Report an error
Popularity of the first name Margaret correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Solar power generated in Madagascar | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No | 
| Solar power generated in North Macedonia | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No | 
| The number of occupational therapy assistants in Virginia | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No | 
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No | 
| Delta Airlines' stock price (DAL) | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No | 
| Master's degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'Rachel and Ross' | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No | 
| Processed cheese consumption | r=0.86 | 27yrs | No | 
| Divorce rates in the United Kingdom | r=0.82 | 38yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Margaret also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
