Report an error
Popularity of the first name Christopher correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Associates degrees awarded in Accounting | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglaries in New York | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Burglary rates in the US | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
| Arson in United States | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Oklahoma | r=0.97 | 38yrs | Yes! |
| Burglaries in New Jersey | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Michigan | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
| The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Egypt | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
| Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Mississippi | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Cuba | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Venezuela | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Christopher also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)