Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'Barack Obama' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of computer network support specialists in Wisconsin | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Total views on Computerphile YouTube videos | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of childcare workers in Hawaii | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
Air pollution in Hilo, Hawaii | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
The number of phlebotomists in Minnesota | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Missouri | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Jamaica | r=0.87 | 18yrs | No |
The number of materials scientists in North Carolina | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Fiji | r=0.86 | 15yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Puerto Rico | r=0.85 | 18yrs | No |
NatWest Group's stock price (NWG) | r=0.82 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'balloon boy' meme | r=0.74 | 15yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Barbados | r=0.62 | 18yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Algeria | r=0.61 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'rickroll' meme | r=0.59 | 18yrs | No |
Air quality in Hilo, Hawaii | r=-0.85 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Barack Obama' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)