about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,428 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps it's because Thaddeus sounds a tad-ious, which subconsciously reminds people of tedious government regulations. This leads them to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, who they believe can 'Thadde-us' to freedom from unnecessary rules and red tape. Thaddeus may sound like a traditional name, but it's sparking some 'Lib-her-Tarian' views in Nevada!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] Prompt: Create an animated scene capturing the bustling Nevada town square. The large banner reading "Thaddeus for Liberty" proudly hangs above a podium, with a lively crowd of people, young and old, gathered around. They are chatting excitedly, carrying signs with slogans like "Thaddeus Rocks" and "Libertarian for Freedom." A straw poll booth for the Libertarian Presidential candidate should be nearby, with a steady stream of people dropping off their ballots. The scene should exude a sense of lively energy and community with a focus on the message of freedom from unnecessary regulations. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Data cyber art Surrealism A scene from Skyrim Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada, in the following situation: Perhaps it's because Thaddeus sounds a tad-ious, which subconsciously reminds people of tedious government regulations. This leads them to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, who they believe can 'Thadde-us' to freedom from unnecessary rules and red tape. Thaddeus may sound like a traditional name, but it's sparking some 'Lib-her-Tarian' views in Nevada!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Nevada town square, a large banner reading "Thaddeus for Liberty" hangs proudly above a podium. A crowd of people, young and old, gathers around, chatting excitedly as they hold signs with slogans like "Thaddeus Rocks" and "Libertarian for Freedom." Meanwhile, a straw poll booth for the Libertarian Presidential candidate stands nearby, with a steady stream of people dropping off their ballots. The name Thaddeus seems to be gaining popularity for a different kind of liberty in Nevada, as people enthusiastically discuss both the name and the candidate's shared message of freedom from unnecessary regulations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Nevada town square, a large banner reading "Thaddeus for Liberty" hangs proudly above a podium. A crowd of people, young and old, gathers around, chatting excitedly as they hold signs with slogans like "Thaddeus Rocks" and "Libertarian for Freedom." Meanwhile, a straw poll booth for the Libertarian Presidential candidate stands nearby, with a steady stream of people dropping off their ballots. The name Thaddeus seems to be gaining popularity for a different kind of liberty in Nevada, as people enthusiastically discuss both the name and the candidate's shared message of freedom from unnecessary regulations. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] Prompt: Create an animated scene capturing the bustling Nevada town square. The large banner reading "Thaddeus for Liberty" proudly hangs above a podium, with a lively crowd of people, young and old, gathered around. They are chatting excitedly, carrying signs with slogans like "Thaddeus Rocks" and "Libertarian for Freedom." A straw poll booth for the Libertarian Presidential candidate should be nearby, with a steady stream of people dropping off their ballots. The scene should exude a sense of lively energy and community with a focus on the message of freedom from unnecessary regulations.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Thaddeus positively influenced Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

The Journal of Eccentric Political Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been a topic of intrigue and mystique. Throughout history, names have been associated with certain attributes or characteristics, influencing perceptions and behaviors in subtle yet profound ways. From Aristotle's belief that one's name can shape their destiny to the modern-day phenomena of nominative determinism, the influence of names on human affairs has been a subject of fascination and speculation.

In the realm of politics, the confluence of names and voting patterns has often been a source of curiosity. Whether it's the alliteration of political candidates' names or the perceived gravitas of a certain moniker, the impact of nomenclature on political allegiances is a domain ripe for exploration. It is within this eccentric milieu that our research delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for Libertarian Presidential candidates in the enigmatic state of Nevada.

As researchers, we harnessed the power of data to unravel this enigmatic connection. Leveraging comprehensive datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of names and political preferences. Our intrepid exploration led us to uncover a strikingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the "Battle Born State."

The nature of this correlation is nothing short of perplexing, akin to stumbling upon a tumbleweed in the political arena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, our findings defy conventional wisdom, prompting both skepticism and a tantalizing sense of curiosity. As we unravel the mystique of Thaddeus and libertarian leanings, it's as if we've stumbled upon a frontier town where the unexpected reigns supreme.

Join us as we traverse the dusty trails of data analysis and embark on a grand expedition through the intersection of nomenclature and political predilections. Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation promises to shed light on a captivating facet of the political landscape, leaving readers both amused and astonished by the unpredictability of human behavior in the realm of elections.

So, saddle up, dear reader, as we venture into uncharted territory where names and electoral proclivities converge. This unconventional exploration promises to tickle your funny bone and expand your intellectual horizons, demonstrating that even in the serious arena of politics, there's always room for a touch of whimsy. Let the saga of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West unfold before your eyes, as we navigate the rib-tickling nuances of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State. Giddy up!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been a topic of intrigue and mystique. Throughout history, names have been associated with certain attributes or characteristics, influencing perceptions and behaviors in subtle yet profound ways. From Aristotle's belief that one's name can shape their destiny to the modern-day phenomena of nominative determinism, the influence of names on human affairs has been a subject of fascination and speculation.
In the realm of politics, the confluence of names and voting patterns has often been a source of curiosity. Whether it's the alliteration of political candidates' names or the perceived gravitas of a certain moniker, the impact of nomenclature on political allegiances is a domain ripe for exploration. It is within this eccentric milieu that our research delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for Libertarian Presidential candidates in the enigmatic state of Nevada.
As researchers, we harnessed the power of data to unravel this enigmatic connection. Leveraging comprehensive datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of names and political preferences. Our intrepid exploration led us to uncover a strikingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the "Battle Born State."
The nature of this correlation is nothing short of perplexing, akin to stumbling upon a tumbleweed in the political arena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, our findings defy conventional wisdom, prompting both skepticism and a tantalizing sense of curiosity. As we unravel the mystique of Thaddeus and libertarian leanings, it's as if we've stumbled upon a frontier town where the unexpected reigns supreme.
Join us as we traverse the dusty trails of data analysis and embark on a grand expedition through the intersection of nomenclature and political predilections. Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation promises to shed light on a captivating facet of the political landscape, leaving readers both amused and astonished by the unpredictability of human behavior in the realm of elections.
So, saddle up, dear reader, as we venture into uncharted territory where names and electoral proclivities converge. This unconventional exploration promises to tickle your funny bone and expand your intellectual horizons, demonstrating that even in the serious arena of politics, there's always room for a touch of whimsy. Let the saga of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West unfold before your eyes, as we navigate the rib-tickling nuances of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State. Giddy up!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The question of the relationship between names and political behavior has spurred considerable interest in the scholarly community. Smith, in "The Nomenclature Nexus: Exploring Name-Driven Trends in Political Affiliation," conducted a comprehensive analysis of voter registration data in multiple states, uncovering intriguing correlations between names and party preferences. Similarly, Doe's "The Label Effect: How Names Shape Political Perceptions" delved into the psychological underpinnings of name associations, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of nomenclature on electoral choices.

As we transition into the realm of the unusual, our investigation also draws upon non-traditional sources of inspiration. In "The Libertarian Mystique: From Ayn Rand to Ron Swanson," the authors explored the allure of libertarian ideology in popular culture, offering a lens through which to examine the potential influence of unconventional factors on political allegiances. On a lighter note, "Tales of the Wild West: Legends and Lore," although a work of fiction, encapsulates the spirit of the American frontier, providing an imaginative backdrop for our resourceful expedition into the enigmatic domain of Thaddeus and libertarianism.

In a surprising twist, we turned to television as a source of insight, immersing ourselves in shows such as "Westworld" and "Deadwood" to glean a sense of the ambiance of the Wild West and its possible implications for the peculiar correlation between the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. While these sources may seem unconventional, they serve as anchors for our playful yet insightful exploration of the unexpected connections between nomenclature and political inclinations.

In the midst of scholarly inquiry and whimsical wanderings, we arrive at the juncture of our captivating investigation, poised to unravel the delightful enigma of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West. Let the scholarly jamboree begin as we embark on this peculiar and rib-tickling pursuit of knowledge at the intersection of nomenclature and political leanings. With an irrepressible sense of merriment and intellectual rigor, we plunge into the fanciful domain of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State, driven by curiosity and a hint of roguish revelry. Hold onto your hats, for the rodeo of research is about to commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been a topic of intrigue and mystique. Throughout history, names have been associated with certain attributes or characteristics, influencing perceptions and behaviors in subtle yet profound ways. From Aristotle's belief that one's name can shape their destiny to the modern-day phenomena of nominative determinism, the influence of names on human affairs has been a subject of fascination and speculation.
In the realm of politics, the confluence of names and voting patterns has often been a source of curiosity. Whether it's the alliteration of political candidates' names or the perceived gravitas of a certain moniker, the impact of nomenclature on political allegiances is a domain ripe for exploration. It is within this eccentric milieu that our research delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for Libertarian Presidential candidates in the enigmatic state of Nevada.
As researchers, we harnessed the power of data to unravel this enigmatic connection. Leveraging comprehensive datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of names and political preferences. Our intrepid exploration led us to uncover a strikingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the "Battle Born State."
The nature of this correlation is nothing short of perplexing, akin to stumbling upon a tumbleweed in the political arena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, our findings defy conventional wisdom, prompting both skepticism and a tantalizing sense of curiosity. As we unravel the mystique of Thaddeus and libertarian leanings, it's as if we've stumbled upon a frontier town where the unexpected reigns supreme.
Join us as we traverse the dusty trails of data analysis and embark on a grand expedition through the intersection of nomenclature and political predilections. Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation promises to shed light on a captivating facet of the political landscape, leaving readers both amused and astonished by the unpredictability of human behavior in the realm of elections.
So, saddle up, dear reader, as we venture into uncharted territory where names and electoral proclivities converge. This unconventional exploration promises to tickle your funny bone and expand your intellectual horizons, demonstrating that even in the serious arena of politics, there's always room for a touch of whimsy. Let the saga of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West unfold before your eyes, as we navigate the rib-tickling nuances of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State. Giddy up!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the captivating connection between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada, an amalgam of egregious methodologies and mirthful manipulations was embraced. Our research team, sporting the most fetching pocket protectors and the keenest wit, ventured forth into the wild and unpredictable domain of nomenclature-driven political proclivities.

To amass the data necessary for our eye-opening investigation, we enlisted the aid of venerable repositories of numerical merriment, namely the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. From these data troves, we extracted the historical voting counts for the Libertarian Presidential candidates in Nevada and the frequency of the name Thaddeus over the span of 1976 to 2020.

With the requisite data in hand, we conjured a waggish cauldron of statistical analyses to scrutinize the correlation between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the Silver State. No stone was left unturned as we invoked the whimsical wizardry of correlation coefficients, t-tests, and regression analyses to discern the mystical nexus between nomenclature and ballot box proclivities.

Our rigorous methodology exuded an air of scholarly gaiety, akin to a penguin donning a bowtie at a black-tie affair. Nevertheless, our jocular pursuits were underpinned by a dedication to scientific rigor and intellectual levity, as we endeavored to unravel the riddle of Thaddeus and libertarian tendencies in the scintillating realm of electoral politics.

In summation, our methodology combined the earnest pursuit of knowledge with a liberal sprinkling of jocularity, as we embarked on a whimsical voyage through the uncharted waters of name-related political predilections. The resulting findings will assuredly prove to be as illuminating as they are mirthful, illuminating the unexpected influence of nomenclature on the political topography of Nevada and beyond.

In the next section, we shall eagerly present our captivating findings, brimming with verve and statistical vaudevillianery. Let the grand unveiling commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8534066, r-squared of 0.7283028, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been a topic of intrigue and mystique. Throughout history, names have been associated with certain attributes or characteristics, influencing perceptions and behaviors in subtle yet profound ways. From Aristotle's belief that one's name can shape their destiny to the modern-day phenomena of nominative determinism, the influence of names on human affairs has been a subject of fascination and speculation.
In the realm of politics, the confluence of names and voting patterns has often been a source of curiosity. Whether it's the alliteration of political candidates' names or the perceived gravitas of a certain moniker, the impact of nomenclature on political allegiances is a domain ripe for exploration. It is within this eccentric milieu that our research delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for Libertarian Presidential candidates in the enigmatic state of Nevada.
As researchers, we harnessed the power of data to unravel this enigmatic connection. Leveraging comprehensive datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of names and political preferences. Our intrepid exploration led us to uncover a strikingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the "Battle Born State."
The nature of this correlation is nothing short of perplexing, akin to stumbling upon a tumbleweed in the political arena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, our findings defy conventional wisdom, prompting both skepticism and a tantalizing sense of curiosity. As we unravel the mystique of Thaddeus and libertarian leanings, it's as if we've stumbled upon a frontier town where the unexpected reigns supreme.
Join us as we traverse the dusty trails of data analysis and embark on a grand expedition through the intersection of nomenclature and political predilections. Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation promises to shed light on a captivating facet of the political landscape, leaving readers both amused and astonished by the unpredictability of human behavior in the realm of elections.
So, saddle up, dear reader, as we venture into uncharted territory where names and electoral proclivities converge. This unconventional exploration promises to tickle your funny bone and expand your intellectual horizons, demonstrating that even in the serious arena of politics, there's always room for a touch of whimsy. Let the saga of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West unfold before your eyes, as we navigate the rib-tickling nuances of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State. Giddy up!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066, indicating a robust positive association between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7283028 suggests that approximately 72.83% of the variation in votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate can be explained by the prevalence of the name Thaddeus. This strong relationship piqued our curiosity and provided an intriguing glimpse into the uncharted territory of name-based political predilections.

To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. This figure encapsulates the charismatic allure of our findings and underscores the captivating intertwining of nomenclature and political inclinations.

Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and provoke contemplation about the hidden influences that shape electoral behaviors. The unexpected influence of a name on political proclivities in the Silver State adds a whimsical twist to the otherwise serious landscape of political analysis. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure trove of electoral oddities in the unexplored frontier of name-based political whimsy.

In summary, our study unravelled a peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada, shedding light on an unanticipated facet of political dynamics. Through our rigorous analysis and quirky expedition into the realm of nomenclature and elections, we have highlighted the enigmatic interplay between names and political preferences, leaving readers both bemused and intrigued by the whimsical undercurrents of the electoral landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The question of the relationship between names and political behavior has spurred considerable interest in the scholarly community. Smith, in "The Nomenclature Nexus: Exploring Name-Driven Trends in Political Affiliation," conducted a comprehensive analysis of voter registration data in multiple states, uncovering intriguing correlations between names and party preferences. Similarly, Doe's "The Label Effect: How Names Shape Political Perceptions" delved into the psychological underpinnings of name associations, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of nomenclature on electoral choices.
As we transition into the realm of the unusual, our investigation also draws upon non-traditional sources of inspiration. In "The Libertarian Mystique: From Ayn Rand to Ron Swanson," the authors explored the allure of libertarian ideology in popular culture, offering a lens through which to examine the potential influence of unconventional factors on political allegiances. On a lighter note, "Tales of the Wild West: Legends and Lore," although a work of fiction, encapsulates the spirit of the American frontier, providing an imaginative backdrop for our resourceful expedition into the enigmatic domain of Thaddeus and libertarianism.
In a surprising twist, we turned to television as a source of insight, immersing ourselves in shows such as "Westworld" and "Deadwood" to glean a sense of the ambiance of the Wild West and its possible implications for the peculiar correlation between the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. While these sources may seem unconventional, they serve as anchors for our playful yet insightful exploration of the unexpected connections between nomenclature and political inclinations.
In the midst of scholarly inquiry and whimsical wanderings, we arrive at the juncture of our captivating investigation, poised to unravel the delightful enigma of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West. Let the scholarly jamboree begin as we embark on this peculiar and rib-tickling pursuit of knowledge at the intersection of nomenclature and political leanings. With an irrepressible sense of merriment and intellectual rigor, we plunge into the fanciful domain of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State, driven by curiosity and a hint of roguish revelry. Hold onto your hats, for the rodeo of research is about to commence!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066, indicating a robust positive association between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7283028 suggests that approximately 72.83% of the variation in votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate can be explained by the prevalence of the name Thaddeus. This strong relationship piqued our curiosity and provided an intriguing glimpse into the uncharted territory of name-based political predilections.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. This figure encapsulates the charismatic allure of our findings and underscores the captivating intertwining of nomenclature and political inclinations.
Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and provoke contemplation about the hidden influences that shape electoral behaviors. The unexpected influence of a name on political proclivities in the Silver State adds a whimsical twist to the otherwise serious landscape of political analysis. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure trove of electoral oddities in the unexplored frontier of name-based political whimsy.
In summary, our study unravelled a peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada, shedding light on an unanticipated facet of political dynamics. Through our rigorous analysis and quirky expedition into the realm of nomenclature and elections, we have highlighted the enigmatic interplay between names and political preferences, leaving readers both bemused and intrigued by the whimsical undercurrents of the electoral landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The overarching objective of this study was to unravel the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Our findings revealed a strikingly robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01. These results not only support but also amplify the quirky inquiries and unconventional inspirations that seeped into our literature review.

While our investigation delved into the intersection of nomenclature and political leanings, we could not help but recall the animated spirit of "Westworld" and the colorful characters of "Deadwood" – seemingly unrelated yet somehow relevant to our whimsical pursuit. The hunches we entertained from these non-traditional sources were not in vain. The Wild West's mystique evidently lingers in the correlation we unraveled, adding an unexpected layer of relevance to our findings.

Moreover, the eclectic sources that permeated our literature review – from psychological underpinnings of name associations to the enticing allure of libertarian ideology in popular culture – undoubtedly steered us in the right direction. The subtle influences of nomenclature on political choices proved to be more than speculative whimsy, as our results decisively confirmed a substantial correlation.

Furthermore, our endeavor was imbued with an irrepressible sense of merriment, and our findings mirror the playful yet insightful spirit that sparked this peculiar pursuit of knowledge. The aura of lightheartedness that accompanied our study did not diminish the rigor of our analysis; rather, it lent a captivating sheen to the unexplored frontier of name-based political proclivities.

In essence, our study has illuminated a fascinating interplay between names and political preferences, uncovering the whimsical undercurrents that animate the electoral landscape. Our results inspire a sense of wonder at the unanticipated facets of political dynamics, akin to discovering hidden treasure in the electoral oddities of the Silver State. The unexpected correlation we unearthed serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking embellishment to the serious tapestry of political analysis.

So, let's tip our hats to the untamed frontier of name-based political proclivities and savor the serendipitous whimsy that underscores our scholarly jamboree. Stay tuned for more surprises from the quirky world of name-driven politicking!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been a topic of intrigue and mystique. Throughout history, names have been associated with certain attributes or characteristics, influencing perceptions and behaviors in subtle yet profound ways. From Aristotle's belief that one's name can shape their destiny to the modern-day phenomena of nominative determinism, the influence of names on human affairs has been a subject of fascination and speculation.
In the realm of politics, the confluence of names and voting patterns has often been a source of curiosity. Whether it's the alliteration of political candidates' names or the perceived gravitas of a certain moniker, the impact of nomenclature on political allegiances is a domain ripe for exploration. It is within this eccentric milieu that our research delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for Libertarian Presidential candidates in the enigmatic state of Nevada.
As researchers, we harnessed the power of data to unravel this enigmatic connection. Leveraging comprehensive datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a whimsical journey through the annals of names and political preferences. Our intrepid exploration led us to uncover a strikingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the "Battle Born State."
The nature of this correlation is nothing short of perplexing, akin to stumbling upon a tumbleweed in the political arena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, our findings defy conventional wisdom, prompting both skepticism and a tantalizing sense of curiosity. As we unravel the mystique of Thaddeus and libertarian leanings, it's as if we've stumbled upon a frontier town where the unexpected reigns supreme.
Join us as we traverse the dusty trails of data analysis and embark on a grand expedition through the intersection of nomenclature and political predilections. Our lighthearted yet rigorous investigation promises to shed light on a captivating facet of the political landscape, leaving readers both amused and astonished by the unpredictability of human behavior in the realm of elections.
So, saddle up, dear reader, as we venture into uncharted territory where names and electoral proclivities converge. This unconventional exploration promises to tickle your funny bone and expand your intellectual horizons, demonstrating that even in the serious arena of politics, there's always room for a touch of whimsy. Let the saga of Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West unfold before your eyes, as we navigate the rib-tickling nuances of name-based political proclivities in the Silver State. Giddy up!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.8534066, indicating a robust positive association between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.7283028 suggests that approximately 72.83% of the variation in votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate can be explained by the prevalence of the name Thaddeus. This strong relationship piqued our curiosity and provided an intriguing glimpse into the uncharted territory of name-based political predilections.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. This figure encapsulates the charismatic allure of our findings and underscores the captivating intertwining of nomenclature and political inclinations.
Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and provoke contemplation about the hidden influences that shape electoral behaviors. The unexpected influence of a name on political proclivities in the Silver State adds a whimsical twist to the otherwise serious landscape of political analysis. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure trove of electoral oddities in the unexplored frontier of name-based political whimsy.
In summary, our study unravelled a peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada, shedding light on an unanticipated facet of political dynamics. Through our rigorous analysis and quirky expedition into the realm of nomenclature and elections, we have highlighted the enigmatic interplay between names and political preferences, leaving readers both bemused and intrigued by the whimsical undercurrents of the electoral landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the rugged terrain of political analysis, one would hardly expect a name like “Thaddeus” to wield such influence. Yet, our findings paint a picture of a name that's more than meets the eye - a name with a penchant for libertarian inclinations in the Silver State. The correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 between the prevalence of Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada is akin to stumbling upon a gold nugget in a stream of data, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

As we mosey on down the thoroughfare of our conclusions, it becomes evident that the interplay of nomenclature and political preferences is as unpredictable as a tumbleweed in a gust of wind. The r-squared value of 0.7283028 further cements the substantial impact of this correlation, akin to finding a needle in a haystack of electoral analysis. It seems that the name Thaddeus carries a certain libertarian mystique in the Silver State, perhaps whispering tales of independent spirit and rugged individualism in the ears of voters.

In light of these surprising results, it's clear that the influence of a name on political proclivities is a frontier worth exploring. However, as we hang our hats on the findings of this study, we assert that there is no need for further research in this area. After all, how much more can one glean from the eccentric dance of data and nomenclature? Sometimes, the unexpected allure of a correlation is best left to tickle the imagination, much like the charm of a whimsical anecdote amid the rigors of scholarly discourse. So, as the sun sets on our expedition into the world of Thaddeus and libertarianism, let's tip our metaphoric hats to the captivating caprices of names and electoral predilections, and declare this journey a wild and wacky success. Yeehaw!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Political Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Frontier Studies and Libertarian Politics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Thaddeus, Libertarianism, and the Wild West: A Vote-Causing Correlation with an abstract of In this captivating research paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we embark on a whimsical journey through the nexus of nomenclature and political leanings. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8534066 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1976 to 2020, suggesting that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name Thaddeus and libertarian preferences in the Silver State. This paper will leave readers both amused and astonished by the unexpected influence of a name on the political pulse of Nevada. So let's buckle up for a rib-tickling ride and explore the untamed frontier of name-based political propensity!

ChatGPT:

Thaddeus, Libertarian, Wild West, Nevada, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political leanings, name influence, Silver State, political preferences, correlation coefficient, p-value, political naming trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Thaddeus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Thaddeus

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada

Correlation r = 0.8534066 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7283028 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Thaddeus) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00041. 0.0004146233302765216000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.041% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,412 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Thaddeus (Babies born)267267175248250216218189211231416297
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada (Percentage of votes)0.7524421.788320.8107051.025840.362420.9606290.5432980.3828410.4404621.080683.321891.05189




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([267,267,175,248,250,216,218,189,211,231,416,297,])
array_2 = np.array([0.752442,1.78832,0.810705,1.02584,0.36242,0.960629,0.543298,0.382841,0.440462,1.08068,3.32189,1.05189,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Thaddeus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Nevada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5428 · Black Variable ID: 3584 · Red Variable ID: 26133
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0