Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'two day shipping' correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas | r=0.99 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| How cool LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Abel | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Harper | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Vivian | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Quinn | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'chuck norris' meme | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
| The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
| The distance between Saturn and Mercury | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
| Average views of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'kermit' meme | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'starter pack' meme | r=0.85 | 18yrs | No |
| Robberies in Alaska | r=0.72 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'two day shipping' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
