Report an error
Popularity of the first name Casey correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Motor vehicle thefts in New Jersey | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Egypt | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.98 | 36yrs | No |
Per capita consumption of margarine | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Carjackings in the US | r=0.97 | 27yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Tennessee | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Arson in United States | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in New Jersey | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Virginia | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
AIG's stock price (AIG) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Lloyds Banking Group's stock price (LYG) | r=0.88 | 21yrs | No |
Citigroup's stock price (C) | r=0.88 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Casey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)