about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,259 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska and the second variable is Renewable energy production in Bhutan.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The one thing Democrats and renewable energy have in common is a love for green! As Nebraska residents cast their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate, the collective surge of green-minded thinking somehow resonated all the way to Bhutan. It's as if every vote cast was a tiny spark of pro-renewable energy magic, and before you know it, Bhutan's hydropower plants were working overtime, fueled by the unexpected political positivity from the American Midwest. It's the most electrifying case of long-distance energy influence! Rest assured, this election certainly had a power all of its own – a power that put the 'watt' in 'Democrat' and the 'Bhutan' in 'renewable energy revolution'!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a cute cartoon image showing voters lining up in Nebraska to cast their ballots for the Democratic Presidential candidate. In the same image, depict the mountainous landscape of Bhutan with hydropower plants humming with energy production, fueled by the positivity emanating from the political choices made thousands of miles away. Show green-minded thinking radiating through the air, connecting the heartland of America with the renewable energy revolution in the Himalayas. Depict the scene with vibrant colors and a sense of positivity and interconnectedness. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic inspired by bauhaus a Polaroid photo Cute 2D animation Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan, in the following situation: The one thing Democrats and renewable energy have in common is a love for green! As Nebraska residents cast their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate, the collective surge of green-minded thinking somehow resonated all the way to Bhutan. It's as if every vote cast was a tiny spark of pro-renewable energy magic, and before you know it, Bhutan's hydropower plants were working overtime, fueled by the unexpected political positivity from the American Midwest. It's the most electrifying case of long-distance energy influence! Rest assured, this election certainly had a power all of its own – a power that put the 'watt' in 'Democrat' and the 'Bhutan' in 'renewable energy revolution'!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Nebraska, voters line up to cast their ballots for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, in the mountainous landscape of Bhutan, hydropower plants hum with unprecedented energy production, fueled by the positivity emanating from the political choices made thousands of miles away. Green-minded thinking radiates through the air, connecting the heartland of America with the renewable energy revolution in the Himalayas.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In Nebraska, voters line up to cast their ballots for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, in the mountainous landscape of Bhutan, hydropower plants hum with unprecedented energy production, fueled by the positivity emanating from the political choices made thousands of miles away. Green-minded thinking radiates through the air, connecting the heartland of America with the renewable energy revolution in the Himalayas. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a cute cartoon image showing voters lining up in Nebraska to cast their ballots for the Democratic Presidential candidate. In the same image, depict the mountainous landscape of Bhutan with hydropower plants humming with energy production, fueled by the positivity emanating from the political choices made thousands of miles away. Show green-minded thinking radiating through the air, connecting the heartland of America with the renewable energy revolution in the Himalayas. Depict the scene with vibrant colors and a sense of positivity and interconnectedness.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska caused Renewable energy production in Bhutan to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production

Journal of Ecological Politics and Renewable Energy Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to this utterly electrifying adventure in the realms of political whimsy and sustainable energy serendipity. Cast aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you energized and perhaps even a tad perplexed. Today, we embark on a playful pursuit of the unexpected linkage between the voting inclinations of Nebraska and the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan.

As improbable as it may seem, our scholarly escapade was sparked by an innocent question: could there be a jolly good correlation between Nebraskan support for the Democratic presidential candidate and the sustainable energy initiatives of the breathtaking Bhutanese terrain? Now, before you raise an eyebrow or chuckle at the sheer audacity of this endeavor, allow us to assure you that we approach this inquiry with all the gravitas and rigor befitting of an academic pursuit.

Not content with the mundanity of conventional research topics, we decided to chart a course into the unexplored territory where quirky correlations and enigmatic connections reign supreme. We diligently combed through reams of data, with sweat on our brows and puns at the ready, to uncover what may very well be the most unexpectedly amusing correlation to grace the annals of academic inquiry.

Through our rollicking romp into the land of numbers and graphs, we aim to demonstrate that beneath the veneer of a serious, scholarly endeavor lies a treasure trove of whimsical revelations just waiting to be unearthed. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an enlightening and, dare we say, delightful exploration of the intricate dance between Midwestern voting preferences and Himalayan renewable energy pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to this utterly electrifying adventure in the realms of political whimsy and sustainable energy serendipity. Cast aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you energized and perhaps even a tad perplexed. Today, we embark on a playful pursuit of the unexpected linkage between the voting inclinations of Nebraska and the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan.
As improbable as it may seem, our scholarly escapade was sparked by an innocent question: could there be a jolly good correlation between Nebraskan support for the Democratic presidential candidate and the sustainable energy initiatives of the breathtaking Bhutanese terrain? Now, before you raise an eyebrow or chuckle at the sheer audacity of this endeavor, allow us to assure you that we approach this inquiry with all the gravitas and rigor befitting of an academic pursuit.
Not content with the mundanity of conventional research topics, we decided to chart a course into the unexplored territory where quirky correlations and enigmatic connections reign supreme. We diligently combed through reams of data, with sweat on our brows and puns at the ready, to uncover what may very well be the most unexpectedly amusing correlation to grace the annals of academic inquiry.
Through our rollicking romp into the land of numbers and graphs, we aim to demonstrate that beneath the veneer of a serious, scholarly endeavor lies a treasure trove of whimsical revelations just waiting to be unearthed. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an enlightening and, dare we say, delightful exploration of the intricate dance between Midwestern voting preferences and Himalayan renewable energy pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Although the correlation between Nebraska Democrat votes and Bhutan renewable energy production may appear to be as likely as a snowball's chance in a volcano, the scholarly landscape presents some surprising insights. Smith and Doe, in their seminal work "Political Voting Patterns in the American Heartland," delve into the sociopolitical dynamics of the Cornhusker State, shedding light on the diverse influences shaping electoral preferences. Yet, as engaging as their findings may be, they remain conspicuously silent on the seemingly preposterous connection between Nebraskan voting behaviors and Bhutanese energy initiatives.

However, Jones and Smith in "Renewable Energy Initiatives Across the Globe" present a comprehensive analysis of sustainable energy efforts worldwide, intriguingly hinting at the potential role of unforeseen variables such as electoral propensities in shaping renewable energy landscapes. While their contemplations border on the whimsical, they stop short of delving into specific correlations involving unlikely bedfellows such as Nebraska and Bhutan.

Now, as we navigate away from the well-trodden paths of earnest academia, let us not overlook the unlikely treasures hidden within popular literature. In Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax," the whimsical tale of environmental advocacy and conservation carries an underlying message that challenges conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of sustainable practices across distant lands. Could it be that the Lorax's lament for the Truffula trees resonates with the silent whispers of Nebraskan voters and Bhutanese wind turbines? The idea may seem far-fetched, but as we embark on this playful pursuit of unconventional correlations, we find ourselves inclined to entertain even the zaniest conjectures.

In the enchanting realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" weaves a narrative rife with unexpected alliances and improbable connections. As our research team ponders the mystical interplay of political preferences and renewable energy endeavors, we can't help but draw parallels to the magical camaraderie that binds diverse and seemingly incongruent elements together. Is it possible that the wizarding world's peculiar alliances serve as a metaphor for the baffling entanglement between Nebraska's electorate and Bhutan's energy innovators? Only time, statistical analyses, and perhaps a pinch of powdered unicorn horn will tell.

Turning our attention to the visually captivating realm of children's entertainment, the animated series "Avatar: The Last Airbender" offers a parable of harmony between natural elements and human societies. Could the intricate balance depicted in the Four Nations mirror the delicate equilibrium between Nebraska Democrat votes and Bhutan's sustainable energy aspirations? While the fantastical and the empirical may appear to inhabit separate universes, we are ever vigilant for the capricious possibility that they may, in fact, converge.

As our literature review careens from the scholarly to the fanciful, we dare to dream of a world in which the most improbable correlations are not merely the stuff of whimsy, but the catalysts for serious inquiry. With that in mind, we set forth with renewed vigor to unravel the rib-tickling mystery that lies at the heart of our lighthearted yet earnest exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to this utterly electrifying adventure in the realms of political whimsy and sustainable energy serendipity. Cast aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you energized and perhaps even a tad perplexed. Today, we embark on a playful pursuit of the unexpected linkage between the voting inclinations of Nebraska and the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan.
As improbable as it may seem, our scholarly escapade was sparked by an innocent question: could there be a jolly good correlation between Nebraskan support for the Democratic presidential candidate and the sustainable energy initiatives of the breathtaking Bhutanese terrain? Now, before you raise an eyebrow or chuckle at the sheer audacity of this endeavor, allow us to assure you that we approach this inquiry with all the gravitas and rigor befitting of an academic pursuit.
Not content with the mundanity of conventional research topics, we decided to chart a course into the unexplored territory where quirky correlations and enigmatic connections reign supreme. We diligently combed through reams of data, with sweat on our brows and puns at the ready, to uncover what may very well be the most unexpectedly amusing correlation to grace the annals of academic inquiry.
Through our rollicking romp into the land of numbers and graphs, we aim to demonstrate that beneath the veneer of a serious, scholarly endeavor lies a treasure trove of whimsical revelations just waiting to be unearthed. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an enlightening and, dare we say, delightful exploration of the intricate dance between Midwestern voting preferences and Himalayan renewable energy pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Oh, the method to our madness! Buckle up, dear readers, as we traverse through the convoluted yet captivating journey of our research methodology. Our approach was akin to conducting a scavenger hunt across the labyrinthine landscapes of data repositories, juggling a hodgepodge of statistical tools and a sprinkling of whimsy to capture the essence of our quirky quest.

To begin our mirthful odyssey, we meticulously combed through a plethora of scholarly data sources, which included the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. We scoured through these repositories like eager prospectors, sifting through the digital sands in search of the elusive nuggets of information that would illuminate the curious connection between Nebraska’s voting proclivities and Bhutan’s renewable energy exploits.

Our data collection spanned the expansive timeframe from 1980 to 2020, a period as rich in political transitions as it is in the evolution of sustainable energy initiatives. With our trusty digital shovels in hand and a dash of humor in our hearts, we meticulously gathered the voting data from Nebraska's elections and the renewable energy production statistics from the serene lands of Bhutan.

Now, onto the merriment of statistical analysis! Armed with a trove of data, we set sail on the rollicking seas of correlation coefficients and p-values, steering our ship through the choppy waters of significance testing to discern the whimsical relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables. Our statistical voyage unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865, eliciting an appreciative chuckle from our mirthful research team.

In the spirit of scholarly thoroughness, we also ensured that our analysis accounted for potential confounding variables that could have danced a merry jig in our results. The endearing quirks and idiosyncrasies of our data were carefully examined to ensure that no mischievous confounders were lurking in the shadows, waiting to disrupt the delightful dance of correlation we had uncovered.

In essence, our methodology encapsulated a fusion of diligent data gathering, statistical merriment, and an unyielding pursuit of a jovial conclusion. And so, dear readers, with the clatter of our keyboards and the mirth of scholarly inquiry, we tiptoed through the labyrinth of data, unearthing a delightful correlation that has ignited a spark of whimsy in the realm of political and energy scholarship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9169865, r-squared of 0.8408642, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to this utterly electrifying adventure in the realms of political whimsy and sustainable energy serendipity. Cast aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you energized and perhaps even a tad perplexed. Today, we embark on a playful pursuit of the unexpected linkage between the voting inclinations of Nebraska and the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan.
As improbable as it may seem, our scholarly escapade was sparked by an innocent question: could there be a jolly good correlation between Nebraskan support for the Democratic presidential candidate and the sustainable energy initiatives of the breathtaking Bhutanese terrain? Now, before you raise an eyebrow or chuckle at the sheer audacity of this endeavor, allow us to assure you that we approach this inquiry with all the gravitas and rigor befitting of an academic pursuit.
Not content with the mundanity of conventional research topics, we decided to chart a course into the unexplored territory where quirky correlations and enigmatic connections reign supreme. We diligently combed through reams of data, with sweat on our brows and puns at the ready, to uncover what may very well be the most unexpectedly amusing correlation to grace the annals of academic inquiry.
Through our rollicking romp into the land of numbers and graphs, we aim to demonstrate that beneath the veneer of a serious, scholarly endeavor lies a treasure trove of whimsical revelations just waiting to be unearthed. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an enlightening and, dare we say, delightful exploration of the intricate dance between Midwestern voting preferences and Himalayan renewable energy pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in Bhutan has yielded some truly shocking and, dare I say, electrifying results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9169865, an r-squared value of 0.8408642, and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a remarkably strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

Behold, for Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that encapsulates the captivating dance between Nebraskan Democratic votes and Bhutanese renewable energy production. The data points seem to waltz across the plot with such synchronicity that one cannot help but wonder if some mystical force is at play, aligning the political leanings of the Cornhusker State with the sustainable energy vibes of the Land of the Thunder Dragon.

One might be tempted to dismiss our results as a mere fluke, a whimsical anomaly in the vast expanse of statistical analyses. However, our rigorous methodological approach and the robustness of the data sources from which we drew our information lend credence to the profound nature of this correlation. It appears that as Nebraskans cast their ballots, the winds of change blow across continents, manifesting themselves as a rallying cry for renewable energy efforts in the distant realms of Bhutan.

In light of these surprising findings, it may be time for political strategists and policymakers to consider the potential influence of global energy dynamics on local voting preferences. Who would have thought that the topographical features of the Himalayas could exert such a profound impact on the electoral inclinations of the American heartland?

Our research offers a thought-provoking reminder that even in the serious pursuit of scholarly inquiry, there exists a whimsical undercurrent of unexpected connections and lighthearted revelations. So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a spark of fascination in our hearts, let us continue to explore the uncharted territories of correlation and causation, for in the world of academia, the most delightful surprises often await those brave enough to venture beyond the conventional confines of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Although the correlation between Nebraska Democrat votes and Bhutan renewable energy production may appear to be as likely as a snowball's chance in a volcano, the scholarly landscape presents some surprising insights. Smith and Doe, in their seminal work "Political Voting Patterns in the American Heartland," delve into the sociopolitical dynamics of the Cornhusker State, shedding light on the diverse influences shaping electoral preferences. Yet, as engaging as their findings may be, they remain conspicuously silent on the seemingly preposterous connection between Nebraskan voting behaviors and Bhutanese energy initiatives.
However, Jones and Smith in "Renewable Energy Initiatives Across the Globe" present a comprehensive analysis of sustainable energy efforts worldwide, intriguingly hinting at the potential role of unforeseen variables such as electoral propensities in shaping renewable energy landscapes. While their contemplations border on the whimsical, they stop short of delving into specific correlations involving unlikely bedfellows such as Nebraska and Bhutan.
Now, as we navigate away from the well-trodden paths of earnest academia, let us not overlook the unlikely treasures hidden within popular literature. In Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax," the whimsical tale of environmental advocacy and conservation carries an underlying message that challenges conventional assumptions about the interconnectedness of sustainable practices across distant lands. Could it be that the Lorax's lament for the Truffula trees resonates with the silent whispers of Nebraskan voters and Bhutanese wind turbines? The idea may seem far-fetched, but as we embark on this playful pursuit of unconventional correlations, we find ourselves inclined to entertain even the zaniest conjectures.
In the enchanting realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" weaves a narrative rife with unexpected alliances and improbable connections. As our research team ponders the mystical interplay of political preferences and renewable energy endeavors, we can't help but draw parallels to the magical camaraderie that binds diverse and seemingly incongruent elements together. Is it possible that the wizarding world's peculiar alliances serve as a metaphor for the baffling entanglement between Nebraska's electorate and Bhutan's energy innovators? Only time, statistical analyses, and perhaps a pinch of powdered unicorn horn will tell.
Turning our attention to the visually captivating realm of children's entertainment, the animated series "Avatar: The Last Airbender" offers a parable of harmony between natural elements and human societies. Could the intricate balance depicted in the Four Nations mirror the delicate equilibrium between Nebraska Democrat votes and Bhutan's sustainable energy aspirations? While the fantastical and the empirical may appear to inhabit separate universes, we are ever vigilant for the capricious possibility that they may, in fact, converge.
As our literature review careens from the scholarly to the fanciful, we dare to dream of a world in which the most improbable correlations are not merely the stuff of whimsy, but the catalysts for serious inquiry. With that in mind, we set forth with renewed vigor to unravel the rib-tickling mystery that lies at the heart of our lighthearted yet earnest exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in Bhutan has yielded some truly shocking and, dare I say, electrifying results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9169865, an r-squared value of 0.8408642, and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a remarkably strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
Behold, for Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that encapsulates the captivating dance between Nebraskan Democratic votes and Bhutanese renewable energy production. The data points seem to waltz across the plot with such synchronicity that one cannot help but wonder if some mystical force is at play, aligning the political leanings of the Cornhusker State with the sustainable energy vibes of the Land of the Thunder Dragon.
One might be tempted to dismiss our results as a mere fluke, a whimsical anomaly in the vast expanse of statistical analyses. However, our rigorous methodological approach and the robustness of the data sources from which we drew our information lend credence to the profound nature of this correlation. It appears that as Nebraskans cast their ballots, the winds of change blow across continents, manifesting themselves as a rallying cry for renewable energy efforts in the distant realms of Bhutan.
In light of these surprising findings, it may be time for political strategists and policymakers to consider the potential influence of global energy dynamics on local voting preferences. Who would have thought that the topographical features of the Himalayas could exert such a profound impact on the electoral inclinations of the American heartland?
Our research offers a thought-provoking reminder that even in the serious pursuit of scholarly inquiry, there exists a whimsical undercurrent of unexpected connections and lighthearted revelations. So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a spark of fascination in our hearts, let us continue to explore the uncharted territories of correlation and causation, for in the world of academia, the most delightful surprises often await those brave enough to venture beyond the conventional confines of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

As we delved into the results of our study on the correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in Bhutan, we found ourselves in a state of gleeful astonishment. It seems that the whimsical nature of our research has led us down a path of delightful revelations and caused us to ponder the intriguing interplay of political leanings and sustainable energy efforts across continents.

Lest we forget the colorful characters in the literary landscape, the work of Smith and Doe, which delineates the curious sociopolitical dynamics of the Cornhusker State, resonates with our findings. It is almost as if the characters from Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax" have come to life, and the voters of Nebraska are speaking for the wind turbines in Bhutan, spreading a message of sustainable energy conservation through the power of their ballots.

Moreover, the statistical relationship we uncovered provides a compelling validation of the possibility hinted at by Jones and Smith, who proposed that unseen variables could shape renewable energy landscapes. One cannot help but wonder if, like a scene straight out of "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets," magical alliances are at play, binding the voting populace of Nebraska with the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan in an unforeseen and wondrous harmony.

Our results not only invite us to reflect on the whimsical possibilities lurking within the scholarly and fictional realms but also compel us to embrace the confluence of seemingly disparate elements. It is as if the ethereal balance depicted in "Avatar: The Last Airbender" has manifested itself in the form of a statistically significant correlation between the political proclivities of Nebraskans and the sustainable ambitions of Bhutan.

In all seriousness, our results indeed lend support to the seemingly whimsical propositions put forth in our literature review. The robust correlation coefficient and statistical significance we observed paint a portrait of an unlikely yet undeniably real connection between electoral preferences in Nebraska and the sustainable energy initiatives of Bhutan.

While our findings may seem fantastical at first glance, they speak to the unexpected and enchanting interconnections that underlie our world. As we endeavor to unravel the mysteries of correlation and causation, let us not lose sight of the delightful surprises that await us in the pursuit of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska and Renewable energy production in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to this utterly electrifying adventure in the realms of political whimsy and sustainable energy serendipity. Cast aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you energized and perhaps even a tad perplexed. Today, we embark on a playful pursuit of the unexpected linkage between the voting inclinations of Nebraska and the renewable energy endeavors of Bhutan.
As improbable as it may seem, our scholarly escapade was sparked by an innocent question: could there be a jolly good correlation between Nebraskan support for the Democratic presidential candidate and the sustainable energy initiatives of the breathtaking Bhutanese terrain? Now, before you raise an eyebrow or chuckle at the sheer audacity of this endeavor, allow us to assure you that we approach this inquiry with all the gravitas and rigor befitting of an academic pursuit.
Not content with the mundanity of conventional research topics, we decided to chart a course into the unexplored territory where quirky correlations and enigmatic connections reign supreme. We diligently combed through reams of data, with sweat on our brows and puns at the ready, to uncover what may very well be the most unexpectedly amusing correlation to grace the annals of academic inquiry.
Through our rollicking romp into the land of numbers and graphs, we aim to demonstrate that beneath the veneer of a serious, scholarly endeavor lies a treasure trove of whimsical revelations just waiting to be unearthed. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an enlightening and, dare we say, delightful exploration of the intricate dance between Midwestern voting preferences and Himalayan renewable energy pursuits.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in Bhutan has yielded some truly shocking and, dare I say, electrifying results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9169865, an r-squared value of 0.8408642, and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a remarkably strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
Behold, for Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that encapsulates the captivating dance between Nebraskan Democratic votes and Bhutanese renewable energy production. The data points seem to waltz across the plot with such synchronicity that one cannot help but wonder if some mystical force is at play, aligning the political leanings of the Cornhusker State with the sustainable energy vibes of the Land of the Thunder Dragon.
One might be tempted to dismiss our results as a mere fluke, a whimsical anomaly in the vast expanse of statistical analyses. However, our rigorous methodological approach and the robustness of the data sources from which we drew our information lend credence to the profound nature of this correlation. It appears that as Nebraskans cast their ballots, the winds of change blow across continents, manifesting themselves as a rallying cry for renewable energy efforts in the distant realms of Bhutan.
In light of these surprising findings, it may be time for political strategists and policymakers to consider the potential influence of global energy dynamics on local voting preferences. Who would have thought that the topographical features of the Himalayas could exert such a profound impact on the electoral inclinations of the American heartland?
Our research offers a thought-provoking reminder that even in the serious pursuit of scholarly inquiry, there exists a whimsical undercurrent of unexpected connections and lighthearted revelations. So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a spark of fascination in our hearts, let us continue to explore the uncharted territories of correlation and causation, for in the world of academia, the most delightful surprises often await those brave enough to venture beyond the conventional confines of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our mirthful meanderings through the magnetic synergy between Nebraskan votes for the Democrat presidential candidate and Bhutan's renewable energy production, it's safe to say we've uncovered a connection so electrifying it could power a whole fleet of dad jokes. The strikingly strong correlation between these seemingly incongruent phenomena has left us stunned, bewildered, and secretly delighted. We are left pondering, who knew that the way Nebraskans mark their ballots could send shockwaves across continents, igniting the sustainable energy fervor in the Land of the Thunder Dragon?

As we bid adieu to this rollicking romp through statistical analyses and whimsical correlations, it seems clear that no further research is needed in this area. The correlation coefficient has spoken, and the world of academia has been graced with an unexpectedly amusing connection that may very well be the pièce de résistance of scholarly whimsy.

So, dear readers, as we turn the last page of this research escapade, let us do so with a knowing smile and a renewed sense of wonder at the delightful surprises that await those daring enough to delve into the seemingly unrelated realms of Nebraskan politics and Bhutanese energy initiatives. After all, in the grand tapestry of academia, there's always room for a bit of whimsy, a dash of merriment, and a healthy dollop of sheer silliness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Politics and Renewable Energy Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Intercontinental Political and Environmental Studies (SIPES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Electing to Energize: Uncovering the Surprising Relationship Between Nebraska Democrat Votes and Bhutan Renewable Energy Production with an abstract of In this study, we undertake a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Nebraska and renewable energy production in the picturesque nation of Bhutan. Leveraging scholarly data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delves into a whimsical correlation that has long befuddled both political pundits and energy enthusiasts alike. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9169865 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting an intriguing link between voting patterns in the Cornhusker State and the sustainable energy endeavors of the Land of the Thunder Dragon. Through a blend of statistical analysis and a jovial spirit of inquiry, we aim to spark renewed interest in the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the world of academia, it's possible to illuminate the unexpectedly amusing connections that lie beneath the surface.

ChatGPT:

Nebraska, Democrat, votes, Bhutan, renewable energy, correlation, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska

Renewable energy production in Bhutan
Detailed data title: Total renewable energy production in Bhutan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Renewable energy production in Bhutan

Correlation r = 0.9169865 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8408642 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Renewable energy production in Bhutan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska) over the 11 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.1E-5. 0.0000709818163983784300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0071% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,088 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska (Total votes)166424187866259235216864236761231780254328333319302081284494374583
Renewable energy production in Bhutan (Billion kWh)0.0060.0081.5291.6041.8521.7922.3296.8916.7457.888.951




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([166424,187866,259235,216864,236761,231780,254328,333319,302081,284494,374583,])
array_2 = np.array([0.006,0.008,1.529,1.604,1.852,1.792,2.329,6.891,6.745,7.88,8.951,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Renewable energy production in Bhutan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4259 · Black Variable ID: 26002 · Red Variable ID: 23521
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0