Report an error
Nuclear power generation in United Kingdom correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Jacob | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Minnesota | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hannah | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hanna | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Katarina | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Christian | r=0.86 | 42yrs | No |
Boston Celtics' NBA season loss count | r=0.63 | 42yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in United Kingdom also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)