and their implications on societal behaviors. The study provides insightful analyses on the distribution and concentration of sociologists in various regions, shedding light on the dynamics of this scholarly profession. Similarly, "Jones" investigates the patterns of online search behavior and the factors influencing individuals' digital inquiries. The authors' comprehensive examination of search trends serves as a foundation for understanding the complexities of internet exploration in modern society.
Moving away from the conventional academic literature, "The Sociological Significance of Online Phenomena" by Lorem Ipsum offers a lighthearted take on the intersection of sociological inquiry and internet culture. Its whimsical perspective on the quirks of digital fascination adds a dash of levity to the otherwise serious realm of sociological studies.
On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "The Curious Case of Mr. Beast" and "Sociologists and the Search for Serendipity" present fanciful narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, offer imaginative portrayals of the potential connections between sociological explorations and internet phenomena. These literary works bring a creative dimension to the otherwise methodical world of sociological inquiry, inviting readers to ponder the boundaries of scholarly exploration.
Moreover, anecdotal evidence from social media posts suggests a growing interest in the juxtaposition of sociological themes and internet curiosities. A tweet by @SocioEnigma muses, "Are we searching for 'Mr. Beast' because sociologists are studying us, or are sociologists studying us because we're searching for 'Mr. Beast'? The chicken or the egg? #SociologicalMystery." Such musings, while rooted in humor, reflect the underlying curiosity and intrigue surrounding the relationship between sociological trends and digital phenomena.
As we navigate through this diverse array of literature and digital discourse, we are reminded that scholarly inquiry, even when delving into offbeat connections, presents a captivating blend of the serious and the whimsical. The varied sources we have examined set the stage for our playful yet rigorous exploration of the correlation between sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7860927, indicating a strong relationship between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for "Mr. Beast." The r-squared value of 0.6179417 further elucidates that 61.79% of the variation in "Mr. Beast" searches can be explained by the number of sociologists in North Carolina. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 signifies a statistically significant association, affirming the robustness of the correlation. This engenders a level of confidence in the reliability of the observed relationship, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving such an unexpected connection.
Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the two variables.
The findings of this investigation do not merely serve as an interesting statistical anomaly but evoke a sense of curiosity about the societal currents that intertwine the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital explorations of "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. The statistical robustness of the correlation challenges conventional expectations and provokes contemplation regarding the societal undercurrents that may fuel such an unexpected association. This serendipitous discovery invites further exploration of the intersection of labor dynamics and online search behavior, leaving scholars and society at large pondering the enigmatic relationship between sociological pursuits and digital curiosity.
The unexpectedly strong correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for "Mr. Beast" highlights the whimsical nature of societal trends and the captivating potential of unconventional academic inquiry. This revelatory finding underscores the notion that scholarly exploration can yield delightfully peculiar revelations, adding a touch of lighthearted intrigue to the hallowed halls of sociological investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The outcomes of this investigation present an intriguing conundrum, one that seems to intertwine the serious pursuit of sociological inquiry with the enigmatic allure of digital phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 uncovers a captivating link between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for "Mr. Beast," prompting contemplation of the underlying societal currents that buoy this unexpected relationship.

Drawing upon the whimsical literature review, we find that "The Curious Case of Mr. Beast" and "Sociologists and the Search for Serendipity" offer imaginative portrayals of potential connections between sociological explorations and internet phenomena. While these fictional works may not be grounded in empirical research, they usher in a creative dimension to our findings, encouraging us to ponder the boundaries of scholarly exploration. As if seeking to embody the lighthearted nature of such literary works, the statistical robustness of the correlation challenges conventional expectations and provokes contemplation regarding the societal undercurrents that may fuel such an unexpected association.

All jest aside, our results concur with the scholarly perspective that portrays the distribution and concentration of sociologists as pivotal in understanding societal behaviors. Smith and Doe's insights into labor market trends for sociologists find corroboration in our findings, indicating a tangible connection between the number of sociologists in a region and online search behavior. Moreover, the imaginative tweet by @SocioEnigma, while rooted in humor, captures the essence of the reciprocal relationship between sociologists and the public's online interests. Thus, our research not only adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior but also offers empirical support for the underlying curiosity and intrigue surrounding the relationship between sociological themes and digital phenomena.

The intriguing correlation uncovered in this study serves as a testament to the unpredictable nature of societal trends and the enticing potential of offbeat academic inquiry. This revelatory finding underscores the notion that scholarly exploration can yield delightfully peculiar revelations, adding a touch of lighthearted intrigue to the hallowed halls of sociological investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of sociological research is often characterized by its serious and meticulous approach to studying human behavior and societal trends. However, in the spirit of unearthing unexpected connections and shedding light on the peculiarities of modern society, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to investigate the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for the internet phenomenon known as "Mr. Beast."
The internet, with its infinite sea of information and enigmatic trends, has become a virtual playground for sociological inquiry. The rise of online personalities and digital influencers has captivated the attention of both scholars and the general public, providing a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of popular culture and academic curiosity.
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital musings of individuals seeking out "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. While this inquiry may initially seem more suited to a lighthearted cocktail party conversation than a scholarly journal, the statistical findings yielded by our investigation have unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation that challenges conventional expectations.
The quest to understand this unanticipated association has taken us on a delightful journey through the data landscape, where we have confronted statistical nuances and embarked on a quest for understanding the underlying sociocultural factors that may underpin this curious correlation. While the seriousness of traditional sociological research may lead one to question the scholarly merit of such an exploration, we argue that embracing the unexpected fosters a spirit of intellectual curiosity and reminds us that academia is not immune to the allure of the peculiar.
In a society overflowing with data and digital footprints, our investigation serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the domain of social science, there exists the potential for delightful surprises and intriguing juxtapositions. Our foray into this unconventional correlation is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis, but rather a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on a journey through the maze of sociological inquiry and internet curiosities, as our findings may just leave you searching for Mr. Beast in more ways than one!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7860927, indicating a strong relationship between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for "Mr. Beast." The r-squared value of 0.6179417 further elucidates that 61.79% of the variation in "Mr. Beast" searches can be explained by the number of sociologists in North Carolina. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 signifies a statistically significant association, affirming the robustness of the correlation. This engenders a level of confidence in the reliability of the observed relationship, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving such an unexpected connection.
Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the two variables.
The findings of this investigation do not merely serve as an interesting statistical anomaly but evoke a sense of curiosity about the societal currents that intertwine the labor market for sociologists in North Carolina and the digital explorations of "Mr. Beast" on the vast expanse of the internet. The statistical robustness of the correlation challenges conventional expectations and provokes contemplation regarding the societal undercurrents that may fuel such an unexpected association. This serendipitous discovery invites further exploration of the intersection of labor dynamics and online search behavior, leaving scholars and society at large pondering the enigmatic relationship between sociological pursuits and digital curiosity.
The unexpectedly strong correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for "Mr. Beast" highlights the whimsical nature of societal trends and the captivating potential of unconventional academic inquiry. This revelatory finding underscores the notion that scholarly exploration can yield delightfully peculiar revelations, adding a touch of lighthearted intrigue to the hallowed halls of sociological investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the unorthodox yet statistically robust correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and Google searches for "Mr. Beast" has left us pondering the whimsical interplay of labor markets and digital curiosity. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and the significant p-value have illuminated a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected relationship, much like a serendipitous encounter, has injected a playful twist into the otherwise solemn landscape of sociological inquiry.

One cannot help but marvel at the enigmatic forces that drive individuals to seek out "Mr. Beast" while also fueling the demand for sociological expertise in the charming state of North Carolina. The cascade of internet searches for "Mr. Beast" seems to ebb and flow in tandem with the labor market dynamics, creating a harmonious dance of digital curiosity and scholarly pursuit. Perhaps there is a sociological phenomenon at play here, one that merits future investigation with curious minds and a penchant for the peculiar.

Nevertheless, our expedition into this eccentric correlation must come to an end, as the statistical robustness of our findings and the whimsical charm of this inquiry have made a compelling case for the quirky connection between sociologists and "Mr. Beast." Future research in this area may no longer be necessary, as the uniqueness of this discovery stands as a testament to the delightful surprises that scholarly exploration can yield. With that said, let us bid adieu to our peculiar findings and embark on new scholarly adventures, armed with the knowledge that even the most unlikely correlations can offer a touch of lighthearted intrigue to the realm of sociological research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sociological Search Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cultural Analysis and Technological Trends (SCATT)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Sociological Search: Unearthing the Correlation Between Sociologists in North Carolina and 'Mr. Beast' Google Searches with an abstract of This paper delves into the whimsical realm of tracking the correlation between the number of sociologists in North Carolina and the frequency of Google searches for the enigmatic "Mr. Beast." Gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team unpacked this peculiar association for the years 2004 to 2019. The statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7860927 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between the two variables. These findings offer a unique point of discussion and pique curiosity about the societal undercurrents that may drive such an unexpected connection. This research adds a lighthearted twist to the exploration of sociological trends and online search behavior, serving as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can offer delightfully bizarre discoveries.

ChatGPT:

sociologists North Carolina, Google search frequency, Mr. Beast, correlation sociologists Google searches, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, sociological trends, online search behavior, societal undercurrents

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of sociologists in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of sociologists in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of sociologists in North Carolina

Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'

Correlation r = 0.7860927 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6179417 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Mr. Beast') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of sociologists in North Carolina) over the 16 years from 2004 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000305. 0.0003054984259817458000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 0.0305% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,273 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
The number of sociologists in North Carolina (Sociologists)1201701901208050505090180140704050200330
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' (Rel. search volume)3.583334.57.53.333335.333334.333333.083333.583332.251.916671.751.666671.752.416676.8333322




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([120,170,190,120,80,50,50,50,90,180,140,70,40,50,200,330,])
array_2 = np.array([3.58333,4.5,7.5,3.33333,5.33333,4.33333,3.08333,3.58333,2.25,1.91667,1.75,1.66667,1.75,2.41667,6.83333,22,])
array_1_name = "The number of sociologists in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Mr. Beast'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4190 · Black Variable ID: 12305 · Red Variable ID: 1446
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0