Report an error
UFO sightings in Texas correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Peyton | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Chloe | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.91 | 39yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Maya | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
| Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.9 | 37yrs | No |
| New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.9 | 40yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Yemen | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.87 | 47yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Ethan | r=0.87 | 47yrs | No |
| Highway diesel consumption in US | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Caden | r=0.85 | 43yrs | No |
| USA Population | r=0.81 | 47yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Andreas | r=0.68 | 47yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.62 | 46yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Houston | r=-0.73 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)