Report an error
Popularity of the first name Maxwell correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Paraguay | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.97 | 48yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.87 | 48yrs | No |
Air quality in Tucson, Arizona | r=0.85 | 43yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.84 | 47yrs | No |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.84 | 15yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Boston Red Sox games | r=0.83 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maxwell also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)