Report an error
Popularity of the first name Madeline correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Portion of all US dairy skim-solids allocated to the production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Patents granted to Toshiba | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Geothermal power generated in Japan | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'desktop background' | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Jamaica | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
| US milk fat used to produce fluid beverage milk | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in North Carolina | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
| Number of Slot Machines in Nevada | r=0.91 | 39yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Virginia | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.88 | 48yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Denmark | r=0.86 | 42yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in France | r=0.85 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Madeline also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)