Report an error
Popularity of the first name Savannah correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Gasoline pumped in Japan | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
| The number of fish and game wardens in Virginia | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of Slot Machines in Nevada | r=0.93 | 39yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Florida | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
| Arson in Idaho | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
| Arson in Iowa | r=0.87 | 22yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Puerto Rico | r=0.87 | 24yrs | No |
| Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
| LeBron James' field goal count | r=0.65 | 20yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.63 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Savannah also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
