Report an error
Points allowed by the Kansas City Chiefs correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Belarus | r=0.74 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Missouri | r=0.74 | 12yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.62 | 11yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 9th grade | r=0.58 | 33yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.52 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jamari | r=0.51 | 44yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Caden | r=0.48 | 44yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Kansas City Chiefs also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)