Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
Report an error
Popularity of the 'pork and beans' meme correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| NatWest Group's stock price (NWG) | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
| Total length of PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of event planners in Georgia | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Virginia | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Hilo, Hawaii | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| How good 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Jet fuel used in Niue | r=0.88 | 16yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'housing prices' | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Mississippi | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Jamaica | r=0.87 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Tamagotchi' | r=0.85 | 16yrs | Yes! |
| Instructor salaries in the US | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'pork and beans' meme also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)