Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total Digital Music Single Downloads | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Drew | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'bing' | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in Arizona | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kyla | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Nicolas Cage' | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of college psychology teachers in Florida | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of social and community service managers in Hawaii | r=-0.03 | 11yrs | No |
The number of dietitians and nutritionists in Georgia | r=-0.77 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)