Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ciara correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of air traffic controllers in Kansas | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of hydrologists in Wyoming | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Kosovo | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
| GMO use in cotton in Arkansas | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Latvia | r=0.85 | 31yrs | No |
| Sherbet consumption | r=0.85 | 32yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in North Carolina | r=0.85 | 38yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ciara also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)