Report an error
Popularity of the first name Gage correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in West Virginia | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.96 | 39yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| United States music album sales | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Greece | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Japan | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
| US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gage also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)