Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Popularity of the first name Rylee | r=0.99 | 43yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Malachi | r=0.99 | 43yrs | No | 
| Number of highschoolers in the US | r=0.99 | 33yrs | No | 
| Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Georgia | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No | 
| Number of Registered Vehicles in the US | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No | 
| GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota | r=0.95 | 23yrs | Yes! | 
| GMO use in soybeans | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No | 
| GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No | 
| GMO use in soybeans in Missouri | r=0.95 | 23yrs | Yes! | 
| Air quality in Steamboat Springs, Colorado | r=0.91 | 38yrs | No | 
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
