about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,587 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the second variable is Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People just couldn't handle the lack of "kermitment" anymore. The green wave of laughter and relatable content was missing, leaving fans feeling a tad "unhoppy." It seems the meme world croaked, taking the popular vote with it.

Create a meme inspired by the kermit meme that in some way references Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the 'kermit' meme caused Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos

The Journal of Internet Culture and Memetics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Despite what may be deemed a superficial and frivolous topic by some, the prevalence of internet memes has become a subject of increasing interest in the realm of social and cultural studies. In the age of digital media, the impact of these humorous, often tongue-in-cheek images and videos cannot be overstated. As we delve into the curious case of the 'kermit' meme and its correlation with the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit the Frog himself: "Time's fun when you're having flies."

This study seeks to explore the fascinating interplay between the 'kermit' meme and the digital engagement with Casually Explained videos on YouTube. Our investigation was prompted by the intriguing anecdotal evidence of the meme's pervasiveness in online discourse, alongside the observable trends in the likes received by the aforementioned content. As we wade through the sea of data and memes, one cannot help but acknowledge that the meme landscape is not just 'none of our business,' but rather a noteworthy subject of scholarly inquiry.

Moreover, our research aims to address the implications of the 'kermit' meme's influence on the digital consumption patterns of netizens. This investigation is a reflection of the adage, "It's not easy being meme," but in this case, it might just be beneficial for YouTube metrics. The unavoidable, yet relatable dad joke serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of humor.

Stay tuned as we unravel the intricate web of internet culture, meme dynamics, and their unforeseen connection to the popularity of YouTube content. After all, as paradoxical as it may seem, there is indeed wisdom to be found in the musings of a felt amphibian with a penchant for sipping tea.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Despite what may be deemed a superficial and frivolous topic by some, the prevalence of internet memes has become a subject of increasing interest in the realm of social and cultural studies. In the age of digital media, the impact of these humorous, often tongue-in-cheek images and videos cannot be overstated. As we delve into the curious case of the 'kermit' meme and its correlation with the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit the Frog himself: "Time's fun when you're having flies."
This study seeks to explore the fascinating interplay between the 'kermit' meme and the digital engagement with Casually Explained videos on YouTube. Our investigation was prompted by the intriguing anecdotal evidence of the meme's pervasiveness in online discourse, alongside the observable trends in the likes received by the aforementioned content. As we wade through the sea of data and memes, one cannot help but acknowledge that the meme landscape is not just 'none of our business,' but rather a noteworthy subject of scholarly inquiry.
Moreover, our research aims to address the implications of the 'kermit' meme's influence on the digital consumption patterns of netizens. This investigation is a reflection of the adage, "It's not easy being meme," but in this case, it might just be beneficial for YouTube metrics. The unavoidable, yet relatable dad joke serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of humor.
Stay tuned as we unravel the intricate web of internet culture, meme dynamics, and their unforeseen connection to the popularity of YouTube content. After all, as paradoxical as it may seem, there is indeed wisdom to be found in the musings of a felt amphibian with a penchant for sipping tea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly discourse surrounding internet memes and their impact on online media engagement has garnered significant attention in recent years. Smith (2016) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the societal implications of popular internet memes, noting their pervasive influence on digital communication. Similarly, Doe (2018) investigated the relationship between meme culture and digital content consumption, highlighting the nuanced ways in which memes shape online behavior.

A relevant non-fiction work in this domain is "Memes: The Power of Online Culture" by Jones (2019), which delves into the psychological and sociological dimensions of internet memes and their effects on contemporary digital culture. Furthermore, "Viral: How the Strangest Trends Go Viral" by Adams (2017) provides valuable insights into the mechanisms behind the propagation of internet phenomena, shedding light on the potential factors contributing to the popularity of specific memes.

In the fictional realm, "The Meme Cipher" by Robinson (2015) presents an imaginative exploration of a world where memes hold mysterious powers, capturing the collective imagination of society. Additionally, "The Digital Dilemma" by Brown (2018) offers a speculative narrative on the unforeseen consequences of meme proliferation in a futuristic digital landscape.

In a departure from traditional academic sources, the present authors gleaned unexpected insights from an unlikely repository: everyday life artifacts. In perusing a multitude of CVS receipts, it became evident that the length and content of these seemingly banal printouts may harbor cryptic messages related to internet memes and YouTube engagement. While the validity of this unconventional approach may be met with skepticism, we posit that the integration of diverse sources enriches the scholarly discourse and adds a touch of whimsy to the investigation.

The intersection of internet memes, YouTube engagement, and societal influence constitutes a rich tapestry of inquiry, inviting researchers to embark on an expedition into the comical and captivating realm of digital culture. As we navigate the digital landscape, we are reminded of the words of wisdom from the meme maestro himself, Kermit the Frog: "When you plant a frog, you get a hoppin' plant."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Despite what may be deemed a superficial and frivolous topic by some, the prevalence of internet memes has become a subject of increasing interest in the realm of social and cultural studies. In the age of digital media, the impact of these humorous, often tongue-in-cheek images and videos cannot be overstated. As we delve into the curious case of the 'kermit' meme and its correlation with the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit the Frog himself: "Time's fun when you're having flies."
This study seeks to explore the fascinating interplay between the 'kermit' meme and the digital engagement with Casually Explained videos on YouTube. Our investigation was prompted by the intriguing anecdotal evidence of the meme's pervasiveness in online discourse, alongside the observable trends in the likes received by the aforementioned content. As we wade through the sea of data and memes, one cannot help but acknowledge that the meme landscape is not just 'none of our business,' but rather a noteworthy subject of scholarly inquiry.
Moreover, our research aims to address the implications of the 'kermit' meme's influence on the digital consumption patterns of netizens. This investigation is a reflection of the adage, "It's not easy being meme," but in this case, it might just be beneficial for YouTube metrics. The unavoidable, yet relatable dad joke serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of humor.
Stay tuned as we unravel the intricate web of internet culture, meme dynamics, and their unforeseen connection to the popularity of YouTube content. After all, as paradoxical as it may seem, there is indeed wisdom to be found in the musings of a felt amphibian with a penchant for sipping tea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between the 'kermit' meme popularity and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, a mixed methods approach was employed. The data collection period spanned from 2015 to 2023, allowing for a comprehensive examination of trends over an extended timeframe. This method was chosen in order to capture any potential shifts in meme popularity and video engagement, as well as any influence from external factors such as changes in internet usage and cultural phenomena.

The primary data source utilized was Google Trends, which provided insights into the relative popularity of the 'kermit' meme over time. This included search interest data, regional interest, and related queries, offering a multifaceted view of the meme's prevalence in online discourse. In the immortal words of Kermit, "If you've got a voice and a good pair of legs, you can be a meme too!" And indeed, our reliance on Google Trends allowed us to hop on that data trend with ease.

Supplementing this, data was also collected from YouTube analytics, focusing specifically on the total likes received by Casually Explained videos. The platform's robust metrics allowed for a thorough analysis of user engagement, serving as a valuable indicator of the videos' popularity and reception. As we dived into the sea of YouTube data, one could not help but be reminded of the words of wisdom from the Muppets themselves: "Life's like a movie, write your own ending."

In order to quantify the relationship between the 'kermit' meme and video likes, statistical analyses were performed. A multivariate regression model was developed, incorporating variables such as the frequency and intensity of 'kermit' meme searches, alongside the publication date and content of Casually Explained videos. This approach allowed for the exploration of the meme's impact on video likes while accounting for potential confounding factors, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics at play. After all, in the realm of meme research, one must always be ready to "kermit" to the pursuit of statistical significance.

Furthermore, qualitative content analysis was conducted to discern any thematic associations between the 'kermit' meme and the content of Casually Explained videos. This involved identifying recurring motifs, references, or thematically linked elements within the videos, offering a deeper understanding of the potential connections between the meme and viewer engagement. As Kermit himself once mused, "I've still got the hopes, of a small green monster," which in this context, served as a reminder of the potential impact of meme-themed content on audience interaction.

In summary, the methodology adopted in this research harnessed a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches, akin to the dual nature of internet memes themselves. By embracing this eclectic mix of methods, our investigation aimed to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the 'kermit' meme and the likes accrued by Casually Explained YouTube videos, ultimately contributing to the burgeoning field of meme studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8902794, r-squared of 0.7925974, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Despite what may be deemed a superficial and frivolous topic by some, the prevalence of internet memes has become a subject of increasing interest in the realm of social and cultural studies. In the age of digital media, the impact of these humorous, often tongue-in-cheek images and videos cannot be overstated. As we delve into the curious case of the 'kermit' meme and its correlation with the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit the Frog himself: "Time's fun when you're having flies."
This study seeks to explore the fascinating interplay between the 'kermit' meme and the digital engagement with Casually Explained videos on YouTube. Our investigation was prompted by the intriguing anecdotal evidence of the meme's pervasiveness in online discourse, alongside the observable trends in the likes received by the aforementioned content. As we wade through the sea of data and memes, one cannot help but acknowledge that the meme landscape is not just 'none of our business,' but rather a noteworthy subject of scholarly inquiry.
Moreover, our research aims to address the implications of the 'kermit' meme's influence on the digital consumption patterns of netizens. This investigation is a reflection of the adage, "It's not easy being meme," but in this case, it might just be beneficial for YouTube metrics. The unavoidable, yet relatable dad joke serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of humor.
Stay tuned as we unravel the intricate web of internet culture, meme dynamics, and their unforeseen connection to the popularity of YouTube content. After all, as paradoxical as it may seem, there is indeed wisdom to be found in the musings of a felt amphibian with a penchant for sipping tea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis, we found a strong and positive correlation between the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 suggests a robust relationship between these variables. As Kermit himself might say, "That's none of my business, but it seems to be all of yours!"

The r-squared value of 0.7925974 indicates that approximately 79.26% of the variation in the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos can be explained by the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme. It appears that Kermit's digital presence truly leaves an indelible mark on the virtual world, much like his amphibian footprints.

Furthermore, our analysis revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. One might say that the 'kermit' meme's impact on YouTube likes is not just a "Frog's luck" situation, but rather a calculated influence.

The relationship between the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos is visualized in Figure 1. As we witness the plot depicting this remarkable correlation, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit, who once said, "I thought of that while riding my bicycle." Just like Kermit's reflections, our findings shed light on a previously unexplored aspect of internet culture and its impact on digital engagement.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of the substantial influence exerted by the 'kermit' meme on the popularity of Casually Explained YouTube videos. As we navigate the digital landscape, it is clear that the 'kermit' meme's reign extends far beyond mere amphibious antics. This unexpected connection between internet memes and online media consumption adds a new dimension to our understanding of digital culture and its whimsical ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly discourse surrounding internet memes and their impact on online media engagement has garnered significant attention in recent years. Smith (2016) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the societal implications of popular internet memes, noting their pervasive influence on digital communication. Similarly, Doe (2018) investigated the relationship between meme culture and digital content consumption, highlighting the nuanced ways in which memes shape online behavior.
A relevant non-fiction work in this domain is "Memes: The Power of Online Culture" by Jones (2019), which delves into the psychological and sociological dimensions of internet memes and their effects on contemporary digital culture. Furthermore, "Viral: How the Strangest Trends Go Viral" by Adams (2017) provides valuable insights into the mechanisms behind the propagation of internet phenomena, shedding light on the potential factors contributing to the popularity of specific memes.
In the fictional realm, "The Meme Cipher" by Robinson (2015) presents an imaginative exploration of a world where memes hold mysterious powers, capturing the collective imagination of society. Additionally, "The Digital Dilemma" by Brown (2018) offers a speculative narrative on the unforeseen consequences of meme proliferation in a futuristic digital landscape.
In a departure from traditional academic sources, the present authors gleaned unexpected insights from an unlikely repository: everyday life artifacts. In perusing a multitude of CVS receipts, it became evident that the length and content of these seemingly banal printouts may harbor cryptic messages related to internet memes and YouTube engagement. While the validity of this unconventional approach may be met with skepticism, we posit that the integration of diverse sources enriches the scholarly discourse and adds a touch of whimsy to the investigation.
The intersection of internet memes, YouTube engagement, and societal influence constitutes a rich tapestry of inquiry, inviting researchers to embark on an expedition into the comical and captivating realm of digital culture. As we navigate the digital landscape, we are reminded of the words of wisdom from the meme maestro himself, Kermit the Frog: "When you plant a frog, you get a hoppin' plant."

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a strong and positive correlation between the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 suggests a robust relationship between these variables. As Kermit himself might say, "That's none of my business, but it seems to be all of yours!"
The r-squared value of 0.7925974 indicates that approximately 79.26% of the variation in the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos can be explained by the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme. It appears that Kermit's digital presence truly leaves an indelible mark on the virtual world, much like his amphibian footprints.
Furthermore, our analysis revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. One might say that the 'kermit' meme's impact on YouTube likes is not just a "Frog's luck" situation, but rather a calculated influence.
The relationship between the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos is visualized in Figure 1. As we witness the plot depicting this remarkable correlation, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit, who once said, "I thought of that while riding my bicycle." Just like Kermit's reflections, our findings shed light on a previously unexplored aspect of internet culture and its impact on digital engagement.
In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of the substantial influence exerted by the 'kermit' meme on the popularity of Casually Explained YouTube videos. As we navigate the digital landscape, it is clear that the 'kermit' meme's reign extends far beyond mere amphibious antics. This unexpected connection between internet memes and online media consumption adds a new dimension to our understanding of digital culture and its whimsical ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study offer substantive support for the existing literature, which has long posited a link between internet memes and digital content engagement. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 between the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos aligns with previous research by Smith (2016) and Doe (2018), underscoring the considerable influence of internet memes on online media consumption. As any Kermit enthusiast would quip, "Looks like we've hopped onto something big here!"

Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provides empirical weight to the notion that the observed correlation is not the result of mere chance. This finding resonates with the insights gleaned from Jones' (2019) comprehensive examination of internet memes, emphasizing the influential role of these digital cultural phenomena in shaping online behavior. The 'kermit' meme's impact on the likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos is not just a "ribbit" in the digital pond; it represents a substantial force driving engagement in the online realm.

The r-squared value of 0.7925974 indicates that approximately 79.26% of the variation in the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos can be attributed to the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme. This illuminating statistic echoes the sentiments espoused in "Viral: How the Strangest Trends Go Viral" by Adams (2017), reaffirming the potent influence of internet phenomena in driving digital trends. As Kermit might mirthfully jest, "Seems like my influence is un-frog-gettable!"

Our findings not only contribute to the scholarly discourse on internet memes and digital content engagement but also lend practical insights for content creators and digital marketers. Understanding the resonance of specific memes, such as the 'kermit' meme, can inform strategic decisions in content creation and audience engagement. As Kermit astutely observed, "Kermits come and go, but good content is forever." This correlation presents an opportunity for content creators to leverage popular internet memes to enhance audience engagement and expand their digital footprint.

The research thrusts the ubiquitous 'kermit' meme into the limelight as a potent catalyst for digital engagement, prompting us to revisit the words of wisdom from our green amphibious friend: "Life's like a movie. Write your own ending." Indeed, our study encapsulates an unexpected twist in the digital narrative, underscoring the significant impact of internet memes on the virtual landscape. As researchers navigate the whimsical world of digital culture, it is imperative to heed the timeless advice of Kermit, who sagely remarked, "Time's fun when you're having flies."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'kermit' meme and Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.

It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Despite what may be deemed a superficial and frivolous topic by some, the prevalence of internet memes has become a subject of increasing interest in the realm of social and cultural studies. In the age of digital media, the impact of these humorous, often tongue-in-cheek images and videos cannot be overstated. As we delve into the curious case of the 'kermit' meme and its correlation with the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit the Frog himself: "Time's fun when you're having flies."
This study seeks to explore the fascinating interplay between the 'kermit' meme and the digital engagement with Casually Explained videos on YouTube. Our investigation was prompted by the intriguing anecdotal evidence of the meme's pervasiveness in online discourse, alongside the observable trends in the likes received by the aforementioned content. As we wade through the sea of data and memes, one cannot help but acknowledge that the meme landscape is not just 'none of our business,' but rather a noteworthy subject of scholarly inquiry.
Moreover, our research aims to address the implications of the 'kermit' meme's influence on the digital consumption patterns of netizens. This investigation is a reflection of the adage, "It's not easy being meme," but in this case, it might just be beneficial for YouTube metrics. The unavoidable, yet relatable dad joke serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of knowledge need not be devoid of humor.
Stay tuned as we unravel the intricate web of internet culture, meme dynamics, and their unforeseen connection to the popularity of YouTube content. After all, as paradoxical as it may seem, there is indeed wisdom to be found in the musings of a felt amphibian with a penchant for sipping tea.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a strong and positive correlation between the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 suggests a robust relationship between these variables. As Kermit himself might say, "That's none of my business, but it seems to be all of yours!"
The r-squared value of 0.7925974 indicates that approximately 79.26% of the variation in the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos can be explained by the prevalence of the 'kermit' meme. It appears that Kermit's digital presence truly leaves an indelible mark on the virtual world, much like his amphibian footprints.
Furthermore, our analysis revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. One might say that the 'kermit' meme's impact on YouTube likes is not just a "Frog's luck" situation, but rather a calculated influence.
The relationship between the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos is visualized in Figure 1. As we witness the plot depicting this remarkable correlation, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom of Kermit, who once said, "I thought of that while riding my bicycle." Just like Kermit's reflections, our findings shed light on a previously unexplored aspect of internet culture and its impact on digital engagement.
In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of the substantial influence exerted by the 'kermit' meme on the popularity of Casually Explained YouTube videos. As we navigate the digital landscape, it is clear that the 'kermit' meme's reign extends far beyond mere amphibious antics. This unexpected connection between internet memes and online media consumption adds a new dimension to our understanding of digital culture and its whimsical ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In sum, our research has elucidated the significantly positive association between the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. It seems that when it comes to online engagement, the 'kermit' meme is not just a tadpole in the digital pond, but rather a big fish in the sea of internet culture.

It appears that the 'kermit' meme has hopped its way into the hearts of internet users, leaving a lasting impression on their preferences for video content. One might even remark that this meme's impact is as enduring as a frog's croak on a tranquil evening.

Therefore, one could say that the 'kermit' meme's influence on YouTube likes is not merely incidental, but rather a well-thought-out and deliberate effect, much like a carefully planned amphibious ambush.

At this point, we can confidently assert that further investigation into the connection between the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos is unnecessary. The evidence from our study has definitively demonstrated the captivating influence of this meme on online engagement. As Kermit might say, "The research is as clear as a frog's pond!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Culture and Memetics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Internet Culture and Meme Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Meme's the Limit: A Kermitment to Likes on Casually Explained YouTube Videos with an abstract of This research explores the relationship between the popularity of the 'kermit' meme and the total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos. We utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to investigate this pressing matter. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8902794 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2015 to 2023.
It appears that the kermit meme has exhibited a profound influence on the engagement with Casually Explained content. As the saying goes, "It ain't easy being green," but it certainly seems to be advantageous for YouTube likes! Our research sheds light on this unexpected connection and contributes to the growing body of knowledge about the impact of internet culture on online media consumption.

ChatGPT:

"kermit meme," "YouTube likes," "Casually Explained," "Google Trends data," "impact of internet culture," "online media consumption," "correlation coefficient," "statistically significant," "YouTube engagement," "internet memes"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'kermit' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'kermit meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'kermit' meme

Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8902794 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7925974 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'kermit' meme) over the 9 years from 2015 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0013. 0.0012920675438737760000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 774 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'kermit' meme (Relative popularity)14.2525.416721.416722.166723.0833137.757.666676.75
Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos (Total likes)631214498211030312002531840304694020788009097240809116




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14.25,25.4167,21.4167,22.1667,23.0833,13,7.75,7.66667,6.75,])
array_2 = np.array([631214,4982110,3031200,2531840,3046940,2078800,909724,0,809116,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'kermit' meme"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5587 · Black Variable ID: 25146 · Red Variable ID: 25886
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0