about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,303 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Samara and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps voters were subconsciously swayed by the subtle association between the name Samara and the popular horror movie character from "The Ring." They may have felt a strange compulsion to support a candidate who they believed could "ring" in positive change for the state. And who knows, maybe they just really liked the idea of a candidate with a mysterious, well, 'ring' to their campaign!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In the middle of a lively town square in New Mexico, a large banner proudly displays the name "Samara" in bold letters. Passersby gather around, some nodding in recognition, while others excitedly engage in conversation. Amidst the bustling scene, a group of voters clad in red "Make America Great Again" hats begins to form a line, adding to the vibrant energy. Meanwhile, a popular horror movie character from "The Ring" is depicted next to the name, adding a chilling presence to the atmosphere. In the background, enthusiastic supporters cheer for the Republican Presidential candidate, creating an atmosphere of fervent enthusiasm as they promise to bring a "ring" of positive change to the country. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Parallax art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A photo-realistic image 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico, in the following situation: Perhaps voters were subconsciously swayed by the subtle association between the name Samara and the popular horror movie character from "The Ring." They may have felt a strange compulsion to support a candidate who they believed could "ring" in positive change for the state. And who knows, maybe they just really liked the idea of a candidate with a mysterious, well, 'ring' to their campaign!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in New Mexico, a large banner with the name "Samara" in bold letters catches the eye of passersby. People gather around nodding and chatting excitedly, all the while, a group of voters wearing red "Make America Great Again" hats begin to form a line creating a dynamic and energetic atmosphere. A popular horror movie character from "The Ring" depicted next to the name, while in the background, enthusiastic supporters cheer for the Republican Presidential candidate who promises to bring "ring" in positive change.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in New Mexico, a large banner with the name "Samara" in bold letters catches the eye of passersby. People gather around nodding and chatting excitedly, all the while, a group of voters wearing red "Make America Great Again" hats begin to form a line creating a dynamic and energetic atmosphere. A popular horror movie character from "The Ring" depicted next to the name, while in the background, enthusiastic supporters cheer for the Republican Presidential candidate who promises to bring "ring" in positive change. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In the middle of a lively town square in New Mexico, a large banner proudly displays the name "Samara" in bold letters. Passersby gather around, some nodding in recognition, while others excitedly engage in conversation. Amidst the bustling scene, a group of voters clad in red "Make America Great Again" hats begins to form a line, adding to the vibrant energy. Meanwhile, a popular horror movie character from "The Ring" is depicted next to the name, adding a chilling presence to the atmosphere. In the background, enthusiastic supporters cheer for the Republican Presidential candidate, creating an atmosphere of fervent enthusiasm as they promise to bring a "ring" of positive change to the country.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Samara caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'

The Journal of Political Ethnolinguistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Naming is a fundamental aspect of one's identity and can harbor subtle connotations that unknowingly influence perceptions and behaviors. In recent years, the academic community has shown burgeoning interest in the intersection of nomenclature and its potential impact on various aspects of life, including but not limited to professional success, social interactions, and, as we attempt to unravel in this study, political inclinations. By examining the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in the diverse state of New Mexico, we seek to shed light on the extent to which nomenclature may inherently sway political preferences.

Before delving into the depths of our investigation, let's start off with a classic dad joke: Why did the Samara cross the road? To get to the pun on the other side, of course! But on a more serious note, the connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political allegiance is indeed an essential and intriguing aspect of sociopolitical analysis.

Inquisitively, we ask – is there a conspicuous correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes cast in favor of Republican presidential candidates? This question piqued our scientific curiosity and prompted an exploration into an unusual, yet captivating, realm of inquiry. Like the name "Samara" itself, the correlation appears enigmatic and we embark on our investigation with an open mind and a dash of whimsy.

The findings from our statistical analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.8877556, prompting us to reflect – perhaps there's a Samara-tian pull toward a particular political persuasion. It's almost as though the name acts as a silent orchestrator of political leanings, like a vote-whisperer.

Speaking of Samaran influence, here's a thought-provoking dad joke to keep things light: Did you hear about the Samaran news anchor? She always delivered the pun-dits with extra punch! Our data suggests that, in New Mexico and potentially beyond, the Samara phenomenon could be more than just a mere coincidence.

As we navigate through the complexities of this unexpected correlation, we invite you to join us in exploring this intriguing, albeit amusing, facet of sociopolitical dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Naming is a fundamental aspect of one's identity and can harbor subtle connotations that unknowingly influence perceptions and behaviors. In recent years, the academic community has shown burgeoning interest in the intersection of nomenclature and its potential impact on various aspects of life, including but not limited to professional success, social interactions, and, as we attempt to unravel in this study, political inclinations. By examining the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in the diverse state of New Mexico, we seek to shed light on the extent to which nomenclature may inherently sway political preferences.
Before delving into the depths of our investigation, let's start off with a classic dad joke: Why did the Samara cross the road? To get to the pun on the other side, of course! But on a more serious note, the connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political allegiance is indeed an essential and intriguing aspect of sociopolitical analysis.
Inquisitively, we ask – is there a conspicuous correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes cast in favor of Republican presidential candidates? This question piqued our scientific curiosity and prompted an exploration into an unusual, yet captivating, realm of inquiry. Like the name "Samara" itself, the correlation appears enigmatic and we embark on our investigation with an open mind and a dash of whimsy.
The findings from our statistical analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.8877556, prompting us to reflect – perhaps there's a Samara-tian pull toward a particular political persuasion. It's almost as though the name acts as a silent orchestrator of political leanings, like a vote-whisperer.
Speaking of Samaran influence, here's a thought-provoking dad joke to keep things light: Did you hear about the Samaran news anchor? She always delivered the pun-dits with extra punch! Our data suggests that, in New Mexico and potentially beyond, the Samara phenomenon could be more than just a mere coincidence.
As we navigate through the complexities of this unexpected correlation, we invite you to join us in exploring this intriguing, albeit amusing, facet of sociopolitical dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To gain comprehensive insight into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico, we reviewed several scholarly articles and studies. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of voter behavior and name popularity, establishing a groundwork for our investigation. Jones et al. (2014) further explored the influence of naming conventions on political preferences, providing invaluable context for our own inquiry.

Our investigation delved into the unexpected correlation between the name "Samara" and Republican presidential votes, akin to a surprise twist in a bestselling novel. While the academic literature lays the foundation for our inquiry, it is essential to look beyond traditional scholarly works to gain a more holistic understanding of our enigmatic subject matter.

Turning to non-fiction books that might shed light on the intersection of naming and political inclination, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner discusses unconventional factors that influence human behavior, weaving an engaging narrative that mirrors our own quest to unravel the Samara mystery. Additionally, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell offers insights into seemingly trivial phenomena that can have profound societal impacts, urging us to consider the influence of the name "Samara" as a tipping point in political allegiance.

As we ventured into the realm of fiction, considering the thought-provoking and often allegorical nature of storytelling, "1984" by George Orwell emerged as a relevant work. The theme of manipulation and conformity in the novel prompts contemplation on the potential influence of names in shaping political perceptions, akin to the influence of Big Brother in the fictional dystopia. Furthermore, Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" presents a speculative narrative that invites reflection on the power dynamics of societal structures, perhaps echoing the subtle influence of a name like "Samara" on political affiliations.

Expanding our sources to unexpected realms, we shifted our focus to unconventional literature, incorporating elements of surprise and whimsy to enhance our understanding. In an offbeat turn, we perused the back of various shampoo bottles, uncovering an "unexpected volume" of information, akin to the unanticipated correlation between the name "Samara" and Republican votes. In this lighthearted pursuit of knowledge, we stumbled upon quips about hair care that, in an amusing parallel, mirrored the levity brought by the occasional dad joke in our scholarly expedition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Naming is a fundamental aspect of one's identity and can harbor subtle connotations that unknowingly influence perceptions and behaviors. In recent years, the academic community has shown burgeoning interest in the intersection of nomenclature and its potential impact on various aspects of life, including but not limited to professional success, social interactions, and, as we attempt to unravel in this study, political inclinations. By examining the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in the diverse state of New Mexico, we seek to shed light on the extent to which nomenclature may inherently sway political preferences.
Before delving into the depths of our investigation, let's start off with a classic dad joke: Why did the Samara cross the road? To get to the pun on the other side, of course! But on a more serious note, the connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political allegiance is indeed an essential and intriguing aspect of sociopolitical analysis.
Inquisitively, we ask – is there a conspicuous correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes cast in favor of Republican presidential candidates? This question piqued our scientific curiosity and prompted an exploration into an unusual, yet captivating, realm of inquiry. Like the name "Samara" itself, the correlation appears enigmatic and we embark on our investigation with an open mind and a dash of whimsy.
The findings from our statistical analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.8877556, prompting us to reflect – perhaps there's a Samara-tian pull toward a particular political persuasion. It's almost as though the name acts as a silent orchestrator of political leanings, like a vote-whisperer.
Speaking of Samaran influence, here's a thought-provoking dad joke to keep things light: Did you hear about the Samaran news anchor? She always delivered the pun-dits with extra punch! Our data suggests that, in New Mexico and potentially beyond, the Samara phenomenon could be more than just a mere coincidence.
As we navigate through the complexities of this unexpected correlation, we invite you to join us in exploring this intriguing, albeit amusing, facet of sociopolitical dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

*Data Collection*

To embark on this whimsical yet serious inquiry, we conducted a rigorous data compilation process, akin to a treasure hunt for statistical gold. The list of first names, including "Samara," was acquired from the US Social Security Administration, and we must say, we certainly felt like name detectives uncovering the secrets of nomenclature. Meanwhile, the Republican presidential vote data for New Mexico from 1976 to 2020 was gallantly retrieved from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Imagine us as digital archaeologists, excavating the buried relics of electoral history. The combination of these datasets forged a peculiar symbiosis, prompting us to dive headfirst into the statistical sea of correlation.

Now, here's a dad joke that's so convoluted, it's almost methodological: Why did the statistician break up with the data scientist? Because there was no correlation! Fortunately for us, we found quite a tantalizing correlation in our datasets.

*Data Analysis*

Our approach to the statistical analysis was akin to a delicate dance, as we waltzed through the twists and turns of data manipulation. Utilizing the wondrous power of statistical software, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the frequency of the name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in New Mexico. This transformative process elucidated the underlying relationship between the variables, akin to witnessing the unveiling of a suspenseful plot twist.

Now, let’s insert a data-themed dad joke for a change. Why was the statistician unimpressed with the graph? Because it didn't have enough plot twists!

*Statistical Techniques*

We employed the classic Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the frequency of the name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in New Mexico. This method allowed us to quantitatively measure the degree of association between these seemingly unrelated entities.

Oh, a quick statistical wordplay here: Why should you never trust a data point? Because they’re always plotting something behind our backs!

*Control Variables*

In our endeavor to ensure the robustness of our findings, we introduced control variables, such as the overall voter turnout, historical political climate, and even the average temperature on Election Day in New Mexico. These additional variables served as gatekeepers, separating the confounding influences from our sought-after correlation.

Speaking of control variables, here's a playfully scientific dad joke: Why do scientists prefer cold weather for their experiments? Because you can always trust the controlled climate conditions!

*Caveats and Limitations*

It is imperative to acknowledge the limitations of our methodology. While we employed meticulous statistical techniques, the correlation discovered does not imply causation. As much as we'd like to believe in the fantastical influence of a name, we must exercise caution in attributing electoral behavior solely to nomenclature. Additionally, the singular focus on New Mexico may hinder the generalizability of our findings to the broader national landscape.

In the spirit of full disclosure and a hint of self-deprecation, here's a methodologically infused dad joke: Why do researchers like studying correlations? Because causation is too mainstream!

In conclusion, our research methodically traversed through the intriguing web of data and statistical analysis to illuminate a surprising correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation unveils an amusing yet captivating intersection between nomenclature and political inclination, offering an enchanting glimpse into the complexities of societal dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8877556, r-squared of 0.7881101, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Naming is a fundamental aspect of one's identity and can harbor subtle connotations that unknowingly influence perceptions and behaviors. In recent years, the academic community has shown burgeoning interest in the intersection of nomenclature and its potential impact on various aspects of life, including but not limited to professional success, social interactions, and, as we attempt to unravel in this study, political inclinations. By examining the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in the diverse state of New Mexico, we seek to shed light on the extent to which nomenclature may inherently sway political preferences.
Before delving into the depths of our investigation, let's start off with a classic dad joke: Why did the Samara cross the road? To get to the pun on the other side, of course! But on a more serious note, the connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political allegiance is indeed an essential and intriguing aspect of sociopolitical analysis.
Inquisitively, we ask – is there a conspicuous correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes cast in favor of Republican presidential candidates? This question piqued our scientific curiosity and prompted an exploration into an unusual, yet captivating, realm of inquiry. Like the name "Samara" itself, the correlation appears enigmatic and we embark on our investigation with an open mind and a dash of whimsy.
The findings from our statistical analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.8877556, prompting us to reflect – perhaps there's a Samara-tian pull toward a particular political persuasion. It's almost as though the name acts as a silent orchestrator of political leanings, like a vote-whisperer.
Speaking of Samaran influence, here's a thought-provoking dad joke to keep things light: Did you hear about the Samaran news anchor? She always delivered the pun-dits with extra punch! Our data suggests that, in New Mexico and potentially beyond, the Samara phenomenon could be more than just a mere coincidence.
As we navigate through the complexities of this unexpected correlation, we invite you to join us in exploring this intriguing, albeit amusing, facet of sociopolitical dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Over the time period from 1976 to 2020, a correlation coefficient of 0.8877556, an r-squared value of 0.7881101, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were determined, suggesting a highly significant relationship.

Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation, plotting the increasing popularity of the first name "Samara" against the rising votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico. The scatterplot graphically conveys the compelling association between the two variables. It's clear that "Samara-nity" may be more than just a play on words!

It seems the name "Samara" may have more sway than we previously thought. You might even say it has a Republican-aissance. It's not just a name; it's a political party in the making! The implications of these findings are quite elephantine in their influence on our understanding of political behavior.

It appears the name "Samara" might just ring a Republican bell, figuratively speaking. These results draw attention to the intriguing dynamics at play when it comes to the name and political inclinations – a real head-scratcher, isn't it?

So there you have it—our investigation into the connection between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and Republican presidential votes in New Mexico leads us to conclude that the correlation between the two is not just a coincidence. The Samara phenomenon may indeed hold some sway in the political landscape, and it's nothing to take lightly!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To gain comprehensive insight into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico, we reviewed several scholarly articles and studies. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of voter behavior and name popularity, establishing a groundwork for our investigation. Jones et al. (2014) further explored the influence of naming conventions on political preferences, providing invaluable context for our own inquiry.
Our investigation delved into the unexpected correlation between the name "Samara" and Republican presidential votes, akin to a surprise twist in a bestselling novel. While the academic literature lays the foundation for our inquiry, it is essential to look beyond traditional scholarly works to gain a more holistic understanding of our enigmatic subject matter.
Turning to non-fiction books that might shed light on the intersection of naming and political inclination, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner discusses unconventional factors that influence human behavior, weaving an engaging narrative that mirrors our own quest to unravel the Samara mystery. Additionally, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell offers insights into seemingly trivial phenomena that can have profound societal impacts, urging us to consider the influence of the name "Samara" as a tipping point in political allegiance.
As we ventured into the realm of fiction, considering the thought-provoking and often allegorical nature of storytelling, "1984" by George Orwell emerged as a relevant work. The theme of manipulation and conformity in the novel prompts contemplation on the potential influence of names in shaping political perceptions, akin to the influence of Big Brother in the fictional dystopia. Furthermore, Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" presents a speculative narrative that invites reflection on the power dynamics of societal structures, perhaps echoing the subtle influence of a name like "Samara" on political affiliations.
Expanding our sources to unexpected realms, we shifted our focus to unconventional literature, incorporating elements of surprise and whimsy to enhance our understanding. In an offbeat turn, we perused the back of various shampoo bottles, uncovering an "unexpected volume" of information, akin to the unanticipated correlation between the name "Samara" and Republican votes. In this lighthearted pursuit of knowledge, we stumbled upon quips about hair care that, in an amusing parallel, mirrored the levity brought by the occasional dad joke in our scholarly expedition.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Over the time period from 1976 to 2020, a correlation coefficient of 0.8877556, an r-squared value of 0.7881101, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were determined, suggesting a highly significant relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation, plotting the increasing popularity of the first name "Samara" against the rising votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico. The scatterplot graphically conveys the compelling association between the two variables. It's clear that "Samara-nity" may be more than just a play on words!
It seems the name "Samara" may have more sway than we previously thought. You might even say it has a Republican-aissance. It's not just a name; it's a political party in the making! The implications of these findings are quite elephantine in their influence on our understanding of political behavior.
It appears the name "Samara" might just ring a Republican bell, figuratively speaking. These results draw attention to the intriguing dynamics at play when it comes to the name and political inclinations – a real head-scratcher, isn't it?
So there you have it—our investigation into the connection between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and Republican presidential votes in New Mexico leads us to conclude that the correlation between the two is not just a coincidence. The Samara phenomenon may indeed hold some sway in the political landscape, and it's nothing to take lightly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico have yielded some truly hair-raising insights. Our findings not only support the previous research conducted by Smith and Doe (2010), but they also add a tantalizing twist to the narrative of naming conventions and political preferences.

Our discovery of a substantial correlation coefficient and a statistically significant p-value between the name "Samara" and Republican votes is, dare I say, quite Samara-culous! You could almost call it a GOP-corn. It seems that there's something about the name "Samara" that resonates with a certain political inclination, much like a well-timed dad joke.

This unexpected correlation between a name and political allegiance hints at the intricate web of factors that shape voting behavior. From Malcolm Gladwell's "The Tipping Point" to our findings, it's clear that seemingly trivial phenomena can have profound impacts, not unlike the influence of the name "Samara" on political affiliations. It's as if we've stumbled upon a turning point in our understanding of voter behavior—a tipping point, if you will.

The robustness of our results suggests that the "Samara-nity" phenomenon might hold more sway than previously envisaged. Could it be that the name "Samara" is the silent architect of political inclinations, exerting its influence through the ballet, I mean, ballot? Our findings not only reinforce the significance of naming conventions on political preferences but also unveil an unexpected dimension to the election dynamics in New Mexico.

And, to end as we began, with a nod to our cherished dad jokes: What's a politician's favorite dance? The Elephant in the Room-ba! It seems that in the case of "Samara," the elephant in the room might just sway the vote.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Samara and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!

Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Naming is a fundamental aspect of one's identity and can harbor subtle connotations that unknowingly influence perceptions and behaviors. In recent years, the academic community has shown burgeoning interest in the intersection of nomenclature and its potential impact on various aspects of life, including but not limited to professional success, social interactions, and, as we attempt to unravel in this study, political inclinations. By examining the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and the Republican presidential vote in the diverse state of New Mexico, we seek to shed light on the extent to which nomenclature may inherently sway political preferences.
Before delving into the depths of our investigation, let's start off with a classic dad joke: Why did the Samara cross the road? To get to the pun on the other side, of course! But on a more serious note, the connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political allegiance is indeed an essential and intriguing aspect of sociopolitical analysis.
Inquisitively, we ask – is there a conspicuous correlation between the popularity of the name "Samara" and votes cast in favor of Republican presidential candidates? This question piqued our scientific curiosity and prompted an exploration into an unusual, yet captivating, realm of inquiry. Like the name "Samara" itself, the correlation appears enigmatic and we embark on our investigation with an open mind and a dash of whimsy.
The findings from our statistical analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.8877556, prompting us to reflect – perhaps there's a Samara-tian pull toward a particular political persuasion. It's almost as though the name acts as a silent orchestrator of political leanings, like a vote-whisperer.
Speaking of Samaran influence, here's a thought-provoking dad joke to keep things light: Did you hear about the Samaran news anchor? She always delivered the pun-dits with extra punch! Our data suggests that, in New Mexico and potentially beyond, the Samara phenomenon could be more than just a mere coincidence.
As we navigate through the complexities of this unexpected correlation, we invite you to join us in exploring this intriguing, albeit amusing, facet of sociopolitical dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Over the time period from 1976 to 2020, a correlation coefficient of 0.8877556, an r-squared value of 0.7881101, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were determined, suggesting a highly significant relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation, plotting the increasing popularity of the first name "Samara" against the rising votes for the Republican presidential candidate in New Mexico. The scatterplot graphically conveys the compelling association between the two variables. It's clear that "Samara-nity" may be more than just a play on words!
It seems the name "Samara" may have more sway than we previously thought. You might even say it has a Republican-aissance. It's not just a name; it's a political party in the making! The implications of these findings are quite elephantine in their influence on our understanding of political behavior.
It appears the name "Samara" might just ring a Republican bell, figuratively speaking. These results draw attention to the intriguing dynamics at play when it comes to the name and political inclinations – a real head-scratcher, isn't it?
So there you have it—our investigation into the connection between the prevalence of the first name "Samara" and Republican presidential votes in New Mexico leads us to conclude that the correlation between the two is not just a coincidence. The Samara phenomenon may indeed hold some sway in the political landscape, and it's nothing to take lightly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the "Samara-nity" and its correlation with Republican presidential votes in New Mexico has illuminated a curious and, dare we say, pun-derful connection between the two. The notable correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a significant relationship that demands further attention, or should we say Samara-tention?

It seems the name "Samara" might just have a Republican flair to it, don't you think? You could almost call it a political "Samara-thesis." The implications of our findings prompt a chuckle and a raised eyebrow—a not-so-subtle nudge to pay closer attention to the influence of nomenclature on political tendencies.

But let's not forget the dad joke we promised: How does the name "Samara" influence elections? It pulls a lot of Republican heartstrings! Sometimes the Samara-nity of life really does make us smile, doesn't it?

All jesting aside, it is clear from our study that the name "Samara" may carry more weight than initially perceived in the political content. Based on these compelling results, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Case closed—Samara's influence on political inclinations is a solid, thumb-on-the-nose fact!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Ethnolinguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Political Ethnography and Unusual Name Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Samara-nity and the Elephant in the Room: An Examination of the Republican Presidential Vote in New Mexico and the Popularity of the Name 'Samara' with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing, and quite frankly, pun-tastic relationship between the popularity of the first name "Samara" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we sought to answer the burning question: is there a correlation between the two?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8877556 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1976 to 2020. This led us to speculate—could the name "Samara" be a sneaky indicator of political inclination? Perhaps there's something about the name that really rings true with a particular political party. It's almost as if the polarization begins at the naming ceremony!
Now, for the obligatory dad joke: What do you call a group of Samaras casting their votes together? A referendum of Samaras! It seems like there's something Seri-ous about this name's influence on political tendencies. So, while the elephant in the room might be the unexplainable correlation, our findings suggest that, when it comes to politics, the name "Samara" might just leave a lasting impression on the ballot.

ChatGPT:

Republican presidential vote, New Mexico, Samara popularity, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, political inclination, polarization, naming ceremony, political party, influence, referendum of Samaras

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Samara
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Samara
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Samara

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico

Correlation r = 0.8877556 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7881101 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Samara) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00012. 0.0001158903650689339000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,629 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Samara (Babies born)101104107108145170248857629516669885
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico (Total votes)211419250779307101270341212824232751286417376930346832335788319667401894




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([101,104,107,108,145,170,248,857,629,516,669,885,])
array_2 = np.array([211419,250779,307101,270341,212824,232751,286417,376930,346832,335788,319667,401894,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Samara"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4303 · Black Variable ID: 3866 · Red Variable ID: 26011
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0