Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
Report an error
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Vanuatu | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Air pollution in Billings, Montana | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Mali | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Namibia | r=0.96 | 16yrs | Yes! |
The number of epidemiologists in Nebraska | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Cook Islands | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
The number of building inspectors in West Virginia | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Amazon's Annual Outbound Shipping Expenditure in Millions | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
How professional-sounding MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Hot days in Paris | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.89 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'yeet' | r=0.87 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Colt | r=0.84 | 17yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.83 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maverick | r=0.82 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)