Report an error
Detroit Tigers' American League Ranking correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average views of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Theology | r=0.83 | 11yrs | Yes! |
University Lecturer salaries in the US | r=0.82 | 13yrs | No |
The number of phlebotomists in Washington | r=0.8 | 11yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Somalia | r=0.79 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Wyoming | r=0.61 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.6 | 17yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire | r=0.56 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in Reading, Pennsylvania | r=0.54 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Detroit Tigers' American League Ranking also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)