Report an error
Popularity of the first name Luke correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of first-line retail sales supervisors in North Dakota | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Italy | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.96 | 39yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Barbados | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Saint Lucia | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.91 | 48yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.9 | 44yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.89 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Luke also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)