Report an error
Points scored by the New Orleans Saints correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| How 'hip and with it' SciShow Space YouTube video titles are | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No | 
| Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Louisiana | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Max | r=0.76 | 48yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Lila | r=0.74 | 48yrs | No | 
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.73 | 32yrs | No | 
| London Gold Prices | r=0.68 | 38yrs | No | 
| UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.66 | 48yrs | No | 
| American cheese consumption | r=0.63 | 32yrs | No | 
| Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=0.62 | 48yrs | No | 
| Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana | r=0.57 | 44yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.51 | 44yrs | No | 
Points scored by the New Orleans Saints also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
