Report an error
Burglaries in Colorado correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Brad | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Crystal | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Jennifer | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Julie | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Jamie | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Angela | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Tara | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Suzanne | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Kim | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name James | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Charles | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
| Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Joanna | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
| Viewership count for Days of Our Lives | r=0.91 | 37yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'why isnt 11 pronounced onety one' | r=0.72 | 19yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Denver, Colorado | r=0.49 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in Colorado also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)