Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Intel's stock price (INTC) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Patents granted to Dell | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Fine and studio arts | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Idaho | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
The number of mechanical engineers in California | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Denver | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! |
The number of statisticians in Colorado | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'adopt a dog' | r=0.74 | 20yrs | No |
Intel's stock price (INTC) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)