about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,418 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption melted over the state, it led to a Gouda feeling among the voters, who were feeling extra grate about the direction of the country. It's as if the candidates were in a fierce "cheese-off" competition, trying to brie the big cheese in the election. The correlation is not just a coincidence; it seems the cheesy goodness of American cheese has the power to swiss the vote in Pennsylvania. It's a campaign strategy that's definitely not too provolone! This just goes to show that when it comes to politics, you can never underestimate the power of dairy deliciousness. So, let's all say "yes we curd" to this unexpected correlation - it's a real game-changer in the political arena!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A scene from Skyrim] Create the setting of a misty and majestic mountainside in Skyrim, with towering peaks shrouded in thick clouds. The landscape should be adorned with ancient ruins and crumbling stone archways, hinting at a history of grandeur. There should also be a hint of magic in the air, with glowing runes etched into the rock faces and a dragon circling overhead. The atmosphere should be both foreboding and awe-inspiring, capturing the sense of adventure and danger that permeates the world of Skyrim. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Magic realism A scene from Skyrim Vaporwave Low poly
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As American cheese consumption melted over the state, it led to a Gouda feeling among the voters, who were feeling extra grate about the direction of the country. It's as if the candidates were in a fierce "cheese-off" competition, trying to brie the big cheese in the election. The correlation is not just a coincidence; it seems the cheesy goodness of American cheese has the power to swiss the vote in Pennsylvania. It's a campaign strategy that's definitely not too provolone! This just goes to show that when it comes to politics, you can never underestimate the power of dairy deliciousness. So, let's all say "yes we curd" to this unexpected correlation - it's a real game-changer in the political arena!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a map of Pennsylvania where the counties are filled with bubbling American cheese, oozing and spreading across the state. Meanwhile, as the cheese covers the map, little blocks of cheese with Republican elephant logos on them start appearing, stacking up in areas where the cheese is thickest. The scene captures a quirky yet impactful visual representation of the correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Pennsylvania.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a map of Pennsylvania where the counties are filled with bubbling American cheese, oozing and spreading across the state. Meanwhile, as the cheese covers the map, little blocks of cheese with Republican elephant logos on them start appearing, stacking up in areas where the cheese is thickest. The scene captures a quirky yet impactful visual representation of the correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Pennsylvania. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A scene from Skyrim] Create the setting of a misty and majestic mountainside in Skyrim, with towering peaks shrouded in thick clouds. The landscape should be adorned with ancient ruins and crumbling stone archways, hinting at a history of grandeur. There should also be a hint of magic in the air, with glowing runes etched into the rock faces and a dragon circling overhead. The atmosphere should be both foreboding and awe-inspiring, capturing the sense of adventure and danger that permeates the world of Skyrim.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania

Journal of Culinary Politics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the great philosopher and cheese lover, Gorgonzola, once mused, "In queso emergency, I find myself turning to American cheese." In our modern-day political landscape, this statement might hold more truth than we'd like to admit. We are intrigued by the peculiar interplay between American cheese consumption and political leanings, especially in the context of swing states. It's a gouda time to be alive, and what better time to delve into the cheddar-laden world of American cheese and its potential influence on political affiliations.

One cannot discuss American cheese without acknowledging its ubiquitous presence in the daily lives of the average Pennsylvanian citizen. After all, as Benjamin Franklin famously proclaimed, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a love for American cheese in Pennsylvania." And if Ben said it, it must be provolone!

The connection between dietary habits and political behavior has long been a source of curiosity, leading us to wonder: Does a fondness for American cheese indicate a preference for conservative ideologies? To answer this question, we put on our lab coats and set out to examine a cheesy correlation that has not been grated the attention it deserves.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the great philosopher and cheese lover, Gorgonzola, once mused, "In queso emergency, I find myself turning to American cheese." In our modern-day political landscape, this statement might hold more truth than we'd like to admit. We are intrigued by the peculiar interplay between American cheese consumption and political leanings, especially in the context of swing states. It's a gouda time to be alive, and what better time to delve into the cheddar-laden world of American cheese and its potential influence on political affiliations.
One cannot discuss American cheese without acknowledging its ubiquitous presence in the daily lives of the average Pennsylvanian citizen. After all, as Benjamin Franklin famously proclaimed, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a love for American cheese in Pennsylvania." And if Ben said it, it must be provolone!
The connection between dietary habits and political behavior has long been a source of curiosity, leading us to wonder: Does a fondness for American cheese indicate a preference for conservative ideologies? To answer this question, we put on our lab coats and set out to examine a cheesy correlation that has not been grated the attention it deserves.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between dietary choices and political affiliations has been a topic of interest for researchers for decades. Smith, in "Cheese and the Art of Persuasion," explores the persuasive power of cheese in influencing consumer behavior and preferences. Similarly, Doe, in "The Politics of Fromage," delves into the potential impact of cheese consumption on political leanings, shedding light on the subtle yet profound interactions between food and ideology. These studies lay the foundation for our investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Pennsylvania.

Speaking of cheese, did you hear about the explosion at the cheese factory? There was de-brie everywhere!

Jones, in "Eating Patterns and Political Allegiance," provides insightful analysis on the correlation between food consumption and party affiliations, emphasizing the need to consider diverse food choices in understanding political behaviors. These serious scholarly works set the stage for our exploration into the cheesy world of American cheese and its potential influence on voting patterns in Pennsylvania.

Now, turning to more casual literature, books such as "Cheese: A Love Story" by Carlos Yescas and "The Big Cheese" by Kat Martin and L.J. Martin offer captivating narratives of cheese's journey from dairy to deli, underscoring its cultural significance and widespread appeal. While not directly addressing our research focus, these books serve as a delightful reminder of the endearing charm of cheese in human society.

If Edam was made illegal, it would cause a lot of social unrest. People would be rioting in the streets!

On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "Cheddar Off Dead" by Julia Buckley and "The Stilton Cheese Wars" by Ian R. MacLeod and Kurt Hunt propose whimsical tales derived from the world of cheese, creating captivating scenarios that entice readers to ponder the intricate relationships between cheese and human experiences. While these books may not contribute directly to our empirical understanding, they present a delightful diversion into the cheesy realm of imagination.

As we navigate the quirky landscape of cheese-related literature, let's not forget the board game "Cheese Chasers" that offers players a thrilling quest to gather the finest cheeses from around the world. Though purely recreational, this game playfully engages with the concept of cheese as a sought-after commodity, hinting at the allure and mystery that surrounds this dairy delight.

What did the cheese say to itself in the mirror? Halloumi!

In summary, the literature surrounding cheese and its intersections with human behavior and culture provides a rich tapestry of insights and entertainment, furnishing us with a diverse lens through which to explore the intriguing relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the great philosopher and cheese lover, Gorgonzola, once mused, "In queso emergency, I find myself turning to American cheese." In our modern-day political landscape, this statement might hold more truth than we'd like to admit. We are intrigued by the peculiar interplay between American cheese consumption and political leanings, especially in the context of swing states. It's a gouda time to be alive, and what better time to delve into the cheddar-laden world of American cheese and its potential influence on political affiliations.
One cannot discuss American cheese without acknowledging its ubiquitous presence in the daily lives of the average Pennsylvanian citizen. After all, as Benjamin Franklin famously proclaimed, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a love for American cheese in Pennsylvania." And if Ben said it, it must be provolone!
The connection between dietary habits and political behavior has long been a source of curiosity, leading us to wonder: Does a fondness for American cheese indicate a preference for conservative ideologies? To answer this question, we put on our lab coats and set out to examine a cheesy correlation that has not been grated the attention it deserves.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this curd-ly research journey, we had to delve into an assortment of data sources like a mouse in a cheese warehouse. We collected data on American cheese consumption from the USDA and presidential election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and Harvard Dataverse to ensure a comprehensive spread of information. From 1990 to 2020, we meticulously gathered and melted down data, leaving no shred of evidence behind – unless, of course, it was gouda evidence!

Once we had our mountain of data, we whipped out our trusty statistical tools and sliced and diced the numbers like a master cheese monger. Our method involved performing a brie-f review of relevant literature to establish a solid foundation for our analysis. We then conducted a series of cheesy regression analyses to explore the correlation between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Pennsylvania.

To ensure our findings were not just a fluke gnawed from the cheese wheel of chance, we employed rigorous statistical tests and controls to control for potential confounding variables. We didn't want our results to crumble like a poorly aged cheddar in the face of skeptical scrutiny. Our approach was as methodical as separating the curds from the whey – no cheesy shortcuts allowed!

After the statistical gymnastics were over, we carefully interpreted the results, even if it meant navigating through the maze of data like a mouse searching for the end of a labyrinthine cheese string. The goal was to present our findings as clearly as a glass of pristine milk, ensuring that our conclusions could stand up to scrutiny sharper than a block of aged Parmesan. Our methodology allowed us to peel back the layers of this cheesy conundrum and reveal the tantalizing connection between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Pennsylvania. And in the end, our findings were as un-brie-lievable as they were eye-opening!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8154526, r-squared of 0.6649630, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the great philosopher and cheese lover, Gorgonzola, once mused, "In queso emergency, I find myself turning to American cheese." In our modern-day political landscape, this statement might hold more truth than we'd like to admit. We are intrigued by the peculiar interplay between American cheese consumption and political leanings, especially in the context of swing states. It's a gouda time to be alive, and what better time to delve into the cheddar-laden world of American cheese and its potential influence on political affiliations.
One cannot discuss American cheese without acknowledging its ubiquitous presence in the daily lives of the average Pennsylvanian citizen. After all, as Benjamin Franklin famously proclaimed, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a love for American cheese in Pennsylvania." And if Ben said it, it must be provolone!
The connection between dietary habits and political behavior has long been a source of curiosity, leading us to wonder: Does a fondness for American cheese indicate a preference for conservative ideologies? To answer this question, we put on our lab coats and set out to examine a cheesy correlation that has not been grated the attention it deserves.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some intriguing results. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8154526, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. If you're feeling a bit bleu, fear not, but don't brielieve it - it's as gouda as it gets!

The r-squared value of 0.6649630 tells us that about 66.5% of the variation in Republican votes can be explained by the variation in American cheese consumption. In other words, it's not just a queso co-inky-dink - the connection is definitely worth exploring further!

In the words of our wise research team leader, "When life gives you Limburger, make Limburgeroni! And when Pennsylvania gives you American cheese consumption data, make groundbreaking political cheese correlations!"

Furthermore, the significance level (p < 0.05) suggests that this relationship is not just a fluke - it's statistically significant. It's a gouda day for science when we can confidently say that the connection between American cheese and political preferences is no accident.

In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a visual masterpiece that's cheddar than we could have possibly imagined!

As we digest these findings, we're reminded of a classic dad joke: Why did the cheese go to the party? Because it was grated to be a part of the queso! And in the realm of research, we're just grate-ful for the opportunity to uncork the potential impact of American cheese on political choices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between dietary choices and political affiliations has been a topic of interest for researchers for decades. Smith, in "Cheese and the Art of Persuasion," explores the persuasive power of cheese in influencing consumer behavior and preferences. Similarly, Doe, in "The Politics of Fromage," delves into the potential impact of cheese consumption on political leanings, shedding light on the subtle yet profound interactions between food and ideology. These studies lay the foundation for our investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Pennsylvania.
Speaking of cheese, did you hear about the explosion at the cheese factory? There was de-brie everywhere!
Jones, in "Eating Patterns and Political Allegiance," provides insightful analysis on the correlation between food consumption and party affiliations, emphasizing the need to consider diverse food choices in understanding political behaviors. These serious scholarly works set the stage for our exploration into the cheesy world of American cheese and its potential influence on voting patterns in Pennsylvania.
Now, turning to more casual literature, books such as "Cheese: A Love Story" by Carlos Yescas and "The Big Cheese" by Kat Martin and L.J. Martin offer captivating narratives of cheese's journey from dairy to deli, underscoring its cultural significance and widespread appeal. While not directly addressing our research focus, these books serve as a delightful reminder of the endearing charm of cheese in human society.
If Edam was made illegal, it would cause a lot of social unrest. People would be rioting in the streets!
On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "Cheddar Off Dead" by Julia Buckley and "The Stilton Cheese Wars" by Ian R. MacLeod and Kurt Hunt propose whimsical tales derived from the world of cheese, creating captivating scenarios that entice readers to ponder the intricate relationships between cheese and human experiences. While these books may not contribute directly to our empirical understanding, they present a delightful diversion into the cheesy realm of imagination.
As we navigate the quirky landscape of cheese-related literature, let's not forget the board game "Cheese Chasers" that offers players a thrilling quest to gather the finest cheeses from around the world. Though purely recreational, this game playfully engages with the concept of cheese as a sought-after commodity, hinting at the allure and mystery that surrounds this dairy delight.
What did the cheese say to itself in the mirror? Halloumi!
In summary, the literature surrounding cheese and its intersections with human behavior and culture provides a rich tapestry of insights and entertainment, furnishing us with a diverse lens through which to explore the intriguing relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some intriguing results. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8154526, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. If you're feeling a bit bleu, fear not, but don't brielieve it - it's as gouda as it gets!
The r-squared value of 0.6649630 tells us that about 66.5% of the variation in Republican votes can be explained by the variation in American cheese consumption. In other words, it's not just a queso co-inky-dink - the connection is definitely worth exploring further!
In the words of our wise research team leader, "When life gives you Limburger, make Limburgeroni! And when Pennsylvania gives you American cheese consumption data, make groundbreaking political cheese correlations!"
Furthermore, the significance level (p < 0.05) suggests that this relationship is not just a fluke - it's statistically significant. It's a gouda day for science when we can confidently say that the connection between American cheese and political preferences is no accident.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a visual masterpiece that's cheddar than we could have possibly imagined!
As we digest these findings, we're reminded of a classic dad joke: Why did the cheese go to the party? Because it was grated to be a part of the queso! And in the realm of research, we're just grate-ful for the opportunity to uncork the potential impact of American cheese on political choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have affirmed and expanded upon prior research, notably Smith's "Cheese and the Art of Persuasion," which hinted at the potentially influential role of cheese in shaping consumer behavior. It seems that cheese is not just a humble dairy product but a muenster of persuasion in the political landscape. Furthermore, Doe's exploration of the linkage between cheese consumption and political leanings receives robust support from our study, suggesting that indeed, cheese may hold a greater sway over voters than previously thought. Who knew American cheese would be the swiss army knife of political influence?

Shifting the discussion to a more whimsical note, the literature review's references to "Cheddar Off Dead" by Julia Buckley and "The Stilton Cheese Wars" by Ian R. MacLeod and Kurt Hunt, while lighthearted in nature, align with our findings by playfully underscoring the potential depth and complexity of the relationship between cheese and human experiences. It seems that these fictional works, though not tied to empirical evidence, may have inadvertently portrayed a cheesy reflection of real-world phenomena.

Taking a closer look at the statistical evidence, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and a p-value of less than 0.05 lend substantial credence to the notion that as American cheese consumption increases in Pennsylvania, so does support for the Republican presidential candidate. It's clear that cheese is more than just a melty concoction; it seems to hold a significant place at the table of political discourse. This scientific validation of the cheese-voting nexus is not just another feta-accompli!

In light of these results, we are compelled to muse upon the wider implications of our findings. Could the cheesy correlation uncovered in Pennsylvania extend to other states and potentially influence national elections? If so, we might need to start considering a "say cheese" campaign strategy for future candidates. The implications are as sharp as a cheddar knife and certainly give us food for thought--perhaps it's time for politicians to embrace the power of Gouda communication skills.

As the field of food and politics continues to mature, our study serves as a reminder that even the humblest of dietary choices may harbor surprising influences on political ideologies. Our data may be cheesy, but as the adage goes, the proof is in the pudding – or in this case, the fondue. The evidence presented here underscores the need for further investigation into the multifaceted interplay between culinary predilections and electoral preferences. After all, in the delightful world of cheese and politics, there's always room for another pun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the great philosopher and cheese lover, Gorgonzola, once mused, "In queso emergency, I find myself turning to American cheese." In our modern-day political landscape, this statement might hold more truth than we'd like to admit. We are intrigued by the peculiar interplay between American cheese consumption and political leanings, especially in the context of swing states. It's a gouda time to be alive, and what better time to delve into the cheddar-laden world of American cheese and its potential influence on political affiliations.
One cannot discuss American cheese without acknowledging its ubiquitous presence in the daily lives of the average Pennsylvanian citizen. After all, as Benjamin Franklin famously proclaimed, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a love for American cheese in Pennsylvania." And if Ben said it, it must be provolone!
The connection between dietary habits and political behavior has long been a source of curiosity, leading us to wonder: Does a fondness for American cheese indicate a preference for conservative ideologies? To answer this question, we put on our lab coats and set out to examine a cheesy correlation that has not been grated the attention it deserves.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some intriguing results. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8154526, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. If you're feeling a bit bleu, fear not, but don't brielieve it - it's as gouda as it gets!
The r-squared value of 0.6649630 tells us that about 66.5% of the variation in Republican votes can be explained by the variation in American cheese consumption. In other words, it's not just a queso co-inky-dink - the connection is definitely worth exploring further!
In the words of our wise research team leader, "When life gives you Limburger, make Limburgeroni! And when Pennsylvania gives you American cheese consumption data, make groundbreaking political cheese correlations!"
Furthermore, the significance level (p < 0.05) suggests that this relationship is not just a fluke - it's statistically significant. It's a gouda day for science when we can confidently say that the connection between American cheese and political preferences is no accident.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a visual masterpiece that's cheddar than we could have possibly imagined!
As we digest these findings, we're reminded of a classic dad joke: Why did the cheese go to the party? Because it was grated to be a part of the queso! And in the realm of research, we're just grate-ful for the opportunity to uncork the potential impact of American cheese on political choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the connection between American cheese consumption and Republican votes in Pennsylvania is sharper than a wheel of aged cheddar. It's truly a gouda day for political dairy enthusiasts! As we ponder over these results, we're reminded of the classic question: What do you call cheese that isn't yours? Nacho cheese! And in this case, Pennsylvania's penchant for American cheese seems to be a vote magnet for the GOP.

This study adds a slice of wisdom to our understanding of the interplay between dietary habits and political leanings. It encourages us to embrace the cheesy side of politics and consider that sometimes the path to a voter's heart may just be through their stomach, or in this case, their cheese platter.

It's clear that there is more depth to the phrase "you are what you eat" than meets the eye, especially when it comes to making electoral decisions. This cheesetastic journey has been legen-dairy, and it's prompted us to rethink the role of dairy products in shaping political preferences. It's a feta-accompli in our quest for understanding, and we hope it will brieing more attention to the fascinating intersection of food and politics.

In the words of the great Swiss psychologist, Carl Jungfuhrt, "Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate." And if our research has brought anything to consciousness, it's that American cheese might just be the key ingredient in shaping political destinies.

Therefore, in the spirit of deep dish-deliberation, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's time to cheese the day elsewhere!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Culinary Politics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Demographics and Political Preferences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Aged Cheddar and Red States: A Cheesy Correlation Between American Cheese Consumption and Republican Votes in Pennsylvania with an abstract of The age-old debate of whether cheese consumption and political leanings are related has finally met its match in our rigorous study. With a blend of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to investigate the cheesy correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8154526 and p < 0.05 for the years 1990 to 2020, leaving us gratefully surprised. It seems that the sayings "you are what you eat" and "show me the money" may have some truth, as our results suggest that as American cheese consumption increases, so does support for the GOP. This study encourages us to think outside the rind and contemplate the complex interplay between dietary choices and political ideologies. In conclusion, it appears that in the world of cheese and politics, things may be more gouda than they seem - but let's not jump to conclusions too feta-ly!

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, Republican votes, Pennsylvania, correlation, political leanings, USDA data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, cheese and politics, dietary choices, swing state, correlation coefficient, GOP support, cheese consumption data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.8154526 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6649630 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.014. 0.0136185715337093870000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 1.4% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 73 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.26, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)11.255911.808712.683912.861213.130613.256914.362115.5
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania (Percentage of votes)36.127240.014446.438148.423744.167146.680948.577948.8436




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.2559,11.8087,12.6839,12.8612,13.1306,13.2569,14.3621,15.5,])
array_2 = np.array([36.1272,40.0144,46.4381,48.4237,44.1671,46.6809,48.5779,48.8436,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5418 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 26160
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0