Report an error
Season wins for the Kansas City Chiefs correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Wind power generated in Venezuela | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No | 
| How nerdy Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No | 
| Biomass power generated in Qatar | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No | 
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.75 | 10yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'no cap' | r=0.69 | 20yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Sterling | r=0.68 | 48yrs | Yes! | 
| Fossil fuel use in Nauru | r=0.64 | 42yrs | Yes! | 
| Air pollution in St. Joseph, Missouri | r=-0.61 | 39yrs | No | 
Season wins for the Kansas City Chiefs also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
