about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,416 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and the second variable is U.S. intercountry adoptions.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved in Dover, Delaware, it seems the city was no longer a-baby-tion to potential adoptive parents, leading to a decrease in U.S. intercountry adoptions. With cleaner air, people were more willing to stay and raise their own little air-ritating bundles of joy, instead of looking abroad to expand their family. It's clear that when the air pollution decreased, so did the urge to make a tiny human fly all the way from another country!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a serene, idyllic scene in Dover, Delaware. The scene depicts clean air sweeping through the city, filling the atmosphere with a sense of purity and revitalization. Families are shown enjoying outdoor activities joyously, breathing in the fresh, clean air. As a consequence of the improved air quality, there is a noticeable decline in U.S. intercountry adoptions, symbolized by the absence of international adoption agencies or paperwork, as more couples opt to raise their own children amidst the rejuvenating environment of Dover, Delaware. The cover exudes a sense of hope and positivity, capturing the peaceful and heartwarming transformation of the city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Brutalism A TIME magazine cover image Parallax art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions, in the following situation: As the air quality improved in Dover, Delaware, it seems the city was no longer a-baby-tion to potential adoptive parents, leading to a decrease in U.S. intercountry adoptions. With cleaner air, people were more willing to stay and raise their own little air-ritating bundles of joy, instead of looking abroad to expand their family. It's clear that when the air pollution decreased, so did the urge to make a tiny human fly all the way from another country!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a scene in Dover, Delaware, we see clean air blowing through the city, with families happily enjoying outdoor activities. At the same time, there is a noticeable decrease in U.S. intercountry adoptions, as more couples choose to raise their own little bundles of joy in the improved air quality of Dover, Delaware.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a scene in Dover, Delaware, we see clean air blowing through the city, with families happily enjoying outdoor activities. At the same time, there is a noticeable decrease in U.S. intercountry adoptions, as more couples choose to raise their own little bundles of joy in the improved air quality of Dover, Delaware. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a serene, idyllic scene in Dover, Delaware. The scene depicts clean air sweeping through the city, filling the atmosphere with a sense of purity and revitalization. Families are shown enjoying outdoor activities joyously, breathing in the fresh, clean air. As a consequence of the improved air quality, there is a noticeable decline in U.S. intercountry adoptions, symbolized by the absence of international adoption agencies or paperwork, as more couples opt to raise their own children amidst the rejuvenating environment of Dover, Delaware. The cover exudes a sense of hope and positivity, capturing the peaceful and heartwarming transformation of the city.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Dover, Delaware caused U.S. intercountry adoptions to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

The Journal of Environmental Whimsy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Consular Affairs to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Since the dawn of time, humans and hares alike have shared an undeniable reliance on clean air. While the focus on human health has long dominated air pollution research, our furry friends have often been left out of the conversation. But fear not, for we are here to bring some bunny business into the mix and see if there's more to the "hare" in air pollution than meets the eye.

A common joke among statisticians is that "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure is a hint." And hint, we shall. We're here to unravel the potential nexus between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and the journey of bunnies—and by bunnies, we mean U.S. intercountry adoptions. So, grab your carrots and let's hop right into the world of statistical analysis and environmental intrigue.

Some might say that studying air pollution is simply not worth the "inhalation," but we disagree. With every breath we take, there lies an opportunity to unearth some startling connections. So, it's time to don our data goggles and embark on an adventure that promises to be more exhilarating than a hoppin' bunny race.

As we navigate through the scientific underbrush, we must acknowledge that research, much like a hare, can be elusive and tricky. However, armed with our trusty statistical tools, we are ready to take this data bull by the horns and see where the winds of research take us. And we promise, there will be some carrot cake at the end of this statistical rabbit hole.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans and hares alike have shared an undeniable reliance on clean air. While the focus on human health has long dominated air pollution research, our furry friends have often been left out of the conversation. But fear not, for we are here to bring some bunny business into the mix and see if there's more to the "hare" in air pollution than meets the eye.
A common joke among statisticians is that "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure is a hint." And hint, we shall. We're here to unravel the potential nexus between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and the journey of bunnies—and by bunnies, we mean U.S. intercountry adoptions. So, grab your carrots and let's hop right into the world of statistical analysis and environmental intrigue.
Some might say that studying air pollution is simply not worth the "inhalation," but we disagree. With every breath we take, there lies an opportunity to unearth some startling connections. So, it's time to don our data goggles and embark on an adventure that promises to be more exhilarating than a hoppin' bunny race.
As we navigate through the scientific underbrush, we must acknowledge that research, much like a hare, can be elusive and tricky. However, armed with our trusty statistical tools, we are ready to take this data bull by the horns and see where the winds of research take us. And we promise, there will be some carrot cake at the end of this statistical rabbit hole.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have explored the impact of air pollution on human health and environmental outcomes. Smith (2015) found a significant correlation between air pollution levels and respiratory illnesses in urban areas, while Doe (2018) demonstrated a link between air quality and adverse birth outcomes. In a similar vein, Jones (2020) highlighted the detrimental effects of air pollution on biodiversity and ecosystem health. However, what these studies failed to address is the potential influence of air pollution on U.S. intercountry adoptions—a topic that has been largely overlooked.

Speaking of adoption, did you hear about the kidnapping at the playground? It's okay, he woke up.

Turning our attention to the realm of adoption, it is essential to understand the dynamics and mechanisms that drive families to pursue intercountry adoption. This area of inquiry has been explored in non-fiction works such as "The Economist's Guide to International Adoption" and "Adopting a Worldview: A Comprehensive Guide to Intercountry Adoption" by renowned authors in the field. These works provide valuable insights into the complex decision-making process and legal considerations surrounding intercountry adoptions, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of this phenomenon.

Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Too many "carry-on" books!

On the flip side, fictional literature has also delved into the theme of adoption, with titles like "The Secret Life of Bees" and "Anne of Green Gables" portraying poignant narratives of familial bonds and the quest for belonging. Although these stories may not directly address the link between air pollution and intercountry adoptions, they offer a rich tapestry of human experiences that is intertwined with the essence of adoption.

Speaking of adoption, did you hear about the pregnant bed? She's waiting to deliver a "bedtime story."

In the realm of popular culture, memes such as the "Distracted Boyfriend" and "Woman Yelling at Cat" have humorously captured the unpredictability and surprises associated with life choices—perhaps hinting at the unforeseen factors that could shape the decision to pursue intercountry adoption. While these memes may seem unrelated at first glance, they playfully underscore the notion that life's most significant decisions often spring from seemingly inconsequential circumstances.

Why did the scarecrow become a successful neurologist? He was outstanding in his field!

In light of the existing research and literature, it becomes evident that the link between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions remains an uncharted territory. As we untangle this web of research and jest, we strive to unearth the underlying factors that may be contributing to this peculiar correlation. So, buckle up, dear readers, for a whimsical journey that promises to be more unpredictable than a hare's hop in an open field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Consular Affairs . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans and hares alike have shared an undeniable reliance on clean air. While the focus on human health has long dominated air pollution research, our furry friends have often been left out of the conversation. But fear not, for we are here to bring some bunny business into the mix and see if there's more to the "hare" in air pollution than meets the eye.
A common joke among statisticians is that "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure is a hint." And hint, we shall. We're here to unravel the potential nexus between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and the journey of bunnies—and by bunnies, we mean U.S. intercountry adoptions. So, grab your carrots and let's hop right into the world of statistical analysis and environmental intrigue.
Some might say that studying air pollution is simply not worth the "inhalation," but we disagree. With every breath we take, there lies an opportunity to unearth some startling connections. So, it's time to don our data goggles and embark on an adventure that promises to be more exhilarating than a hoppin' bunny race.
As we navigate through the scientific underbrush, we must acknowledge that research, much like a hare, can be elusive and tricky. However, armed with our trusty statistical tools, we are ready to take this data bull by the horns and see where the winds of research take us. And we promise, there will be some carrot cake at the end of this statistical rabbit hole.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Gathering data for this hare-raising study involved a multifaceted approach that would make even the most nimble hare envious of our leaps and bounds. We diligently scoured the depths of the Environmental Protection Agency's air quality reports, combing through reams of pollution data like a rabbit through a lettuce patch. Paired with information from the Bureau of Consular Affairs on U.S. intercountry adoptions, we had all the ingredients to whip up a statistical salad that would leave even the most discerning hare satisfied.

Enlisting the help of our trusty statistical software, we performed a rigorous analysis of the air pollution data from Dover, Delaware, spanning the years 1999 to 2021. With each data point scrutinized more closely than a rabbit sniffing out a potential mate, we calculated parameters such as the levels of particulate matter and ozone, all while keeping an astute eye on nitrous oxide levels – no laughing gas here, only serious science!

Meanwhile, our investigation into U.S. intercountry adoptions followed a similarly detailed procedure. We pored over adoption statistics, tracking the number of adoptions from Dover, Delaware and its potential correlation with air pollution levels. It was a process that required meticulousness akin to that of a hare carefully grooming its fur.

After consolidating and cleaning the data, we turned to our trusty statistics toolkit, employing regression analysis to tease out potential relationships between air pollution and intercountry adoptions. We adjusted for confounding variables and covariates with the precision of a hare nibbling around the edges of a garden patch, ensuring our model accounted for any unexpected lurking factors that could alter the course of our findings.

Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat, we conjured up correlation coefficients and p-values that would make even the most seasoned statistician’s whiskers twitch with excitement. With a nod to probability theory, we carefully evaluated the significance of our findings, ensuring that our results were as robust as a warren of scholarly bunnies.

In the end, our methodology was as tight as a rabbit's warren, providing a sturdy foundation upon which to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions. And just like a well-crafted hare pun, our methodology was not only precise but delightfully hop-timistic about the potential for uncovering meaningful insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Consular Affairs .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9216967, r-squared of 0.8495249, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Since the dawn of time, humans and hares alike have shared an undeniable reliance on clean air. While the focus on human health has long dominated air pollution research, our furry friends have often been left out of the conversation. But fear not, for we are here to bring some bunny business into the mix and see if there's more to the "hare" in air pollution than meets the eye.
A common joke among statisticians is that "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure is a hint." And hint, we shall. We're here to unravel the potential nexus between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and the journey of bunnies—and by bunnies, we mean U.S. intercountry adoptions. So, grab your carrots and let's hop right into the world of statistical analysis and environmental intrigue.
Some might say that studying air pollution is simply not worth the "inhalation," but we disagree. With every breath we take, there lies an opportunity to unearth some startling connections. So, it's time to don our data goggles and embark on an adventure that promises to be more exhilarating than a hoppin' bunny race.
As we navigate through the scientific underbrush, we must acknowledge that research, much like a hare, can be elusive and tricky. However, armed with our trusty statistical tools, we are ready to take this data bull by the horns and see where the winds of research take us. And we promise, there will be some carrot cake at the end of this statistical rabbit hole.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In analyzing the relationship between air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions, our findings uncovered an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 with an r-squared value of 0.8495249. This suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to air quality and international adoptions, the correlation is not just hot air.

Our statistical analysis revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This remarkable level of statistical significance reinforces the notion that there might be more than a mere whiff of connection between air pollution and the cross-border adoption of our fluffy, long-eared friends.

Fig. 1, the scatterplot, visually showcases the robust correlation between air pollution levels and U.S. intercountry adoptions. As we gaze upon this plot, it becomes abundantly clear that the influence of air quality on the transnational movement of bunnies... err, we mean adoptive families, cannot be simply brushed off as a hare-brained idea.

Our results not only lend support to the hypothesis that air pollution may play a role in shaping international adoption patterns, but they also underscore the importance of considering diverse environmental factors in the analysis of social phenomena. It seems that the air we breathe may not only shape our health and wellbeing but also have unexpected and far-reaching influences on the dynamics of global adoptions.

In conclusion, these findings suggest that air pollution in Dover, Delaware may not only impact respiratory health but also have an unforeseen impact on the international adoption of bunnies - and the occasional human child. It turns out that when it comes to understanding the complexities of air pollution and international bunny hops, there's much more than just a puff of smoke to consider.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have explored the impact of air pollution on human health and environmental outcomes. Smith (2015) found a significant correlation between air pollution levels and respiratory illnesses in urban areas, while Doe (2018) demonstrated a link between air quality and adverse birth outcomes. In a similar vein, Jones (2020) highlighted the detrimental effects of air pollution on biodiversity and ecosystem health. However, what these studies failed to address is the potential influence of air pollution on U.S. intercountry adoptions—a topic that has been largely overlooked.
Speaking of adoption, did you hear about the kidnapping at the playground? It's okay, he woke up.
Turning our attention to the realm of adoption, it is essential to understand the dynamics and mechanisms that drive families to pursue intercountry adoption. This area of inquiry has been explored in non-fiction works such as "The Economist's Guide to International Adoption" and "Adopting a Worldview: A Comprehensive Guide to Intercountry Adoption" by renowned authors in the field. These works provide valuable insights into the complex decision-making process and legal considerations surrounding intercountry adoptions, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of this phenomenon.
Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Too many "carry-on" books!
On the flip side, fictional literature has also delved into the theme of adoption, with titles like "The Secret Life of Bees" and "Anne of Green Gables" portraying poignant narratives of familial bonds and the quest for belonging. Although these stories may not directly address the link between air pollution and intercountry adoptions, they offer a rich tapestry of human experiences that is intertwined with the essence of adoption.
Speaking of adoption, did you hear about the pregnant bed? She's waiting to deliver a "bedtime story."
In the realm of popular culture, memes such as the "Distracted Boyfriend" and "Woman Yelling at Cat" have humorously captured the unpredictability and surprises associated with life choices—perhaps hinting at the unforeseen factors that could shape the decision to pursue intercountry adoption. While these memes may seem unrelated at first glance, they playfully underscore the notion that life's most significant decisions often spring from seemingly inconsequential circumstances.
Why did the scarecrow become a successful neurologist? He was outstanding in his field!
In light of the existing research and literature, it becomes evident that the link between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions remains an uncharted territory. As we untangle this web of research and jest, we strive to unearth the underlying factors that may be contributing to this peculiar correlation. So, buckle up, dear readers, for a whimsical journey that promises to be more unpredictable than a hare's hop in an open field.

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the relationship between air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions, our findings uncovered an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 with an r-squared value of 0.8495249. This suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to air quality and international adoptions, the correlation is not just hot air.
Our statistical analysis revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This remarkable level of statistical significance reinforces the notion that there might be more than a mere whiff of connection between air pollution and the cross-border adoption of our fluffy, long-eared friends.
Fig. 1, the scatterplot, visually showcases the robust correlation between air pollution levels and U.S. intercountry adoptions. As we gaze upon this plot, it becomes abundantly clear that the influence of air quality on the transnational movement of bunnies... err, we mean adoptive families, cannot be simply brushed off as a hare-brained idea.
Our results not only lend support to the hypothesis that air pollution may play a role in shaping international adoption patterns, but they also underscore the importance of considering diverse environmental factors in the analysis of social phenomena. It seems that the air we breathe may not only shape our health and wellbeing but also have unexpected and far-reaching influences on the dynamics of global adoptions.
In conclusion, these findings suggest that air pollution in Dover, Delaware may not only impact respiratory health but also have an unforeseen impact on the international adoption of bunnies - and the occasional human child. It turns out that when it comes to understanding the complexities of air pollution and international bunny hops, there's much more than just a puff of smoke to consider.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study illuminate a curious connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. It appears that the proverbial "bunny trail" of correlation has led us to an unexpected intersection of environmental quality and familial dynamics. Upon revisiting the existing research on air pollution and its impacts, we find that our results align with prior studies that have underscored the significant influence of air pollution on diverse outcomes. It seems that the air we breathe doesn't just affect our lungs; it may also nudge us to expand our families across borders.

Speaking of unexpected intersections, did you hear about the biologist who crossed a mountain with a data analyst? They were hoping to reach new peaks in their fields.

In the continuum of literature, the whimsical notion of air pollution influencing intercountry adoptions may have raised eyebrows, but our analysis has substantiated this surprising relationship. Just as "The Secret Life of Bees" and "Anne of Green Gables" sensitively portray the intricate tapestry of familial bonds, our findings delicately weave the fabric of air quality into the narrative of intercountry adoptions.

On the statistical front, our correlation coefficient and p-value strut confidently in line with the existing body of scientific literature. It appears that the staff at the playgrounds of air pollution and intercountry adoptions has revealed a dance of significance that is not just a game of chance. The observed correlation, when juxtaposed with other research in disparate fields, aligns harmoniously like a symphony of converging data points.

Did you hear about the statistician who always kept a rabbit by his side? He wanted an expert in multiplying coefficients.

With a nod to the interplay of meme culture and scholarly pursuits, it seems that the "Distracted Boyfriend" and "Woman Yelling at Cat" have unexpectedly pointed us to the capricious nature of life choices, and in our case, research findings. The unforeseen factors that these memes bring to light mirror the unforeseen factors that drive families to embark on the journey of intercountry adoptions, where air quality may just be one influential breeze in the wind of decision-making.

As we navigate through the whimsical maze of air pollution and international bunny hops, our findings bring to light the merry dance of statistical significance and correlation. From the unexplored territory of air pollution influencing adoptions springs a compelling avenue for future research and policy considerations. It seems that when it comes to understanding the influences of air quality and international adoptions, we must keep our eyes and noses open to the unexpected intersections that may shape our understanding of the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans and hares alike have shared an undeniable reliance on clean air. While the focus on human health has long dominated air pollution research, our furry friends have often been left out of the conversation. But fear not, for we are here to bring some bunny business into the mix and see if there's more to the "hare" in air pollution than meets the eye.
A common joke among statisticians is that "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure is a hint." And hint, we shall. We're here to unravel the potential nexus between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and the journey of bunnies—and by bunnies, we mean U.S. intercountry adoptions. So, grab your carrots and let's hop right into the world of statistical analysis and environmental intrigue.
Some might say that studying air pollution is simply not worth the "inhalation," but we disagree. With every breath we take, there lies an opportunity to unearth some startling connections. So, it's time to don our data goggles and embark on an adventure that promises to be more exhilarating than a hoppin' bunny race.
As we navigate through the scientific underbrush, we must acknowledge that research, much like a hare, can be elusive and tricky. However, armed with our trusty statistical tools, we are ready to take this data bull by the horns and see where the winds of research take us. And we promise, there will be some carrot cake at the end of this statistical rabbit hole.

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the relationship between air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions, our findings uncovered an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 with an r-squared value of 0.8495249. This suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to air quality and international adoptions, the correlation is not just hot air.
Our statistical analysis revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This remarkable level of statistical significance reinforces the notion that there might be more than a mere whiff of connection between air pollution and the cross-border adoption of our fluffy, long-eared friends.
Fig. 1, the scatterplot, visually showcases the robust correlation between air pollution levels and U.S. intercountry adoptions. As we gaze upon this plot, it becomes abundantly clear that the influence of air quality on the transnational movement of bunnies... err, we mean adoptive families, cannot be simply brushed off as a hare-brained idea.
Our results not only lend support to the hypothesis that air pollution may play a role in shaping international adoption patterns, but they also underscore the importance of considering diverse environmental factors in the analysis of social phenomena. It seems that the air we breathe may not only shape our health and wellbeing but also have unexpected and far-reaching influences on the dynamics of global adoptions.
In conclusion, these findings suggest that air pollution in Dover, Delaware may not only impact respiratory health but also have an unforeseen impact on the international adoption of bunnies - and the occasional human child. It turns out that when it comes to understanding the complexities of air pollution and international bunny hops, there's much more than just a puff of smoke to consider.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our study, we can confidently say that there's no need to hold our breath any longer - the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. intercountry adoptions is as clear as the air on a breezy day. Our findings provide overwhelming evidence that bunny hops across international borders might just be influenced by the air they breathe, just like us humans! It seems that clean air is not only essential for our own health but may also play a role in the transnational movement of our fuzzy, long-eared friends.

These findings will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the environmental and adoption research communities. We've certainly hopped into some unexpected territory with this study, but as they say, sometimes the best discoveries happen when you follow your nose.

As the great statistician once said, "A good dataset is like a good joke - If you have to explain it, it's not that good." And our findings speak for themselves - the correlation between air pollution and international adoptions is no laughing matter.

In the wise words of every dad ever, "You know what they say about research? It's always worth it in the end." And in this case, we can confidently say that we're not just "hare" today, gone tomorrow.

In conclusion, it's clear that we've painted a pretty "aerodynabunny" picture of the link between air pollution and international adoptions. So, let's tip our hats off to our fuzzy friends and breathe a sigh of relief knowing that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already "hopped to it" and found all the answers we were looking for!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Whimsy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Entanglement Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Hare: Unearthing the Link Between Air Pollution in Dover, Delaware and U.S. Intercountry Adoptions with an abstract of Breathing clean air is essential for human health, but what about bunny health? This study investigates the connection between air pollution in Dover, Delaware, and U.S. intercountry adoptions, probing whether smog could inadvertently be driving more families to hop across borders to expand their broods. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Consular Affairs for the years 1999 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9216967 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the nose when it comes to the influence of air quality on intercountry adoptions. As we navigate through this complex maze of data, buckle up for a breath of fresh hare as we delve into the whimsical world of air pollution and international bunny hops.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Dover Delaware, US intercountry adoptions, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Consular Affairs, correlation coefficient, p-value, rabbit health, international adoptions, smog, air quality

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Dover, Delaware
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Dover, DE
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Dover, Delaware

U.S. intercountry adoptions
Source: Bureau of Consular Affairs
See what else correlates with U.S. intercountry adoptions

Correlation r = 0.9216967 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8495249 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85% of the change in the one variable (i.e., U.S. intercountry adoptions) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Dover, Delaware) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-10. 0.0000000004277261532939659500
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 4.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,337,944,482 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Dover, Delaware (Bad air quality days)46.992542.379246.209448.042737.956236.882143.396241.132141.603141.417924.045832.573319.72628.947422.969218.95622.191817.582416.066515.068519.7268.2872914.4444
U.S. intercountry adoptions (Adoptions)15719188571964721467216542299122734206801960817456127441105893198668709264385644537047144059297116221785




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([46.9925,42.3792,46.2094,48.0427,37.9562,36.8821,43.3962,41.1321,41.6031,41.4179,24.0458,32.5733,19.726,28.9474,22.9692,18.956,22.1918,17.5824,16.0665,15.0685,19.726,8.28729,14.4444,])
array_2 = np.array([15719,18857,19647,21467,21654,22991,22734,20680,19608,17456,12744,11058,9319,8668,7092,6438,5644,5370,4714,4059,2971,1622,1785,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Dover, Delaware"
array_2_name = "U.S. intercountry adoptions"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5416 · Black Variable ID: 20555 · Red Variable ID: 216
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0