about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,379 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Irene and the second variable is Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Irene gained popularity, more babies were named after their great aunt Irene, who just so happened to have a passion for excessively long storytelling. This influx of baby Irenes eventually led to a mysterious but undeniable spike in demand for epically lengthy MrBeast videos, as if an unseen Irene fan club was secretly pulling the strings of content creation. After all, what could be more fitting than a wave of Irenes indirectly shaping the digital landscape with their inherent love for never-ending narratives?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting a bustling nursery filled with cribs adorned with the name Irene. In the corner, there is a computer screen displaying the increasing length of MrBeast's YouTube videos, with an atmosphere of technological wonder and influence. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art High-tech An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' High-tech Oragami
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the name Irene gained popularity, more babies were named after their great aunt Irene, who just so happened to have a passion for excessively long storytelling. This influx of baby Irenes eventually led to a mysterious but undeniable spike in demand for epically lengthy MrBeast videos, as if an unseen Irene fan club was secretly pulling the strings of content creation. After all, what could be more fitting than a wave of Irenes indirectly shaping the digital landscape with their inherent love for never-ending narratives?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling nursery, baby Irenes lay in cribs adorned with their great aunt's name. As the popularity of the name Irene soared, a computer screen in the corner displayed the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos growing longer and longer, as if in response to this surge of Irenes who were unknowingly influencing the digital world with their love for enduring tales.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling nursery, baby Irenes lay in cribs adorned with their great aunt's name. As the popularity of the name Irene soared, a computer screen in the corner displayed the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos growing longer and longer, as if in response to this surge of Irenes who were unknowingly influencing the digital world with their love for enduring tales. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting a bustling nursery filled with cribs adorned with the name Irene. In the corner, there is a computer screen displaying the increasing length of MrBeast's YouTube videos, with an atmosphere of technological wonder and influence.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Irene positively influenced Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

The International Journal of Internet Phenomena and Cultural Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The exploration of correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the minds of scholars and nonscholars alike. In this vein, the unlikely rapport between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has piqued the curiosity of many. While some may perceive this inquiry as a mere flight of fancy, an unearthing of an unexpected link between nomenclature and digital content creation holds considerable significance. As much as we strive for austerity in our scholarly pursuits, it is quite refreshing to delve into an investigation that infuses a dollop of quirkiness into the usually somber landscape of research.

The enigma of this correlation nestles within the heart of popular culture. The name Irene, derived from the Greek word for peace, has traversed the ages, maintaining a steady presence in the annals of nomenclature. Meanwhile, MrBeast, a prominent figure in the digital realm, has garnered an ardent following for his benevolent stunts and captivating content. The juxtaposition of these two entities seems somewhat whimsical, bordering on the whimsy of an unlikely pairing at a masquerade ball. Yet, as with all enigmas, the puzzle beckons to be solved, and so we embark on this intellectual escapade with apprehension and anticipation.

You may find yourself musing, "What fascination lies in deciphering such an incongruous connection?" It is here that our curiosity intertwines with the thrill of scholarly inquiry. Just as a jester's cap adds a touch of playfulness to a stern countenance, the investigation into this correlation adds a vibrant hue to the scholarly canvas. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the absurdities and incongruities that make life delightfully unpredictable.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The exploration of correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the minds of scholars and nonscholars alike. In this vein, the unlikely rapport between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has piqued the curiosity of many. While some may perceive this inquiry as a mere flight of fancy, an unearthing of an unexpected link between nomenclature and digital content creation holds considerable significance. As much as we strive for austerity in our scholarly pursuits, it is quite refreshing to delve into an investigation that infuses a dollop of quirkiness into the usually somber landscape of research.
The enigma of this correlation nestles within the heart of popular culture. The name Irene, derived from the Greek word for peace, has traversed the ages, maintaining a steady presence in the annals of nomenclature. Meanwhile, MrBeast, a prominent figure in the digital realm, has garnered an ardent following for his benevolent stunts and captivating content. The juxtaposition of these two entities seems somewhat whimsical, bordering on the whimsy of an unlikely pairing at a masquerade ball. Yet, as with all enigmas, the puzzle beckons to be solved, and so we embark on this intellectual escapade with apprehension and anticipation.
You may find yourself musing, "What fascination lies in deciphering such an incongruous connection?" It is here that our curiosity intertwines with the thrill of scholarly inquiry. Just as a jester's cap adds a touch of playfulness to a stern countenance, the investigation into this correlation adds a vibrant hue to the scholarly canvas. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the absurdities and incongruities that make life delightfully unpredictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The discussion of seemingly inexplicable relationships between disparate entities has long captured the imagination of scholars and non-scholars alike. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has invited a diverse array of inquiries and bemusement. In "Smith et al.," the authors explicate the enigmatic nature of correlations that transcend conventional categories. This is where our scholarly journey begins, yet we must be prepared for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead.

As we delve into the realms of nomenclature and digital content creation, it is imperative to consider the profound impact of individual identities on cultural phenomena. The work of Doe et al. underscores the enduring significance of personal monikers in shaping societal discourse and cultural trends. We are reminded that every name carries with it a narrative, an essence that transcends mere letters and phonemes. Similarly, Jones' comprehensive study unearths the intricate web of digital content creation and its influence on contemporary culture, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected connection between Irene and MrBeast.

Turning the pages to non-fiction works, "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria offers illuminating insights into the historical, linguistic, and cultural aspects of names, enriching our understanding of the significance attached to different appellations. On the digital front, "YouTube Secrets" by Sean Cannell provides a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of online content creation, shedding light on the multifaceted world of YouTube videos.

In the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as "Irene" by Pierre Lemaitre and "The Beast's Heart" by Leife Shallcross draw attention to the tantalizing nuances of storytelling and character depiction, serving as a reminder that the interplay of monikers and narratives can take on unexpected dimensions. As we venture into the uncharted territory of whimsical correlations, it is vital to acknowledge the intersection of the real and the imaginary in shaping our perceptions.

Finally, the omnipresent influence of popular internet memes, such as "Irene, Goodnight Sweet Princess" and "Here's the Beast!" highlights the intersection of digital culture and linguistic expressions, offering a lighthearted lens through which to view our investigation. These memetic phenomena evoke smiles and laughter, underscoring the delightful unpredictability of online discourse and cultural references.

As we progress through this literature review, we are reminded that scholarly inquiry need not be devoid of whimsy; rather, it can embrace the delightful peculiarities that make our intellectual pursuits all the more charming.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The exploration of correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the minds of scholars and nonscholars alike. In this vein, the unlikely rapport between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has piqued the curiosity of many. While some may perceive this inquiry as a mere flight of fancy, an unearthing of an unexpected link between nomenclature and digital content creation holds considerable significance. As much as we strive for austerity in our scholarly pursuits, it is quite refreshing to delve into an investigation that infuses a dollop of quirkiness into the usually somber landscape of research.
The enigma of this correlation nestles within the heart of popular culture. The name Irene, derived from the Greek word for peace, has traversed the ages, maintaining a steady presence in the annals of nomenclature. Meanwhile, MrBeast, a prominent figure in the digital realm, has garnered an ardent following for his benevolent stunts and captivating content. The juxtaposition of these two entities seems somewhat whimsical, bordering on the whimsy of an unlikely pairing at a masquerade ball. Yet, as with all enigmas, the puzzle beckons to be solved, and so we embark on this intellectual escapade with apprehension and anticipation.
You may find yourself musing, "What fascination lies in deciphering such an incongruous connection?" It is here that our curiosity intertwines with the thrill of scholarly inquiry. Just as a jester's cap adds a touch of playfulness to a stern countenance, the investigation into this correlation adds a vibrant hue to the scholarly canvas. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the absurdities and incongruities that make life delightfully unpredictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To undertake this beguiling investigation, we employed a multi-faceted methodology that harmonized the availability of data with the tenets of whimsical inquiry. Our research team ventured into the virtual corridors of the US Social Security Administration to retrieve historical records of the prevalence of the name Irene from 2012 to 2022. We meticulously combed through these archives, hearkening back to an era where the name Irene may have fluttered through the timeless corridors of peace and serenity.

Simultaneously, we delved into the digital expanse of YouTube, where MrBeast's benevolent endeavors and captivating content have cultivated a dedicated following. Utilizing the arcane art of web scraping, we extracted data on the total length of MrBeast's videos from the designated timeframe. As our computational contraption whirred and clicked, it echoed an enthusiasm for this tryst with the unconventional.

With our trove of data in hand, we sought to confirm the authenticity of the unexpected connection between Irene's moniker and the length of MrBeast's digital opuses. We employed advanced statistical techniques to analyze the datasets, under the vigilant gaze of our statistical sages. The correlation coefficient, that elusive compass guiding our expedition, emerged from the depths of our calculations, yielding a value of 0.8615000. This enigmatic number affirmed the existence of a robust relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities, prompting a collective raising of scholarly eyebrows at the tale of this unexpected rendezvous.

Additionally, we subjected our findings to the rigors of hypothesis testing, seeking evidence of a statistically significant association. Lo and behold, the p-value we unearthed stood at less than 0.01, affirming the validity and relevance of our findings with a statistical flourish more captivating than a magician's sleight of hand.

As much as the underlying whimsy of this investigation may prompt jests and quips, the methodology harnessed in this scholarly escapade bears the earnest hallmark of rigor and precision. This offbeat voyage into the interplay between nomenclature and digital captivation has enriched our scholarly quest, reinforcing the adage that the most unexpected connections often hold the most delightful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8615000, r-squared of 0.7421822, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The exploration of correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the minds of scholars and nonscholars alike. In this vein, the unlikely rapport between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has piqued the curiosity of many. While some may perceive this inquiry as a mere flight of fancy, an unearthing of an unexpected link between nomenclature and digital content creation holds considerable significance. As much as we strive for austerity in our scholarly pursuits, it is quite refreshing to delve into an investigation that infuses a dollop of quirkiness into the usually somber landscape of research.
The enigma of this correlation nestles within the heart of popular culture. The name Irene, derived from the Greek word for peace, has traversed the ages, maintaining a steady presence in the annals of nomenclature. Meanwhile, MrBeast, a prominent figure in the digital realm, has garnered an ardent following for his benevolent stunts and captivating content. The juxtaposition of these two entities seems somewhat whimsical, bordering on the whimsy of an unlikely pairing at a masquerade ball. Yet, as with all enigmas, the puzzle beckons to be solved, and so we embark on this intellectual escapade with apprehension and anticipation.
You may find yourself musing, "What fascination lies in deciphering such an incongruous connection?" It is here that our curiosity intertwines with the thrill of scholarly inquiry. Just as a jester's cap adds a touch of playfulness to a stern countenance, the investigation into this correlation adds a vibrant hue to the scholarly canvas. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the absurdities and incongruities that make life delightfully unpredictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting a thorough analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and an r-squared value of 0.7421822 revealed a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 lent statistical support to this unexpected connection, prompting much head-scratching and contemplation within our research cohort.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) offers a visual representation of this noteworthy correlation, depicting a striking alignment of data points that can only be described as delightfully intriguing.

While some may view the exploration of this correlation as a mere escapade into the whimsical realms of curiosity, our investigation has yielded compelling evidence of a tangible link between nomenclature and digital content creation. The implications of this connection extend beyond the confines of traditional academia, offering a thrilling glimpse into the serendipitous intersections of popular culture and digital prominence.

This unanticipated correlation between Irene's popularity and MrBeast's video length not only adds a touch of levity to scholarly discourse but also underscores the multifaceted nature of cultural phenomena. Our findings invite further exploration and contemplation, beckoning researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the delightful mysteries that abound in the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The discussion of seemingly inexplicable relationships between disparate entities has long captured the imagination of scholars and non-scholars alike. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has invited a diverse array of inquiries and bemusement. In "Smith et al.," the authors explicate the enigmatic nature of correlations that transcend conventional categories. This is where our scholarly journey begins, yet we must be prepared for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead.
As we delve into the realms of nomenclature and digital content creation, it is imperative to consider the profound impact of individual identities on cultural phenomena. The work of Doe et al. underscores the enduring significance of personal monikers in shaping societal discourse and cultural trends. We are reminded that every name carries with it a narrative, an essence that transcends mere letters and phonemes. Similarly, Jones' comprehensive study unearths the intricate web of digital content creation and its influence on contemporary culture, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected connection between Irene and MrBeast.
Turning the pages to non-fiction works, "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria offers illuminating insights into the historical, linguistic, and cultural aspects of names, enriching our understanding of the significance attached to different appellations. On the digital front, "YouTube Secrets" by Sean Cannell provides a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of online content creation, shedding light on the multifaceted world of YouTube videos.
In the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as "Irene" by Pierre Lemaitre and "The Beast's Heart" by Leife Shallcross draw attention to the tantalizing nuances of storytelling and character depiction, serving as a reminder that the interplay of monikers and narratives can take on unexpected dimensions. As we venture into the uncharted territory of whimsical correlations, it is vital to acknowledge the intersection of the real and the imaginary in shaping our perceptions.
Finally, the omnipresent influence of popular internet memes, such as "Irene, Goodnight Sweet Princess" and "Here's the Beast!" highlights the intersection of digital culture and linguistic expressions, offering a lighthearted lens through which to view our investigation. These memetic phenomena evoke smiles and laughter, underscoring the delightful unpredictability of online discourse and cultural references.
As we progress through this literature review, we are reminded that scholarly inquiry need not be devoid of whimsy; rather, it can embrace the delightful peculiarities that make our intellectual pursuits all the more charming.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting a thorough analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and an r-squared value of 0.7421822 revealed a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 lent statistical support to this unexpected connection, prompting much head-scratching and contemplation within our research cohort.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) offers a visual representation of this noteworthy correlation, depicting a striking alignment of data points that can only be described as delightfully intriguing.
While some may view the exploration of this correlation as a mere escapade into the whimsical realms of curiosity, our investigation has yielded compelling evidence of a tangible link between nomenclature and digital content creation. The implications of this connection extend beyond the confines of traditional academia, offering a thrilling glimpse into the serendipitous intersections of popular culture and digital prominence.
This unanticipated correlation between Irene's popularity and MrBeast's video length not only adds a touch of levity to scholarly discourse but also underscores the multifaceted nature of cultural phenomena. Our findings invite further exploration and contemplation, beckoning researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the delightful mysteries that abound in the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and MrBeast's video length has been a subject of mirth and scholarly contemplation, and our investigation has shed light on this captivating link. While it may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings have, in fact, substantiated prior research that hinted at the unexpected interplay between nomenclature and digital content creation.

Recalling the scholarly musings of Smith et al., who eloquently articulated the enigmatic nature of correlations that defy conventional categorization, our study has indeed charted unanticipated twists and turns in the seemingly disparate realms of names and YouTube content. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value we uncovered align with Doe et al.'s emphasis on the enduring influence of personal monikers on cultural trends, as well as Jones' comprehensive exploration of digital content creation's impact on contemporary culture.

The scatterplot, metaphorically speaking, is akin to a digital treasure map, revealing a veritable trove of data points that beckon explorers to discover the wonder and peculiarity of this unexpected connection. This correlation is not merely a flight of whimsy; rather, it underscores the delightful unpredictability that infuses our scholarly pursuits.

Delving into the litany of memes that pervade popular culture, we cannot dismiss the delightful influence of internet memes such as "Irene, Goodnight Sweet Princess" and "Here's the Beast!" These light-hearted cultural phenomena, in all their memetic splendor, offer a lens through which to view our investigation with a chuckle and a nod to the unpredictable nature of online discourse and cultural references.

In essence, our findings have not only validated the scholarly intrigue surrounding this connection but also illuminated the joyous, unexpected dimensions of scholarly inquiry. The intersection of nomenclature and digital prominence unveils a tapestry of interconnectedness that adds a touch of whimsy to our intellectual pursuits and celebrates the enigmatic beauty of the world around us. Our investigation serves as a testament to the charm inherent in scholarly pursuit, reminding us that even the most puzzling correlations can yield laughter and contemplation in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Irene and Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The exploration of correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the minds of scholars and nonscholars alike. In this vein, the unlikely rapport between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has piqued the curiosity of many. While some may perceive this inquiry as a mere flight of fancy, an unearthing of an unexpected link between nomenclature and digital content creation holds considerable significance. As much as we strive for austerity in our scholarly pursuits, it is quite refreshing to delve into an investigation that infuses a dollop of quirkiness into the usually somber landscape of research.
The enigma of this correlation nestles within the heart of popular culture. The name Irene, derived from the Greek word for peace, has traversed the ages, maintaining a steady presence in the annals of nomenclature. Meanwhile, MrBeast, a prominent figure in the digital realm, has garnered an ardent following for his benevolent stunts and captivating content. The juxtaposition of these two entities seems somewhat whimsical, bordering on the whimsy of an unlikely pairing at a masquerade ball. Yet, as with all enigmas, the puzzle beckons to be solved, and so we embark on this intellectual escapade with apprehension and anticipation.
You may find yourself musing, "What fascination lies in deciphering such an incongruous connection?" It is here that our curiosity intertwines with the thrill of scholarly inquiry. Just as a jester's cap adds a touch of playfulness to a stern countenance, the investigation into this correlation adds a vibrant hue to the scholarly canvas. After all, the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the absurdities and incongruities that make life delightfully unpredictable.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting a thorough analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and an r-squared value of 0.7421822 revealed a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 lent statistical support to this unexpected connection, prompting much head-scratching and contemplation within our research cohort.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) offers a visual representation of this noteworthy correlation, depicting a striking alignment of data points that can only be described as delightfully intriguing.
While some may view the exploration of this correlation as a mere escapade into the whimsical realms of curiosity, our investigation has yielded compelling evidence of a tangible link between nomenclature and digital content creation. The implications of this connection extend beyond the confines of traditional academia, offering a thrilling glimpse into the serendipitous intersections of popular culture and digital prominence.
This unanticipated correlation between Irene's popularity and MrBeast's video length not only adds a touch of levity to scholarly discourse but also underscores the multifaceted nature of cultural phenomena. Our findings invite further exploration and contemplation, beckoning researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the delightful mysteries that abound in the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study has unraveled the surprising correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value undeniably highlight the tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements. This unforeseen connection not only adds a whimsical twist to scholarly inquiry but also underscores the intricate interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of traditional research, offering a delightful glimpse into the serendipitous intersections of popular culture and digital prominence. The scatterplot, a visual representation of this remarkable correlation, encapsulates the captivating alignment of data points that defies conventional expectations. The quirky nature of this correlation serves as a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not shy away from the delightful incongruities that make scholarly endeavors infinitely intriguing.

While our investigation may seem like an excursion into the whimsical realms of curiosity, the tangible evidence of this unexpected correlation beckons for contemplation and appreciation. As we reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of Irene's popularity and MrBeast's video length, we are reminded that scholarly pursuit need not always be solemn; it can also embrace the delightful unpredictabilities that enrich our understanding of the world around us.

In light of these findings, we assert that further exploration in this area is unnecessary. The enigmatic connection between Irene's popularity and MrBeast's video length has been thoroughly illuminated, leaving no stone unturned.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Internet Phenomena and Cultural Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Behavioral Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Irene's Popularity and MrBeast's Video Length: An Unanticipated Connection Revealed with an abstract of The correlation between the popularity of the name Irene and the total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos has been a topic of both whimsical curiosity and scholarly bewilderment. In this study, we harnessed data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube to uncover the unexpected link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8615000 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings shed light on this enigmatic relationship and pose thought-provoking questions about the interplay of nomenclature and digital content creation. This investigation not only adds a dash of whimsy to the world of research but also enriches our understanding of the quirky interconnectedness of popular culture and individual monikers.

ChatGPT:

Irene popularity, MrBeast video length, correlation, nomenclature, US Social Security Administration data, YouTube data, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, popular culture, digital content creation, whimsical relationship, scholarly research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Irene
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Irene
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Irene

Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of MrBeast YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8615000 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7421822 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Irene) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00065. 0.0006539055775769025000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.065% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,529 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Irene (Babies born)436439431453444507466468471437440
Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)3961944517486473004102944685711100256918309171981412146




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([436,439,431,453,444,507,466,468,471,437,440,])
array_2 = np.array([396,19445,17486,47300,41029,446857,111002,56918,30917,19814,12146,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Irene"
array_2_name = "Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5379 · Black Variable ID: 2763 · Red Variable ID: 25755
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0