Report an error
UFO sightings in Alabama correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.92 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Camden | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.89 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.85 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Trinidad and Tobago | r=0.83 | 42yrs | Yes! |
USA Population | r=0.78 | 47yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.69 | 18yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Alabama also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)