about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,441 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption goes up, so does the cheesiness of political ads in Nebraska. This activates the latent fondness for dairy-based humor, leading voters to cast their ballots for the candidate who is gouda at cracking jokes. Remember, when in doubt, let Velveeta decide your vote!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a lively scene in a quaint Nebraska town. The town is bustling with activity as people gather at a local diner, enjoying American cheeseburgers and grilled cheese sandwiches. As the cheese consumption increases, political ads featuring the Republican Presidential candidate progressively become cheesier, complete with playful cheese-related puns and jokes. The townsfolk are amused by the dairy-based humor, as it influences their voting decision. They are depicted casting their ballots for the candidate who is skilled at cracking cheesy jokes. In the midst of the scene, a giant block of Velveeta prominently sits nearby, seemingly guiding their choices. The illustration captures the lively and jovial atmosphere, showcasing the influence of cheese-related humor in the political decision-making process. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Cybernetic art Vaporwave Macabre
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska, in the following situation: As American cheese consumption goes up, so does the cheesiness of political ads in Nebraska. This activates the latent fondness for dairy-based humor, leading voters to cast their ballots for the candidate who is gouda at cracking jokes. Remember, when in doubt, let Velveeta decide your vote!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Nebraska town, people are seen enjoying American cheeseburgers and grilled cheese sandwiches at a local diner. As the cheese consumption increases, political ads featuring the Republican Presidential candidate become cheesier, with playful cheese-related puns and jokes. The townsfolk are amused by the dairy-based humor, and it influences their voting decision. They are seen casting their ballots for the candidate who is skilled at cracking cheesy jokes, all while a giant block of Velveeta prominently sits nearby, seemingly guiding their choices.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Nebraska town, people are seen enjoying American cheeseburgers and grilled cheese sandwiches at a local diner. As the cheese consumption increases, political ads featuring the Republican Presidential candidate become cheesier, with playful cheese-related puns and jokes. The townsfolk are amused by the dairy-based humor, and it influences their voting decision. They are seen casting their ballots for the candidate who is skilled at cracking cheesy jokes, all while a giant block of Velveeta prominently sits nearby, seemingly guiding their choices. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a lively scene in a quaint Nebraska town. The town is bustling with activity as people gather at a local diner, enjoying American cheeseburgers and grilled cheese sandwiches. As the cheese consumption increases, political ads featuring the Republican Presidential candidate progressively become cheesier, complete with playful cheese-related puns and jokes. The townsfolk are amused by the dairy-based humor, as it influences their voting decision. They are depicted casting their ballots for the candidate who is skilled at cracking cheesy jokes. In the midst of the scene, a giant block of Velveeta prominently sits nearby, seemingly guiding their choices. The illustration captures the lively and jovial atmosphere, showcasing the influence of cheese-related humor in the political decision-making process.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska

The Journal of Dairy Politics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to brie amazed by the results of our research on the unexpected connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. It’s time to delve into the Swiss-terious world of political dairy correlations.

As researchers, we often find ourselves embarking on a journey of discovery, seeking answers to questions that may seem a little gouda to be true. However, our investigation into this cheesy affair has led to some truly interesting and feta-nomenal revelations.

The dairy industry has always had a way of stirring up strong emotions – but in our study, we decided to take the whiz out of the equation and focus on American cheese, the unsung hero of countless sandwiches and burgers. Who would have thought that behind those gooey, melt-in-your-mouth slices lies a connection to political voting patterns? It’s enough to make any academic’s head spin as if caught in a whirl of Edam madness!

Much to our surprise, our initial findings revealed a striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska. It's almost as if our data was saying, "Curds of a feather, vote together!" But of course, we understand the importance of cautious interpretation – after all, we don't want to go off half-baked with our conclusions.

We take it with a grain of salt – or maybe a sprinkle of Parmesan – that our findings may be met with skepticism. After all, the idea of a link between cheese and politics could be considered a bit cheesy. However, we are confident that our thorough analysis of the data speaks volumes and sets a foundational basis for further examination.

It’s an exciting time for research, especially if it involves unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its potential impact on political allegiances. So, let’s dive in and explore the provolone depths of this fascinating topic, because as any good researcher knows, the pursuit of knowledge is no gouda-ing off!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to brie amazed by the results of our research on the unexpected connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. It’s time to delve into the Swiss-terious world of political dairy correlations.
As researchers, we often find ourselves embarking on a journey of discovery, seeking answers to questions that may seem a little gouda to be true. However, our investigation into this cheesy affair has led to some truly interesting and feta-nomenal revelations.
The dairy industry has always had a way of stirring up strong emotions – but in our study, we decided to take the whiz out of the equation and focus on American cheese, the unsung hero of countless sandwiches and burgers. Who would have thought that behind those gooey, melt-in-your-mouth slices lies a connection to political voting patterns? It’s enough to make any academic’s head spin as if caught in a whirl of Edam madness!
Much to our surprise, our initial findings revealed a striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska. It's almost as if our data was saying, "Curds of a feather, vote together!" But of course, we understand the importance of cautious interpretation – after all, we don't want to go off half-baked with our conclusions.
We take it with a grain of salt – or maybe a sprinkle of Parmesan – that our findings may be met with skepticism. After all, the idea of a link between cheese and politics could be considered a bit cheesy. However, we are confident that our thorough analysis of the data speaks volumes and sets a foundational basis for further examination.
It’s an exciting time for research, especially if it involves unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its potential impact on political allegiances. So, let’s dive in and explore the provolone depths of this fascinating topic, because as any good researcher knows, the pursuit of knowledge is no gouda-ing off!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2017) analyze the consumption patterns of American cheese in the United States and its potential impact on political behavior. Their study, titled "Cheese and the Social Fabric: A Gouda Look at American Culture," presents compelling evidence supporting the notion that cheese consumption may influence political attitudes. However, as cheesy as it may seem, the authors caution against drawing causational conclusions, as correlation does not always imply causation.

Speaking of drawing conclusions, did you hear about the cheesy detective? He always gets to the Gouda evidence.

Jones (2019) delves into the political landscape of Nebraska in his work "Cornfields and Cheddar: A Tale of Political Pioneers." The author examines voting patterns across various demographics, including the correlation between dairy consumption and political affiliation. His findings suggest a potential association between cheese consumption and conservative voting tendencies, particularly in rural areas. The study sheds light on the intricate interplay of cultural and dietary factors in shaping political preferences.

In "The Big Cheese: A History of Dairy in American Culture" by Smith (2015), the author traces the evolution of cheese consumption in the United States and its symbolic significance. This comprehensive exploration highlights the cultural ties between dairy products and national identity, offering valuable insights into the potential influence of cheese on societal norms and values.

Moving from non-fiction to fiction, the novel "Cheese and Politics: A Baked Tale" by Jane Gruyère (2018) presents an imaginative narrative depicting a world where cheese consumption dictates political alliances. While a work of fiction, the novel underscores the enduring fascination with the idea of cheese as a political force.

And now for a real slice of cheesy childhood nostalgia, "Wallace and Gromit: A Grand Day Out" (1989) brings us to the animated world of a man and his loyal dog as they embark on a quest for cheese on the moon. Their cheese-related adventures serve as a lighthearted reminder of the universal appeal of this dairy delight. After all, who wouldn't go to the moon for a slice of good cheese?

In the realm of children's shows, "SpongeBob SquarePants" (1999-present) situates the beloved character in a fantastical underwater world where cheese and political parodies abound. The cartoon series humorously reflects the way in which popular culture intertwines with political satire, demonstrating the enduring presence of cheese-related themes in various forms of media.

Speaking of cartoons, what did the cheese say to itself in the mirror? Halloumi!

As our review demonstrates, the connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska is a topic that not only piques scholarly curiosity but also elicits a gouda laugh or two. The interactive relationship between cheese, culture, and politics offers a rich tapestry for academic investigation, promising a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and grate fun!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to brie amazed by the results of our research on the unexpected connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. It’s time to delve into the Swiss-terious world of political dairy correlations.
As researchers, we often find ourselves embarking on a journey of discovery, seeking answers to questions that may seem a little gouda to be true. However, our investigation into this cheesy affair has led to some truly interesting and feta-nomenal revelations.
The dairy industry has always had a way of stirring up strong emotions – but in our study, we decided to take the whiz out of the equation and focus on American cheese, the unsung hero of countless sandwiches and burgers. Who would have thought that behind those gooey, melt-in-your-mouth slices lies a connection to political voting patterns? It’s enough to make any academic’s head spin as if caught in a whirl of Edam madness!
Much to our surprise, our initial findings revealed a striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska. It's almost as if our data was saying, "Curds of a feather, vote together!" But of course, we understand the importance of cautious interpretation – after all, we don't want to go off half-baked with our conclusions.
We take it with a grain of salt – or maybe a sprinkle of Parmesan – that our findings may be met with skepticism. After all, the idea of a link between cheese and politics could be considered a bit cheesy. However, we are confident that our thorough analysis of the data speaks volumes and sets a foundational basis for further examination.
It’s an exciting time for research, especially if it involves unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its potential impact on political allegiances. So, let’s dive in and explore the provolone depths of this fascinating topic, because as any good researcher knows, the pursuit of knowledge is no gouda-ing off!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In conducting this study, our research team utilized a multi-faceted approach to gather and analyze the data necessary to explore the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. First, we combed through the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse databases to harvest a dairy-licious array of information from the years 1990 to 2020.

To address the cheesy question at hand, our data scientists embraced the 'Edam and Eve' of statistical methods to tease apart the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes. Using robust regression analyses and multivariate models, we delved into the heart of the data, searching for patterns that would make any cheese aficionado's heart melt.

With a little sprinkle of scientific curiosity and a whole lot of dedication, we carefully matched the data on cheese consumption with the electoral results in Nebraska, making sure not to overlook any 'whey'-ward trends or 'cheese-melting' outliers along the way. Our approach was akin to crafting the perfect cheese board – meticulous, thoughtful, and packed with flavor.

For each year within our study period, we meticulously assessed American cheese consumption per capita and matched it with the corresponding Republican votes in Nebraska. We employed cutting-edge analytical techniques, making sure to keep our methods as sharp as the cheddar we were studying.

Of course, no research endeavor is complete without a thorough review of the literature. We combed through a variety of scholarly works, ensuring we were not 'grating' against any previous research or ignoring any pertinent 'gouda' evidence that might inform our analysis.

As the cheesy data poured in, we kept our eyes peeled for any 'curd-ious' outliers, making sure to distinguish between mere correlations and genuine causations. After all, we didn't want to draw conclusions that were too 'cheesy' to stand up to academic scrutiny.

With our data in hand, we then performed a series of rigorous statistical tests to assess the strength and significance of the relationship between American cheese consumption and Republican votes. To top it off, we leveraged state-of-the-art software to ensure that our calculations were as precise as the cut of a fine aged Gouda.

Our methods upheld the highest standards of scientific inquiry, ensuring that we presented our findings like a well-aged Camembert: refined, complex, and ripe for intellectual consumption. With our methodology as sound as a wheel of Parmigiano-Reggiano, we set out to crack the case of the curious connection between American cheese and Nebraska Republican votes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9018190, r-squared of 0.8132775, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to brie amazed by the results of our research on the unexpected connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. It’s time to delve into the Swiss-terious world of political dairy correlations.
As researchers, we often find ourselves embarking on a journey of discovery, seeking answers to questions that may seem a little gouda to be true. However, our investigation into this cheesy affair has led to some truly interesting and feta-nomenal revelations.
The dairy industry has always had a way of stirring up strong emotions – but in our study, we decided to take the whiz out of the equation and focus on American cheese, the unsung hero of countless sandwiches and burgers. Who would have thought that behind those gooey, melt-in-your-mouth slices lies a connection to political voting patterns? It’s enough to make any academic’s head spin as if caught in a whirl of Edam madness!
Much to our surprise, our initial findings revealed a striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska. It's almost as if our data was saying, "Curds of a feather, vote together!" But of course, we understand the importance of cautious interpretation – after all, we don't want to go off half-baked with our conclusions.
We take it with a grain of salt – or maybe a sprinkle of Parmesan – that our findings may be met with skepticism. After all, the idea of a link between cheese and politics could be considered a bit cheesy. However, we are confident that our thorough analysis of the data speaks volumes and sets a foundational basis for further examination.
It’s an exciting time for research, especially if it involves unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its potential impact on political allegiances. So, let’s dive in and explore the provolone depths of this fascinating topic, because as any good researcher knows, the pursuit of knowledge is no gouda-ing off!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our research revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. The correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and an r-squared of 0.8132775 indicated a substantial relationship between these variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirmed the statistical significance of our results.

Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, visually capturing the evident association between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska over the years 1990 to 2020. The sheer magnitude of the correlation certainly gives new meaning to the phrase "cheesy politics."

It seems that the political preference for American cheese has not only been reflected on plates and sandwiches but also at the polling stations in Nebraska. This unexpected connection between dairy consumption and political behavior highlights an aspect of voter decision-making that has been largely unexplored until now.

As we sliced through the data, the significance of this correlation became increasingly sharp. It's remarkable how the tangy taste of American cheese seems to resonate with certain political ideologies, creating a blend of flavors that transcends from the dinner table to the ballot box.

While the causality behind this correlation remains a topic for further investigation, our findings suggest that there may indeed be more at stake in the political arena than meets the eye – or the palate, for that matter.

This study opens the door to a thought-provoking discussion about the influence of seemingly innocuous consumer choices on political preferences. In unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its unforeseen impact on voting patterns, we hope to have sparked a newfound interest in the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

In the grand scheme of things, it appears that when it comes to making political decisions, some Nebraskans may be swayed not just by policy and rhetoric, but also by the alluring allure of good old American cheese.

All in all, this groundbreaking research serves as a reminder that in the grand banquet of politics, the role of cheese may be more than just a crumb of the bigger picture. As this study undoubtedly supports, when it comes to the interplay between cheese and politics, it's a matter of "gouda" governance!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2017) analyze the consumption patterns of American cheese in the United States and its potential impact on political behavior. Their study, titled "Cheese and the Social Fabric: A Gouda Look at American Culture," presents compelling evidence supporting the notion that cheese consumption may influence political attitudes. However, as cheesy as it may seem, the authors caution against drawing causational conclusions, as correlation does not always imply causation.
Speaking of drawing conclusions, did you hear about the cheesy detective? He always gets to the Gouda evidence.
Jones (2019) delves into the political landscape of Nebraska in his work "Cornfields and Cheddar: A Tale of Political Pioneers." The author examines voting patterns across various demographics, including the correlation between dairy consumption and political affiliation. His findings suggest a potential association between cheese consumption and conservative voting tendencies, particularly in rural areas. The study sheds light on the intricate interplay of cultural and dietary factors in shaping political preferences.
In "The Big Cheese: A History of Dairy in American Culture" by Smith (2015), the author traces the evolution of cheese consumption in the United States and its symbolic significance. This comprehensive exploration highlights the cultural ties between dairy products and national identity, offering valuable insights into the potential influence of cheese on societal norms and values.
Moving from non-fiction to fiction, the novel "Cheese and Politics: A Baked Tale" by Jane Gruyère (2018) presents an imaginative narrative depicting a world where cheese consumption dictates political alliances. While a work of fiction, the novel underscores the enduring fascination with the idea of cheese as a political force.
And now for a real slice of cheesy childhood nostalgia, "Wallace and Gromit: A Grand Day Out" (1989) brings us to the animated world of a man and his loyal dog as they embark on a quest for cheese on the moon. Their cheese-related adventures serve as a lighthearted reminder of the universal appeal of this dairy delight. After all, who wouldn't go to the moon for a slice of good cheese?
In the realm of children's shows, "SpongeBob SquarePants" (1999-present) situates the beloved character in a fantastical underwater world where cheese and political parodies abound. The cartoon series humorously reflects the way in which popular culture intertwines with political satire, demonstrating the enduring presence of cheese-related themes in various forms of media.
Speaking of cartoons, what did the cheese say to itself in the mirror? Halloumi!
As our review demonstrates, the connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska is a topic that not only piques scholarly curiosity but also elicits a gouda laugh or two. The interactive relationship between cheese, culture, and politics offers a rich tapestry for academic investigation, promising a journey that is both intellectually stimulating and grate fun!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. The correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and an r-squared of 0.8132775 indicated a substantial relationship between these variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirmed the statistical significance of our results.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, visually capturing the evident association between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska over the years 1990 to 2020. The sheer magnitude of the correlation certainly gives new meaning to the phrase "cheesy politics."
It seems that the political preference for American cheese has not only been reflected on plates and sandwiches but also at the polling stations in Nebraska. This unexpected connection between dairy consumption and political behavior highlights an aspect of voter decision-making that has been largely unexplored until now.
As we sliced through the data, the significance of this correlation became increasingly sharp. It's remarkable how the tangy taste of American cheese seems to resonate with certain political ideologies, creating a blend of flavors that transcends from the dinner table to the ballot box.
While the causality behind this correlation remains a topic for further investigation, our findings suggest that there may indeed be more at stake in the political arena than meets the eye – or the palate, for that matter.
This study opens the door to a thought-provoking discussion about the influence of seemingly innocuous consumer choices on political preferences. In unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its unforeseen impact on voting patterns, we hope to have sparked a newfound interest in the intersection of gastronomy and governance.
In the grand scheme of things, it appears that when it comes to making political decisions, some Nebraskans may be swayed not just by policy and rhetoric, but also by the alluring allure of good old American cheese.
All in all, this groundbreaking research serves as a reminder that in the grand banquet of politics, the role of cheese may be more than just a crumb of the bigger picture. As this study undoubtedly supports, when it comes to the interplay between cheese and politics, it's a matter of "gouda" governance!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study set out to investigate the potential link between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska, and the results have certainly grated some attention. The strong positive correlation we uncovered supports prior research by Smith and Doe (2017) and Jones (2019), who hinted at the intriguing alliance between dairy delight and political proclivity. It appears that the cheese may not stand alone in its influence on Republican votes in Nebraska; it has found its whey into the heart of political decisions.

Cheesy jokes aside, the consistent connection between American cheese consumption and Republican votes over the span of three decades cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. Our findings align with Smith and Doe's caution against ignoring correlations, as in this case, they seem to offer a sneak peek into causational pathways, much like a hole in Swiss cheese.

The magnitudinal correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value emphasize the statistical weight behind our results. The data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse have shown that the relationship between American cheese and Republican votes is not just mere fondue of the imagination but a compelling facet of Nebraska's political landscape.

One may concur that the implications of our study are cheddar be taken seriously. The persistent correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican candidate prompts intriguing questions about the role of seemingly trivial everyday choices in shaping political leanings. It's a stark reminder that behind every ballot, there might just be a slice of American cheese, molding preferences and decisions much in the way it molds over a warm burger patty.

So, is there causation or simply correlation? This is a question ripe for future exploration. The need to understand the mechanisms underlying this relationship is as pressing as the need to stock up on crackers for all this cheese. The potential influence of American cheese on political behavior is not just a wedge issue; it is a multifaceted avenue deserving of further academic exploration.

In a world often feta with complex political issues, it may seem gouda to have some lighthearted insights every now and then. Yet, beneath the playful engagement with cheese-related political research lies a crumble of truth that demands serious consideration. Our study, in its own whey, adds to the understanding of the interwoven fabric of cheese, culture, and politics, provolone-ing that perhaps there is indeed more to the old adage of "laughing all the way to the ballot box." After all, who knew that the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska have been curd-nered by American cheese all along?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.

It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.

In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to brie amazed by the results of our research on the unexpected connection between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. It’s time to delve into the Swiss-terious world of political dairy correlations.
As researchers, we often find ourselves embarking on a journey of discovery, seeking answers to questions that may seem a little gouda to be true. However, our investigation into this cheesy affair has led to some truly interesting and feta-nomenal revelations.
The dairy industry has always had a way of stirring up strong emotions – but in our study, we decided to take the whiz out of the equation and focus on American cheese, the unsung hero of countless sandwiches and burgers. Who would have thought that behind those gooey, melt-in-your-mouth slices lies a connection to political voting patterns? It’s enough to make any academic’s head spin as if caught in a whirl of Edam madness!
Much to our surprise, our initial findings revealed a striking correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska. It's almost as if our data was saying, "Curds of a feather, vote together!" But of course, we understand the importance of cautious interpretation – after all, we don't want to go off half-baked with our conclusions.
We take it with a grain of salt – or maybe a sprinkle of Parmesan – that our findings may be met with skepticism. After all, the idea of a link between cheese and politics could be considered a bit cheesy. However, we are confident that our thorough analysis of the data speaks volumes and sets a foundational basis for further examination.
It’s an exciting time for research, especially if it involves unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its potential impact on political allegiances. So, let’s dive in and explore the provolone depths of this fascinating topic, because as any good researcher knows, the pursuit of knowledge is no gouda-ing off!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. The correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and an r-squared of 0.8132775 indicated a substantial relationship between these variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirmed the statistical significance of our results.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, visually capturing the evident association between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska over the years 1990 to 2020. The sheer magnitude of the correlation certainly gives new meaning to the phrase "cheesy politics."
It seems that the political preference for American cheese has not only been reflected on plates and sandwiches but also at the polling stations in Nebraska. This unexpected connection between dairy consumption and political behavior highlights an aspect of voter decision-making that has been largely unexplored until now.
As we sliced through the data, the significance of this correlation became increasingly sharp. It's remarkable how the tangy taste of American cheese seems to resonate with certain political ideologies, creating a blend of flavors that transcends from the dinner table to the ballot box.
While the causality behind this correlation remains a topic for further investigation, our findings suggest that there may indeed be more at stake in the political arena than meets the eye – or the palate, for that matter.
This study opens the door to a thought-provoking discussion about the influence of seemingly innocuous consumer choices on political preferences. In unraveling the mysteries of American cheese and its unforeseen impact on voting patterns, we hope to have sparked a newfound interest in the intersection of gastronomy and governance.
In the grand scheme of things, it appears that when it comes to making political decisions, some Nebraskans may be swayed not just by policy and rhetoric, but also by the alluring allure of good old American cheese.
All in all, this groundbreaking research serves as a reminder that in the grand banquet of politics, the role of cheese may be more than just a crumb of the bigger picture. As this study undoubtedly supports, when it comes to the interplay between cheese and politics, it's a matter of "gouda" governance!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled an un-brie-lievable relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. The magnitude of the correlation we observed is no small curd. It appears that Nebraskans are not just aficionados of corn, but also connoisseurs of American cheese when it comes to their political palette.

As we reflect on our findings, it's evident that this study has shredded light on a previously unexplored dimension of political behavior. The notion that cheese could influence voting patterns may sound cheezy at first, but our research has grated a thought-provolone connection that demands further attention.

It's a Gouda thing we embarked on this cheddar-worthy investigation, as it has provided a foundation for future studies to delve deeper into the correlation between culinary preferences and political affiliations. However, we must caution against jumping to conclusions that are too nacho-ral. There may be other factors at play, and we certainly don't want to put all our eggs in one cheese basket!

Given the substantial and statistically significant correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Nebraska, it's safe to say that this research has feta-lly accomplished its objectives. We can confidently declare that the unexpected bond between cheese and political behavior is more than just a fondue hope.

In closing, we believe this study has matured and aged like a fine Parmesan. As for future research in this area, we can confidently assert that no additional investigation is needed – this topic is fully ripe for the picking, and it's whey past time to move on to other matters. This concludes our cheesy endeavor, and we hope it has been a gouda experience for all involved. Thank you for following along on this dairy-curious journey!

It's safe to say that we've feta-lly accomplished our goals with this research, and it's whey past time to move on to other matters. All in all, it's clear that in the world of political analysis, the unexpected connection between cheese and Republican votes has been thoroughly shredded, and we can say "cheese" and move on to the next topic!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Politics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Dairy Delights and Political Leanings


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Say Cheese: An Examination of the Gouda Connection Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Nebraska with an abstract of The dairy industry has long been steeped in controversy, but our research set out to explore a different kind of cheddar- the political kind. After grate efforts and a gouda amount of data crunching, we aimed to provolone whether a link exists between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Nebraska. Using data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our study uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9018190 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. It is evident that the political landscape in Nebraska is not just about corn, but also about curd.
It seems that the power of American cheese extends beyond its melty, gooey goodness and has transcended into the political realms. All jokes asiago- when it comes to understanding voting patterns in the Cornhusker State, the data suggests that it may be whey more complex than previously thought. This research aims to breed greater curiosity within the academic community and spark further investigation into the multifaceted relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation.
In conclusion, it is clear that our findings are not just a bunch of muenster. The cheese-Republican vote relationship is no mere havarti and should not be brushed off as just another queso mistaken for correlation. This study serves as a feta-ful reminder that behind every political decision, there may indeed be a slice of cheese. After all, who knew the wedge issue of American cheese could be so thought provolone?

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, Republican votes, Nebraska, political affiliation, dairy consumption, voting patterns, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, USDA data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, cheese consumption, political landscape, voting patterns, Cornhusker State, dairy consumption, academic research, relationship between dairy consumption and political affiliation, cheese-Republican vote relationship, wedge issue, American cheese, political decisions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska

Correlation r = 0.9018190 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8132775 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0022. 0.0021952377122742620000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.22% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 456 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)11.255911.808712.683912.861213.130613.256914.362115.5
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska (Total votes)343678363467433862512814452979475064495961556846




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.2559,11.8087,12.6839,12.8612,13.1306,13.2569,14.3621,15.5,])
array_2 = np.array([343678,363467,433862,512814,452979,475064,495961,556846,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Nebraska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4441 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 26003
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0