Report an error
Arson in Hawaii correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume | r=0.94 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Intercountry adoptions | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Bangladesh | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
| Annual book sales in the US | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| Instructor salaries in the US | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on floor coverings | r=0.8 | 23yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Ben | r=0.74 | 38yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Marques | r=0.6 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Annette | r=0.6 | 38yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Nicolas Cage' | r=-0.85 | 19yrs | No |
Arson in Hawaii also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
